Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: water managers' assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater
The connection between scientific knowledge and environmental policy is enhanced through boundary organizations and objects that are perceived to be credible, salient, and legitimate. In this study, water resource decision-makers evaluated the knowledge embedded in WaterSim, an interactive simulatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Science & public policy 2010-04, Vol.37 (3), p.219-232 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 232 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 219 |
container_title | Science & public policy |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | White, Dave D Wutich, Amber Larson, Kelli L Gober, Patricia Lant, Timothy Senneville, Clea |
description | The connection between scientific knowledge and environmental policy is enhanced through boundary organizations and objects that are perceived to be credible, salient, and legitimate. In this study, water resource decision-makers evaluated the knowledge embedded in WaterSim, an interactive simulation model of water supply and demand presented in an immersive decision theater. Content analysis of individual responses demonstrated that stakeholders were fairly critical of the model's validity, relevance, and bias. Differing perspectives reveal tradeoffs in achieving credible, salient, and legitimate boundary objects, along with the need for iterative processes that engage them in the co-production of knowledge and action. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3152/030234210X497726 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755927512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.3152/030234210X497726</oup_id><sourcerecordid>755927512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-10d6659dd1e9eddfd315ab6705957e65765bebbf84a8291018ecb9ac494827ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDtPHDEUha0okbIh9JTuKMIktscez9BFqwQiEUEBAtFYftwhJvPY-HpI9j_wo5nRohRUVPdK5zun-Ag54OxzyZX4wkomSik4u5GN1qJ6Q1Zcal4oWbK3ZLXExZzr9-QD4j1jTNRSrcjjOkGILnYxb48o2i7C4OGI2iHQDu5ijr31Wzq21I3TEGyaf3cPPuMx_WszJNrbwd5BwkNqEQGxhyEvvKUY-6mzOY4D7ccAHY3DvEtj3894fAAawEdc4vwLlq2P5F1rO4T957tHrr5_u1yfFmfnJz_WX88KLyuRC85CVakmBA4NhNCGWYB1lWaqURoqpSvlwLm2lrYWDWe8Bu8a62Uja6GtK_fI4W53k8Y_E2A2fUQPXWcHGCc0WqlGaMXFTLId6dOImKA1mzQbSVvDmVm8m5fe58qnXWWcNq-hix0dMcO__7xNv02lS63M6c2tkRcX_PLn7bW5Lp8A5fGTxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>755927512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: water managers' assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>White, Dave D ; Wutich, Amber ; Larson, Kelli L ; Gober, Patricia ; Lant, Timothy ; Senneville, Clea</creator><creatorcontrib>White, Dave D ; Wutich, Amber ; Larson, Kelli L ; Gober, Patricia ; Lant, Timothy ; Senneville, Clea</creatorcontrib><description>The connection between scientific knowledge and environmental policy is enhanced through boundary organizations and objects that are perceived to be credible, salient, and legitimate. In this study, water resource decision-makers evaluated the knowledge embedded in WaterSim, an interactive simulation model of water supply and demand presented in an immersive decision theater. Content analysis of individual responses demonstrated that stakeholders were fairly critical of the model's validity, relevance, and bias. Differing perspectives reveal tradeoffs in achieving credible, salient, and legitimate boundary objects, along with the need for iterative processes that engage them in the co-production of knowledge and action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-3427</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-5430</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3152/030234210X497726</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beech Tree Publishing</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Environmental policy ; Knowledge ; Legitimacy ; Organizational analysis ; Scientific research ; Simulation ; Water management</subject><ispartof>Science & public policy, 2010-04, Vol.37 (3), p.219-232</ispartof><rights>Beech Tree Publishing 2010 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-10d6659dd1e9eddfd315ab6705957e65765bebbf84a8291018ecb9ac494827ab3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, Dave D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wutich, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Kelli L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gober, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lant, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senneville, Clea</creatorcontrib><title>Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: water managers' assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater</title><title>Science & public policy</title><addtitle>sci public policy</addtitle><addtitle>sci public policy</addtitle><description>The connection between scientific knowledge and environmental policy is enhanced through boundary organizations and objects that are perceived to be credible, salient, and legitimate. In this study, water resource decision-makers evaluated the knowledge embedded in WaterSim, an interactive simulation model of water supply and demand presented in an immersive decision theater. Content analysis of individual responses demonstrated that stakeholders were fairly critical of the model's validity, relevance, and bias. Differing perspectives reveal tradeoffs in achieving credible, salient, and legitimate boundary objects, along with the need for iterative processes that engage them in the co-production of knowledge and action.