Mammography use and outcomes in a community the greater lansing area mammography study

Background. Mammography is widely known to reduce morbidity and mortality from breast cancer, but a population‐based assessment of mammography use and follow‐up of mammography findings has not been reported previously. Methods. An observational, population‐based, follow‐up study was conducted of all...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 1993-03, Vol.71 (5), p.1801-1809
Hauptverfasser: Sienko, Dean G., Hahn, Robert A., Mills, Elaine M., Yoon‐DeLong, Victoria, Ciesielski, Carol A., Williamson, G. David, Teutsch, Steven M., Klenn, Philip J., Berkelman, Ruth L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1809
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1801
container_title Cancer
container_volume 71
creator Sienko, Dean G.
Hahn, Robert A.
Mills, Elaine M.
Yoon‐DeLong, Victoria
Ciesielski, Carol A.
Williamson, G. David
Teutsch, Steven M.
Klenn, Philip J.
Berkelman, Ruth L.
description Background. Mammography is widely known to reduce morbidity and mortality from breast cancer, but a population‐based assessment of mammography use and follow‐up of mammography findings has not been reported previously. Methods. An observational, population‐based, follow‐up study was conducted of all women having mammograms in the Greater Lansing, Michigan, metropolitan area, between June 1987 and June 1988. A total of 17,811 Greater Lansing women participated. The adherence of women to mammography screening guidelines was estimated, and mammography's utility to detect breast cancer was assessed through follow‐up review of breast biopsy results. Results. Thirty‐seven percent of the expected number of women 35 years of age and older had mammograms. Adherence to screening guidelines declined with age, and less than 5% (302 of 6700) of women 55 years of age and older reporting having annual mammograms. Seventy‐six percent of women reported that their physicians prompted the examination. The predictive value of a positive mammogram was 21.9% for women without symptoms and 32.4% for women with symptoms. Mammography's sensitivity and specificity for breast cancer detection were 71% and 98%, respectively. Conclusions. The study highlights the need to target mammography to women 50 years of age and older, underscores the importance of physicians in promoting mammography, and demonstrates the analytic value and limitation of mammography in clinical decision‐making.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1097-0142(19930301)71:5<1801::AID-CNCR2820710515>3.0.CO;2-W
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75608951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75608951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4985-b6a4af4ef815faf4cc46cc26d8fb26b4d8d07a481fa92f9b9d87e7e3731a87913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkN1r1EAUxQdR6lr9E4R5ELEP2c5nZrKKUGJrC9UFUSv4cJlMZrYp-dhmEiT_vRN2XdQHwad7L-fcw-GHUE7JkhLCTinJVEKoYK9olnHCCT1RdCXfUE3oanV29S7JP-afmGZEUSKpfMuXZJmvX7Pk5gFaHL4fogUhRCdS8G-P0ZMQ7uKpmORH6EgLoZXgC_T1g2mabtOb7e2Ex-CwaUvcjYPtGhdw1WKD49qMbTVMeLh1eNM7M7ge16YNVbvBJt64-S0kDGM5PUWPvKmDe7afx-jLxfnn_DK5Xr-_ys-uEysyLZMiNcJ44bym0sfFWpFay9JS-4KlhSh1SZQRmnqTMZ8VWamVU44rTo1WGeXH6OUud9t396MLAzRVsK6O7Vw3BlAyJTqTs_H7zmj7LoTeedj2VWP6CSiBmTrM3GDmBr-og6IgYaYOEKnDn9SBA4F8DQxuYvrzfY2xaFx5yN5jjvqLvW6CNbXvTWurcLCJlAnNRLT5ne1HVbvp_xr-s-BfCv8JB5WtZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75608951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mammography use and outcomes in a community the greater lansing area mammography study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sienko, Dean G. ; Hahn, Robert A. ; Mills, Elaine M. ; Yoon‐DeLong, Victoria ; Ciesielski, Carol A. ; Williamson, G. David ; Teutsch, Steven M. ; Klenn, Philip J. ; Berkelman, Ruth L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sienko, Dean G. ; Hahn, Robert A. ; Mills, Elaine M. ; Yoon‐DeLong, Victoria ; Ciesielski, Carol A. ; Williamson, G. David ; Teutsch, Steven M. ; Klenn, Philip J. ; Berkelman, Ruth L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Mammography is widely known to reduce morbidity and mortality from breast cancer, but a population‐based assessment of mammography use and follow‐up of mammography findings has not been reported previously. Methods. An observational, population‐based, follow‐up study was conducted of all women having mammograms in the Greater Lansing, Michigan, metropolitan area, between June 1987 and June 1988. A total of 17,811 Greater Lansing women participated. The adherence of women to mammography screening guidelines was estimated, and mammography's utility to detect breast cancer was assessed through follow‐up review of breast biopsy results. Results. Thirty‐seven percent of the expected number of women 35 years of age and older had mammograms. Adherence to screening