Chest “gestalt” and detectability of lung lesions
Image perception in chest radiography is thought to occur on two levels, (a) a fast global response based on learned templates (“gestalt”) and, (b) a slower systematic scan process. The relative importance of “gestalt” on the detection of nodular lung cancers was studied by disturbing the “gestalt”...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 1993-02, Vol.16 (2), p.154-157 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 157 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 154 |
container_title | European journal of radiology |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Oestmann, Joerg W. Greene, Reginald Bourgouin, Pierre M. Linetsky, Lidia Llewellyn, Henry J. |
description | Image perception in chest radiography is thought to occur on two levels, (a) a fast global response based on learned templates (“gestalt”) and, (b) a slower systematic scan process. The relative importance of “gestalt” on the detection of nodular lung cancers was studied by disturbing the “gestalt” through rotation of the radiograph but not actually diminishing the image content available for viewing. Sixty chest radiographs (20 normals, 21 with subtle lung cancers, 19 with obvious lung cancers) were presented to three readers in normal and abnormal (rotated randomly in 90 degree increments) orientation for varying durations (0.25 s, 1 s, 4 s and unlimited viewing time). The results indicate that the detectability of obvious and subtle lung lesions was degraded by the disturbed “gestalt” for both short and long viewing times. The readers did not significantly increase their unlimited viewing time when faced with rotated images (4.4 ± 3.4 s) as opposed to non-rotated images (4.0 ± 3.2 s). We conclude that the detection of lung lesions relies heavily on the chest “gestalt” and that systematic scanning cannot fully compensate for an impaired global response due to a disturbed “gestalt”. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0720-048X(93)90015-F |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75645725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0720048X9390015F</els_id><sourcerecordid>16659009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-b9527f524654e11cde05718d89dc65e62c4594a34e1f991492cd41949a48cda93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KAzEUhYMotVbfQGEWIroYTTL53QhSrAqCGwV3IU0yNTKdqZMZobs-iL5cn8SMHbrU1V2c7x4OHwDHCF4iiNgV5BimkIjXc5ldSAgRTSc7YIgExynnmO-C4RbZBwchvEMIKZF4AAaCMEwFHgI6fnOhSdarr1m8umjWq-9ElzaxrnGm0VNf-GaZVHlStOUsKVzwVRkOwV6ui-CO-jsCL5Pb5_F9-vh09zC-eUwNYaJJp5JinlNMGCUOIWMdpBwJK6Q1jDqGDaGS6CyGuZQoTjOWIEmkJsJYLbMRONv0Lurqo40D1dwH44pCl65qg-KUEcox_RdEjNGoqGskG9DUVQi1y9Wi9nNdLxWCqtOqOmeqc6Zkpn61qkl8O-n72-nc2e1T7zHmp32ug9FFXuvS-LDFiEBQoixi1xvMRWmf3tUqGO9K46yvo21lK__3jh-uX5O8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16659009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chest “gestalt” and detectability of lung lesions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Oestmann, Joerg W. ; Greene, Reginald ; Bourgouin, Pierre M. ; Linetsky, Lidia ; Llewellyn, Henry J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oestmann, Joerg W. ; Greene, Reginald ; Bourgouin, Pierre M. ; Linetsky, Lidia ; Llewellyn, Henry J.</creatorcontrib><description>Image perception in chest radiography is thought to occur on two levels, (a) a fast global response based on learned templates (“gestalt”) and, (b) a slower systematic scan process. The relative importance of “gestalt” on the detection of nodular lung cancers was studied by disturbing the “gestalt” through rotation of the radiograph but not actually diminishing the image content available for viewing. Sixty chest radiographs (20 normals, 21 with subtle lung cancers, 19 with obvious lung cancers) were presented to three readers in normal and abnormal (rotated randomly in 90 degree increments) orientation for varying durations (0.25 s, 1 s, 4 s and unlimited viewing time). The results indicate that the detectability of obvious and subtle lung lesions was degraded by the disturbed “gestalt” for both short and long viewing times. The readers did not significantly increase their unlimited viewing time when faced with rotated images (4.4 ± 3.4 s) as opposed to non-rotated images (4.0 ± 3.2 s). We conclude that the detection of lung lesions relies heavily on the chest “gestalt” and that systematic scanning cannot fully compensate for an impaired global response due to a disturbed “gestalt”.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0720-048X(93)90015-F</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8462582</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJRADR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Medical sciences ; Observer Variation ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Radiography ; Respiratory system ; ROC Curve ; Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnostic imaging ; Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - epidemiology ; Thorax, perception ; Thorax, radiography ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 1993-02, Vol.16 (2), p.154-157</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-b9527f524654e11cde05718d89dc65e62c4594a34e1f991492cd41949a48cda93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-b9527f524654e11cde05718d89dc65e62c4594a34e1f991492cd41949a48cda93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0720-048X(93)90015-F$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4810913$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8462582$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oestmann, Joerg W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Reginald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourgouin, Pierre M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linetsky, Lidia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llewellyn, Henry J.