Distributed low-frequency functional electrical stimulation delays muscle fatigue compared to conventional stimulation
We present a low‐frequency stimulation method via multi‐pad electrodes for delaying muscle fatigue. We compared two protocols for muscle activation of the quadriceps in paraplegics. One protocol involved a large cathode at 30 HZ (HPR, high pulse‐rate), and the other involved four smaller cathodes at...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Muscle & nerve 2010-10, Vol.42 (4), p.556-562 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 562 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 556 |
| container_title | Muscle & nerve |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Malešević, Nebojša M. Popović, Lana Z. Schwirtlich, Laszlo Popović, Dejan B. |
| description | We present a low‐frequency stimulation method via multi‐pad electrodes for delaying muscle fatigue. We compared two protocols for muscle activation of the quadriceps in paraplegics. One protocol involved a large cathode at 30 HZ (HPR, high pulse‐rate), and the other involved four smaller cathodes at 16 HZ (LPR, low pulse‐rate). The treatment included 30‐min daily sessions for 20 days. One leg was treated with the HPR protocol and the other with the LPR protocol. Knee‐joint torque was measured before and after therapy to assess the time interval before the knee‐joint torque decreased to 70% of the initial value. The HPR therapy provided greater increases in muscle endurance and force in prolonged training. Yet the LPR stimulation produced less muscle fatigue compared to the HPR stimulation. The results suggest that HPR is the favored protocol for training, and LPR is better suited for prolonged stimulation. Muscle Nerve, 2010 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mus.21736 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755971009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>755971009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4586-49aeb9c72b250794cf07c83e18e0ef407e3583d639d61c97b6bfa1eb8a5346493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtP3DAUhS3UCqbAon-gyqZCXQTsOH4tqykvaQCJ985ynGsU6iRTOwHm3-PpDNBNV76yv3uOzjFCXwneJxgXB-0Y9wsiKN9AE4KVyEum5Cc0waSUOafqfgt9ifERY0wkF5toq8CcM0b4BD39auIQmmocoM58_5y7AH9G6Owic2Nnh6bvjM_Ag02UTWMcmnb0ZvmQ1eDNImbJ3nrIXLp8GCGzfTs3IckNfZq7J-jWKv-s7qDPzvgIu-tzG90cHV5PT_LZxfHp9OcstyWTPC-VgUpZUVQFw0KV1mFhJQUiAYMrsQDKJK1TxJoTq0TFK2cIVNIwWvJS0W20t9Kdhz7FioNum2jBe9NBP0YtGFMidbgkf6xIG_oYAzg9D01rwkITrJct6xRT_205sd_WqmPVQv1OvtWagO9rwMRUmgums0384CjFlGCRuIMV99x4WPzfUZ_dXL1Z56uN9G3w8r5hwm_NBRVM350f66Pb2d35pZhqSV8BPwimSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>755971009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distributed low-frequency functional electrical stimulation delays muscle fatigue compared to conventional stimulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Malešević, Nebojša M. ; Popović, Lana Z. ; Schwirtlich, Laszlo ; Popović, Dejan B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Malešević, Nebojša M. ; Popović, Lana Z. ; Schwirtlich, Laszlo ; Popović, Dejan B.</creatorcontrib><description>We present a low‐frequency stimulation method via multi‐pad electrodes for delaying muscle fatigue. We compared two protocols for muscle activation of the quadriceps in paraplegics. One protocol involved a large cathode at 30 HZ (HPR, high pulse‐rate), and the other involved four smaller cathodes at 16 HZ (LPR, low pulse‐rate). The treatment included 30‐min daily sessions for 20 days. One leg was treated with the HPR protocol and the other with the LPR protocol. Knee‐joint torque was measured before and after therapy to assess the time interval before the knee‐joint torque decreased to 70% of the initial value. The HPR therapy provided greater increases in muscle endurance and force in prolonged training. Yet the LPR stimulation produced less muscle fatigue compared to the HPR stimulation. The results suggest that HPR is the favored protocol for training, and LPR is better suited for prolonged stimulation. Muscle Nerve, 2010</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-639X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mus.21736</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20665516</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MUNEDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Electric