Revisiting anatomic landmarks: lateral popliteal approach for sciatic nerve block based on magnetic resonance imaging

When the conventional lateral popliteal sciatic nerve (SN) block is performed, the needle angle required to localize and the level of the SN bifurcation are highly variable. The aim of our magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study was to determine the most common range of needle-insertion angles and th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 2010-05, Vol.35 (3), p.227-230
Hauptverfasser: Grasu, Roxana M, Costelloe, Colleen M, Boddu, Krishna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 230
container_issue 3
container_start_page 227
container_title Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
container_volume 35
creator Grasu, Roxana M
Costelloe, Colleen M
Boddu, Krishna
description When the conventional lateral popliteal sciatic nerve (SN) block is performed, the needle angle required to localize and the level of the SN bifurcation are highly variable. The aim of our magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study was to determine the most common range of needle-insertion angles and the relationship between skin-to-femur distance and angle. We also evaluated the variability of the SN bifurcation level and the relationship between patient height and nerve bifurcation level. Using 289 thigh MRIs to simulate a lateral approach in the supine position, we measured and analyzed with simple linear regressions the level of SN bifurcation, the skin-to-femur and SN-to-femur distances, and the angle at which the needle must be directed posteriorly to intersect the SN at 9 cm proximal to the lateral joint line. The mean insertion angle was 30 (SD, 8) degrees. In 95% of cases, angles ranged from 15 to 45 degrees, and the larger the thigh, the smaller the angle. The SN divided at a mean distance of 7.5 (SD, 1.6) cm (range, 1.5-12.8 cm) proximal to the lateral joint line. In 93% of cases, the bifurcation level was 10 cm or less. Our simulated lateral popliteal SN block on MRIs shows a 15- to 45-degree range of needle-insertion angles. As the skin-to-femur distance was greater than 4.5 cm, the angles were progressively smaller than 30 degrees. Although this was an MRI study, it does provide some evidence that indicates the conventional clinically recommended 25- to 30-degree-angle ranges may need to be reevaluated. Needle insertion of 10 cm or greater proximal to the popliteal crease may increase the chance of placement at or proximal to the SN bifurcation.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181dfe47b
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756668540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>756668540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-efa7f81ca43c6dc31c32da6549cd4eeb53b8bcae0d1bb821fb6680734b6872373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUdtKxDAQDaJ4Wf0DkYAPPlVzaZrUt2XxBguK6HNJ0ql2t01q0i7498brg09zmDln5gwHoWNKzikp5cV8_nBODKEcOFW0biCXZgvtU8FZpgpBtxMmpcok5-UeOohxRQhRMi920R4jJaOK0300PcKmje3YuhesnR5931rcaVf3OqzjZYIjBN3hwQ9dO0JCehiC1_YVNz7gaFs9JoWDsAFsOm_X2OgINfYO9_rFwec0QPROOwu4Tb106hDtNLqLcPRTZ-j5-uppcZst72_uFvNlZpniYwaNlo2iVufcFrXl1HJW60Lkpa1zACO4UcZqIDU1RjHamKJQRPLcFEoyLvkMnX3vTZbfJohj1bfRQpceBD_FSooiKUROEvP0H3Plp-CSuYoJwUlJ2Bcr_2bZ4GMM0FRDSC-F94qS6jOVKqVS_U8lyU5-lk-mh_pP9BsD_wBuK4vu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553090240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting anatomic landmarks: lateral popliteal approach for sciatic nerve block based on magnetic resonance imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Grasu, Roxana M ; Costelloe, Colleen M ; Boddu, Krishna</creator><creatorcontrib>Grasu, Roxana M ; Costelloe, Colleen M ; Boddu, Krishna</creatorcontrib><description>When the conventional lateral popliteal sciatic nerve (SN) block is performed, the needle angle required to localize and the level of the SN bifurcation are highly variable. The aim of our magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study was to determine the most common range of needle-insertion angles and the relationship between skin-to-femur distance and angle. We also evaluated the variability of the SN bifurcation level and the relationship between patient height and nerve bifurcation level. Using 289 thigh MRIs to simulate a lateral approach in the supine position, we measured and analyzed with simple linear regressions the level of SN bifurcation, the skin-to-femur and SN-to-femur distances, and the angle at which the needle must be directed posteriorly to intersect the SN at 9 cm proximal to the lateral joint line. The mean insertion angle was 30 (SD, 8) degrees. In 95% of cases, angles ranged from 15 to 45 degrees, and the larger the thigh, the smaller the angle. The SN divided