Use of Coercive Measures During Involuntary Hospitalization: Findings From Ten European Countries
Involuntary treatment in mental health care is a sensitive but rarely studied issue. This study was part of the European Evaluation of Coercion in Psychiatry and Harmonization of Best Clinical Practice (EUNOMIA) project. It assessed and compared the use of coercive measures in psychiatric inpatient...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2010-10, Vol.61 (10), p.1012-1017 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1017 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1012 |
container_title | Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Raboch, Ji í Kališová, Lucie Nawka, Alexander Kitzlerová, Eva Onchev, Georgi Karastergiou, Anastasia Magliano, Lorenza Dembinskas, Algirdas Kiejna, Andrzej Torres-Gonzales, Francisco Kjellin, Lars Priebe, Stefan Kallert, Thomas W |
description | Involuntary treatment in mental health care is a sensitive but rarely studied issue. This study was part of the European Evaluation of Coercion in Psychiatry and Harmonization of Best Clinical Practice (EUNOMIA) project. It assessed and compared the use of coercive measures in psychiatric inpatient facilities in ten European countries.
The sample included 2,030 involuntarily admitted patients. Data were obtained on coercive measures (physical restraint, seclusion, and forced medication).
In total, 1,462 coercive measures were used with 770 patients (38%). The percentage of patients receiving coercive measures in each country varied between 21% and 59%. The most frequent reason for prescribing coercive measures was patient aggression against others. In eight of the countries, the most frequent measure used was forced medication, and in two of the countries mechanical restraint was the most frequent measure used. Seclusion was rarely administered and was reported in only six countries. A diagnosis of schizophrenia and more severe symptoms were associated with a higher probability of receiving coercive measures.
Coercive measures were used in a substantial group of involuntarily admitted patients across Europe. Their use appeared to depend on diagnosis and the severity of illness, but use was also heavily influenced by the individual country. Variation across countries may reflect differences in societal attitudes and clinical traditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756664740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2171452831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-5e182e55a0606950bb4216bdee108150d80d0e58ef3613d1de5683d3759309973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MFO3DAQBmALtQIKvAAHZFWqOGUZx7GdcKsWFpCoeoFz5E0myChrB0-yUvv0eNmlSBx6sj36Zjz6GTsVMBPC6IuBZjmkhxazTQlEvscOhVImqwzAl3QHo7LcSDhg34ieAUAYoffZQQ5lWekCDpl9JOSh4_OAsXFr5L_Q0hSR-NUUnX_id34d-smPNv7ht4EGN9re_bWjC_6SL5xvEyK-iGHFH9Dz6ymGAa1PA1NTdEjH7Gtne8KT3XnEHhfXD_Pb7P73zd38531mZVmMmUJR5qiUBQ26UrBcFrnQyxZRQCkUtCW0gKrETmohW9Gi0qVspVGVhKoy8oidb-cOMbxMSGO9ctRg31uPYaLaKK11YQpI8vsn-Rym6NNyCVVmk6lKKN-iJgaiiF09RLdKKdQC6k389UD1htZavJVS_KnpbDd5Wq6w_dfynncCP3bAUmP7LlrfOPpwUkIOWid3sXV2GNzHev_5-hW1l5rL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>759720105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Coercive Measures During Involuntary Hospitalization: Findings From Ten European Countries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Psychiatric Publishing Journals (1997-Present)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Raboch, Ji í ; Kališová, Lucie ; Nawka, Alexander ; Kitzlerová, Eva ; Onchev, Georgi ; Karastergiou, Anastasia ; Magliano, Lorenza ; Dembinskas, Algirdas ; Kiejna, Andrzej ; Torres-Gonzales, Francisco ; Kjellin, Lars ; Priebe, Stefan ; Kallert, Thomas W</creator><creatorcontrib>Raboch, Ji í ; Kališová, Lucie ; Nawka, Alexander ; Kitzlerová, Eva ; Onchev, Georgi ; Karastergiou, Anastasia ; Magliano, Lorenza ; Dembinskas, Algirdas ; Kiejna, Andrzej ; Torres-Gonzales, Francisco ; Kjellin, Lars ; Priebe, Stefan ; Kallert, Thomas W</creatorcontrib><description>Involuntary treatment in mental health care is a sensitive but rarely studied issue. This study was part of the European Evaluation of Coercion in Psychiatry and Harmonization of Best Clinical Practice (EUNOMIA) project. It assessed and compared the use of coercive measures in psychiatric inpatient facilities in ten European countries.
