The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty

Thirty-five patients treated for 37 cases of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty were analyzed. All augmentations were performed with silicone gel prostheses at a mean age of 38 years (range 24 to 59 years). The mean interval from breast augmentation to the detection of breast cancer was 7....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 1993-04, Vol.91 (5), p.837-840
Hauptverfasser: CARLSON, G. W, CURLEY, S. A, MARTIN, J. E, FORNAGE, B. D, AMES, F. C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 840
container_issue 5
container_start_page 837
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 91
creator CARLSON, G. W
CURLEY, S. A
MARTIN, J. E
FORNAGE, B. D
AMES, F. C
description Thirty-five patients treated for 37 cases of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty were analyzed. All augmentations were performed with silicone gel prostheses at a mean age of 38 years (range 24 to 59 years). The mean interval from breast augmentation to the detection of breast cancer was 7.5 years. Physical examination demonstrated a palpable breast mass in 35 of the 37 cases (95 percent). The pathologic staging was in situ 3 (8 percent), local 18 (49 percent), and nonlocal 16 (43 percent). Standard compression mammography was performed in 31 patients prior to breast biopsy. Abnormalities were detected in 17 (54.8 percent). Palpable masses were visualized in only 12 (38.7 percent). Ultrasound was utilized successfully in 3 patients with palpable masses to guide fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Standard two-view mammography has a low sensitivity in detecting palpable cancers in patients who have undergone augmentation mammaplasty. Ultrasound should be evaluated as a routine adjunctive screening method in this group of patients. The clinical detection of breast cancer, as evidenced by pathologic staging, is not delayed.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00006534-199304001-00014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75652977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75652977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-98ba94da865c8d7deb8c1db0a4829022d2f5072acb8a1abe584480dbc52a86f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLlOAzEQhi0ECiHwCEhbILoFn2u7oECIS4pEE2prfCws2iPYmyJvj5MsmcIjeb5_LH8IFQTfEazlPc5VCcZLojXDHGNS5hvCT9CcCKpLTjk9RXOMGS0JFvQcXaT0kwnJKjFDM8UrTFQ1Rw-r71D4MAY3NkNfDHVhY4A0Fg56F2IB9bg7N19d6EfYMx10HazbDG0v0VkNbQpXU1-gz5fn1dNbufx4fX96XJaOMT2WWlnQ3IOqhFNe-mCVI95i4IpqTKmntcCSgrMKCNggFOcKe-sEzZm6Ygt0e9i7jsPvJqTRdE1yoW2hD8MmGSmq_GspM6gOoItDSjHUZh2bDuLWEGx25sy_OXM0Z_bmcvR6emNju-CPwUlVnt9Mc0gO2jpmQU06YlwSxQVlf0O3dcc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75652977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>CARLSON, G. W ; CURLEY, S. A ; MARTIN, J. E ; FORNAGE, B. D ; AMES, F. C</creator><creatorcontrib>CARLSON, G. W ; CURLEY, S. A ; MARTIN, J. E ; FORNAGE, B. D ; AMES, F. C</creatorcontrib><description>Thirty-five patients treated for 37 cases of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty were analyzed. All augmentations were performed with silicone gel prostheses at a mean age of 38 years (range 24 to 59 years). The mean interval from breast augmentation to the detection of breast cancer was 7.5 years. Physical examination demonstrated a palpable breast mass in 35 of the 37 cases (95 percent). The pathologic staging was in situ 3 (8 percent), local 18 (49 percent), and nonlocal 16 (43 percent). Standard compression mammography was performed in 31 patients prior to breast biopsy. Abnormalities were detected in 17 (54.8 percent). Palpable masses were visualized in only 12 (38.7 percent). Ultrasound was utilized successfully in 3 patients with palpable masses to guide fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Standard two-view mammography has a low sensitivity in detecting palpable cancers in patients who have undergone augmentation mammaplasty. Ultrasound should be evaluated as a routine adjunctive screening method in this group of patients. The clinical detection of breast cancer, as evidenced by pathologic staging, is not delayed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199304001-00014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8460186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - mortality ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Mammaplasty ; Mammary gland diseases ; Mammography ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Prostheses and Implants ; Silicone Elastomers ; Survival Analysis ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 1993-04, Vol.91 (5), p.837-840</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-98ba94da865c8d7deb8c1db0a4829022d2f5072acb8a1abe584480dbc52a86f63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4718452$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8460186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CARLSON, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CURLEY, S. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARTIN, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORNAGE, B. