Color stability of pigmented maxillofacial silicone elastomer: Effects of nano-oxides as opacifiers

Abstract Objectives This study evaluated the effects of nano-oxides on the color stability of pigmented silicone A-2186 maxillofacial prosthetic elastomers before and after artificial aging. Methods Each of three widely used UV-shielding nano-sized particle oxides (TiO2 , ZnO, CeO2 ), based on recen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dentistry 2010, Vol.38, p.e100-e105
Hauptverfasser: Han, Ying, Zhao, YiMin, Xie, Chao, Powers, John M, Kiat-amnuay, Sudarat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e105
container_issue
container_start_page e100
container_title Journal of dentistry
container_volume 38
creator Han, Ying
Zhao, YiMin
Xie, Chao
Powers, John M
Kiat-amnuay, Sudarat
description Abstract Objectives This study evaluated the effects of nano-oxides on the color stability of pigmented silicone A-2186 maxillofacial prosthetic elastomers before and after artificial aging. Methods Each of three widely used UV-shielding nano-sized particle oxides (TiO2 , ZnO, CeO2 ), based on recent survey of the industry at 1%, 2%, 2.5% concentrations were combined with each of five intrinsic silicone pigment types (no pigments, red, yellow, blue, and a mixture of the three pigments). Silicone A-2186 without nano-oxides or pigments served as control, for a total of 46 experimental groups of elastomers. In each group of the study, all specimens were aged in an artificial aging chamber for an energy exposure of 450 kJ/m2 . CIE L * a * b * values were measured by a spectrophotometer. The 50:50% perceptibility (Δ E * = 1.1) and acceptability threshold (Δ E * = 3.0) were used in interpretation of recorded color differences. Color differences after aging were subjected to three-way analysis of variance. Means were compared by Fisher's PLSD intervals at the 0.05 level of significance. Results Yellow pigments mixed with all three nano-oxides at all intervals increased Δ E * values significantly from 3.7 up to 8.4. When mixed pigment groups were considered, TiO2 at 2%, and 2.5% exhibited the smallest color changes, followed by ZnO and CeO2 , respectively ( p < 0.001). At 1%, CeO2 exhibited the smallest color changes, followed by TiO2 and ZnO, respectively ( p < 0.001). The smallest color differences, observed for nano-oxides groups, were recorded for CeO2 at 1%, and TiO2 at 2% and 2.5%. When the nano-oxides were tested at all concentrations, CeO2 groups overall had the most color changes, and TiO2 groups had the least. All Δ E * values of the mixed pigment groups were below the 50:50% acceptability threshold (Δ E * = 1.2–2.3, below 3.0) except 2% CeO2 (Δ E * = 4.2). Conclusion 1% nano-CeO2 and 2% and 2.5% nano-TiO2 used as opacifiers for silicone A-2186 maxillofacial prostheses with mixed pigments exhibited the least color changes when subjected to artificial aging at 450 kJ/m2 . Yellow silicone pigment mixed with all three nano-oxides significantly affected color stability of A-2186 silicone elastomer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756305617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S030057121000117X</els_id><sourcerecordid>756305617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-3d1720c7e34a4815d83e4601b618db4b801c0869d43175002ef568567254a4753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhFyCh3DhlmXHiOEECqVoVqFSJQ4vUm-XYE-TgxIudRd1_j8MWDlx6sjR6743ne4y9RtgiYPNu3I6W5mXLIU9AbAG6J2yDrexKlM3dU7aBCqAUEvkZe5HSCAA18O45O-NQSw4cN8zsgg-xSIvunXfLsQhDsXffpxxMtpj0vfM-DNo47YuUFSbMVJDXaQkTxffF5TCQWdJqm_UcynDvLKVC58k-uwZHMb1kzwbtE716eM_Zt0-Xt7sv5fXXz1e7i-vS1LJbyspi_pSRVNW6blHYtqK6AewbbG1f9y2ggbbpbF2hFACcBtG0opFcZIMU1Tl7e8rdx_DzQGlRk0uGvNczhUNSUjQViAZlVlYnpYkhpUiD2kc36XhUCGqFq0b1B65a4SoQKsPNrjcP-Yd-IvvP85dmFnw4CShf-SufrpJxNBuyLmZKygb3yIKP__mNd7Mz2v-gI6UxHOKcASpUiStQN2u_a72Ym0WUd9VvSPWgQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>756305617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Color stability of pigmented maxillofacial silicone elastomer: Effects of nano-oxides as opacifiers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Han, Ying ; Zhao, YiMin ; Xie, Chao ; Powers, John M ; Kiat-amnuay, Sudarat</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Ying ; Zhao, YiMin ; Xie, Chao ; Powers, John M ; Kiat-amnuay, Sudarat</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives This study evaluated the effects of nano-oxides on the color stability of pigmented silicone A-2186 maxillofacial prosthetic elastomers before and after artificial aging. Methods Each of three widely used UV-shielding nano-sized particle oxides (TiO2 , ZnO, CeO2 ), based on recent survey of the industry at 1%, 2%, 2.5% concentrations were combined with each of five intrinsic silicone