Use of Coercive Measures During Involuntary Hospitalization: Findings From Ten European Countries

Involuntary treatment in mental health care is a sensitive but rarely studied issue. This study was part of the European Evaluation of Coercion in Psychiatry and Harmonization of Best Clinical Practice (EUNOMIA) project. It assessed and compared the use of coercive measures in psychiatric inpatient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2010-10, Vol.61 (10), p.1012-1017
Hauptverfasser: Raboch, Ji í, Kališová, Lucie, Nawka, Alexander, Kitzlerová, Eva, Onchev, Georgi, Karastergiou, Anastasia, Magliano, Lorenza, Dembinskas, Algirdas, Kiejna, Andrzej, Torres-Gonzales, Francisco, Kjellin, Lars, Priebe, Stefan, Kallert, Thomas W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1017
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1012
container_title Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)
container_volume 61
creator Raboch, Ji í
Kališová, Lucie
Nawka, Alexander
Kitzlerová, Eva
Onchev, Georgi
Karastergiou, Anastasia
Magliano, Lorenza
Dembinskas, Algirdas
Kiejna, Andrzej
Torres-Gonzales, Francisco
Kjellin, Lars
Priebe, Stefan
Kallert, Thomas W
description Involuntary treatment in mental health care is a sensitive but rarely studied issue. This study was part of the European Evaluation of Coercion in Psychiatry and Harmonization of Best Clinical Practice (EUNOMIA) project. It assessed and compared the use of coercive measures in psychiatric inpatient facilities in ten European countries. The sample included 2,030 involuntarily admitted patients. Data were obtained on coercive measures (physical restraint, seclusion, and forced medication). In total, 1,462 coercive measures were used with 770 patients (38%). The percentage of patients receiving coercive measures in each country varied between 21% and 59%. The most frequent reason for prescribing coercive measures was patient aggression against others. In eight of the countries, the most frequent measure used was forced medication, and in two of the countries mechanical restraint was the most frequent measure used. Seclusion was rarely administered and was reported in only six countries. A diagnosis of schizophrenia and more severe symptoms were associated with a higher probability of receiving coercive measures. Coercive measures were used in a substantial group of involuntarily admitted patients across Europe. Their use appeared to depend on diagnosis and the severity of illness, but use was also heavily influenced by the individual country. Variation across countries may reflect differences in societal attitudes and clinical traditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756664740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2171452831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-5e182e55a0606950bb4216bdee108150d80d0e58ef3613d1de5683d3759309973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MFO3DAQBmALtQIKvAAHZFWqOGUZx7GdcKsWFpCoeoFz5E0myChrB0-yUvv0eNmlSBx6sj36Zjz6GTsVMBPC6IuBZjmkhxazTQlEvscOhVImqwzAl3QHo7LcSDhg34ieAUAYoffZQQ5lWekCDpl9JOSh4_OAsXFr5L_Q0hSR-NUUnX_id34d-smPNv7ht4EGN9re_bWjC_6SL5xvEyK-iGHFH9Dz6ymGAa1PA1NTdEjH7Gtne8KT3XnEHhfXD_Pb7P73zd38531mZVmMmUJR5qiUBQ26UrBcFrnQyxZRQCkUtCW0gKrETmohW9Gi0qVspVGVhKoy8oidb-cOMbxMSGO9ctRg31uPYaLaKK11YQpI8vsn-Rym6NNyCVVmk6lKKN-iJgaiiF09RLdKKdQC6k389UD1htZavJVS_KnpbDd5Wq6w_dfynncCP3bAUmP7LlrfOPpwUkIOWid3sXV2GNzHev_5-hW1l5rL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>759720105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Coercive Measures During Involuntary Hospitalization: Findings From Ten European Countries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Psychiatric Publishing Journals (1997-Present)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Raboch, Ji í ; Kališová, Lucie ; Nawka, Alexander ; Kitzlerová, Eva ; Onchev, Georgi ; Karastergiou, Anastasia ; Magliano, Lorenza ; Dembinskas, Algirdas ; Kiejna, Andrzej ; Torres-Gonzales, Francisco ; Kjellin, Lars ; Priebe, Stefan ; Kallert, Thomas W</creator><creatorcontrib>Raboch, Ji í ; Kališová, Lucie ; Nawka, Alexander ; Kitzlerová, Eva ; Onchev, Georgi ; Karastergiou, Anastasia ; Magliano, Lorenza ; Dembinskas, Algirdas ; Kiejna, Andrzej ; Torres-Gonzales, Francisco ; Kjellin, Lars ; Priebe, Stefan ; Kallert, Thomas W</creatorcontrib><description>Involuntary treatment in mental health care is a sensitive but rarely studied issue. This study was part of the European Evaluation of Coercion in Psychiatry and Harmonization of Best Clinical Practice (EUNOMIA) project. It assessed and compared the use of coercive measures in psychiatric inpatient facilities in ten European countries. The sample included 2,030 involuntarily admitted patients. Data were obtained on coercive measures (physical restraint, seclusion, and forced medication). In total, 1,462 coercive measures were used with 770 patients (38%). The percentage of patients receiving coercive measures in each country varied between 21% and 59%. The most frequent reason for prescribing coercive measures was patient aggression against others. In eight of the countries, the most frequent measure used was forced medication, and in two of the countries mechanical restraint was the most frequent measure used. Seclusion was rarely administered and was reported in only six countries. A diagnosis of schizophrenia and more severe symptoms were associated with a higher probability of receiving coercive measures. Coercive measures were used in a substantial group of involuntarily admitted patients across Europe. Their use appeared to depend on diagnosis and the severity