Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale
ABSTRACT The Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) was developed to provide clinical information on four hypothesized functions that may control problem behaviour in persons with developmental disabilities. The original four‐factor structure of the MAS was based on face validity, with the items being gr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of intellectual disability research 1993-02, Vol.37 (1), p.65-74 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 74 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 65 |
container_title | Journal of intellectual disability research |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | SINGH, N. N. DONATELLI, L. S. BEST, A. WILLIAMS, D. E. BARRERA, F. J. LENZ, M. W. LANDRUM, T. J. ELLIS, C. R. MOE, T. L. |
description | ABSTRACT
The Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) was developed to provide clinical information on four hypothesized functions that may control problem behaviour in persons with developmental disabilities. The original four‐factor structure of the MAS was based on face validity, with the items being grouped in terms of each of the hypothesized functions. Validation of the scale was provided in terms of correlations between teacher ratings of eight children on the MAS and ranking of the controlling variables from functional analogue tests. In this study, staff in residential facilities rated 60 residents and teachers in schools rated 96 students on the MAS. The target behaviour rated for both samples was self‐injury, with the institutional sample engaging in the behaviour more than 15 times an hour and the school sample, less than 15 times an hour. The results of factor analyses, with varimax rotation, provided a conceptually meaningful factor structure with the institutional sample, but not with the school sample. The 16 MAS items resolved into four factors that were conceptually related to four conditions that may maintain problem behaviour (i.e. sensory, escape, attention and tangible). The results suggested that the original MAS has a robust factor structure and may be clinically useful in predicting the controlling functions of problem behaviours, if the target behaviours occur at a rate no less than 15 responses per hour. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb00870.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75659585</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57785474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4665-684863c336922bbac229226b6686f990fb1705d50538e43f88ead099fb0ae34f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEFP2zAYhq1piJXCT5gUTdNuyezY_mwj7cAQ0CIGEjBxtBzX1lLSptgOlH-_RI16neaLLb3Pa39-EPpCcEH69X1ZEAo8L4WUBVGKFqnCWApcbD-gyT76iCZYActLoPQTOopxiTEGwuAQHUoGBIiYIHppbGpDFlPobOqCy1qfpT8u-9Wm-tWkul1nZzG6GFdunbIHaxp3jA68aaI7Gfcp-n158Xg-y2_urubnZze5ZdDPAJJJoJZSUGVZVcaWZX-ACkCCVwr7igjMFxxzKh2jXkpnFlgpX2HjKPN0ir7t7t2E9qVzMelVHa1rGrN2bRe14MAVl_yfIBdCciZYD57uQBvaGIPzehPqlQnvmmA9qNVLPfjTgz89qNWjWr3ty5_HV7pq5Rb76uiyz7-OuYm9Jh_M2tZxjzHAhGHosR877K1u3Pt_DKCv5_cwfDbf9euY3HbfN-FZg6CC66fbK_3zlt6T2exJP9K_78Ki6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57785474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>SINGH, N. N. ; DONATELLI, L. S. ; BEST, A. ; WILLIAMS, D. E. ; BARRERA, F. J. ; LENZ, M. W. ; LANDRUM, T. J. ; ELLIS, C. R. ; MOE, T. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>SINGH, N. N. ; DONATELLI, L. S. ; BEST, A. ; WILLIAMS, D. E. ; BARRERA, F. J. ; LENZ, M. W. ; LANDRUM, T. J. ; ELLIS, C. R. ; MOE, T. L.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
The Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) was developed to provide clinical information on four hypothesized functions that may control problem behaviour in persons with developmental disabilities. The original four‐factor structure of the MAS was based on face validity, with the items being grouped in terms of each of the hypothesized functions. Validation of the scale was provided in terms of correlations between teacher ratings of eight children on the MAS and ranking of the controlling variables from functional analogue tests. In this study, staff in residential facilities rated 60 residents and teachers in schools rated 96 students on the MAS. The target behaviour rated for both samples was self‐injury, with the institutional sample engaging in the behaviour more than 15 times an hour and the school sample, less than 15 times an hour. The results of factor analyses, with varimax rotation, provided a conceptually meaningful factor structure with the institutional sample, but not with the school sample. The 16 MAS items resolved into four factors that were conceptually related to four conditions that may maintain problem behaviour (i.e. sensory, escape, attention and tangible). The results suggested that the original MAS has a robust factor structure and may be clinically useful in predicting the controlling functions of problem behaviours, if the target behaviours occur at a rate no less than 15 responses per hour.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-2633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb00870.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8461617</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Challenging behaviour ; Factor structures ; Female ; Humans ; Institutionalization ; Intellectual Disability - complications ; Intellectual Disability - psychology ; Interviews as Topic ; Learning disabled people ; Learning Disorders - complications ; Learning Disorders - psychology ; Male ; Measures ; Medical sciences ; Motivation ; Motivation Assessment Scale ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Self-Injurious Behavior - diagnosis ; Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology ; Techniques and methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual disability research, 1993-02, Vol.37 (1), p.65-74</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4665-684863c336922bbac229226b6686f990fb1705d50538e43f88ead099fb0ae34f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4665-684863c336922bbac229226b6686f990fb1705d50538e43f88ead099fb0ae34f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30979</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4601406$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8461617$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SINGH, N. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DONATELLI, L. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BEST, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMS, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRERA, F. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LENZ, M. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDRUM, T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELLIS, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOE, T. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale</title><title>Journal of intellectual disability research</title><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
The Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) was developed to provide clinical information on four hypothesized functions that may control problem behaviour in persons with developmental disabilities. The original four‐factor structure of the MAS was based on face validity, with the items being grouped in terms of each of the hypothesized functions. Validation of the scale was provided in terms of correlations between teacher ratings of eight children on the MAS and ranking of the controlling variables from functional analogue tests. In this study, staff in residential facilities rated 60 residents and teachers in schools rated 96 students on the MAS. The target behaviour rated for both samples was self‐injury, with the institutional sample engaging in the behaviour more than 15 times an hour and the school sample, less than 15 times an hour. The results of factor analyses, with varimax rotation, provided a conceptually meaningful factor structure with the institutional sample, but not with the school sample. The 16 MAS items resolved into four factors that were conceptually related to four conditions that may maintain problem behaviour (i.e. sensory, escape, attention and tangible). The results suggested that the original MAS has a robust factor structure and may be clinically useful in predicting the controlling functions of problem behaviours, if the target behaviours occur at a rate no less than 15 responses per hour.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Challenging behaviour</subject><subject>Factor structures</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - complications</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - psychology</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Learning disabled people</subject><subject>Learning Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Learning Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Motivation Assessment Scale</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Self-Injurious Behavior - diagnosis</subject><subject>Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEFP2zAYhq1piJXCT5gUTdNuyezY_mwj7cAQ0CIGEjBxtBzX1lLSptgOlH-_RI16neaLLb3Pa39-EPpCcEH69X1ZEAo8L4WUBVGKFqnCWApcbD-gyT76iCZYActLoPQTOopxiTEGwuAQHUoGBIiYIHppbGpDFlPobOqCy1qfpT8u-9Wm-tWkul1nZzG6GFdunbIHaxp3jA68aaI7Gfcp-n158Xg-y2_urubnZze5ZdDPAJJJoJZSUGVZVcaWZX-ACkCCVwr7igjMFxxzKh2jXkpnFlgpX2HjKPN0ir7t7t2E9qVzMelVHa1rGrN2bRe14MAVl_yfIBdCciZYD57uQBvaGIPzehPqlQnvmmA9qNVLPfjTgz89qNWjWr3ty5_HV7pq5Rb76uiyz7-OuYm9Jh_M2tZxjzHAhGHosR877K1u3Pt_DKCv5_cwfDbf9euY3HbfN-FZg6CC66fbK_3zlt6T2exJP9K_78Ki6w</recordid><startdate>199302</startdate><enddate>199302</enddate><creator>SINGH, N. N.</creator><creator>DONATELLI, L. S.</creator><creator>BEST, A.</creator><creator>WILLIAMS, D. E.</creator><creator>BARRERA, F. J.</creator><creator>LENZ, M. W.</creator><creator>LANDRUM, T. J.</creator><creator>ELLIS, C. R.</creator><creator>MOE, T. L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199302</creationdate><title>Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale</title><author>SINGH, N. N. ; DONATELLI, L. S. ; BEST, A. ; WILLIAMS, D. E. ; BARRERA, F. J. ; LENZ, M. W. ; LANDRUM, T. J. ; ELLIS, C. R. ; MOE, T. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4665-684863c336922bbac229226b6686f990fb1705d50538e43f88ead099fb0ae34f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Challenging behaviour</topic><topic>Factor structures</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - complications</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - psychology</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Learning disabled people</topic><topic>Learning Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Learning Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Motivation Assessment Scale</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Self-Injurious Behavior - diagnosis</topic><topic>Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SINGH, N. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DONATELLI, L. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BEST, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMS, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRERA, F. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LENZ, M. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDRUM, T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELLIS, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOE, T. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SINGH, N. N.</au><au>DONATELLI, L. S.</au><au>BEST, A.</au><au>WILLIAMS, D. E.</au><au>BARRERA, F. J.</au><au>LENZ, M. W.</au><au>LANDRUM, T. J.</au><au>ELLIS, C. R.</au><au>MOE, T. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><date>1993-02</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>65-74</pages><issn>0964-2633</issn><eissn>1365-2788</eissn><coden>JIDREN</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
The Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) was developed to provide clinical information on four hypothesized functions that may control problem behaviour in persons with developmental disabilities. The original four‐factor structure of the MAS was based on face validity, with the items being grouped in terms of each of the hypothesized functions. Validation of the scale was provided in terms of correlations between teacher ratings of eight children on the MAS and ranking of the controlling variables from functional analogue tests. In this study, staff in residential facilities rated 60 residents and teachers in schools rated 96 students on the MAS. The target behaviour rated for both samples was self‐injury, with the institutional sample engaging in the behaviour more than 15 times an hour and the school sample, less than 15 times an hour. The results of factor analyses, with varimax rotation, provided a conceptually meaningful factor structure with the institutional sample, but not with the school sample. The 16 MAS items resolved into four factors that were conceptually related to four conditions that may maintain problem behaviour (i.e. sensory, escape, attention and tangible). The results suggested that the original MAS has a robust factor structure and may be clinically useful in predicting the controlling functions of problem behaviours, if the target behaviours occur at a rate no less than 15 responses per hour.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>8461617</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb00870.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-2633 |
ispartof | Journal of intellectual disability research, 1993-02, Vol.37 (1), p.65-74 |
issn | 0964-2633 1365-2788 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75659585 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Education Source |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Challenging behaviour Factor structures Female Humans Institutionalization Intellectual Disability - complications Intellectual Disability - psychology Interviews as Topic Learning disabled people Learning Disorders - complications Learning Disorders - psychology Male Measures Medical sciences Motivation Motivation Assessment Scale Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Self-Injurious Behavior - diagnosis Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology Techniques and methods |
title | Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A10%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factor%20structure%20of%20the%20Motivation%20Assessment%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20disability%20research&rft.au=SINGH,%20N.%20N.&rft.date=1993-02&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=65-74&rft.issn=0964-2633&rft.eissn=1365-2788&rft.coden=JIDREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb00870.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57785474%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57785474&rft_id=info:pmid/8461617&rfr_iscdi=true |