at a mean distance of 7.5 (SD, 1.6) cm (range, 1.5-12.8 cm) proximal to the lateral joint line. In 93% of cases, the bifurcation level was 10 cm or less. Our simulated lateral popliteal SN block on MRIs shows a 15- to 45-degree range of needle-insertion angles. As the skin-to-femur distance was greater than 4.5 cm, the angles were progressively smaller than 30 degrees. Although this was an MRI study, it does provide some evidence that indicates the conventional clinically recommended 25- to 30-degree-angle ranges may need to be reevaluated. Needle insertion of 10 cm or greater proximal to the popliteal crease may increase the chance of placement at or proximal to the SN bifurcation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-7339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8651</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181dfe47b</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20921831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Body Height ; Femur - anatomy &amp; histology ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Lower Extremity - anatomy &amp; histology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Nerve Block - methods ; Regional anesthesia ; Retrospective Studies ; Sample Size ; Sciatic Nerve - anatomy &amp; histology ; Skin - anatomy &amp; histology ; Thigh</subject><ispartof>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2010-05, Vol.35 (3), p.227-230</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-efa7f81ca43c6dc31c32da6549cd4eeb53b8bcae0d1bb821fb6680734b6872373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20921831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grasu, Roxana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costelloe, Colleen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boddu, Krishna</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting anatomic landmarks: lateral popliteal approach for sciatic nerve block based on magnetic resonance imaging</title><title>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</title><addtitle>Reg Anesth Pain Med</addtitle><description>When the conventional lateral popliteal sciatic nerve (SN) block is performed, the needle angle required to localize and the level of the SN bifurcation are highly variable. The aim of our magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study was to determine the most common range of needle-insertion angles and the relationship between skin-to-femur distance and angle. We also evaluated the variability of the SN bifurcation level and the relationship between patient height and nerve bifurcation level. Using 289 thigh MRIs to simulate a lateral approach in the supine position, we measured and analyzed with simple linear regressions the level of SN bifurcation, the skin-to-femur and SN-to-femur distances, and the angle at which the needle must be directed posteriorly to intersect the SN at 9 cm proximal to the lateral joint line. The mean insertion angle was 30 (SD, 8) degrees. In 95% of cases, angles ranged from 15 to 45 degrees, and the larger the thigh, the smaller the angle. The SN divided at a mean distance of 7.5 (SD, 1.6) cm (range, 1.5-12.8 cm) proximal to the lateral joint line. In 93% of cases, the bifurcation level was 10 cm or less. Our simulated lateral popliteal SN block on MRIs shows a 15- to 45-degree range of needle-insertion angles. As the skin-to-femur distance was greater than 4.5 cm, the angles were progressively smaller than 30 degrees. Although this was an MRI study, it does provide some evidence that indicates the conventional clinically recommended 25- to 30-degree-angle ranges may need to be reevaluated. Needle insertion of 10 cm or greater proximal to the popliteal crease may increase the chance of placement at or proximal to the SN bifurcation.</description><subject>Body Height</subject><subject>Femur - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Lower Extremity - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Regional anesthesia</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Sciatic Nerve - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Skin - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Thigh</subject><issn>1098-7339</issn><issn>1532-8651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUdtKxDAQDaJ4Wf0DkYAPPlVzaZrUt2XxBguK6HNJ0ql2t01q0i7498brg09zmDln5gwHoWNKzikp5cV8_nBODKEcOFW0biCXZgvtU8FZpgpBtxMmpcok5-UeOohxRQhRMi920R4jJaOK0300PcKmje3YuhesnR5931rcaVf3OqzjZYIjBN3hwQ9dO0JCehiC1_YVNz7gaFs9JoWDsAFsOm_X2OgINfYO9_rFwec0QPROOwu4Tb106hDtNLqLcPRTZ-j5-uppcZst72_uFvNlZpniYwaNlo2iVufcFrXl1HJW60Lkpa1zACO4UcZqIDU1RjHamKJQRPLcFEoyLvkMnX3vTZbfJohj1bfRQpceBD_FSooiKUROEvP0H3Plp-CSuYoJwUlJ2Bcr_2bZ4GMM0FRDSC-F94qS6jOVKqVS_U8lyU5-lk-mh_pP9BsD_wBuK4vu</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Grasu, Roxana