Problem-based learning for professionalism and scientific integrity training of biomedical graduate students: process evaluation
ObjectiveWe conducted a process evaluation to (a) assess the effectiveness of a new problem-based learning curriculum designed to teach professionalism and scientific integrity to biomedical graduate students and (b) modify the course to enhance its relevance and effectiveness. The content presented...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical ethics 2010-10, Vol.36 (10), p.620-626 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 626 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 620 |
container_title | Journal of medical ethics |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Jones, Nancy L Peiffer, Ann M Lambros, Ann Eldridge, J Charles |
description | ObjectiveWe conducted a process evaluation to (a) assess the effectiveness of a new problem-based learning curriculum designed to teach professionalism and scientific integrity to biomedical graduate students and (b) modify the course to enhance its relevance and effectiveness. The content presented realistic cases and issues in the practice of science, to promote skill development and to acculturate students to professional norms of science.MethodWe used 5-step Likert-scaled questions, open-ended questions, and interviews of students and facilitators to assess curricular effectiveness.ResultsBoth facilitators and students perceived course objectives were achieved. For example, respondents preferred active learning over lectures; both faculty and students perceived that the curriculum increased their understanding of norms, role obligations and responsibilities of professional scientists. They also reported an increased ability to identify ethical situations and felt that they had developed skills in moral reasoning and effective group work.ConclusionsThese data helped to improve course implementation and instructional material. For example, to correct a negative perception that this was an ‘ethics’ course, we redesigned case debriefing activities to reinforce learning objectives and important skills. We refined cases to be more engaging and relevant for students, and gave facilitators more specific training and resources for each case. The problem-based learning small group strategy can stimulate an environment whereby participants are more aware of ethical implications of science, and increase their socialisation and open communication about professional behaviour. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/jme.2009.035238 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756299185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A241515866</galeid><jstor_id>20789531</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A241515866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b498t-4aaca5844f67be2adac7dc1c07c36ff4018f2d73595dcc99bb449917595c61f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2L1TAYhYMozvXq2pUScCEIvZM0n3U3FL8HZxYq4iakaVJyTZsxacXZ-dPNnY6juLGbUN7nHA7nAPAQox3GhB_vR7urEWp2iLCayFtgg6kgFa2ZuA02iCBecYnQEbiX8x6Vr5bNXXBUI86JYHQDfp6n2AU7Vp3OtofB6jT5aYAuJniRorM5-zjp4PMI9dTDbLydZu-8gX6a7ZD8fAnnpP2VKjrY-Tja3hsd4JB0v-jZwjwvfVHl5wdLUyyh_a5DORXr--CO0yHbB9fvFnx8-eJD-7o6PXv1pj05rTrayLmiWhvNJKWOi87WutdG9AYbJAzhzlGEpat7QVjDemOapusobRosyr_h2DVkC56uviXCt8XmWY0-GxuCnmxcshKM10UgWSGf_EPu45JKB1lhITGSRFxR1UoNOljlJxNLHT9mE0Owg1Ule3umTmqKGWaytL0FxytvUsw5Wacukh91ulQYqcOWqmypDluqdcuieHydY-lKpTf87_EK8GgF9nmO6a-7kA0j-E9En0u0m7tOXxUXxUG9_9Qq8pm_bcX5F_Wu8M9Wvhv3_033CysGwd4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781083785</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Problem-based learning for professionalism and scientific integrity training of biomedical graduate students: process evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals Online Archive</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Jones, Nancy L ; Peiffer, Ann M ; Lambros, Ann ; Eldridge, J Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Nancy L ; Peiffer, Ann M ; Lambros, Ann ; Eldridge, J Charles</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveWe conducted a process evaluation to (a) assess the effectiveness of a new problem-based learning curriculum designed to teach professionalism and scientific integrity to biomedical graduate students and (b) modify the course to enhance its relevance and effectiveness. The content presented realistic cases and issues in the practice of science, to promote skill development and to acculturate students to professional norms of science.MethodWe used 5-step Likert-scaled questions, open-ended questions, and interviews of students and facilitators to assess curricular effectiveness.ResultsBoth facilitators and students perceived course objectives were achieved. For example, respondents preferred active learning over lectures; both faculty and students perceived that the curriculum increased their understanding of norms, role obligations and responsibilities of professional scientists. They also reported an increased ability to identify ethical situations and felt that they had developed skills in moral reasoning and effective group work.ConclusionsThese data helped to improve course implementation and instructional material. For example, to correct a negative perception that this was an ‘ethics’ course, we redesigned case debriefing activities to reinforce learning objectives and important skills. We refined cases to be more engaging and relevant for students, and gave facilitators more specific training and resources for each case. The problem-based learning small group strategy can stimulate an environment whereby participants are more aware of ethical implications of science, and increase their socialisation and open communication about professional behaviour.