Stimulation - instrumentation ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Electrodes ; Equipment Design ; Female ; functional electrical stimulation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Knee Joint - physiopathology ; low-frequency distributed stimulation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; multi-pad electrode ; Muscle Fatigue ; Paraplegia - physiopathology ; Paraplegia - therapy ; Physical Endurance ; Quadriceps Muscle - physiopathology ; Quadriplegia - physiopathology ; Quadriplegia - therapy ; Striated muscle. Tendons ; therapy ; Torque ; Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Muscle & nerve, 2010-10, Vol.42 (4), p.556-562</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4586-49aeb9c72b250794cf07c83e18e0ef407e3583d639d61c97b6bfa1eb8a5346493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4586-49aeb9c72b250794cf07c83e18e0ef407e3583d639d61c97b6bfa1eb8a5346493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmus.21736$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmus.21736$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23303107$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20665516$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malešević, Nebojša M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popović, Lana Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwirtlich, Laszlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popović, Dejan B.</creatorcontrib><title>Distributed low-frequency functional electrical stimulation delays muscle fatigue compared to conventional stimulation</title><title>Muscle & nerve</title><addtitle>Muscle Nerve</addtitle><description>We present a low‐frequency stimulation method via multi‐pad electrodes for delaying muscle fatigue. We compared two protocols for muscle activation of the quadriceps in paraplegics. One protocol involved a large cathode at 30 HZ (HPR, high pulse‐rate), and the other involved four smaller cathodes at 16 HZ (LPR, low pulse‐rate). The treatment included 30‐min daily sessions for 20 days. One leg was treated with the HPR protocol and the other with the LPR protocol. Knee‐joint torque was measured before and after therapy to assess the time interval before the knee‐joint torque decreased to 70% of the initial value. The HPR therapy provided greater increases in muscle endurance and force in prolonged training. Yet the LPR stimulation produced less muscle fatigue compared to the HPR stimulation. The results suggest that HPR is the favored protocol for training, and LPR is better suited for prolonged stimulation. Muscle Nerve, 2010</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>functional electrical stimulation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>low-frequency distributed stimulation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multi-pad electrode</subject><subject>Muscle Fatigue</subject><subject>Paraplegia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Paraplegia - therapy</subject><subject>Physical Endurance</subject><subject>Quadriceps Muscle - physiopathology</subject><subject>Quadriplegia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Quadriplegia - therapy</subject><subject>Striated muscle. Tendons</subject><subject>therapy</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0148-639X</issn><issn>1097-4598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtP3DAUhS3UCqbAon-gyqZCXQTsOH4tqykvaQCJ985ynGsU6iRTOwHm3-PpDNBNV76yv3uOzjFCXwneJxgXB-0Y9wsiKN9AE4KVyEum5Cc0waSUOafqfgt9ifERY0wkF5toq8CcM0b4BD39auIQmmocoM58_5y7AH9G6Owic2Nnh6bvjM_Ag02UTWMcmnb0ZvmQ1eDNImbJ3nrIXLp8GCGzfTs3IckNfZq7J-jWKv-s7qDPzvgIu-tzG90cHV5PT_LZxfHp9OcstyWTPC-VgUpZUVQFw0KV1mFhJQUiAYMrsQDKJK1TxJoTq0TFK2cIVNIwWvJS0W20t9Kdhz7FioNum2jBe9NBP0YtGFMidbgkf6xIG_oYAzg9D01rwkITrJct6xRT_205sd_WqmPVQv1OvtWagO9rwMRUmgums0384CjFlGCRuIMV99x4WPzfUZ_dXL1Z56uN9G3w8r5hwm_NBRVM350f66Pb2d35pZhqSV8BPwimSA</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Malešević, Nebojša M.</creator><creator>Popović, Lana Z.</creator><creator>Schwirtlich, Laszlo</creator><creator>Popović, Dejan B.