Evaluation of a Breast Mass
To the Editor: The Current Concepts article by Donegan (Sept. 24 issue) 1 on the management of palpable breast masses raises several important issues that should be clarified. Although the term “diagnostic mammography” is commonly used, mammography is rarely diagnostic in the sense of “distinguishin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1993-03, Vol.328 (11), p.810-812 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 812 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 810 |
container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
container_volume | 328 |
creator | Kopans, D B |
description | To the Editor:
The Current Concepts article by Donegan (Sept. 24 issue)
1
on the management of palpable breast masses raises several important issues that should be clarified. Although the term “diagnostic mammography” is commonly used, mammography is rarely diagnostic in the sense of “distinguishing one disease from another”
2
. Mammography is almost exclusively a screening technique. It is rare that the mammogram can characterize a palpable lesion sufficiently that no further evaluation is needed. Even specially targeted mammographic views may fail to image the palpable abnormality. Mammography should be used in a woman who has a mass, but it should . . . |
doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJM199303183281115 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75597026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75597026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-af5fe17b738c92f0a66868faea1f500100033b85160b81c65cf51cebd4caa42a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRaq3-giJk5Uaic3PnlaWW-qLVja6Hm-kMtCRNzSRC_72RFFfi3dzFOec7cBibAr8BLtXt6_xlCXmOHMFgZgBAHrExSMRUCK6O2ZjzzKRC53jKzmLc8P5A5CM2MgK14nrMpvMvKjtq1_U2qUNCyX3jKbbJkmI8ZyeByugvDn_CPh7m77OndPH2-Dy7W6QOtWhTCjJ40IVG4_IscFLKKBPIEwTZF_aliIWRoHhhwCnpggTni5VwRCIjnLCrgbtr6s_Ox9ZW6-h8WdLW1120Wspc80z1RhyMrqljbHywu2ZdUbO3wO3PJPaPSfrU5QHfFZVf_WYOG_T69aBXVbRbv6n-pX0DPlZlug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75597026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a Breast Mass</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Kopans, D B</creator><creatorcontrib>Kopans, D B</creatorcontrib><description>To the Editor:
The Current Concepts article by Donegan (Sept. 24 issue)
1
on the management of palpable breast masses raises several important issues that should be clarified. Although the term “diagnostic mammography” is commonly used, mammography is rarely diagnostic in the sense of “distinguishing one disease from another”
2
. Mammography is almost exclusively a screening technique. It is rare that the mammogram can characterize a palpable lesion sufficiently that no further evaluation is needed. Even specially targeted mammographic views may fail to image the palpable abnormality. Mammography should be used in a woman who has a mass, but it should . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199303183281115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8437607</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Breast Diseases - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Humans ; Mammography</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 1993-03, Vol.328 (11), p.810-812</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1993 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-af5fe17b738c92f0a66868faea1f500100033b85160b81c65cf51cebd4caa42a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-af5fe17b738c92f0a66868faea1f500100033b85160b81c65cf51cebd4caa42a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJM199303183281115$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199303183281115$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,2746,2747,26084,27905,27906,52363,54045,64366</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8437607$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kopans, D B</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a Breast Mass</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>To the Editor:
The Current Concepts article by Donegan (Sept. 24 issue)
1
on the management of palpable breast masses raises several important issues that should be clarified. Although the term “diagnostic mammography” is commonly used, mammography is rarely diagnostic in the sense of “distinguishing one disease from another”
2
. Mammography is almost exclusively a screening technique. It is rare that the mammogram can characterize a palpable lesion sufficiently that no further evaluation is needed. Even specially targeted mammographic views may fail to image the palpable abnormality. Mammography should be used in a woman who has a mass, but it should . . .</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRaq3-giJk5Uaic3PnlaWW-qLVja6Hm-kMtCRNzSRC_72RFFfi3dzFOec7cBibAr8BLtXt6_xlCXmOHMFgZgBAHrExSMRUCK6O2ZjzzKRC53jKzmLc8P5A5CM2MgK14nrMpvMvKjtq1_U2qUNCyX3jKbbJkmI8ZyeByugvDn_CPh7m77OndPH2-Dy7W6QOtWhTCjJ40IVG4_IscFLKKBPIEwTZF_aliIWRoHhhwCnpggTni5VwRCIjnLCrgbtr6s_Ox9ZW6-h8WdLW1120Wspc80z1RhyMrqljbHywu2ZdUbO3wO3PJPaPSfrU5QHfFZVf_WYOG_T69aBXVbRbv6n-pX0DPlZlug</recordid><startdate>19930318</startdate><enddate>19930318</enddate><creator>Kopans, D B</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930318</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a Breast Mass</title><author>Kopans, D B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-af5fe17b738c92f0a66868faea1f500100033b85160b81c65cf51cebd4caa42a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kopans, D B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kopans, D B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a Breast Mass</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>1993-03-18</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>328</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>810</spage><epage>812</epage><pages>810-812</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>To the Editor:
The Current Concepts article by Donegan (Sept. 24 issue)
1
on the management of palpable breast masses raises several important issues that should be clarified. Although the term “diagnostic mammography” is commonly used, mammography is rarely diagnostic in the sense of “distinguishing one disease from another”
2
. Mammography is almost exclusively a screening technique. It is rare that the mammogram can characterize a palpable lesion sufficiently that no further evaluation is needed. Even specially targeted mammographic views may fail to image the palpable abnormality. Mammography should be used in a woman who has a mass, but it should . . .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>8437607</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJM199303183281115</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 1993-03, Vol.328 (11), p.810-812 |
issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75597026 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; New England Journal of Medicine |
subjects | Adult Breast Diseases - diagnosis Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Diagnosis, Differential Female Humans Mammography |
title | Evaluation of a Breast Mass |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A40%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20Breast%20Mass&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Kopans,%20D%20B&rft.date=1993-03-18&rft.volume=328&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=810&rft.epage=812&rft.pages=810-812&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJM199303183281115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75597026%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75597026&rft_id=info:pmid/8437607&rfr_iscdi=true |