of illness, but use was also heavily influenced by the individual country. Variation across countries may reflect differences in societal attitudes and clinical traditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1075-2730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9700</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20889640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical medicine ; Coercion ; Commitment of Mentally Ill ; Europe ; Female ; Health services ; Hospital systems ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, Psychiatric ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mental health ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Psychiatric-mental health nursing ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychoses ; Recruitment ; Schizophrenia ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2010-10, Vol.61 (10), p.1012-1017</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-5e182e55a0606950bb4216bdee108150d80d0e58ef3613d1de5683d3759309973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-5e182e55a0606950bb4216bdee108150d80d0e58ef3613d1de5683d3759309973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://psychiatryonline.org/doi/epdf/10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012$$EPDF$$P50$$Gappi$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gappi$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2842,21605,21606,21607,27901,27902,77537,77542</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23302066$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20889640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raboch, Ji í</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kališová, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawka, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitzlerová, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onchev, Georgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karastergiou, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magliano, Lorenza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dembinskas, Algirdas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiejna, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Gonzales, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjellin, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priebe, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallert, Thomas W</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Coercive Measures During Involuntary Hospitalization: Findings From Ten European Countries</title><title>Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)</title><addtitle>Psychiatr Serv</addtitle><description>Involuntary treatment in mental health care is a sensitive but rarely studied issue. This study was part of the European Evaluation of Coercion in Psychiatry and Harmonization of Best Clinical Practice (EUNOMIA) project. It assessed and compared the use of coercive measures in psychiatric inpatient facilities in ten European countries. The sample included 2,030 involuntarily admitted patients. Data were obtained on coercive measures (physical restraint, seclusion, and forced medication). In total, 1,462 coercive measures were used with 770 patients (38%). The percentage of patients receiving coercive measures in each country varied between 21% and 59%. The most frequent reason for prescribing coercive measures was patient aggression against others. In eight of the countries, the most frequent measure used was forced medication, and in two of the countries mechanical restraint was the most frequent measure used. Seclusion was rarely administered and was reported in only six countries. A diagnosis of schizophrenia and more severe symptoms were associated with a higher probability of receiving coercive measures. Coercive measures were used in a substantial group of involuntarily admitted patients across Europe. Their use appeared to depend on diagnosis and the severity of illness, but use was also heavily influenced by the individual country. Variation across countries may reflect differences in societal attitudes and clinical traditions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Coercion</subject><subject>Commitment of Mentally Ill</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospital systems</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, Psychiatric</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychoses</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1075-2730</issn><issn>1557-9700</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MFO3DAQBmALtQIKvAAHZFWqOGUZx7GdcKsWFpCoeoFz5E0myChrB0-yUvv0eNmlSBx6sj36Zjz6GTsVMBPC6IuBZjmkhxazTQlEvscOhVImqwzAl3QHo7LcSDhg34ieAUAYoffZQQ5lWekCDpl9JOSh4_OAsXFr5L_Q0hSR-NUUnX_id34d-smPNv7ht4EGN9re_bWjC_6SL5xvEyK-iGHFH9Dz6ymGAa1PA1NTdEjH7Gtne8KT3XnEHhfXD_Pb7P73zd38531mZVmMmUJR5qiUBQ26UrBcFrnQyxZRQCkUtCW0gKrETmohW9Gi0qVspVGVhKoy8oidb-cOMbxMSGO9ctRg31uPYaLaKK11YQpI8vsn-Rym6NNyCVVmk6lKKN-iJgaiiF09RLdKKdQC6k389UD1htZavJVS_KnpbDd5Wq6w_dfynncCP3bAUmP7LlrfOPpwUkIOWid3sXV2GNzHev_5-hW1l5rL</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Raboch, Ji í</creator><creator>Kališová, Lucie</creator><creator>Nawka, Alexander</creator><creator>Kitzlerová, Eva</creator><creator>Onchev, Georgi</creator><creator>Karastergiou, Anastasia</creator><creator>Magliano, Lorenza</creator><creator>Dembinskas, Algirdas</creator><creator>Kiejna, Andrzej</creator><creator>Torres-Gonzales, Francisco</creator><creator>Kjellin, Lars</creator><creator>Priebe, Stefan</creator><creator>Kallert, Thomas W</creator><general>American Psychiatric