The potent bile acid sequestrant colesevelam is not effective in cholestatic pruritus: Results of a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial
Colesevelam is an anion‐exchange resin with a 7‐fold higher bile acid–binding capacity and fewer side effects than cholestyramine, the current first‐line treatment option for cholestatic pruritus. The aim of this trial was to compare the effects of colesevelam and a placebo in patients with cholesta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2010-10, Vol.52 (4), p.1334-1340 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1340 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1334 |
container_title | Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Kuiper, Edith M. M. van Erpecum, Karel J. Beuers, Ulrich Hansen, Bettina E. Thio, H. Bing de Man, Robert A. Janssen, Harry L. A. van Buuren, Henk R. |
description | Colesevelam is an anion‐exchange resin with a 7‐fold higher bile acid–binding capacity and fewer side effects than cholestyramine, the current first‐line treatment option for cholestatic pruritus. The aim of this trial was to compare the effects of colesevelam and a placebo in patients with cholestatic pruritus. In a randomized, double‐blind, investigator‐initiated, multicenter trial, patients with cholestatic pruritus, both treatment‐naive and previously treated, received 1875 mg of colesevelam or an identical placebo twice daily for 3 weeks. The effect on pruritus was assessed with daily visual analogue scales, quality‐of‐life scores, and evaluations of cutaneous scratch lesions. The predefined primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with at least a 40% reduction in pruritus visual analogue scale scores. Thirty‐eight patients were included, and 35 were evaluable: 17 took colesevelam, 18 took the placebo, 22 were female, 8 were treatment‐naive, 14 had primary biliary cirrhosis, and 14 had primary sclerosing cholangitis. The mean serum bile acid levels were comparable between the groups before treatment (P = 0.74), but they were significantly different after treatment (P = 0.01) in favor of patients treated with colesevelam. Thirty‐six percent of patients in the colesevelam group reached the primary endpoint versus 35% in the placebo group (P = 1.0). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to pruritus scores, quality‐of‐life scores, and severity of cutaneous scratch lesions. Mild side effects occurred in one colesevelam‐treated patient and four placebo‐treated patients. Conclusion: Although colesevelam significantly decreased serum bile acid levels, this trial was unable to demonstrate that it was more effective than a placebo in alleviating the severity of pruritus of cholestasis. (HEPATOLOGY 2010) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hep.23821 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755969599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>755969599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4501-a38344eef2ca3ceba8d14a7a1bdcbac7d1f3ed67e4f569fd20d374320807d9e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90s1qFTEUB_AgFnutLnwBCYio0GnzMTOZuJNSbaGgSF0PmeSEm5KZjEmmUlc-gmsfzycxt_eqUNBVQvLjHE7-QegJJUeUEHa8hvmI8Y7Re2hFGyYqzhtyH60IE6SSlMt99DClK0KIrFn3AO0z0nZccrJCPy7XgOeQYcp4cB6w0s7gBJ8XSDmqcqqDhwTX4NWIXcJTyBisBZ3dNWA3Yb3egKyy03iOS3R5Sa_xR0iLzwkHixU2YRk8_Pz2ffBuMoe41DVhdF-h7GevNAyhXOow5Ri8B4NzdMo_QntW-QSPd-sB-vT29PLkrLp4_-785M1FpeuG0Erxjtc1gGVa8VJKdYbWSig6GD0oLQy1HEwroLZNK61hxHBRc0Y6IowEyg_Qi23dOYbbsfvRJQ3eqwnCknrRNLKVjZRFvvyvpEK0bSsFqQt9dodehSVOZY6i2rZjjPCNerVVOoaUIth-jm5U8aanpN9E25do-9toi326q7gMI5g_8neWBTzfAZW08ra8snbpr-PlVwi-meJ4676UvG_-3bE_O_2wbf0LyGG-8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1766822034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The potent bile acid sequestrant colesevelam is not effective in cholestatic pruritus: Results of a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Kuiper, Edith M. M. ; van Erpecum, Karel J. ; Beuers, Ulrich ; Hansen, Bettina E. ; Thio, H. Bing ; de Man, Robert A. ; Janssen, Harry L. A. ; van Buuren, Henk R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuiper, Edith M. M. ; van Erpecum, Karel J. ; Beuers, Ulrich ; Hansen, Bettina E. ; Thio, H. Bing ; de Man, Robert A. ; Janssen, Harry L. A. ; van Buuren, Henk R.</creatorcontrib><description>Colesevelam is an anion‐exchange resin with a 7‐fold higher bile acid–binding capacity and fewer side effects than cholestyramine, the current first‐line treatment option for cholestatic pruritus. The aim of this trial was to compare the effects of colesevelam and a placebo in patients with cholestatic pruritus. In a randomized, double‐blind, investigator‐initiated, multicenter trial, patients with cholestatic pruritus, both treatment‐naive and previously treated, received 1875 mg of colesevelam or an identical placebo twice daily for 3 weeks. The effect on pruritus was assessed with daily visual analogue scales, quality‐of‐life scores, and evaluations of cutaneous scratch lesions. The predefined primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with at least a 40% reduction in pruritus visual analogue scale scores. Thirty‐eight patients were included, and 35 were evaluable: 17 took colesevelam, 18 took the placebo, 22 were female, 8 were treatment‐naive, 14 had primary biliary cirrhosis, and 14 had primary sclerosing cholangitis. The mean serum bile acid levels were comparable between the groups before treatment (P = 0.74), but they were significantly different after treatment (P = 0.01) in favor of patients treated with colesevelam. Thirty‐six percent of patients in the colesevelam group reached the primary endpoint versus 35% in the placebo group (P = 1.0). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to pruritus scores, quality‐of‐life scores, and severity of cutaneous scratch lesions. Mild side effects occurred in one colesevelam‐treated patient and four placebo‐treated patients. Conclusion: Although colesevelam significantly decreased serum bile acid levels, this trial was unable to demonstrate that it was more effective than a placebo in alleviating the severity of pruritus of cholestasis. (HEPATOLOGY 2010)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-9139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hep.23821</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20683930</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HPTLD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Acids ; Adult ; Aged ; Allylamine - analogs & derivatives ; Allylamine - therapeutic use ; Bile ; Bile Acids and Salts - blood ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cholangitis, Sclerosing - drug therapy ; Cholestasis - drug therapy ; Cholesterol ; Colesevelam Hydrochloride ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary - drug therapy ; Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Placebos ; Pruritus - drug therapy</subject><ispartof>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2010-10, Vol.52 (4), p.1334-1340</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4501-a38344eef2ca3ceba8d14a7a1bdcbac7d1f3ed67e4f569fd20d374320807d9e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4501-a38344eef2ca3ceba8d14a7a1bdcbac7d1f3ed67e4f569fd20d374320807d9e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhep.23821$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhep.23821$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23335739$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20683930$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuiper, Edith M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Erpecum, Karel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beuers, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Bettina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thio, H. Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Man, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Harry L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Buuren, Henk R.</creatorcontrib><title>The potent bile acid sequestrant colesevelam is not effective in cholestatic pruritus: Results of a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial</title><title>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</title><addtitle>Hepatology</addtitle><description>Colesevelam is an anion‐exchange resin with a 7‐fold higher bile acid–binding capacity and fewer side effects than cholestyramine, the current first‐line treatment option for cholestatic pruritus. The aim of this trial was to compare the effects of colesevelam and a placebo in patients with cholestatic pruritus. In a randomized, double‐blind, investigator‐initiated, multicenter trial, patients with cholestatic pruritus, both treatment‐naive and previously treated, received 1875 mg of colesevelam or an identical placebo twice daily for 3 weeks. The effect on pruritus was assessed with daily visual analogue scales, quality‐of‐life scores, and evaluations of cutaneous scratch lesions. The predefined primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with at least a 40% reduction in pruritus visual analogue scale scores. Thirty‐eight patients were included, and 35 were evaluable: 17 took colesevelam, 18 took the placebo, 22 were female, 8 were treatment‐naive, 14 had primary biliary cirrhosis, and 14 had primary sclerosing cholangitis. The mean serum bile acid levels were comparable between the groups before treatment (P = 0.74), but they were significantly different after treatment (P = 0.01) in favor of patients treated with colesevelam. Thirty‐six percent of patients in the colesevelam group reached the primary endpoint versus 35% in the placebo group (P = 1.0). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to pruritus scores, quality‐of‐life scores, and severity of cutaneous scratch lesions. Mild side effects occurred in one colesevelam‐treated patient and four placebo‐treated patients. Conclusion: Although colesevelam significantly decreased serum bile acid levels, this trial was unable to demonstrate that it was more effective than a placebo in alleviating the severity of pruritus of cholestasis. (HEPATOLOGY 2010)</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Allylamine - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Allylamine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bile</subject><subject>Bile Acids and Salts - blood</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cholangitis, Sclerosing - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cholestasis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cholesterol</subject><subject>Colesevelam Hydrochloride</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary - drug therapy</subject><subject>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Pruritus - drug therapy</subject><issn>0270-9139</issn><issn>1527-3350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90s1qFTEUB_AgFnutLnwBCYio0GnzMTOZuJNSbaGgSF0PmeSEm5KZjEmmUlc-gmsfzycxt_eqUNBVQvLjHE7-QegJJUeUEHa8hvmI8Y7Re2hFGyYqzhtyH60IE6SSlMt99DClK0KIrFn3AO0z0nZccrJCPy7XgOeQYcp4cB6w0s7gBJ8XSDmqcqqDhwTX4NWIXcJTyBisBZ3dNWA3Yb3egKyy03iOS3R5Sa_xR0iLzwkHixU2YRk8_Pz2ffBuMoe41DVhdF-h7GevNAyhXOow5Ri8B4NzdMo_QntW-QSPd-sB-vT29PLkrLp4_-785M1FpeuG0Erxjtc1gGVa8VJKdYbWSig6GD0oLQy1HEwroLZNK61hxHBRc0Y6IowEyg_Qi23dOYbbsfvRJQ3eqwnCknrRNLKVjZRFvvyvpEK0bSsFqQt9dodehSVOZY6i2rZjjPCNerVVOoaUIth-jm5U8aanpN9E25do-9toi326q7gMI5g_8neWBTzfAZW08ra8snbpr-PlVwi-meJ4676UvG_-3bE_O_2wbf0LyGG-8w</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Kuiper, Edith M. M.</creator><creator>van Erpecum, Karel J.</creator><creator>Beuers, Ulrich</creator><creator>Hansen, Bettina E.</creator><creator>Thio, H. Bing</creator><creator>de Man, Robert A.</creator><creator>Janssen, Harry L. A.