Static single channel and multichannel water perfusion pressure profilometry in a bench model of a urethra

Aims To determine the catheter perfusion and withdrawal rate which generate the most repeatable single (SCPP) and multichannel pressure profilometry (MCPP) profiles in a bench model. Methods A bench model using a urethral substitute was developed in which SCPP and MCPP were performed using the Brown...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurourology and urodynamics 2010-09, Vol.29 (7), p.1312-1319
Hauptverfasser: Hirst, G.R., Beeton, R.J., Lucas, M.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1319
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1312
container_title Neurourology and urodynamics
container_volume 29
creator Hirst, G.R.
Beeton, R.J.
Lucas, M.G.
description Aims To determine the catheter perfusion and withdrawal rate which generate the most repeatable single (SCPP) and multichannel pressure profilometry (MCPP) profiles in a bench model. Methods A bench model using a urethral substitute was developed in which SCPP and MCPP were performed using the Brown–Wickham method. One single channel and four multichannel catheters were tested using seven withdrawal rates and three perfusion rates. Repeatability was determined using spread of mean profile pressure, cross‐correlation, Bland–Altman statistic, and a one‐tailed Student's t‐statistic. An artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) model was constructed to create a predictable intraluminal profile. MCPP data were used to generate three‐dimensional (3D) images of the pressures exerted by the AUS model. Results A withdrawal rate of 0.5 mm/sec and perfusion rate 1 ml/min produced the most repeatable SCPP profiles with a spread of mean profile pressure ≤7 cmH2O. For MCPP, a 10 F 6‐channel catheter using a withdrawal rate of 1 mm/sec and perfusion rate of 1 ml/min produced the most similar profiles (cross‐correlation = 0.99). However, the spread of MCPP was large (spread ≤44 cmH2O per channel). Nevertheless MCPP was able to consistently demonstrate areas of high pressure as predicted by the AUS model. Conclusions MCPP was not repeatable and is an unreliable measure of urethral pressure. MCPP and 3D images do demonstrate directional differences predicted from the AUS model. These may be of use for qualitative understanding and appreciation of relative relationships if not actual forces within the urethra and have application in understanding urethral function in vivo. Neurourol. Urodynam. 29:1312–1319, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nau.20831
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755968664</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>755968664</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3621-a1a776adc06c76df8d3bece3296fa0cfe0ebeefec59ac4b49e8846e8115fd5443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtP3DAUhS1UxEyBBX-g8q5iEcaPxE6WCBWoNKKMeElsLMe5ZkwTZ2onovPvazrD7Fjdq3O_c3R1EDqh5IwSwmZej2eMlJzuoSktGMmElPILmhLJecZyISfoa4yvhCQmrw7QhBHKZMmqKXq9G_TgDI7Ov7SAzVJ7Dy3WvsHd2KbLVnjTAwS8gmDH6HqPVwFiHAOkpbeu7TsYwho7jzWuwZsl7vom2XqbhIQNy6CP0L7VbYTj7TxED5c_7i-us_mvq58X5_PMcMFopqmWUujGEGGkaGzZ8BoMcFYJq4mxQKAGsGCKSpu8zisoy1xASWlhmyLP-SH6vslNr_0ZIQ6qc9FA22oP_RiVLIpKlEK8k6cb0oQ-xgBWrYLrdFgrStR7syo1q_43m9hv29Sx7qDZkR9VJmC2Ad5cC-vPk9TN-cNHZLZxuDjA351Dh99KSC4L9XRzpa6fy8VtMX9UC_4PfjCUow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>755968664</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Static single channel and multichannel water perfusion pressure profilometry in a bench model of a urethra</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hirst, G.R. ; Beeton, R.J. ; Lucas, M.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hirst, G.R. ; Beeton, R.J. ; Lucas, M.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Aims To determine the catheter perfusion and withdrawal rate which generate the most repeatable single (SCPP) and multichannel pressure profilometry (MCPP) profiles in a bench model. Methods A bench model using a urethral substitute was developed in which SCPP and MCPP were performed using the Brown–Wickham method. One single channel and four multichannel catheters were tested using seven withdrawal rates and three perfusion rates. Repeatability was determined using spread of mean profile pressure, cross‐correlation, Bland–Altman statistic, and a one‐tailed Student's t‐statistic. An artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) model was constructed to create a predictable intraluminal profile. MCPP data were used to generate three‐dimensional (3D) images of the pressures exerted by the AUS model. Results A withdrawal rate of 0.5 mm/sec and perfusion rate 1 ml/min produced the most repeatable SCPP