pigment types (no pigments, red, yellow, blue, and a mixture of the three pigments). Silicone A-2186 without nano-oxides or pigments served as control, for a total of 46 experimental groups of elastomers. In each group of the study, all specimens were aged in an artificial aging chamber for an energy exposure of 450 kJ/m2 . CIE L * a * b * values were measured by a spectrophotometer. The 50:50% perceptibility (Δ E * = 1.1) and acceptability threshold (Δ E * = 3.0) were used in interpretation of recorded color differences. Color differences after aging were subjected to three-way analysis of variance. Means were compared by Fisher's PLSD intervals at the 0.05 level of significance. Results Yellow pigments mixed with all three nano-oxides at all intervals increased Δ E * values significantly from 3.7 up to 8.4. When mixed pigment groups were considered, TiO2 at 2%, and 2.5% exhibited the smallest color changes, followed by ZnO and CeO2 , respectively ( p &lt; 0.001). At 1%, CeO2 exhibited the smallest color changes, followed by TiO2 and ZnO, respectively ( p &lt; 0.001). The smallest color differences, observed for nano-oxides groups, were recorded for CeO2 at 1%, and TiO2 at 2% and 2.5%. When the nano-oxides were tested at all concentrations, CeO2 groups overall had the most color changes, and TiO2 groups had the least. All Δ E * values of the mixed pigment groups were below the 50:50% acceptability threshold (Δ E * = 1.2–2.3, below 3.0) except 2% CeO2 (Δ E * = 4.2). Conclusion 1% nano-CeO2 and 2% and 2.5% nano-TiO2 used as opacifiers for silicone A-2186 maxillofacial prostheses with mixed pigments exhibited the least color changes when subjected to artificial aging at 450 kJ/m2 . Yellow silicone pigment mixed with all three nano-oxides significantly affected color stability of A-2186 silicone elastomer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20472021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Artificial aging ; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry ; Biocompatible Materials - radiation effects ; Cerium - chemistry ; Cerium - radiation effects ; Color ; Color differences (Δ E) ; Coloring Agents - chemistry ; Coloring Agents - radiation effects ; Dentistry ; Dimethylpolysiloxanes - chemistry ; Dimethylpolysiloxanes - radiation effects ; Elastomers - chemistry ; Elastomers - radiation effects ; Humans ; Maxillofacial elastomer ; Maxillofacial Prosthesis ; Nano-oxides ; Nanoparticles - chemistry ; Nanoparticles - radiation effects ; Optical Phenomena ; Oxides - chemistry ; Oxides - radiation effects ; Prosthesis Coloring - methods ; Silicones - chemistry ; Silicones - radiation effects ; Titanium - chemistry ; Titanium - radiation effects ; Ultraviolet Rays ; UV shielding ; Zinc Oxide - chemistry ; Zinc Oxide - radiation effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 2010, Vol.38, p.e100-e105</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-3d1720c7e34a4815d83e4601b618db4b801c0869d43175002ef568567254a4753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-3d1720c7e34a4815d83e4601b618db4b801c0869d43175002ef568567254a4753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,4010,27904,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20472021$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, YiMin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powers, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiat-amnuay, Sudarat</creatorcontrib><title>Color stability of pigmented maxillofacial silicone elastomer: Effects of nano-oxides as opacifiers</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives This study evaluated the effects of nano-oxides on the color stability of pigmented silicone A-2186 maxillofacial prosthetic elastomers before and after artificial aging. Methods Each of three widely used UV-shielding nano-sized particle oxides (TiO2 , ZnO, CeO2 ), based on recent survey of the industry at 1%, 2%, 2.5% concentrations were combined with each of five intrinsic silicone pigment types (no pigments, red, yellow, blue, and a mixture of the three pigments). Silicone A-2186 without nano-oxides or pigments served as control, for a total of 46 experimental groups of elastomers. In each group of the study, all specimens were aged in an artificial aging chamber for an energy exposure of 450 kJ/m2 . CIE L * a * b * values were measured by a spectrophotometer. The 50:50% perceptibility (Δ E * = 1.1) and acceptability threshold (Δ E * = 3.0) were used in interpretation of recorded color differences. Color differences after aging were subjected to three-way analysis of variance. Means were compared by Fisher's PLSD intervals at the 0.05 level of significance. Results Yellow pigments mixed with all three nano-oxides at all intervals increased Δ E * values