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-6800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jme.2009.035238</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20663754</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMETDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Bioethics ; Biomedical Research - education ; Biomedical Research - ethics ; Consumer Behavior ; Core curriculum ; Curricula ; Curriculum - standards ; Education ; Education, Medical, Graduate - methods ; Education, Medical, Graduate - organization & administration ; Ethical instruction ; Ethics ; Ethics, Medical - education ; Evaluation ; graduate education ; Graduate students ; Group facilitation ; Independent study ; Knowledge ; Methods ; Morality ; Problem based learning ; Problem-Based Learning - methods ; Professional Competence - standards ; Professional Practice - standards ; Professionalism ; Research ethics ; Responsibilities ; responsible conduct of research ; Science ; Science learning ; scientific integrity ; Social ethics ; Study and teaching ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching and learning ethics ; Teaching methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical ethics, 2010-10, Vol.36 (10), p.620-626</ispartof><rights>2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics</rights><rights>Copyright: 2010 (c) 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b498t-4aaca5844f67be2adac7dc1c07c36ff4018f2d73595dcc99bb449917595c61f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b498t-4aaca5844f67be2adac7dc1c07c36ff4018f2d73595dcc99bb449917595c61f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jme.bmj.com/content/36/10/620.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jme.bmj.com/content/36/10/620.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,803,3196,23571,27924,27925,58017,58250,77600,77631</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20663754$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Nancy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peiffer, Ann M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambros, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldridge, J Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Problem-based learning for professionalism and scientific integrity training of biomedical graduate students: process evaluation</title><title>Journal of medical ethics</title><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><description>ObjectiveWe conducted a process evaluation to (a) assess the effectiveness of a new problem-based learning curriculum designed to teach professionalism and scientific integrity to biomedical graduate students and (b) modify the course to enhance its relevance and effectiveness. The content presented realistic cases and issues in the practice of science, to promote skill development and to acculturate students to professional norms of science.MethodWe used 5-step Likert-scaled questions, open-ended questions, and interviews of students and facilitators to assess curricular effectiveness.ResultsBoth facilitators and students perceived course objectives were achieved. For example, respondents preferred active learning over lectures; both faculty and students perceived that the curriculum increased their understanding of norms, role obligations and responsibilities of professional scientists. They also reported an increased ability to identify ethical situations and felt that they had developed skills in moral reasoning and effective group work.ConclusionsThese data helped to improve course implementation and instructional material. For example, to correct a negative perception that this was an ‘ethics’ course, we redesigned case debriefing activities to reinforce learning objectives and important skills. We refined cases to be more engaging and relevant for students, and gave facilitators more specific training and resources for each case. The problem-based learning small group strategy can stimulate an environment whereby participants are more aware of ethical implications of science, and increase their socialisation and open communication about professional behaviour.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - education</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - ethics</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior</subject><subject>Core curriculum</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum - standards</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate - methods</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate - organization & administration</subject><subject>Ethical instruction</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics, Medical - education</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>graduate education</subject><subject>Graduate students</subject><subject>Group facilitation</subject><subject>Independent study</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Problem based learning</subject><subject>Problem-Based Learning - methods</subject><subject>Professional Competence - standards</subject><subject>Professional Practice - standards</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Responsibilities</subject><subject>responsible conduct of research</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science learning</subject><subject>scientific integrity</subject><subject>Social ethics</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching and learning ethics</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><issn>0306-6800</issn><issn>1473-4257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2L1TAYhYMozvXq2pUScCEIvZM0n3U3FL8HZxYq4iakaVJyTZsxacXZ-dPNnY6juLGbUN7nHA7nAPAQox3GhB_vR7urEWp2iLCayFtgg6kgFa2ZuA02iCBecYnQEbiX8x6Vr5bNXXBUI86JYHQDfp6n2AU7Vp3OtofB6jT5aYAuJniRorM5-zjp4PMI9dTDbLydZu-8gX6a7ZD8fAnnpP2VKjrY-Tja3hsd4JB0v-jZwjwvfVHl5wdLUyyh_a5DORXr--CO0yHbB9fvFnx8-eJD-7o6PXv1pj05rTrayLmiWhvNJKWOi87WutdG9AYbJAzhzlGEpat7QVjDemOapusobRosyr_h2DVkC56uviXCt8XmWY0-GxuCnmxcshKM10UgWSGf_EPu45JKB1lhITGSRFxR1UoNOljlJxNLHT9mE0Owg1Ule3umTmqKGWaytL0FxytvUsw5Wacukh91ulQYqcOWqmypDluqdcuieHydY-lKpTf87_EK8GgF9nmO6a-7kA0j-E9En0u0m7tOXxUXxUG9_9Qq8pm_bcX5F_Wu8M9Wvhv3_033CysGwd4</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Jones, Nancy L</creator><creator>Peiffer, Ann M</creator><creator>Lambros, Ann</creator><creator>Eldridge, J Charles</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Problem-based learning