</creatorcontrib><title>Chest “gestalt” and detectability of lung lesions</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>Image perception in chest radiography is thought to occur on two levels, (a) a fast global response based on learned templates (“gestalt”) and, (b) a slower systematic scan process. The relative importance of “gestalt” on the detection of nodular lung cancers was studied by disturbing the “gestalt” through rotation of the radiograph but not actually diminishing the image content available for viewing. Sixty chest radiographs (20 normals, 21 with subtle lung cancers, 19 with obvious lung cancers) were presented to three readers in normal and abnormal (rotated randomly in 90 degree increments) orientation for varying durations (0.25 s, 1 s, 4 s and unlimited viewing time). The results indicate that the detectability of obvious and subtle lung lesions was degraded by the disturbed “gestalt” for both short and long viewing times. The readers did not significantly increase their unlimited viewing time when faced with rotated images (4.4 ± 3.4 s) as opposed to non-rotated images (4.0 ± 3.2 s). We conclude that the detection of lung lesions relies heavily on the chest “gestalt” and that systematic scanning cannot fully compensate for an impaired global response due to a disturbed “gestalt”.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Respiratory system</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - epidemiology</subject><subject>Thorax, perception</subject><subject>Thorax, radiography</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1KAzEUhYMotVbfQGEWIroYTTL53QhSrAqCGwV3IU0yNTKdqZMZobs-iL5cn8SMHbrU1V2c7x4OHwDHCF4iiNgV5BimkIjXc5ldSAgRTSc7YIgExynnmO-C4RbZBwchvEMIKZF4AAaCMEwFHgI6fnOhSdarr1m8umjWq-9ElzaxrnGm0VNf-GaZVHlStOUsKVzwVRkOwV6ui-CO-jsCL5Pb5_F9-vh09zC-eUwNYaJJp5JinlNMGCUOIWMdpBwJK6Q1jDqGDaGS6CyGuZQoTjOWIEmkJsJYLbMRONv0Lurqo40D1dwH44pCl65qg-KUEcox_RdEjNGoqGskG9DUVQi1y9Wi9nNdLxWCqtOqOmeqc6Zkpn61qkl8O-n72-nc2e1T7zHmp32ug9FFXuvS-LDFiEBQoixi1xvMRWmf3tUqGO9K46yvo21lK__3jh-uX5O8</recordid><startdate>19930201</startdate><enddate>19930201</enddate><creator>Oestmann, Joerg W.</creator><creator>Greene, Reginald</creator><creator>Bourgouin, Pierre M.</creator><creator>Linetsky, Lidia</creator><creator>Llewellyn, Henry J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930201</creationdate><title>Chest “gestalt” and detectability of lung lesions</title><author>Oestmann, Joerg W. ; Greene, Reginald ; Bourgouin, Pierre M. ; Linetsky, Lidia ; Llewellyn, Henry J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-b9527f524654e11cde05718d89dc65e62c4594a34e1f991492cd41949a48cda93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Respiratory system</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - epidemiology</topic><topic>Thorax, perception</topic><topic>Thorax, radiography</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oestmann, Joerg W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Reginald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourgouin, Pierre M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linetsky, Lidia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llewellyn, Henry J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oestmann, Joerg W.</au><au>Greene, Reginald</au><au>Bourgouin, Pierre M.</au><au>Linetsky, Lidia</au><au>Llewellyn, Henry J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chest “gestalt” and detectability of lung lesions</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>1993-02-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>154</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>154-157</pages><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><coden>EJRADR</coden><abstract>Image perception in chest radiography is thought to occur on two levels, (a) a fast global response based on learned templates (“gestalt”) and, (b) a slower systematic scan process. The relative importance of “gestalt” on the detection of nodular lung cancers was studied by disturbing the “gestalt” through rotation of the radiograph but not actually diminishing the image content available for viewing. Sixty chest radiographs (20 normals, 21 with subtle lung cancers, 19 with obvious lung cancers) were presented to three readers in normal and abnormal (rotated randomly in 90 degree increments) orientation for varying durations (0.25 s, 1 s, 4 s and unlimited viewing time). The results indicate that the detectability of obvious and subtle lung lesions was degraded by the disturbed “gestalt” for both short and long viewing times. The readers did not significantly increase their unlimited viewing time when faced with rotated images (4.4 ± 3.4 s) as opposed to non-rotated images (4.0 ± 3.2 s). We conclude that the detection of lung lesions relies heavily on the chest “gestalt” and that systematic scanning cannot fully compensate for an impaired global response due to a disturbed “gestalt”.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>8462582</pmid><doi>10.1016/0720-048X(93)90015-F</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-048X |
ispartof | European journal of radiology, 1993-02, Vol.16 (2), p.154-157 |
issn | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75645725 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Lung - diagnostic imaging Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology Medical sciences Observer Variation Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Radiography Respiratory system ROC Curve Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnostic imaging Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - epidemiology Thorax, perception Thorax, radiography Time Factors |
title | Chest “gestalt” and detectability of lung lesions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T01%3A12%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chest%20%E2%80%9Cgestalt%E2%80%9D%20and%20detectability%20of%20lung%20lesions&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Oestmann,%20Joerg%20W.&rft.date=1993-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=154&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=154-157&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft.coden=EJRADR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0720-048X(93)90015-F&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16659009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16659009&rft_id=info:pmid/8462582&rft_els_id=0720048X9390015F&rfr_iscdi=true |