Fissure sealing with Nuva-seal and Alphaseal: two-year data

A double-blind study with Nuva-seal and Alphaseal in contralateral quaurants of the same mouths obtained complete retention rates for Nuva-seal of 94·5 per cent of 293 sealed sites at 1 year and 83·1 per cent of 225 sites by 2 years. The corresponding Alphaseal data was poorer at 89·9 per cent and 7...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dentistry 1981-03, Vol.9 (1), p.53-57
Hauptverfasser: Stephen, K.W., Kirkwood, M., Campbell, D., Young, K.C., Gillespie, F.C., Boyle, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 57
container_issue 1
container_start_page 53
container_title Journal of dentistry
container_volume 9
creator Stephen, K.W.
Kirkwood, M.
Campbell, D.
Young, K.C.
Gillespie, F.C.
Boyle, P.
description A double-blind study with Nuva-seal and Alphaseal in contralateral quaurants of the same mouths obtained complete retention rates for Nuva-seal of 94·5 per cent of 293 sealed sites at 1 year and 83·1 per cent of 225 sites by 2 years. The corresponding Alphaseal data was poorer at 89·9 per cent and 78·7 per cent respectively. Only 1 sealed surface (0·2 per cent) was carious at 2 years. Nuva-seal first permanent molar retention was also superior to that of Alphaseal, 93·5 per cent compared to 85·6 per cent at 1 year, and 81·1 per cent compared to 70·1 per cent at 2 years. However, retention in these teeth for 6- to 7-year-old children was inferior to that of 8- to 11-year-old children for both sealants although only the Alphaseal data was significant. This material also had a significantly greater loss rate than Nuva-seal at 6 months and 18 months in 6- to 7-year-old children. The use of Nuva-seal with adequate attention to clinical detail and monitoring of UV sources can thus provide substantial clinical benefit in first permanent molars.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0300-5712(81)90035-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75645457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>030057128190035X</els_id><sourcerecordid>75645457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-c310097b541f0d69ee48eb808e6e1bb6cb7810279996dc65b5ffb5ed66b806263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRaq3-A4WcRA_R2SS7m1UQSrEqFL0o9LZsNhO7kiZ1N2npvzexxaOnYWbee8N8hJxTuKFA-S3EACETNLpK6bUEiFk4PyBDmgoZUsHnh2T4JzkmJ95_AUACkRyQAU9YTBM6JPdT633rMPCoS1t9BhvbLILXdq3DfhLoKg_G5Wqh--4uaDZ1uEXtglw3-pQcFbr0eLavI_IxfXyfPIezt6eXyXgWmkhETWhiCiBFxhJaQM4lYpJilkKKHGmWcZOJlEIkpJQ8N5xlrCgyhjnnnYhHPB6Ry13uytXfLfpGLa03WJa6wrr1SrDunYSJTpjshMbV3jss1MrZpXZbRUH1zFQPRPVAVErVLzM172wX-_w2W2L-Z9pD6vYPuz12T64tOuWNxcpgbh2aRuW1_f_ADy05edA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75645457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fissure sealing with Nuva-seal and Alphaseal: two-year data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect</source><creator>Stephen, K.W. ; Kirkwood, M. ; Campbell, D. ; Young, K.C. ; Gillespie, F.C. ; Boyle, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stephen, K.W. ; Kirkwood, M. ; Campbell, D. ; Young, K.C. ; Gillespie, F.C. ; Boyle, P.</creatorcontrib><description>A double-blind study with Nuva-seal and Alphaseal in contralateral quaurants of the same mouths obtained complete retention rates for Nuva-seal of 94·5 per cent of 293 sealed sites at 1 year and 83·1 per cent of 225 sites by 2 years. The corresponding Alphaseal data was poorer at 89·9 per cent and 78·7 per cent respectively. Only 1 sealed surface (0·2 per cent) was carious at 2 years. Nuva-seal first permanent molar retention was also superior to that of Alphaseal, 93·5 per cent compared to 85·6 per cent at 1 year, and 81·1 per cent compared to 70·1 per cent at 2 years. However, retention in these teeth for 6- to 7-year-old children was inferior to that of 8- to 11-year-old children for both sealants although only the Alphaseal data was significant. This material also had a significantly greater loss rate than Nuva-seal at 6 months and 18 months in 6- to 7-year-old children. The use of Nuva-seal with adequate attention to clinical detail and monitoring of UV sources can thus provide substantial clinical benefit in first permanent molars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(81)90035-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6453141</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acrylates ; Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate ; Child ; Composite Resins ; Dental Bonding ; Dentistry ; Double-Blind Method ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans ; Methacrylates ; Pit and Fissure Sealants ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 1981-03, Vol.9 (1), p.53-57</ispartof><rights>1981</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-c310097b541f0d69ee48eb808e6e1bb6cb7810279996dc65b5ffb5ed66b806263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-c310097b541f0d69ee48eb808e6e1bb6cb7810279996dc65b5ffb5ed66b806263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(81)90035-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6453141$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stephen, K.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkwood, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, K.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, F.