guidelines declined with age, and less than 5% (302 of 6700) of women 55 years of age and older reporting having annual mammograms. Seventy‐six percent of women reported that their physicians prompted the examination. The predictive value of a positive mammogram was 21.9% for women without symptoms and 32.4% for women with symptoms. Mammography's sensitivity and specificity for breast cancer detection were 71% and 98%, respectively. Conclusions. The study highlights the need to target mammography to women 50 years of age and older, underscores the importance of physicians in promoting mammography, and demonstrates the analytic value and limitation of mammography in clinical decision‐making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930301)71:5&lt;1801::AID-CNCR2820710515&gt;3.0.CO;2-W</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8448743</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast - pathology ; breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; community health ; epidemiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Mammary gland diseases ; mammography ; Mammography - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Michigan - epidemiology ; Middle Aged ; screening ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tumors ; Utilization Review</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 1993-03, Vol.71 (5), p.1801-1809</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1993 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4985-b6a4af4ef815faf4cc46cc26d8fb26b4d8d07a481fa92f9b9d87e7e3731a87913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4624824$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8448743$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sienko, Dean G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Elaine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon‐DeLong, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciesielski, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, G. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teutsch, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klenn, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkelman, Ruth L.</creatorcontrib><title>Mammography use and outcomes in a community the greater lansing area mammography study</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background. Mammography is widely known to reduce morbidity and mortality from breast cancer, but a population‐based assessment of mammography use and follow‐up of mammography findings has not been reported previously. Methods. An observational, population‐based, follow‐up study was conducted of all women having mammograms in the Greater Lansing, Michigan, metropolitan area, between June 1987 and June 1988. A total of 17,811 Greater Lansing women participated. The adherence of women to mammography screening guidelines was estimated, and mammography's utility to detect breast cancer was assessed through follow‐up review of breast biopsy results. Results. Thirty‐seven percent of the expected number of women 35 years of age and older had mammograms. Adherence to screening guidelines declined with age, and less than 5% (302 of 6700) of women 55 years of age and older reporting having annual mammograms. Seventy‐six percent of women reported that their physicians prompted the examination. The predictive value of a positive mammogram was 21.9% for women without symptoms and 32.4% for women with symptoms. Mammography's sensitivity and specificity for breast cancer detection were 71% and 98%, respectively. Conclusions. The study highlights the need to target mammography to women 50 years of age and older, underscores the importance of physicians in promoting mammography, and demonstrates the analytic value and limitation of mammography in clinical decision‐making.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>community health</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Michigan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Utilization Review</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkN1r1EAUxQdR6lr9E4R5ELEP2c5nZrKKUGJrC9UFUSv4cJlMZrYp-dhmEiT_vRN2XdQHwad7L-fcw-GHUE7JkhLCTinJVEKoYK9olnHCCT1RdCXfUE3oanV29S7JP-afmGZEUSKpfMuXZJmvX7Pk5gFaHL4fogUhRCdS8G-P0ZMQ7uKpmORH6EgLoZXgC_T1g2mabtOb7e2Ex-CwaUvcjYPtGhdw1WKD49qMbTVMeLh1eNM7M7ge16YNVbvBJt64-S0kDGM5PUWPvKmDe7afx-jLxfnn_DK5Xr-_ys-uEysyLZMiNcJ44bym0sfFWpFay9JS-4KlhSh1SZQRmnqTMZ8VWamVU44rTo1WGeXH6OUud9t396MLAzRVsK6O7Vw3BlAyJTqTs_H7zmj7LoTeedj2VWP6CSiBmTrM3GDmBr-og6IgYaYOEKnDn9SBA4F8DQxuYvrzfY2xaFx5yN5jjvqLvW6CNbXvTWurcLCJlAnNRLT5ne1HVbvp_xr-s-BfCv8JB5WtZQ</recordid><startdate>19930301</startdate><enddate>19930301</enddate><creator>Sienko, Dean G.</creator><creator>Hahn, Robert A.</creator><creator>Mills, Elaine M.</creator><creator>Yoon‐DeLong, Victoria</creator><creator>Ciesielski, Carol A.</creator><creator>Williamson, G. David</creator><creator>Teutsch, Steven M.