A descriptive analysis of tail-pinch elicited eating-behavior of rats
Noninjurious tail-pinch (TP) reportedly elicits “a normal pattern of eating” from sated rats. The present investigation, however, revealed notable features of TP-elicited eating which distinguished it from food-deprivation (FD) elicited eating. For example, naive sated rats which were subjected to T...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Physiology & behavior 1981-01, Vol.26 (3), p.355-359 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 359 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 355 |
| container_title | Physiology & behavior |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Fass, Barry Strub, Harry Greenspon, Jeffrey M. Stevens, David A. Stein, Donald G. |
| description | Noninjurious tail-pinch (TP) reportedly elicits “a normal pattern of eating” from sated rats. The present investigation, however, revealed notable features of TP-elicited eating which distinguished it from food-deprivation (FD) elicited eating. For example, naive sated rats which were subjected to TP and offered familiar food in an unfamiliar setting ate more reliably than did naive rats subjected to FD. Presentation of an unfamiliar food (chocolate wafer cookies) resulted in TP rats dropping considerably more than they ingested, whereas FD rats ingested much more than they dropped. The present findings therefore indicate that TP may be more useful as a tool for assessing stimulus control of eating independent of depletion due to FD than as a model for “normal eating.” |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0031-9384(81)90159-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75687219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0031938481901591</els_id><sourcerecordid>15345995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-a48701ae7e5f0738fb1a6283df2d97eb4be67cbc9501025b0aa4bc7d81a96a6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcKeRA-rySbZJBehlPoBBS8K3kI2mbWR7W5N0kL_vbu0eNS5zOF95h14ELok-I5gUt5jTEmuqGQ3ktwqTLjKyREaEylozrH4OEbjX-QUncX4hfuhjI7QSBSMKl6M0XyaOYg2-HXyW8hMa5pd9DHr6iwZ3-Rr39plBo23PoHLwCTffuYVLM3Wd2HAgknxHJ3UpolwcdgT9P44f5s954vXp5fZdJFbKmXKDZMCEwMCeI0FlXVFTFlI6urCKQEVq6AUtrKKY4ILXmFjWGWFk8So0pSOTtD1vncduu8NxKRXPlpoGtNCt4la8FKKgqh_QcIp40rxHmR70IYuxgC1Xge_MmGnCdaDZj041INDLfs9aNakP7s69G-qFbjfo4PXPn_Y59Db2HoIOloPrQXnA9ikXef_fvADGmeL3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15345995</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A descriptive analysis of tail-pinch elicited eating-behavior of rats</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Fass, Barry ; Strub, Harry ; Greenspon, Jeffrey M. ; Stevens, David A. ; Stein, Donald G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fass, Barry ; Strub, Harry ; Greenspon, Jeffrey M. ; Stevens, David A. ; Stein, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><description>Noninjurious tail-pinch (TP) reportedly elicits “a normal pattern of eating” from sated rats. The present investigation, however, revealed notable features of TP-elicited eating which distinguished it from food-deprivation (FD) elicited eating. For example, naive sated rats which were subjected to TP and offered familiar food in an unfamiliar setting ate more reliably than did naive rats subjected to FD. Presentation of an unfamiliar food (chocolate wafer cookies) resulted in TP rats dropping considerably more than they ingested, whereas FD rats ingested much more than they dropped. The present findings therefore indicate that TP may be more useful as a tool for assessing stimulus control of eating independent of depletion due to FD than as a model for “normal eating.”</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-507X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(81)90159-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7243952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Eating ; Eating behavior ; Food Deprivation ; Male ; Mechanoreceptors - physiology ; Rats ; Space life sciences ; Stimulus control ; Tail - innervation ; Tail pinch ; Taste - physiology ; Touch - physiology</subject><ispartof>Physiology & behavior, 1981-01, Vol.26 (3), p.355-359</ispartof><rights>1981</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-a48701ae7e5f0738fb1a6283df2d97eb4be67cbc9501025b0aa4bc7d81a96a6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-a48701ae7e5f0738fb1a6283df2d97eb4be67cbc9501025b0aa4bc7d81a96a6d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(81)90159-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7243952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fass, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strub, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenspon, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><title>A descriptive analysis of tail-pinch elicited eating-behavior of rats</title><title>Physiology & behavior</title><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><description>Noninjurious tail-pinch (TP) reportedly elicits “a normal pattern of eating” from sated rats. The present investigation, however, revealed notable features of TP-elicited eating which distinguished it from food-deprivation (FD) elicited eating. For example, naive sated rats which were subjected to TP and offered familiar food in an unfamiliar setting ate more reliably than did naive rats subjected to FD. Presentation of an unfamiliar food (chocolate wafer cookies) resulted in TP rats dropping considerably more than they ingested, whereas FD rats ingested much more than they dropped. The present findings therefore indicate that TP may be more useful as a tool for assessing stimulus control of eating independent of depletion due to FD than as a model for “normal eating.”