M</creator><creator>Costelloe, Colleen M</creator><creator>Boddu, Krishna</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Revisiting anatomic landmarks: lateral popliteal approach for sciatic nerve block based on magnetic resonance imaging</title><author>Grasu, Roxana M ; Costelloe, Colleen M ; Boddu, Krishna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-efa7f81ca43c6dc31c32da6549cd4eeb53b8bcae0d1bb821fb6680734b6872373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Body Height</topic><topic>Femur - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Lower Extremity - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Regional anesthesia</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Sciatic Nerve - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Skin - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Thigh</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grasu, Roxana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costelloe, Colleen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boddu, Krishna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grasu, Roxana M</au><au>Costelloe, Colleen M</au><au>Boddu, Krishna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting anatomic landmarks: lateral popliteal approach for sciatic nerve block based on magnetic resonance imaging</atitle><jtitle>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Reg Anesth Pain Med</addtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>230</epage><pages>227-230</pages><issn>1098-7339</issn><eissn>1532-8651</eissn><abstract>When the conventional lateral popliteal sciatic nerve (SN) block is performed, the needle angle required to localize and the level of the SN bifurcation are highly variable. The aim of our magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study was to determine the most common range of needle-insertion angles and the relationship between skin-to-femur distance and angle. We also evaluated the variability of the SN bifurcation level and the relationship between patient height and nerve bifurcation level. Using 289 thigh MRIs to simulate a lateral approach in the supine position, we measured and analyzed with simple linear regressions the level of SN bifurcation, the skin-to-femur and SN-to-femur distances, and the angle at which the needle must be directed posteriorly to intersect the SN at 9 cm proximal to the lateral joint line. The mean insertion angle was 30 (SD, 8) degrees. In 95% of cases, angles ranged from 15 to 45 degrees, and the larger the thigh, the smaller the angle. The SN divided at a mean distance of 7.5 (SD, 1.6) cm (range, 1.5-12.8 cm) proximal to the lateral joint line. In 93% of cases, the bifurcation level was 10 cm or less. Our simulated lateral popliteal SN block on MRIs shows a 15- to 45-degree range of needle-insertion angles. As the skin-to-femur distance was greater than 4.5 cm, the angles were progressively smaller than 30 degrees. Although this was an MRI study, it does provide some evidence that indicates the conventional clinically recommended 25- to 30-degree-angle ranges may need to be reevaluated. Needle insertion of 10 cm or greater proximal to the popliteal crease may increase the chance of placement at or proximal to the SN bifurcation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>20921831</pmid><doi>10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181dfe47b</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-7339
ispartof Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2010-05, Vol.35 (3), p.227-230
issn 1098-7339
1532-8651
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756668540
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Body Height
Femur - anatomy & histology
Humans
Linear Models
Lower Extremity - anatomy & histology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Nerve Block - methods
Regional anesthesia
Retrospective Studies
Sample Size
Sciatic Nerve - anatomy & histology
Skin - anatomy & histology
Thigh
title Revisiting anatomic landmarks: lateral popliteal approach for sciatic nerve block based on magnetic resonance imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A52%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20anatomic%20landmarks:%20lateral%20popliteal%20approach%20for%20sciatic%20nerve%20block%20based%20on%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Regional%20anesthesia%20and%20pain%20medicine&rft.au=Grasu,%20Roxana%20M&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=230&rft.pages=227-230&rft.issn=1098-7339&rft.eissn=1532-8651&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181dfe47b&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E756668540%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553090240&rft_id=info:pmid/20921831&rfr_iscdi=true