The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy
The focus of health promotion is moving from the level of individuals to organizations, communities and broader social policy. Traditional quantitative methods (e.g. social surverys and experimental designs) which are variously appropriate at the level of individual behavior change require adaptatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 1993, Vol.36 (2), p.109-117 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 117 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 109 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | McKinlay, John B. |
description | The focus of health promotion is moving from the level of individuals to organizations, communities and broader social policy. Traditional quantitative methods (e.g. social surverys and experimental designs) which are variously appropriate at the level of individual behavior change require adaptation and refinement when sociopolitical change becomes the mechanism for health promotion. Because of their training and experience health services researchers and health educators (especially psychologists) are understandably resistant to necessary methodologic changes. Well designed and carefully conducted qualitative studies (e.g. ethnographic interviewing, participant observation, case studies and focus group activities) are required to complement quantitative approaches, and can fill gaps where quantitative techniques are suboptimal or even inappropriate:
hard qualitative techniques can support
soft quantitative methods. Their utility in process evaluation is now beyond dispute. Recent work at the New England Research Institute (NERI) is used to illustrate the role of qualitative research in the evaluation of health promotion through planned sociopolitical change. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90202-F |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75556464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>027795369390202F</els_id><sourcerecordid>57687085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-b60d6de84c157781b6382cb4e52e46bd23b919c1b897f4ccfdfe67117b7d6b683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEKtvCPwDJB4TgELDj7x6Q0KrLhypxKWfLsSeNURIHO1tp_z0Ou-yRHka2Zp53NDNvVb0i-APBRHzEjZS15lS80_S9xg1u6t2TakOUpDWnTD6tNmfkeXWZ8y-MMcGKXlQXijVEKrmp7F0PaE5xjEuIE4od6sEOS4-WPsX9fY_mwU4TeJSjC3GOQ1iCswNyvZ3u4RptezsMUL4ZdTGhBBlscj2yk0cr7Q4vqmedHTK8PL1X1c_dzd32a33748u37efb2nFBlroV2AsPijnCpVSkFVQ1rmXAG2Ci9Q1tNdGOtErLjjnX-Q6EJES20otWKHpVvT32Ldv83kNezBiyg6HMD3GfjeScCybYo6AglHFF9aMgl0JJrHgB2RF0KeacoDNzCqNNB0OwWb0yqxFmNcJoav56ZXZF9v0oSzCDO2sAoBx7BG8eDLVFQu2hBNFFSm0o0ZSY1xTWplzA9MtYmr0-DbtvV-2_bienS_3NqW5zMbBLdnIhnzHGNJEUF-zTEYNi1UOAZLILMDnwIYFbjI_h_0v9AerayZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57687085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>McKinlay, John B.</creator><creatorcontrib>McKinlay, John B.</creatorcontrib><description>The focus of health promotion is moving from the level of individuals to organizations, communities and broader social policy. Traditional quantitative methods (e.g. social surverys and experimental designs) which are variously appropriate at the level of individual behavior change require adaptation and refinement when sociopolitical change becomes the mechanism for health promotion. Because of their training and experience health services researchers and health educators (especially psychologists) are understandably resistant to necessary methodologic changes. Well designed and carefully conducted qualitative studies (e.g. ethnographic interviewing, participant observation, case studies and focus group activities) are required to complement quantitative approaches, and can fill gaps where quantitative techniques are suboptimal or even inappropriate:
hard qualitative techniques can support
soft quantitative methods. Their utility in process evaluation is now beyond dispute. Recent work at the New England Research Institute (NERI) is used to illustrate the role of qualitative research in the evaluation of health promotion through planned sociopolitical change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90202-F</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8421787</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSMDEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Delivery Systems ; Educational Programs ; evaluation research ; General aspects ; Health Behavior ; Health Policy - trends ; Health promotion ; Health Promotion - trends ; health promotion evaluation research quantitative and qualitative methods ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation ; Political Factors ; Politics ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; quantitative and qualitative methods ; Risk Factors ; Social Change ; Social Environment ; Sociopolitical aspects ; United States ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 1993, Vol.36 (2), p.109-117</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-b60d6de84c157781b6382cb4e52e46bd23b919c1b897f4ccfdfe67117b7d6b683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-b60d6de84c157781b6382cb4e52e46bd23b919c1b897f4ccfdfe67117b7d6b683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90202-F$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,4024,27923,27924,27925,31000,33775,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4491730$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8421787$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeesocmed/v_3a36_3ay_3a1993_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a109-117.