significantly from 3.7 up to 8.4. When mixed pigment groups were considered, TiO2 at 2%, and 2.5% exhibited the smallest color changes, followed by ZnO and CeO2 , respectively ( p &lt; 0.001). At 1%, CeO2 exhibited the smallest color changes, followed by TiO2 and ZnO, respectively ( p &lt; 0.001). The smallest color differences, observed for nano-oxides groups, were recorded for CeO2 at 1%, and TiO2 at 2% and 2.5%. When the nano-oxides were tested at all concentrations, CeO2 groups overall had the most color changes, and TiO2 groups had the least. All Δ E * values of the mixed pigment groups were below the 50:50% acceptability threshold (Δ E * = 1.2–2.3, below 3.0) except 2% CeO2 (Δ E * = 4.2). Conclusion 1% nano-CeO2 and 2% and 2.5% nano-TiO2 used as opacifiers for silicone A-2186 maxillofacial prostheses with mixed pigments exhibited the least color changes when subjected to artificial aging at 450 kJ/m2 . Yellow silicone pigment mixed with all three nano-oxides significantly affected color stability of A-2186 silicone elastomer.</description><subject>Artificial aging</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cerium - chemistry</subject><subject>Cerium - radiation effects</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Color differences (Δ E)</subject><subject>Coloring Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>Coloring Agents - radiation effects</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dimethylpolysiloxanes - chemistry</subject><subject>Dimethylpolysiloxanes - radiation effects</subject><subject>Elastomers - chemistry</subject><subject>Elastomers - radiation effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maxillofacial elastomer</subject><subject>Maxillofacial Prosthesis</subject><subject>Nano-oxides</subject><subject>Nanoparticles - chemistry</subject><subject>Nanoparticles - radiation effects</subject><subject>Optical Phenomena</subject><subject>Oxides - chemistry</subject><subject>Oxides - radiation effects</subject><subject>Prosthesis Coloring - methods</subject><subject>Silicones - chemistry</subject><subject>Silicones - radiation effects</subject><subject>Titanium - chemistry</subject><subject>Titanium - radiation effects</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays</subject><subject>UV shielding</subject><subject>Zinc Oxide - chemistry</subject><subject>Zinc Oxide - radiation effects</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhFyCh3DhlmXHiOEECqVoVqFSJQ4vUm-XYE-TgxIudRd1_j8MWDlx6sjR6743ne4y9RtgiYPNu3I6W5mXLIU9AbAG6J2yDrexKlM3dU7aBCqAUEvkZe5HSCAA18O45O-NQSw4cN8zsgg-xSIvunXfLsQhDsXffpxxMtpj0vfM-DNo47YuUFSbMVJDXaQkTxffF5TCQWdJqm_UcynDvLKVC58k-uwZHMb1kzwbtE716eM_Zt0-Xt7sv5fXXz1e7i-vS1LJbyspi_pSRVNW6blHYtqK6AewbbG1f9y2ggbbpbF2hFACcBtG0opFcZIMU1Tl7e8rdx_DzQGlRk0uGvNczhUNSUjQViAZlVlYnpYkhpUiD2kc36XhUCGqFq0b1B65a4SoQKsPNrjcP-Yd-IvvP85dmFnw4CShf-SufrpJxNBuyLmZKygb3yIKP__mNd7Mz2v-gI6UxHOKcASpUiStQN2u_a72Ym0WUd9VvSPWgQw</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Han, Ying</creator><creator>Zhao, YiMin</creator><creator>Xie, Chao</creator><creator>Powers, John M</creator><creator>Kiat-amnuay, Sudarat</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Color stability of pigmented maxillofacial silicone elastomer: Effects of nano-oxides as opacifiers</title><author>Han, Ying ; Zhao, YiMin ; Xie, Chao ; Powers, John M ; Kiat-amnuay, Sudarat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-3d1720c7e34a4815d83e4601b618db4b801c0869d43175002ef568567254a4753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Artificial aging</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cerium - chemistry</topic><topic>Cerium - radiation effects</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Color differences (Δ E)</topic><topic>Coloring Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>Coloring Agents - radiation effects</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dimethylpolysiloxanes - chemistry</topic><topic>Dimethylpolysiloxanes - radiation effects</topic><topic>Elastomers - chemistry</topic><topic>Elastomers - radiation effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maxillofacial elastomer</topic><topic>Maxillofacial Prosthesis</topic><topic>Nano-oxides</topic><topic>Nanoparticles - chemistry</topic><topic>Nanoparticles - radiation effects</topic><topic>Optical Phenomena</topic><topic>Oxides - chemistry</topic><topic>Oxides - radiation effects</topic><topic>Prosthesis Coloring - methods</topic><topic>Silicones - chemistry</topic><topic>Silicones - radiation effects</topic><topic>Titanium - chemistry</topic><topic>Titanium - radiation effects</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays</topic><topic>UV shielding</topic><topic>Zinc Oxide - chemistry</topic><topic>Zinc Oxide - radiation effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, YiMin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powers, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiat-amnuay, Sudarat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Ying</au><au>Zhao, YiMin</au><au>Xie, Chao</au><au>Powers, John M</au><au>Kiat-amnuay, Sudarat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Color stability of pigmented maxillofacial silicone elastomer: Effects of nano-oxides as opacifiers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>38</volume><spage>e100</spage><epage>e105</epage><pages>e100-e105</pages><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives This study evaluated the effects of nano-oxides on the color stability of pigmented silicone A-2186 maxillofacial prosthetic elastomers before and after artificial aging. Methods Each of three widely used UV-shielding nano-sized particle oxides (TiO2 , ZnO, CeO2 ), based on recent survey of the industry at 1%, 2%, 2.5% concentrations were combined with each of five intrinsic silicone pigment types (no pigments, red, yellow, blue, and a mixture of the three pigments). Silicone A-2186 without nano-oxides or pigments served as control, for a total of 46 experimental groups of elastomers. In each group of the study, all specimens were aged in an artificial aging chamber for an energy exposure of 450 kJ/m2 . CIE L * a * b * values were measured by a spectrophotometer. The 50:50% perceptibility (Δ E * = 1.1) and acceptability threshold (Δ E * = 3.0) were used in interpretation of recorded color differences. Color differences after aging were subjected to three-way analysis of variance. Means were compared by Fisher's PLSD intervals at the 0.05 level of significance. Results Yellow pigments mixed with all three nano-oxides at all intervals increased Δ E * values significantly from 3.7 up to 8.4. When mixed pigment groups were considered, TiO2 at 2%, and 2.5% exhibited the smallest color changes, followed by ZnO and CeO2 , respectively ( p &lt; 0.001). At 1%, CeO2 exhibited the smallest color changes, followed by TiO2 and ZnO, respectively ( p &lt; 0.001). The smallest color differences, observed for nano-oxides groups, were recorded for CeO2 at 1%, and TiO2 at 2% and 2.5%. When the nano-oxides were tested at all concentrations, CeO2 groups overall had the most color changes, and TiO2 groups had the least. All Δ E * values of the mixed pigment groups were below the 50:50% acceptability threshold (Δ E * = 1.2–2.3, below 3.0) except 2% CeO2 (Δ E * = 4.2). Conclusion 1% nano-CeO2 and 2% and 2.5% nano-TiO2 used as opacifiers for silicone A-2186 maxillofacial prostheses with mixed pigments exhibited the least color changes when subjected to artificial aging at 450 kJ/m2 . Yellow silicone pigment mixed with all three nano-oxides significantly affected color stability of A-2186 silicone elastomer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20472021</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.009</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-5712
ispartof Journal of dentistry, 2010, Vol.38, p.e100-e105
issn 0300-5712
1879-176X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756305617
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Artificial aging
Biocompatible Materials - chemistry
Biocompatible Materials - radiation effects
Cerium - chemistry
Cerium - radiation effects
Color
Color differences (Δ E)
Coloring Agents - chemistry
Coloring Agents - radiation effects
Dentistry
Dimethylpolysiloxanes - chemistry
Dimethylpolysiloxanes - radiation effects
Elastomers - chemistry
Elastomers - radiation effects
Humans
Maxillofacial elastomer
Maxillofacial Prosthesis
Nano-oxides
Nanoparticles - chemistry
Nanoparticles - radiation effects
Optical Phenomena
Oxides - chemistry
Oxides - radiation effects
Prosthesis Coloring - methods
Silicones - chemistry
Silicones - radiation effects
Titanium - chemistry
Titanium - radiation effects
Ultraviolet Rays
UV shielding
Zinc Oxide - chemistry
Zinc Oxide - radiation effects
title Color stability of pigmented maxillofacial silicone elastomer: Effects of nano-oxides as opacifiers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A20%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Color%20stability%20of%20pigmented%20maxillofacial%20silicone%20elastomer:%20Effects%20of%20nano-oxides%20as%20opacifiers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Han,%20Ying&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=38&rft.spage=e100&rft.epage=e105&rft.pages=e100-e105&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E756305617%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=756305617&rft_id=info:pmid/20472021&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S030057121000117X&rfr_iscdi=true