The sample included 2,030 involuntarily admitted patients. Data were obtained on coercive measures (physical restraint, seclusion, and forced medication).
In total, 1,462 coercive measures were used with 770 patients (38%). The percentage of patients receiving coercive measures in each country varied between 21% and 59%. The most frequent reason for prescribing coercive measures was patient aggression against others. In eight of the countries, the most frequent measure used was forced medication, and in two of the countries mechanical restraint was the most frequent measure used. Seclusion was rarely administered and was reported in only six countries. A diagnosis of schizophrenia and more severe symptoms were associated with a higher probability of receiving coercive measures.
Coercive measures were used in a substantial group of involuntarily admitted patients across Europe. Their use appeared to depend on diagnosis and the severity of illness, but use was also heavily influenced by the individual country. Variation across countries may reflect differences in societal attitudes and clinical traditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1075-2730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9700</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20889640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical medicine ; Coercion ; Commitment of Mentally Ill ; Europe ; Female ; Health services ; Hospital systems ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, Psychiatric ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mental health ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Psychiatric-mental health nursing ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychoses ; Recruitment ; Schizophrenia ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2010-10, Vol.61 (10), p.1012-1017</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-5e182e55a0606950bb4216bdee108150d80d0e58ef3613d1de5683d3759309973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-5e182e55a0606950bb4216bdee108150d80d0e58ef3613d1de5683d3759309973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://psychiatryonline.org/doi/epdf/10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012$$EPDF$$P50$$Gappi$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gappi$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2842,21605,21606,21607,27901,27902,77537,77542</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23302066$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20889640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raboch, Ji í</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kališová, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawka, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitzlerová, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onchev, Georgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karastergiou, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magliano, Lorenza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dembinskas, Algirdas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiejna, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Gonzales, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjellin, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priebe, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallert, Thomas W</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Coercive Measures During Involuntary Hospitalization: Findings From Ten European Countries</title><title>Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)</title><addtitle>Psychiatr Serv</addtitle><description>Involuntary treatment in mental health care is a sensitive but rarely studied issue. This study was part of the European Evaluation of Coercion in Psychiatry and Harmonization of Best Clinical Practice (EUNOMIA) project. It assessed and compared the use of coercive measures in psychiatric inpatient facilities in ten European countries.
The sample included 2,030 involuntarily admitted patients. Data were obtained on coercive measures (physical restraint, seclusion, and forced medication).
In total, 1,462 coercive measures were used with 770 patients (38%). The percentage of patients receiving coercive measures in each country varied between 21% and 59%. The most frequent reason for prescribing coercive measures was patient aggression against others. In eight of the countries, the most frequent measure used was forced medication, and in two of the countries mechanical restraint was the most frequent measure used. Seclusion was rarely administered and was reported in only six countries. A diagnosis of schizophrenia and more severe symptoms were associated with a higher probability of receiving coercive measures.
Coercive measures were used in a substantial group of involuntarily admitted patients across Europe. Their use appeared to depend on diagnosis and the severity of illness, but use was also heavily influenced by the individual country. Variation across countries may reflect differences in societal attitudes and clinical traditions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Coercion</subject><subject>Commitment of Mentally Ill</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospital systems</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, Psychiatric</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychoses</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1075-2730</issn><issn>1557-9700</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MFO3DAQBmALtQIKvAAHZFWqOGUZx7GdcKsWFpCoeoFz5E0myChrB0-yUvv0eNmlSBx6sj36Zjz6GTsVMBPC6IuBZjmkhxazTQlEvscOhVImqwzAl3QHo7LcSDhg34ieAUAYoffZQQ5lWekCDpl9JOSh4_OAsXFr5L_Q0hSR-NUUnX_id34d-smPNv7ht4EGN9re_bWjC_6SL5xvEyK-iGHFH9Dz6ymGAa1PA1NTdEjH7Gtne8KT3XnEHhfXD_Pb7P73zd38531mZVmMmUJR5qiUBQ26UrBcFrnQyxZRQCkUtCW0gKrETmohW9Gi0qVspVGVhKoy8oidb-cOMbxMSGO9ctRg31uPYaLaKK11YQpI8vsn-Rym6NNyCVVmk6lKKN-iJgaiiF09RLdKKdQC6k389UD1htZavJVS_KnpbDd5Wq6w_dfynncCP3bAUmP7LlrfOPpwUkIOWid3sXV2GNzHev_5-hW1l5rL</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Raboch, Ji