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Organizational analysis</subject><subject>Scientific research</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Water management</subject><issn>0302-3427</issn><issn>1471-5430</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkDtPHDEUha0okbIh9JTuKMIktscez9BFqwQiEUEBAtFYftwhJvPY-HpI9j_wo5nRohRUVPdK5zun-Ag54OxzyZX4wkomSik4u5GN1qJ6Q1Zcal4oWbK3ZLXExZzr9-QD4j1jTNRSrcjjOkGILnYxb48o2i7C4OGI2iHQDu5ijr31Wzq21I3TEGyaf3cPPuMx_WszJNrbwd5BwkNqEQGxhyEvvKUY-6mzOY4D7ccAHY3DvEtj3894fAAawEdc4vwLlq2P5F1rO4T957tHrr5_u1yfFmfnJz_WX88KLyuRC85CVakmBA4NhNCGWYB1lWaqURoqpSvlwLm2lrYWDWe8Bu8a62Uja6GtK_fI4W53k8Y_E2A2fUQPXWcHGCc0WqlGaMXFTLId6dOImKA1mzQbSVvDmVm8m5fe58qnXWWcNq-hix0dMcO__7xNv02lS63M6c2tkRcX_PLn7bW5Lp8A5fGTxQ</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>White, Dave D</creator><creator>Wutich, Amber</creator><creator>Larson, Kelli L</creator><creator>Gober, Patricia</creator><creator>Lant, Timothy</creator><creator>Senneville, Clea</creator><general>Beech Tree Publishing</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: water managers' assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater</title><author>White, Dave D ; Wutich, Amber ; Larson, Kelli L ; Gober, Patricia ; Lant, Timothy ; Senneville, Clea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-10d6659dd1e9eddfd315ab6705957e65765bebbf84a8291018ecb9ac494827ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Organizational analysis</topic><topic>Scientific research</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Water management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, Dave D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wutich, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Kelli L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gober, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lant, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senneville, Clea</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Science & public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, Dave D</au><au>Wutich, Amber</au><au>Larson, Kelli L</au><au>Gober, Patricia</au><au>Lant, Timothy</au><au>Senneville, Clea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: water managers' assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater</atitle><jtitle>Science & public policy</jtitle><stitle>sci public policy</stitle><addtitle>sci public policy</addtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>219-232</pages><issn>0302-3427</issn><eissn>1471-5430</eissn><abstract>The connection between scientific knowledge and environmental policy is enhanced through boundary organizations and objects that are perceived to be credible, salient, and legitimate. In this study, water resource decision-makers evaluated the knowledge embedded in WaterSim, an interactive simulation model of water supply and demand presented in an immersive decision theater. Content analysis of individual responses demonstrated that stakeholders were fairly critical of the model's validity, relevance, and bias. Differing perspectives reveal tradeoffs in achieving credible, salient, and legitimate boundary objects, along with the need for iterative processes that engage them in the co-production of knowledge and action.</abstract><pub>Beech Tree Publishing</pub><doi>10.3152/030234210X497726</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0302-3427 |
ispartof | Science & public policy, 2010-04, Vol.37 (3), p.219-232 |
issn | 0302-3427 1471-5430 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755927512 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Decision making Environmental policy Knowledge Legitimacy Organizational analysis Scientific research Simulation Water management |
title | Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: water managers' assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A50%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Credibility,%20salience,%20and%20legitimacy%20of%20boundary%20objects:%20water%20managers'%20assessment%20of%20a%20simulation%20model%20in%20an%20immersive%20decision%20theater&rft.jtitle=Science%20&%20public%20policy&rft.au=White,%20Dave%20D&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=219-232&rft.issn=0302-3427&rft.eissn=1471-5430&rft_id=info:doi/10.3152/030234210X497726&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E755927512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=755927512&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.3152/030234210X497726&rfr_iscdi=true |