</creator><creator>van Buuren, Henk R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>The potent bile acid sequestrant colesevelam is not effective in cholestatic pruritus: Results of a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial</title><author>Kuiper, Edith M. M. ; van Erpecum, Karel J. ; Beuers, Ulrich ; Hansen, Bettina E. ; Thio, H. Bing ; de Man, Robert A. ; Janssen, Harry L. A. ; van Buuren, Henk R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4501-a38344eef2ca3ceba8d14a7a1bdcbac7d1f3ed67e4f569fd20d374320807d9e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Allylamine - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Allylamine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bile</topic><topic>Bile Acids and Salts - blood</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cholangitis, Sclerosing - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cholestasis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cholesterol</topic><topic>Colesevelam Hydrochloride</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary - drug therapy</topic><topic>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Pruritus - drug therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuiper, Edith M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Erpecum, Karel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beuers, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Bettina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thio, H. Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Man, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Harry L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Buuren, Henk R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuiper, Edith M. M.</au><au>van Erpecum, Karel J.</au><au>Beuers, Ulrich</au><au>Hansen, Bettina E.</au><au>Thio, H. Bing</au><au>de Man, Robert A.</au><au>Janssen, Harry L. A.</au><au>van Buuren, Henk R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The potent bile acid sequestrant colesevelam is not effective in cholestatic pruritus: Results of a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Hepatology</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1334</spage><epage>1340</epage><pages>1334-1340</pages><issn>0270-9139</issn><eissn>1527-3350</eissn><coden>HPTLD9</coden><abstract>Colesevelam is an anion‐exchange resin with a 7‐fold higher bile acid–binding capacity and fewer side effects than cholestyramine, the current first‐line treatment option for cholestatic pruritus. The aim of this trial was to compare the effects of colesevelam and a placebo in patients with cholestatic pruritus. In a randomized, double‐blind, investigator‐initiated, multicenter trial, patients with cholestatic pruritus, both treatment‐naive and previously treated, received 1875 mg of colesevelam or an identical placebo twice daily for 3 weeks. The effect on pruritus was assessed with daily visual analogue scales, quality‐of‐life scores, and evaluations of cutaneous scratch lesions. The predefined primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with at least a 40% reduction in pruritus visual analogue scale scores. Thirty‐eight patients were included, and 35 were evaluable: 17 took colesevelam, 18 took the placebo, 22 were female, 8 were treatment‐naive, 14 had primary biliary cirrhosis, and 14 had primary sclerosing cholangitis. The mean serum bile acid levels were comparable between the groups before treatment (P = 0.74), but they were significantly different after treatment (P = 0.01) in favor of patients treated with colesevelam. Thirty‐six percent of patients in the colesevelam group reached the primary endpoint versus 35% in the placebo group (P = 1.0). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to pruritus scores, quality‐of‐life scores, and severity of cutaneous scratch lesions. Mild side effects occurred in one colesevelam‐treated patient and four placebo‐treated patients. Conclusion: Although colesevelam significantly decreased serum bile acid levels, this trial was unable to demonstrate that it was more effective than a placebo in alleviating the severity of pruritus of cholestasis. (HEPATOLOGY 2010)</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>20683930</pmid><doi>10.1002/hep.23821</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-9139 |
ispartof | Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2010-10, Vol.52 (4), p.1334-1340 |
issn | 0270-9139 1527-3350 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755969599 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Acids Adult Aged Allylamine - analogs & derivatives Allylamine - therapeutic use Bile Bile Acids and Salts - blood Biological and medical sciences Cholangitis, Sclerosing - drug therapy Cholestasis - drug therapy Cholesterol Colesevelam Hydrochloride Double-Blind Method Female Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Hepatology Humans Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary - drug therapy Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Other diseases. Semiology Placebos Pruritus - drug therapy |
title | The potent bile acid sequestrant colesevelam is not effective in cholestatic pruritus: Results of a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T20%3A51%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20potent%20bile%20acid%20sequestrant%20colesevelam%20is%20not%20effective%20in%20cholestatic%20pruritus:%20Results%20of%20a%20double%E2%80%90blind,%20randomized,%20placebo%E2%80%90controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Hepatology%20(Baltimore,%20Md.)&rft.au=Kuiper,%20Edith%20M.%20M.&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1334&rft.epage=1340&rft.pages=1334-1340&rft.issn=0270-9139&rft.eissn=1527-3350&rft.coden=HPTLD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hep.23821&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E755969599%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1766822034&rft_id=info:pmid/20683930&rfr_iscdi=true |