Association</general><general>American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Use of Coercive Measures During Involuntary Hospitalization: Findings From Ten European Countries</title><author>Raboch, Ji í ; Kališová, Lucie ; Nawka, Alexander ; Kitzlerová, Eva ; Onchev, Georgi ; Karastergiou, Anastasia ; Magliano, Lorenza ; Dembinskas, Algirdas ; Kiejna, Andrzej ; Torres-Gonzales, Francisco ; Kjellin, Lars ; Priebe, Stefan ; Kallert, Thomas W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-5e182e55a0606950bb4216bdee108150d80d0e58ef3613d1de5683d3759309973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Coercion</topic><topic>Commitment of Mentally Ill</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospital systems</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, Psychiatric</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychoses</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raboch, Ji í</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kališová, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawka, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitzlerová, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onchev, Georgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karastergiou, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magliano, Lorenza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dembinskas, Algirdas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiejna, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Gonzales, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjellin, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priebe, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallert, Thomas W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raboch, Ji í</au><au>Kališová, Lucie</au><au>Nawka, Alexander</au><au>Kitzlerová, Eva</au><au>Onchev, Georgi</au><au>Karastergiou, Anastasia</au><au>Magliano, Lorenza</au><au>Dembinskas, Algirdas</au><au>Kiejna, Andrzej</au><au>Torres-Gonzales, Francisco</au><au>Kjellin, Lars</au><au>Priebe, Stefan</au><au>Kallert, Thomas W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Coercive Measures During Involuntary Hospitalization: Findings From Ten European Countries</atitle><jtitle>Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><addtitle>Psychiatr Serv</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1012</spage><epage>1017</epage><pages>1012-1017</pages><issn>1075-2730</issn><eissn>1557-9700</eissn><abstract>Involuntary treatment in mental health care is a sensitive but rarely studied issue. This study was part of the European Evaluation of Coercion in Psychiatry and Harmonization of Best Clinical Practice (EUNOMIA) project. It assessed and compared the use of coercive measures in psychiatric inpatient facilities in ten European countries. The sample included 2,030 involuntarily admitted patients. Data were obtained on coercive measures (physical restraint, seclusion, and forced medication). In total, 1,462 coercive measures were used with 770 patients (38%). The percentage of patients receiving coercive measures in each country varied between 21% and 59%. The most frequent reason for prescribing coercive measures was patient aggression against others. In eight of the countries, the most frequent measure used was forced medication, and in two of the countries mechanical restraint was the most frequent measure used. Seclusion was rarely administered and was reported in only six countries. A diagnosis of schizophrenia and more severe symptoms were associated with a higher probability of receiving coercive measures. Coercive measures were used in a substantial group of involuntarily admitted patients across Europe. Their use appeared to depend on diagnosis and the severity of illness, but use was also heavily influenced by the individual country. Variation across countries may reflect differences in societal attitudes and clinical traditions.</abstract><cop>Arlington, VA</cop><pub>American Psychiatric Association</pub><pmid>20889640</pmid><doi>10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1075-2730
ispartof Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2010-10, Vol.61 (10), p.1012-1017
issn 1075-2730
1557-9700
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756664740
source MEDLINE; American Psychiatric Publishing Journals (1997-Present); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Clinical medicine
Coercion
Commitment of Mentally Ill
Europe
Female
Health services
Hospital systems
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Hospitals, Psychiatric
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Mental health
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Psychiatric-mental health nursing
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Psychoses
Recruitment
Schizophrenia
Studies
title Use of Coercive Measures During Involuntary Hospitalization: Findings From Ten European Countries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A14%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Coercive%20Measures%20During%20Involuntary%20Hospitalization:%20Findings%20From%20Ten%20European%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Psychiatric%20services%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Raboch,%20Ji%20%C3%AD&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1012&rft.epage=1017&rft.pages=1012-1017&rft.issn=1075-2730&rft.eissn=1557-9700&rft_id=info:doi/10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2171452831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=759720105&rft_id=info:pmid/20889640&rfr_iscdi=true