profiles with a spread of mean profile pressure ≤7 cmH2O. For MCPP, a 10 F 6‐channel catheter using a withdrawal rate of 1 mm/sec and perfusion rate of 1 ml/min produced the most similar profiles (cross‐correlation = 0.99). However, the spread of MCPP was large (spread ≤44 cmH2O per channel). Nevertheless MCPP was able to consistently demonstrate areas of high pressure as predicted by the AUS model. Conclusions MCPP was not repeatable and is an unreliable measure of urethral pressure. MCPP and 3D images do demonstrate directional differences predicted from the AUS model. These may be of use for qualitative understanding and appreciation of relative relationships if not actual forces within the urethra and have application in understanding urethral function in vivo. Neurourol. Urodynam. 29:1312–1319, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.20831</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20127829</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Male ; Models, Anatomic ; Penis - anatomy &amp; histology ; Perfusion ; Pressure ; Reproducibility of Results ; Swine ; Urethra - anatomy &amp; histology ; Urethra - physiology ; urethral pressure ; urethral pressure profilometry ; Urinary Catheterization ; Urodynamics</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 2010-09, Vol.29 (7), p.1312-1319</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3621-a1a776adc06c76df8d3bece3296fa0cfe0ebeefec59ac4b49e8846e8115fd5443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3621-a1a776adc06c76df8d3bece3296fa0cfe0ebeefec59ac4b49e8846e8115fd5443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.20831$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.20831$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20127829$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hirst, G.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beeton, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, M.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Static single channel and multichannel water perfusion pressure profilometry in a bench model of a urethra</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodyn</addtitle><description>Aims To determine the catheter perfusion and withdrawal rate which generate the most repeatable single (SCPP) and multichannel pressure profilometry (MCPP) profiles in a bench model. Methods A bench model using a urethral substitute was developed in which SCPP and MCPP were performed using the Brown–Wickham method. One single channel and four multichannel catheters were tested using seven withdrawal rates and three perfusion rates. Repeatability was determined using spread of mean profile pressure, cross‐correlation, Bland–Altman statistic, and a one‐tailed Student's t‐statistic. An artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) model was constructed to create a predictable intraluminal profile. MCPP data were used to generate three‐dimensional (3D) images of the pressures exerted by the AUS model. Results A withdrawal rate of 0.5 mm/sec and perfusion rate 1 ml/min produced the most repeatable SCPP profiles with a spread of mean profile pressure ≤7 cmH2O. For MCPP, a 10 F 6‐channel catheter using a withdrawal rate of 1 mm/sec and perfusion rate of 1 ml/min produced the most similar profiles (cross‐correlation = 0.99). However, the spread of MCPP was large (spread ≤44 cmH2O per channel). Nevertheless MCPP was able to consistently demonstrate areas of high pressure as predicted by the AUS model. Conclusions MCPP was not repeatable and is an unreliable measure of urethral pressure. MCPP and 3D images do demonstrate directional differences predicted from the AUS model. These may be of use for qualitative understanding and appreciation of relative relationships if not actual forces within the urethra and have application in understanding urethral function in vivo. Neurourol. Urodynam. 29:1312–1319, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Penis - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Perfusion</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Urethra - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Urethra - physiology</subject><subject>urethral pressure</subject><subject>urethral pressure profilometry</subject><subject>Urinary Catheterization</subject><subject>Urodynamics</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtP3DAUhS1UxEyBBX-g8q5iEcaPxE6WCBWoNKKMeElsLMe5ZkwTZ2onovPvazrD7Fjdq3O_c3R1EDqh5IwSwmZej2eMlJzuoSktGMmElPILmhLJecZyISfoa4yvhCQmrw7QhBHKZMmqKXq9G_TgDI7Ov7SAzVJ7Dy3WvsHd2KbLVnjTAwS8gmDH6HqPVwFiHAOkpbeu7TsYwho7jzWuwZsl7vom2XqbhIQNy6CP0L7VbYTj7TxED5c_7i-us_mvq58X5_PMcMFopqmWUujGEGGkaGzZ8BoMcFYJq4mxQKAGsGCKSpu8zisoy1xASWlhmyLP-SH6vslNr_0ZIQ6qc9FA22oP_RiVLIpKlEK8k6cb0oQ-xgBWrYLrdFgrStR7syo1q_43m9hv29Sx7qDZkR9VJmC2Ad5cC-vPk9TN-cNHZLZxuDjA351Dh99KSC4L9XRzpa6fy8VtMX9UC_4PfjCUow</recordid><startdate>201009</startdate><enddate>201009</enddate><creator>Hirst, G.R.