The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty
Thirty-five patients treated for 37 cases of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty were analyzed. All augmentations were performed with silicone gel prostheses at a mean age of 38 years (range 24 to 59 years). The mean interval from breast augmentation to the detection of breast cancer was 7....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 1993-04, Vol.91 (5), p.837-840 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 840 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 837 |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | CARLSON, G. W CURLEY, S. A MARTIN, J. E FORNAGE, B. D AMES, F. C |
description | Thirty-five patients treated for 37 cases of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty were analyzed. All augmentations were performed with silicone gel prostheses at a mean age of 38 years (range 24 to 59 years). The mean interval from breast augmentation to the detection of breast cancer was 7.5 years. Physical examination demonstrated a palpable breast mass in 35 of the 37 cases (95 percent). The pathologic staging was in situ 3 (8 percent), local 18 (49 percent), and nonlocal 16 (43 percent). Standard compression mammography was performed in 31 patients prior to breast biopsy. Abnormalities were detected in 17 (54.8 percent). Palpable masses were visualized in only 12 (38.7 percent). Ultrasound was utilized successfully in 3 patients with palpable masses to guide fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Standard two-view mammography has a low sensitivity in detecting palpable cancers in patients who have undergone augmentation mammaplasty. Ultrasound should be evaluated as a routine adjunctive screening method in this group of patients. The clinical detection of breast cancer, as evidenced by pathologic staging, is not delayed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00006534-199304001-00014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75652977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75652977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-98ba94da865c8d7deb8c1db0a4829022d2f5072acb8a1abe584480dbc52a86f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLlOAzEQhi0ECiHwCEhbILoFn2u7oECIS4pEE2prfCws2iPYmyJvj5MsmcIjeb5_LH8IFQTfEazlPc5VCcZLojXDHGNS5hvCT9CcCKpLTjk9RXOMGS0JFvQcXaT0kwnJKjFDM8UrTFQ1Rw-r71D4MAY3NkNfDHVhY4A0Fg56F2IB9bg7N19d6EfYMx10HazbDG0v0VkNbQpXU1-gz5fn1dNbufx4fX96XJaOMT2WWlnQ3IOqhFNe-mCVI95i4IpqTKmntcCSgrMKCNggFOcKe-sEzZm6Ygt0e9i7jsPvJqTRdE1yoW2hD8MmGSmq_GspM6gOoItDSjHUZh2bDuLWEGx25sy_OXM0Z_bmcvR6emNju-CPwUlVnt9Mc0gO2jpmQU06YlwSxQVlf0O3dcc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75652977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>CARLSON, G. W ; CURLEY, S. A ; MARTIN, J. E ; FORNAGE, B. D ; AMES, F. C</creator><creatorcontrib>CARLSON, G. W ; CURLEY, S. A ; MARTIN, J. E ; FORNAGE, B. D ; AMES, F. C</creatorcontrib><description>Thirty-five patients treated for 37 cases of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty were analyzed. All augmentations were performed with silicone gel prostheses at a mean age of 38 years (range 24 to 59 years). The mean interval from breast augmentation to the detection of breast cancer was 7.5 years. Physical examination demonstrated a palpable breast mass in 35 of the 37 cases (95 percent). The pathologic staging was in situ 3 (8 percent), local 18 (49 percent), and nonlocal 16 (43 percent). Standard compression mammography was performed in 31 patients prior to breast biopsy. Abnormalities were detected in 17 (54.8 percent). Palpable masses were visualized in only 12 (38.7 percent). Ultrasound was utilized successfully in 3 patients with palpable masses to guide fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Standard two-view mammography has a low sensitivity in detecting palpable cancers in patients who have undergone augmentation mammaplasty. Ultrasound should be evaluated as a routine adjunctive screening method in this group of patients. The clinical detection of breast cancer, as evidenced by pathologic staging, is not delayed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199304001-00014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8460186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - mortality ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Mammaplasty ; Mammary gland diseases ; Mammography ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Prostheses and Implants ; Silicone Elastomers ; Survival Analysis ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 1993-04, Vol.91 (5), p.837-840</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-98ba94da865c8d7deb8c1db0a4829022d2f5072acb8a1abe584480dbc52a86f63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4718452$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8460186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CARLSON, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CURLEY, S. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARTIN, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORNAGE, B. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMES, F. C</creatorcontrib><title>The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Thirty-five patients treated for 37 cases of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty were analyzed. All augmentations were performed with silicone gel prostheses at a mean age of 38 years (range 24 to 59 years). The mean interval from breast augmentation to the detection of breast cancer was 7.5 years. Physical examination demonstrated a palpable breast mass in 35 of the 37 cases (95 percent). The pathologic staging was in situ 3 (8 percent), local 18 (49 percent), and nonlocal 16 (43 percent). Standard compression mammography was performed in 31 patients prior to breast biopsy. Abnormalities were detected in 17 (54.8 percent). Palpable masses were visualized in only 12 (38.7 percent). Ultrasound was utilized successfully in 3 patients with palpable masses to guide fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Standard two-view mammography has a low sensitivity in detecting palpable cancers in patients who have undergone augmentation mammaplasty. Ultrasound should be evaluated as a routine adjunctive screening method in this group of patients. The clinical detection of breast cancer, as evidenced by pathologic staging, is not delayed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Silicone Elastomers</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kLlOAzEQhi0ECiHwCEhbILoFn2u7oECIS4pEE2prfCws2iPYmyJvj5MsmcIjeb5_LH8IFQTfEazlPc5VCcZLojXDHGNS5hvCT9CcCKpLTjk9RXOMGS0JFvQcXaT0kwnJKjFDM8UrTFQ1Rw-r71D4MAY3NkNfDHVhY4A0Fg56F2IB9bg7N19d6EfYMx10HazbDG0v0VkNbQpXU1-gz5fn1dNbufx4fX96XJaOMT2WWlnQ3IOqhFNe-mCVI95i4IpqTKmntcCSgrMKCNggFOcKe-sEzZm6Ygt0e9i7jsPvJqTRdE1yoW2hD8MmGSmq_GspM6gOoItDSjHUZh2bDuLWEGx25sy_OXM0Z_bmcvR6emNju-CPwUlVnt9Mc0gO2jpmQU06YlwSxQVlf0O3dcc</recordid><startdate>19930401</startdate><enddate>19930401</enddate><creator>CARLSON, G. W</creator><creator>CURLEY, S. A</creator><creator>MARTIN, J. E</creator><creator>FORNAGE, B. D</creator><creator>AMES, F. C</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930401</creationdate><title>The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty</title><author>CARLSON, G. W ; CURLEY, S. A ; MARTIN, J. E ; FORNAGE, B. D ; AMES, F. C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-98ba94da865c8d7deb8c1db0a4829022d2f5072acb8a1abe584480dbc52a86f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Silicone Elastomers</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CARLSON, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CURLEY, S. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARTIN, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORNAGE, B. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMES, F. C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CARLSON, G. W</au><au>CURLEY, S. A</au><au>MARTIN, J. E</au><au>FORNAGE, B. D</au><au>AMES, F. C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>1993-04-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>837</spage><epage>840</epage><pages>837-840</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Thirty-five patients treated for 37 cases of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty were analyzed. All augmentations were performed with silicone gel prostheses at a mean age of 38 years (range 24 to 59 years). The mean interval from breast augmentation to the detection of breast cancer was 7.5 years. Physical examination demonstrated a palpable breast mass in 35 of the 37 cases (95 percent). The pathologic staging was in situ 3 (8 percent), local 18 (49 percent), and nonlocal 16 (43 percent). Standard compression mammography was performed in 31 patients prior to breast biopsy. Abnormalities were detected in 17 (54.8 percent). Palpable masses were visualized in only 12 (38.7 percent). Ultrasound was utilized successfully in 3 patients with palpable masses to guide fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Standard two-view mammography has a low sensitivity in detecting palpable cancers in patients who have undergone augmentation mammaplasty. Ultrasound should be evaluated as a routine adjunctive screening method in this group of patients. The clinical detection of breast cancer, as evidenced by pathologic staging, is not delayed.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>8460186</pmid><doi>10.1097/00006534-199304001-00014</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-1052 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 1993-04, Vol.91 (5), p.837-840 |
issn | 0032-1052 1529-4242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75652977 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Breast Neoplasms - mortality Breast Neoplasms - surgery Female Follow-Up Studies Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Mammaplasty Mammary gland diseases Mammography Medical sciences Middle Aged Postoperative Complications - diagnosis Postoperative Complications - mortality Postoperative Complications - surgery Prostheses and Implants Silicone Elastomers Survival Analysis Tumors |
title | The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A03%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20detection%20of%20breast%20cancer%20after%20augmentation%20mammaplasty&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=CARLSON,%20G.%20W&rft.date=1993-04-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=837&rft.epage=840&rft.pages=837-840&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00006534-199304001-00014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75652977%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75652977&rft_id=info:pmid/8460186&rfr_iscdi=true |