</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Eating</subject><subject>Eating behavior</subject><subject>Food Deprivation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mechanoreceptors - physiology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Stimulus control</subject><subject>Tail - innervation</subject><subject>Tail pinch</subject><subject>Taste - physiology</subject><subject>Touch - physiology</subject><issn>0031-9384</issn><issn>1873-507X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcKeRA-rySbZJBehlPoBBS8K3kI2mbWR7W5N0kL_vbu0eNS5zOF95h14ELok-I5gUt5jTEmuqGQ3ktwqTLjKyREaEylozrH4OEbjX-QUncX4hfuhjI7QSBSMKl6M0XyaOYg2-HXyW8hMa5pd9DHr6iwZ3-Rr39plBo23PoHLwCTffuYVLM3Wd2HAgknxHJ3UpolwcdgT9P44f5s954vXp5fZdJFbKmXKDZMCEwMCeI0FlXVFTFlI6urCKQEVq6AUtrKKY4ILXmFjWGWFk8So0pSOTtD1vncduu8NxKRXPlpoGtNCt4la8FKKgqh_QcIp40rxHmR70IYuxgC1Xge_MmGnCdaDZj041INDLfs9aNakP7s69G-qFbjfo4PXPn_Y59Db2HoIOloPrQXnA9ikXef_fvADGmeL3A</recordid><startdate>19810101</startdate><enddate>19810101</enddate><creator>Fass, Barry</creator><creator>Strub, Harry</creator><creator>Greenspon, Jeffrey M.</creator><creator>Stevens, David A.</creator><creator>Stein, Donald G.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19810101</creationdate><title>A descriptive analysis of tail-pinch elicited eating-behavior of rats</title><author>Fass, Barry ; Strub, Harry ; Greenspon, Jeffrey M. ; Stevens, David A. ; Stein, Donald G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-a48701ae7e5f0738fb1a6283df2d97eb4be67cbc9501025b0aa4bc7d81a96a6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Eating</topic><topic>Eating behavior</topic><topic>Food Deprivation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mechanoreceptors - physiology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Stimulus control</topic><topic>Tail - innervation</topic><topic>Tail pinch</topic><topic>Taste - physiology</topic><topic>Touch - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fass, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strub, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenspon, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physiology & behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fass, Barry</au><au>Strub, Harry</au><au>Greenspon, Jeffrey M.</au><au>Stevens, David A.</au><au>Stein, Donald G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A descriptive analysis of tail-pinch elicited eating-behavior of rats</atitle><jtitle>Physiology & behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><date>1981-01-01</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>355-359</pages><issn>0031-9384</issn><eissn>1873-507X</eissn><abstract>Noninjurious tail-pinch (TP) reportedly elicits “a normal pattern of eating” from sated rats. The present investigation, however, revealed notable features of TP-elicited eating which distinguished it from food-deprivation (FD) elicited eating. For example, naive sated rats which were subjected to TP and offered familiar food in an unfamiliar setting ate more reliably than did naive rats subjected to FD. Presentation of an unfamiliar food (chocolate wafer cookies) resulted in TP rats dropping considerably more than they ingested, whereas FD rats ingested much more than they dropped. The present findings therefore indicate that TP may be more useful as a tool for assessing stimulus control of eating independent of depletion due to FD than as a model for “normal eating.”</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7243952</pmid><doi>10.1016/0031-9384(81)90159-1</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0031-9384 |
| ispartof | Physiology & behavior, 1981-01, Vol.26 (3), p.355-359 |
| issn | 0031-9384 1873-507X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75687219 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Animals Eating Eating behavior Food Deprivation Male Mechanoreceptors - physiology Rats Space life sciences Stimulus control Tail - innervation Tail pinch Taste - physiology Touch - physiology |
| title | A descriptive analysis of tail-pinch elicited eating-behavior of rats |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A19%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20descriptive%20analysis%20of%20tail-pinch%20elicited%20eating-behavior%20of%20rats&rft.jtitle=Physiology%20&%20behavior&rft.au=Fass,%20Barry&rft.date=1981-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=355-359&rft.issn=0031-9384&rft.eissn=1873-507X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0031-9384(81)90159-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15345995%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15345995&rft_id=info:pmid/7243952&rft_els_id=0031938481901591&rfr_iscdi=true |