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Fissure sealing with Nuva-seal and Alphaseal: two-year data</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>A double-blind study with Nuva-seal and Alphaseal in contralateral quaurants of the same mouths obtained complete retention rates for Nuva-seal of 94·5 per cent of 293 sealed sites at 1 year and 83·1 per cent of 225 sites by 2 years. The corresponding Alphaseal data was poorer at 89·9 per cent and 78·7 per cent respectively. Only 1 sealed surface (0·2 per cent) was carious at 2 years. Nuva-seal first permanent molar retention was also superior to that of Alphaseal, 93·5 per cent compared to 85·6 per cent at 1 year, and 81·1 per cent compared to 70·1 per cent at 2 years. However, retention in these teeth for 6- to 7-year-old children was inferior to that of 8- to 11-year-old children for both sealants although only the Alphaseal data was significant. This material also had a significantly greater loss rate than Nuva-seal at 6 months and 18 months in 6- to 7-year-old children. The use of Nuva-seal with adequate attention to clinical detail and monitoring of UV sources can thus provide substantial clinical benefit in first permanent molars.</description><subject>Acrylates</subject><subject>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Methacrylates</subject><subject>Pit and Fissure Sealants</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRaq3-A4WcRA_R2SS7m1UQSrEqFL0o9LZsNhO7kiZ1N2npvzexxaOnYWbee8N8hJxTuKFA-S3EACETNLpK6bUEiFk4PyBDmgoZUsHnh2T4JzkmJ95_AUACkRyQAU9YTBM6JPdT633rMPCoS1t9BhvbLILXdq3DfhLoKg_G5Wqh--4uaDZ1uEXtglw3-pQcFbr0eLavI_IxfXyfPIezt6eXyXgWmkhETWhiCiBFxhJaQM4lYpJilkKKHGmWcZOJlEIkpJQ8N5xlrCgyhjnnnYhHPB6Ry13uytXfLfpGLa03WJa6wrr1SrDunYSJTpjshMbV3jss1MrZpXZbRUH1zFQPRPVAVErVLzM172wX-_w2W2L-Z9pD6vYPuz12T64tOuWNxcpgbh2aRuW1_f_ADy05edA</recordid><startdate>198103</startdate><enddate>198103</enddate><creator>Stephen, K.W.</creator><creator>Kirkwood, M.</creator><creator>Campbell, D.</creator><creator>Young, K.C.</creator><creator>Gillespie, F.C.</creator><creator>Boyle, P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198103</creationdate><title>Fissure sealing with Nuva-seal and Alphaseal: two-year data</title><author>Stephen, K.W. ; Kirkwood, M. ; Campbell, D. ; Young, K.C. ; Gillespie, F.C. ; Boyle, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-c310097b541f0d69ee48eb808e6e1bb6cb7810279996dc65b5ffb5ed66b806263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><topic>Acrylates</topic><topic>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Methacrylates</topic><topic>Pit and Fissure Sealants</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stephen, K.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkwood, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, K.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, F.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stephen, K.W.</au><au>Kirkwood, M.</au><au>Campbell, D.</au><au>Young, K.C.</au><au>Gillespie, F.C.</au><au>Boyle, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fissure sealing with Nuva-seal and Alphaseal: two-year data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>1981-03</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>53-57</pages><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>A double-blind study with Nuva-seal and Alphaseal in contralateral quaurants of the same mouths obtained complete retention rates for Nuva-seal of 94·5 per cent of 293 sealed sites at 1 year and 83·1 per cent of 225 sites by 2 years. The corresponding Alphaseal data was poorer at 89·9 per cent and 78·7 per cent respectively. Only 1 sealed surface (0·2 per cent) was carious at 2 years. Nuva-seal first permanent molar retention was also superior to that of Alphaseal, 93·5 per cent compared to 85·6 per cent at 1 year, and 81·1 per cent compared to 70·1 per cent at 2 years. However, retention in these teeth for 6- to 7-year-old children was inferior to that of 8- to 11-year-old children for both sealants although only the Alphaseal data was significant. This material also had a significantly greater loss rate than Nuva-seal at 6 months and 18 months in 6- to 7-year-old children. The use of Nuva-seal with adequate attention to clinical detail and monitoring of UV sources can thus provide substantial clinical benefit in first permanent molars.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>6453141</pmid><doi>10.1016/0300-5712(81)90035-X</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-5712
ispartof Journal of dentistry, 1981-03, Vol.9 (1), p.53-57
issn 0300-5712
1879-176X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75645457
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect
subjects Acrylates
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
Child
Composite Resins
Dental Bonding
Dentistry
Double-Blind Method
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
Methacrylates
Pit and Fissure Sealants
Time Factors
title Fissure sealing with Nuva-seal and Alphaseal: two-year data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T16%3A31%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fissure%20sealing%20with%20Nuva-seal%20and%20Alphaseal:%20two-year%20data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Stephen,%20K.W.&rft.date=1981-03&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=53-57&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0300-5712(81)90035-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75645457%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75645457&rft_id=info:pmid/6453141&rft_els_id=030057128190035X&rfr_iscdi=true