The radial forearm flap donor site: should we vein graft the artery? A comparative study

Controversy exists in the literature regarding reconstruction of the radial artery after elevation of the radial forearm flap. The literature suggests that reconstructing the radial artery with a vein graft is an important aspect in the use of this flap. In our experience, this has never been perfor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 1993-04, Vol.91 (5), p.865-870
Hauptverfasser: Meland, N B, Core, G B, Hoverman, V R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 870
container_issue 5
container_start_page 865
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 91
creator Meland, N B
Core, G B
Hoverman, V R
description Controversy exists in the literature regarding reconstruction of the radial artery after elevation of the radial forearm flap. The literature suggests that reconstructing the radial artery with a vein graft is an important aspect in the use of this flap. In our experience, this has never been performed with no sequela. We examined 13 consecutive patients who underwent radial forearm flaps for head and neck reconstruction over a 28-month period. The patients were examined and questioned about the function of their upper extremities in hope of evaluating the postoperative vascular status in each. Median follow-up was 6 months, with a range of 1 month to 24 months. No patient had preexisting trauma or congenital abnormality of either arm, so that the nondonor arm could be considered as a control for each patient. Evaluation consisted of history and physical examination. The following parameters in each patient were carefully accumulated: grip strength, cutaneous blood flow measured by using a laser Doppler flowmeter, transcutaneous oxygen levels, digital/brachial blood pressure ratios, cutaneous temperature from thumb/index and thumb/small pinch, and rapid rewarming at 1-minute and 5-minute intervals after cold immersion for 2 minutes. The radial forearm flap was elevated in each patient in the nondominant extremity. Grip strengths ranged from 19 to 77 kg, with a median of 30 kg. Early rewarming of the thumb/index was also an average of 1.5 degrees less than the temperature in the control arm and was statistically significant to (p = .01).
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00006534-199304001-00019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75662977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75662977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-39b85f632481d112c389a1f4064d3f8dc875b2fc7512cde04abdc7e9117ab39c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLAzEUhbNQaq3-BCErd6N5TCYTN1KKLyi4qeAuZPKwIzPNmGQq_fdGW3s3F8495x74AIAY3WAk-C3KUzFaFlgIikqEcJEVLE7AFCFKCowYOQPnMX5mldOKTcCkLqvsQFPwvlpbGJRpVQedD1aFHrpODdD4jQ8wtsnewbj2Y2fgt4Vb227gR1AuwZSDKiQbdvdwDrXvBxVUarcWxjSa3QU4daqL9vKwZ-Dt8WG1eC6Wr08vi_my0JSwVFDR1MxVlJQ1NhgTTWuhsCtRVRrqaqNrzhriNGf5ZiwqVWM0twJjrhoqNJ2B6_3fIfiv0cYk-zZq23VqY_0YJWdVRQTn2VjvjTr4GIN1cghtr8JOYiR_Qcp_kPIIUv6BzNGrQ8fY9NYcgweK9AepiW_8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75662977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The radial forearm flap donor site: should we vein graft the artery? A comparative study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Meland, N B ; Core, G B ; Hoverman, V R</creator><creatorcontrib>Meland, N B ; Core, G B ; Hoverman, V R</creatorcontrib><description>Controversy exists in the literature regarding reconstruction of the radial artery after elevation of the radial forearm flap. The literature suggests that reconstructing the radial artery with a vein graft is an important aspect in the use of this flap. In our experience, this has never been performed with no sequela. We examined 13 consecutive patients who underwent radial forearm flaps for head and neck reconstruction over a 28-month period. The patients were examined and questioned about the function of their upper extremities in hope of evaluating the postoperative vascular status in each. Median follow-up was 6 months, with a range of 1 month to 24 months. No patient had preexisting trauma or congenital abnormality of either arm, so that the nondonor arm could be considered as a control for each patient. Evaluation consisted of history and physical examination. The following parameters in each patient were carefully accumulated: grip strength, cutaneous blood flow measured by using a laser Doppler flowmeter, transcutaneous oxygen levels, digital/brachial blood pressure ratios, cutaneous temperature from thumb/index and thumb/small pinch, and rapid rewarming at 1-minute and 5-minute intervals after cold immersion for 2 minutes. The radial forearm flap was elevated in each patient in the nondominant extremity. Grip strengths ranged from 19 to 77 kg, with a median of 30 kg. Early rewarming of the thumb/index was also an average of 1.5 degrees less than the temperature in the control arm and was statistically significant to (p = .01).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199304001-00019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8460190</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Blood Gas Monitoring, Transcutaneous ; Blood Pressure ; Body Temperature ; Female ; Fingers - blood supply ; Fingers - physiology ; Follow-Up Studies ; Forearm - blood supply ; Forearm - physiology ; Forearm - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radial Artery - surgery ; Regional Blood Flow ; Surgical Flaps ; Veins - surgery</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 1993-04, Vol.91 (5), p.865-870</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8460190$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meland, N B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Core, G B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoverman, V R</creatorcontrib><title>The radial forearm flap donor site: should we vein graft the artery? A comparative study</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Controversy exists in the literature regarding reconstruction of the radial artery after elevation of the radial forearm flap. The literature suggests that reconstructing the radial artery with a vein graft is an important aspect in the use of this flap. In our experience, this has never been performed with no sequela. We examined 13 consecutive patients who underwent radial forearm flaps for head and neck reconstruction over a 28-month period. The patients were examined and questioned about the function of their upper extremities in hope of evaluating the postoperative vascular status in each. Median follow-up was 6 months, with a range of 1 month to 24 months. No patient had preexisting trauma or congenital abnormality of either arm, so that the nondonor arm could be considered as a control for each patient. Evaluation consisted of history and physical examination. The following parameters in each patient were carefully accumulated: grip strength, cutaneous blood flow measured by using a laser Doppler flowmeter, transcutaneous oxygen levels, digital/brachial blood pressure ratios, cutaneous temperature from thumb/index and thumb/small pinch, and rapid rewarming at 1-minute and 5-minute intervals after cold immersion for 2 minutes. The radial forearm flap was elevated in each patient in the nondominant extremity. Grip strengths ranged from 19 to 77 kg, with a median of 30 kg. Early rewarming of the thumb/index was also an average of 1.5 degrees less than the temperature in the control arm and was statistically significant to (p = .01).