</creator><creator>Klenn, Philip J.</creator><creator>Berkelman, Ruth L.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930301</creationdate><title>Mammography use and outcomes in a community the greater lansing area mammography study</title><author>Sienko, Dean G. ; Hahn, Robert A. ; Mills, Elaine M. ; Yoon‐DeLong, Victoria ; Ciesielski, Carol A. ; Williamson, G. David ; Teutsch, Steven M. ; Klenn, Philip J. ; Berkelman, Ruth L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4985-b6a4af4ef815faf4cc46cc26d8fb26b4d8d07a481fa92f9b9d87e7e3731a87913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>community health</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Michigan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Utilization Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sienko, Dean G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Elaine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon‐DeLong, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciesielski, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, G. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teutsch, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klenn, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkelman, Ruth L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sienko, Dean G.</au><au>Hahn, Robert A.</au><au>Mills, Elaine M.</au><au>Yoon‐DeLong, Victoria</au><au>Ciesielski, Carol A.</au><au>Williamson, G. David</au><au>Teutsch, Steven M.</au><au>Klenn, Philip J.</au><au>Berkelman, Ruth L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mammography use and outcomes in a community the greater lansing area mammography study</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>1993-03-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1801</spage><epage>1809</epage><pages>1801-1809</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>Background. Mammography is widely known to reduce morbidity and mortality from breast cancer, but a population‐based assessment of mammography use and follow‐up of mammography findings has not been reported previously. Methods. An observational, population‐based, follow‐up study was conducted of all women having mammograms in the Greater Lansing, Michigan, metropolitan area, between June 1987 and June 1988. A total of 17,811 Greater Lansing women participated. The adherence of women to mammography screening guidelines was estimated, and mammography's utility to detect breast cancer was assessed through follow‐up review of breast biopsy results. Results. Thirty‐seven percent of the expected number of women 35 years of age and older had mammograms. Adherence to screening guidelines declined with age, and less than 5% (302 of 6700) of women 55 years of age and older reporting having annual mammograms. Seventy‐six percent of women reported that their physicians prompted the examination. The predictive value of a positive mammogram was 21.9% for women without symptoms and 32.4% for women with symptoms. Mammography's sensitivity and specificity for breast cancer detection were 71% and 98%, respectively. Conclusions. The study highlights the need to target mammography to women 50 years of age and older, underscores the importance of physicians in promoting mammography, and demonstrates the analytic value and limitation of mammography in clinical decision‐making.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>8448743</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-0142(19930301)71:5&lt;1801::AID-CNCR2820710515&gt;3.0.CO;2-W</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 1993-03, Vol.71 (5), p.1801-1809
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75608951
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Breast - pathology
breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
community health
epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Mammary gland diseases
mammography
Mammography - statistics & numerical data
Medical sciences
Michigan - epidemiology
Middle Aged
screening
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tumors
Utilization Review
title Mammography use and outcomes in a community the greater lansing area mammography study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T04%3A51%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mammography%20use%20and%20outcomes%20in%20a%20community%20the%20greater%20lansing%20area%20mammography%20study&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Sienko,%20Dean%20G.&rft.date=1993-03-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1801&rft.epage=1809&rft.pages=1801-1809&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19930301)71:5%3C1801::AID-CNCR2820710515%3E3.0.CO;2-W&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75608951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75608951&rft_id=info:pmid/8448743&rfr_iscdi=true