</creator><creator>Beeton, R.J.</creator><creator>Lucas, M.G.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201009</creationdate><title>Static single channel and multichannel water perfusion pressure profilometry in a bench model of a urethra</title><author>Hirst, G.R. ; Beeton, R.J. ; Lucas, M.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3621-a1a776adc06c76df8d3bece3296fa0cfe0ebeefec59ac4b49e8846e8115fd5443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Penis - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Perfusion</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Urethra - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Urethra - physiology</topic><topic>urethral pressure</topic><topic>urethral pressure profilometry</topic><topic>Urinary Catheterization</topic><topic>Urodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hirst, G.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beeton, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, M.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hirst, G.R.</au><au>Beeton, R.J.</au><au>Lucas, M.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Static single channel and multichannel water perfusion pressure profilometry in a bench model of a urethra</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodyn</addtitle><date>2010-09</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1312</spage><epage>1319</epage><pages>1312-1319</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Aims To determine the catheter perfusion and withdrawal rate which generate the most repeatable single (SCPP) and multichannel pressure profilometry (MCPP) profiles in a bench model. Methods A bench model using a urethral substitute was developed in which SCPP and MCPP were performed using the Brown–Wickham method. One single channel and four multichannel catheters were tested using seven withdrawal rates and three perfusion rates. Repeatability was determined using spread of mean profile pressure, cross‐correlation, Bland–Altman statistic, and a one‐tailed Student's t‐statistic. An artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) model was constructed to create a predictable intraluminal profile. MCPP data were used to generate three‐dimensional (3D) images of the pressures exerted by the AUS model. Results A withdrawal rate of 0.5 mm/sec and perfusion rate 1 ml/min produced the most repeatable SCPP profiles with a spread of mean profile pressure ≤7 cmH2O. For MCPP, a 10 F 6‐channel catheter using a withdrawal rate of 1 mm/sec and perfusion rate of 1 ml/min produced the most similar profiles (cross‐correlation = 0.99). However, the spread of MCPP was large (spread ≤44 cmH2O per channel). Nevertheless MCPP was able to consistently demonstrate areas of high pressure as predicted by the AUS model. Conclusions MCPP was not repeatable and is an unreliable measure of urethral pressure. MCPP and 3D images do demonstrate directional differences predicted from the AUS model. These may be of use for qualitative understanding and appreciation of relative relationships if not actual forces within the urethra and have application in understanding urethral function in vivo. Neurourol. Urodynam. 29:1312–1319, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>20127829</pmid><doi>10.1002/nau.20831</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-2467
ispartof Neurourology and urodynamics, 2010-09, Vol.29 (7), p.1312-1319
issn 0733-2467
1520-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755968664
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Male
Models, Anatomic
Penis - anatomy & histology
Perfusion
Pressure
Reproducibility of Results
Swine
Urethra - anatomy & histology
Urethra - physiology
urethral pressure
urethral pressure profilometry
Urinary Catheterization
Urodynamics
title Static single channel and multichannel water perfusion pressure profilometry in a bench model of a urethra
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A56%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Static%20single%20channel%20and%20multichannel%20water%20perfusion%20pressure%20profilometry%20in%20a%20bench%20model%20of%20a%20urethra&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Hirst,%20G.R.&rft.date=2010-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1312&rft.epage=1319&rft.pages=1312-1319&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.20831&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E755968664%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=755968664&rft_id=info:pmid/20127829&rfr_iscdi=true