í</creator><creator>Kališová, Lucie</creator><creator>Nawka, Alexander</creator><creator>Kitzlerová, Eva</creator><creator>Onchev, Georgi</creator><creator>Karastergiou, Anastasia</creator><creator>Magliano, Lorenza</creator><creator>Dembinskas, Algirdas</creator><creator>Kiejna, Andrzej</creator><creator>Torres-Gonzales, Francisco</creator><creator>Kjellin, Lars</creator><creator>Priebe, Stefan</creator><creator>Kallert, Thomas W</creator><general>American Psychiatric Association</general><general>American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Use of Coercive Measures During Involuntary Hospitalization: Findings From Ten European Countries</title><author>Raboch, Ji í ; Kališová, Lucie ; Nawka, Alexander ; Kitzlerová, Eva ; Onchev, Georgi ; Karastergiou, Anastasia ; Magliano, Lorenza ; Dembinskas, Algirdas ; Kiejna, Andrzej ; Torres-Gonzales, Francisco ; Kjellin, Lars ; Priebe, Stefan ; Kallert, Thomas W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-5e182e55a0606950bb4216bdee108150d80d0e58ef3613d1de5683d3759309973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Coercion</topic><topic>Commitment of Mentally Ill</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospital systems</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, Psychiatric</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychoses</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raboch, Ji í</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kališová, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawka, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitzlerová, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onchev, Georgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karastergiou, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magliano, Lorenza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dembinskas, Algirdas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiejna, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Gonzales, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjellin, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priebe, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallert, Thomas W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raboch, Ji í</au><au>Kališová, Lucie</au><au>Nawka, Alexander</au><au>Kitzlerová, Eva</au><au>Onchev, Georgi</au><au>Karastergiou, Anastasia</au><au>Magliano, Lorenza</au><au>Dembinskas, Algirdas</au><au>Kiejna, Andrzej</au><au>Torres-Gonzales, Francisco</au><au>Kjellin, Lars</au><au>Priebe, Stefan</au><au>Kallert, Thomas W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Coercive Measures During Involuntary Hospitalization: Findings From Ten European Countries</atitle><jtitle>Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><addtitle>Psychiatr Serv</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1012</spage><epage>1017</epage><pages>1012-1017</pages><issn>1075-2730</issn><eissn>1557-9700</eissn><abstract>Involuntary treatment in mental health care is a sensitive but rarely studied issue. This study was part of the European Evaluation of Coercion in Psychiatry and Harmonization of Best Clinical Practice (EUNOMIA) project. It assessed and compared the use of coercive measures in psychiatric inpatient facilities in ten European countries.
The sample included 2,030 involuntarily admitted patients. Data were obtained on coercive measures (physical restraint, seclusion, and forced medication).
In total, 1,462 coercive measures were used with 770 patients (38%). The percentage of patients receiving coercive measures in each country varied between 21% and 59%. The most frequent reason for prescribing coercive measures was patient aggression against others. In eight of the countries, the most frequent measure used was forced medication, and in two of the countries mechanical restraint was the most frequent measure used. Seclusion was rarely administered and was reported in only six countries. A diagnosis of schizophrenia and more severe symptoms were associated with a higher probability of receiving coercive measures.
Coercive measures were used in a substantial group of involuntarily admitted patients across Europe. Their use appeared to depend on diagnosis and the severity of illness, but use was also heavily influenced by the individual country. Variation across countries may reflect differences in societal attitudes and clinical traditions.</abstract><cop>Arlington, VA</cop><pub>American Psychiatric Association</pub><pmid>20889640</pmid><doi>10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1075-2730 |
ispartof | Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2010-10, Vol.61 (10), p.1012-1017 |
issn | 1075-2730 1557-9700 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756664740 |
source | MEDLINE; American Psychiatric Publishing Journals (1997-Present); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Behavior Biological and medical sciences Clinical medicine Coercion Commitment of Mentally Ill Europe Female Health services Hospital systems Hospitalization Hospitals Hospitals, Psychiatric Humans Male Medical sciences Mental health Middle Aged Prospective Studies Psychiatric-mental health nursing Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Psychoses Recruitment Schizophrenia Studies |
title | Use of Coercive Measures During Involuntary Hospitalization: Findings From Ten European Countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A14%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Coercive%20Measures%20During%20Involuntary%20Hospitalization:%20Findings%20From%20Ten%20European%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Psychiatric%20services%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Raboch,%20Ji%20%C3%AD&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1012&rft.epage=1017&rft.pages=1012-1017&rft.issn=1075-2730&rft.eissn=1557-9700&rft_id=info:doi/10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2171452831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=759720105&rft_id=info:pmid/20889640&rfr_iscdi=true |