for professionalism and scientific integrity training of biomedical graduate students: process evaluation</title><author>Jones, Nancy L ; Peiffer, Ann M ; Lambros, Ann ; Eldridge, J Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b498t-4aaca5844f67be2adac7dc1c07c36ff4018f2d73595dcc99bb449917595c61f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - education</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - ethics</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior</topic><topic>Core curriculum</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum - standards</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate - methods</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate - organization & administration</topic><topic>Ethical instruction</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics, Medical - education</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>graduate education</topic><topic>Graduate students</topic><topic>Group facilitation</topic><topic>Independent study</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Problem based learning</topic><topic>Problem-Based Learning - methods</topic><topic>Professional Competence - standards</topic><topic>Professional Practice - standards</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Responsibilities</topic><topic>responsible conduct of research</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science learning</topic><topic>scientific integrity</topic><topic>Social ethics</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching and learning ethics</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Nancy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peiffer, Ann M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambros, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldridge, J Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Nancy L</au><au>Peiffer, Ann M</au><au>Lambros, Ann</au><au>Eldridge, J Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Problem-based learning for professionalism and scientific integrity training of biomedical graduate students: process evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>620</spage><epage>626</epage><pages>620-626</pages><issn>0306-6800</issn><eissn>1473-4257</eissn><coden>JMETDR</coden><abstract>ObjectiveWe conducted a process evaluation to (a) assess the effectiveness of a new problem-based learning curriculum designed to teach professionalism and scientific integrity to biomedical graduate students and (b) modify the course to enhance its relevance and effectiveness. The content presented realistic cases and issues in the practice of science, to promote skill development and to acculturate students to professional norms of science.MethodWe used 5-step Likert-scaled questions, open-ended questions, and interviews of students and facilitators to assess curricular effectiveness.ResultsBoth facilitators and students perceived course objectives were achieved. For example, respondents preferred active learning over lectures; both faculty and students perceived that the curriculum increased their understanding of norms, role obligations and responsibilities of professional scientists. They also reported an increased ability to identify ethical situations and felt that they had developed skills in moral reasoning and effective group work.ConclusionsThese data helped to improve course implementation and instructional material. For example, to correct a negative perception that this was an ‘ethics’ course, we redesigned case debriefing activities to reinforce learning objectives and important skills. We refined cases to be more engaging and relevant for students, and gave facilitators more specific training and resources for each case. The problem-based learning small group strategy can stimulate an environment whereby participants are more aware of ethical implications of science, and increase their socialisation and open communication about professional behaviour.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</pub><pmid>20663754</pmid><doi>10.1136/jme.2009.035238</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-6800 |
ispartof | Journal of medical ethics, 2010-10, Vol.36 (10), p.620-626 |
issn | 0306-6800 1473-4257 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_756299185 |
source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals Online Archive; JSTOR |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Bioethics Biomedical Research - education Biomedical Research - ethics Consumer Behavior Core curriculum Curricula Curriculum - standards Education Education, Medical, Graduate - methods Education, Medical, Graduate - organization & administration Ethical instruction Ethics Ethics, Medical - education Evaluation graduate education Graduate students Group facilitation Independent study Knowledge Methods Morality Problem based learning Problem-Based Learning - methods Professional Competence - standards Professional Practice - standards Professionalism Research ethics Responsibilities responsible conduct of research Science Science learning scientific integrity Social ethics Study and teaching Surveys and Questionnaires Teaching and learning ethics Teaching methods |
title | Problem-based learning for professionalism and scientific integrity training of biomedical graduate students: process evaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A53%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Problem-based%20learning%20for%20professionalism%20and%20scientific%20integrity%20training%20of%20biomedical%20graduate%20students:%20process%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20ethics&rft.au=Jones,%20Nancy%20L&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=620&rft.epage=626&rft.pages=620-626&rft.issn=0306-6800&rft.eissn=1473-4257&rft.coden=JMETDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jme.2009.035238&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA241515866%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781083785&rft_id=info:pmid/20663754&rft_galeid=A241515866&rft_jstor_id=20789531&rfr_iscdi=true |