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMES, F. C</creatorcontrib><title>The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Thirty-five patients treated for 37 cases of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty were analyzed. All augmentations were performed with silicone gel prostheses at a mean age of 38 years (range 24 to 59 years). The mean interval from breast augmentation to the detection of breast cancer was 7.5 years. Physical examination demonstrated a palpable breast mass in 35 of the 37 cases (95 percent). The pathologic staging was in situ 3 (8 percent), local 18 (49 percent), and nonlocal 16 (43 percent). Standard compression mammography was performed in 31 patients prior to breast biopsy. Abnormalities were detected in 17 (54.8 percent). Palpable masses were visualized in only 12 (38.7 percent). Ultrasound was utilized successfully in 3 patients with palpable masses to guide fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Standard two-view mammography has a low sensitivity in detecting palpable cancers in patients who have undergone augmentation mammaplasty. Ultrasound should be evaluated as a routine adjunctive screening method in this group of patients. The clinical detection of breast cancer, as evidenced by pathologic staging, is not delayed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Silicone Elastomers</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kLlOAzEQhi0ECiHwCEhbILoFn2u7oECIS4pEE2prfCws2iPYmyJvj5MsmcIjeb5_LH8IFQTfEazlPc5VCcZLojXDHGNS5hvCT9CcCKpLTjk9RXOMGS0JFvQcXaT0kwnJKjFDM8UrTFQ1Rw-r71D4MAY3NkNfDHVhY4A0Fg56F2IB9bg7N19d6EfYMx10HazbDG0v0VkNbQpXU1-gz5fn1dNbufx4fX96XJaOMT2WWlnQ3IOqhFNe-mCVI95i4IpqTKmntcCSgrMKCNggFOcKe-sEzZm6Ygt0e9i7jsPvJqTRdE1yoW2hD8MmGSmq_GspM6gOoItDSjHUZh2bDuLWEGx25sy_OXM0Z_bmcvR6emNju-CPwUlVnt9Mc0gO2jpmQU06YlwSxQVlf0O3dcc</recordid><startdate>19930401</startdate><enddate>19930401</enddate><creator>CARLSON, G. W</creator><creator>CURLEY, S. A</creator><creator>MARTIN, J. E</creator><creator>FORNAGE, B. D</creator><creator>AMES, F. C</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930401</creationdate><title>The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty</title><author>CARLSON, G. W ; CURLEY, S. A ; MARTIN, J. E ; FORNAGE, B. D ; AMES, F. C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-98ba94da865c8d7deb8c1db0a4829022d2f5072acb8a1abe584480dbc52a86f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Silicone Elastomers</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CARLSON, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CURLEY, S. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARTIN, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORNAGE, B. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMES, F. C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CARLSON, G. W</au><au>CURLEY, S. A</au><au>MARTIN, J. E</au><au>FORNAGE, B. D</au><au>AMES, F. C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>1993-04-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>837</spage><epage>840</epage><pages>837-840</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Thirty-five patients treated for 37 cases of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty were analyzed. All augmentations were performed with silicone gel prostheses at a mean age of 38 years (range 24 to 59 years). The mean interval from breast augmentation to the detection of breast cancer was 7.5 years. Physical examination demonstrated a palpable breast mass in 35 of the 37 cases (95 percent). The pathologic staging was in situ 3 (8 percent), local 18 (49 percent), and nonlocal 16 (43 percent). Standard compression mammography was performed in 31 patients prior to breast biopsy. Abnormalities were detected in 17 (54.8 percent). Palpable masses were visualized in only 12 (38.7 percent). Ultrasound was utilized successfully in 3 patients with palpable masses to guide fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Standard two-view mammography has a low sensitivity in detecting palpable cancers in patients who have undergone augmentation mammaplasty. Ultrasound should be evaluated as a routine adjunctive screening method in this group of patients. The clinical detection of breast cancer, as evidenced by pathologic staging, is not delayed.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>8460186</pmid><doi>10.1097/00006534-199304001-00014</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 1993-04, Vol.91 (5), p.837-840
issn 0032-1052
1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75652977
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - mortality
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Mammaplasty
Mammary gland diseases
Mammography
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - diagnosis
Postoperative Complications - mortality
Postoperative Complications - surgery
Prostheses and Implants
Silicone Elastomers
Survival Analysis
Tumors
title The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A03%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20detection%20of%20breast%20cancer%20after%20augmentation%20mammaplasty&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=CARLSON,%20G.%20W&rft.date=1993-04-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=837&rft.epage=840&rft.pages=837-840&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00006534-199304001-00014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75652977%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75652977&rft_id=info:pmid/8460186&rfr_iscdi=true