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Distributed low-frequency functional electrical stimulation delays muscle fatigue compared to conventional stimulation</title><author>Malešević, Nebojša M. ; Popović, Lana Z. ; Schwirtlich, Laszlo ; Popović, Dejan B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4586-49aeb9c72b250794cf07c83e18e0ef407e3583d639d61c97b6bfa1eb8a5346493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>functional electrical stimulation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>low-frequency distributed stimulation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multi-pad electrode</topic><topic>Muscle Fatigue</topic><topic>Paraplegia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Paraplegia - therapy</topic><topic>Physical Endurance</topic><topic>Quadriceps Muscle - physiopathology</topic><topic>Quadriplegia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Quadriplegia - therapy</topic><topic>Striated muscle. Tendons</topic><topic>therapy</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malešević, Nebojša M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popović, Lana Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwirtlich, Laszlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popović, Dejan B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Muscle & nerve</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malešević, Nebojša M.</au><au>Popović, Lana Z.</au><au>Schwirtlich, Laszlo</au><au>Popović, Dejan B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distributed low-frequency functional electrical stimulation delays muscle fatigue compared to conventional stimulation</atitle><jtitle>Muscle & nerve</jtitle><addtitle>Muscle Nerve</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>556</spage><epage>562</epage><pages>556-562</pages><issn>0148-639X</issn><eissn>1097-4598</eissn><coden>MUNEDE</coden><abstract>We present a low‐frequency stimulation method via multi‐pad electrodes for delaying muscle fatigue. We compared two protocols for muscle activation of the quadriceps in paraplegics. One protocol involved a large cathode at 30 HZ (HPR, high pulse‐rate), and the other involved four smaller cathodes at 16 HZ (LPR, low pulse‐rate). The treatment included 30‐min daily sessions for 20 days. One leg was treated with the HPR protocol and the other with the LPR protocol. Knee‐joint torque was measured before and after therapy to assess the time interval before the knee‐joint torque decreased to 70% of the initial value. The HPR therapy provided greater increases in muscle endurance and force in prolonged training. Yet the LPR stimulation produced less muscle fatigue compared to the HPR stimulation. The results suggest that HPR is the favored protocol for training, and LPR is better suited for prolonged stimulation. Muscle Nerve, 2010</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>20665516</pmid><doi>10.1002/mus.21736</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0148-639X |
| ispartof | Muscle & nerve, 2010-10, Vol.42 (4), p.556-562 |
| issn | 0148-639X 1097-4598 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755971009 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Electric Stimulation - instrumentation Electric Stimulation - methods Electrodes Equipment Design Female functional electrical stimulation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Knee Joint - physiopathology low-frequency distributed stimulation Male Middle Aged multi-pad electrode Muscle Fatigue Paraplegia - physiopathology Paraplegia - therapy Physical Endurance Quadriceps Muscle - physiopathology Quadriplegia - physiopathology Quadriplegia - therapy Striated muscle. Tendons therapy Torque Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system Young Adult |
| title | Distributed low-frequency functional electrical stimulation delays muscle fatigue compared to conventional stimulation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T06%3A09%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distributed%20low-frequency%20functional%20electrical%20stimulation%20delays%20muscle%20fatigue%20compared%20to%20conventional%20stimulation&rft.jtitle=Muscle%20&%20nerve&rft.au=Male%C5%A1evi%C4%87,%20Neboj%C5%A1a%20M.&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=556&rft.epage=562&rft.pages=556-562&rft.issn=0148-639X&rft.eissn=1097-4598&rft.coden=MUNEDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mus.21736&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E755971009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=755971009&rft_id=info:pmid/20665516&rfr_iscdi=true |