</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Blood Gas Monitoring, Transcutaneous</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Body Temperature</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fingers - blood supply</subject><subject>Fingers - physiology</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Forearm - blood supply</subject><subject>Forearm - physiology</subject><subject>Forearm - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radial Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Regional Blood Flow</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Veins - surgery</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLAzEUhbNQaq3-BCErd6N5TCYTN1KKLyi4qeAuZPKwIzPNmGQq_fdGW3s3F8495x74AIAY3WAk-C3KUzFaFlgIikqEcJEVLE7AFCFKCowYOQPnMX5mldOKTcCkLqvsQFPwvlpbGJRpVQedD1aFHrpODdD4jQ8wtsnewbj2Y2fgt4Vb227gR1AuwZSDKiQbdvdwDrXvBxVUarcWxjSa3QU4daqL9vKwZ-Dt8WG1eC6Wr08vi_my0JSwVFDR1MxVlJQ1NhgTTWuhsCtRVRrqaqNrzhriNGf5ZiwqVWM0twJjrhoqNJ2B6_3fIfiv0cYk-zZq23VqY_0YJWdVRQTn2VjvjTr4GIN1cghtr8JOYiR_Qcp_kPIIUv6BzNGrQ8fY9NYcgweK9AepiW_8</recordid><startdate>19930401</startdate><enddate>19930401</enddate><creator>Meland, N B</creator><creator>Core, G B</creator><creator>Hoverman, V R</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930401</creationdate><title>The radial forearm flap donor site: should we vein graft the artery? A comparative study</title><author>Meland, N B ; Core, G B ; Hoverman, V R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-39b85f632481d112c389a1f4064d3f8dc875b2fc7512cde04abdc7e9117ab39c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Blood Gas Monitoring, Transcutaneous</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Body Temperature</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fingers - blood supply</topic><topic>Fingers - physiology</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Forearm - blood supply</topic><topic>Forearm - physiology</topic><topic>Forearm - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radial Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Regional Blood Flow</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Veins - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meland, N B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Core, G B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoverman, V R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meland, N B</au><au>Core, G B</au><au>Hoverman, V R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The radial forearm flap donor site: should we vein graft the artery? A comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>1993-04-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>865</spage><epage>870</epage><pages>865-870</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><abstract>Controversy exists in the literature regarding reconstruction of the radial artery after elevation of the radial forearm flap. The literature suggests that reconstructing the radial artery with a vein graft is an important aspect in the use of this flap. In our experience, this has never been performed with no sequela. We examined 13 consecutive patients who underwent radial forearm flaps for head and neck reconstruction over a 28-month period. The patients were examined and questioned about the function of their upper extremities in hope of evaluating the postoperative vascular status in each. Median follow-up was 6 months, with a range of 1 month to 24 months. No patient had preexisting trauma or congenital abnormality of either arm, so that the nondonor arm could be considered as a control for each patient. Evaluation consisted of history and physical examination. The following parameters in each patient were carefully accumulated: grip strength, cutaneous blood flow measured by using a laser Doppler flowmeter, transcutaneous oxygen levels, digital/brachial blood pressure ratios, cutaneous temperature from thumb/index and thumb/small pinch, and rapid rewarming at 1-minute and 5-minute intervals after cold immersion for 2 minutes. The radial forearm flap was elevated in each patient in the nondominant extremity. Grip strengths ranged from 19 to 77 kg, with a median of 30 kg. Early rewarming of the thumb/index was also an average of 1.5 degrees less than the temperature in the control arm and was statistically significant to (p = .01).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>8460190</pmid><doi>10.1097/00006534-199304001-00019</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 1993-04, Vol.91 (5), p.865-870
issn 0032-1052
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75662977
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Blood Gas Monitoring, Transcutaneous
Blood Pressure
Body Temperature
Female
Fingers - blood supply
Fingers - physiology
Follow-Up Studies
Forearm - blood supply
Forearm - physiology
Forearm - surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Radial Artery - surgery
Regional Blood Flow
Surgical Flaps
Veins - surgery
title The radial forearm flap donor site: should we vein graft the artery? A comparative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T03%3A54%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20radial%20forearm%20flap%20donor%20site:%20should%20we%20vein%20graft%20the%20artery?%20A%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Meland,%20N%20B&rft.date=1993-04-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=865&rft.epage=870&rft.pages=865-870&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00006534-199304001-00019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75662977%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75662977&rft_id=info:pmid/8460190&rfr_iscdi=true