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKinlay, John B.</creatorcontrib><title>The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>The focus of health promotion is moving from the level of individuals to organizations, communities and broader social policy. Traditional quantitative methods (e.g. social surverys and experimental designs) which are variously appropriate at the level of individual behavior change require adaptation and refinement when sociopolitical change becomes the mechanism for health promotion. Because of their training and experience health services researchers and health educators (especially psychologists) are understandably resistant to necessary methodologic changes. Well designed and carefully conducted qualitative studies (e.g. ethnographic interviewing, participant observation, case studies and focus group activities) are required to complement quantitative approaches, and can fill gaps where quantitative techniques are suboptimal or even inappropriate:
hard qualitative techniques can support
soft quantitative methods. Their utility in process evaluation is now beyond dispute. Recent work at the New England Research Institute (NERI) is used to illustrate the role of qualitative research in the evaluation of health promotion through planned sociopolitical change.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Educational Programs</subject><subject>evaluation research</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Policy - trends</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health Promotion - trends</subject><subject>health promotion evaluation research quantitative and qualitative methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</subject><subject>Political Factors</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>quantitative and qualitative methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Social Change</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Sociopolitical aspects</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEKtvCPwDJB4TgELDj7x6Q0KrLhypxKWfLsSeNURIHO1tp_z0Ou-yRHka2Zp53NDNvVb0i-APBRHzEjZS15lS80_S9xg1u6t2TakOUpDWnTD6tNmfkeXWZ8y-MMcGKXlQXijVEKrmp7F0PaE5xjEuIE4od6sEOS4-WPsX9fY_mwU4TeJSjC3GOQ1iCswNyvZ3u4RptezsMUL4ZdTGhBBlscj2yk0cr7Q4vqmedHTK8PL1X1c_dzd32a33748u37efb2nFBlroV2AsPijnCpVSkFVQ1rmXAG2Ci9Q1tNdGOtErLjjnX-Q6EJES20otWKHpVvT32Ldv83kNezBiyg6HMD3GfjeScCybYo6AglHFF9aMgl0JJrHgB2RF0KeacoDNzCqNNB0OwWb0yqxFmNcJoav56ZXZF9v0oSzCDO2sAoBx7BG8eDLVFQu2hBNFFSm0o0ZSY1xTWplzA9MtYmr0-DbtvV-2_bienS_3NqW5zMbBLdnIhnzHGNJEUF-zTEYNi1UOAZLILMDnwIYFbjI_h_0v9AerayZE</recordid><startdate>1993</startdate><enddate>1993</enddate><creator>McKinlay, John B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1993</creationdate><title>The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy</title><author>McKinlay, John B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-b60d6de84c157781b6382cb4e52e46bd23b919c1b897f4ccfdfe67117b7d6b683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Educational Programs</topic><topic>evaluation research</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Policy - trends</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health Promotion - trends</topic><topic>health promotion evaluation research quantitative and qualitative methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</topic><topic>Political Factors</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>quantitative and qualitative methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Social Change</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Sociopolitical aspects</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKinlay, John B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKinlay, John B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>1993</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>109-117</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSMDEP</coden><abstract>The focus of health promotion is moving from the level of individuals to organizations, communities and broader social policy. Traditional quantitative methods (e.g. social surverys and experimental designs) which are variously appropriate at the level of individual behavior change require adaptation and refinement when sociopolitical change becomes the mechanism for health promotion. Because of their training and experience health services researchers and health educators (especially psychologists) are understandably resistant to necessary methodologic changes. Well designed and carefully conducted qualitative studies (e.g. ethnographic interviewing, participant observation, case studies and focus group activities) are required to complement quantitative approaches, and can fill gaps where quantitative techniques are suboptimal or even inappropriate:
hard qualitative techniques can support
soft quantitative methods. Their utility in process evaluation is now beyond dispute. Recent work at the New England Research Institute (NERI) is used to illustrate the role of qualitative research in the evaluation of health promotion through planned sociopolitical change.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>8421787</pmid><doi>10.1016/0277-9536(93)90202-F</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 1993, Vol.36 (2), p.109-117 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75556464 |
source | MEDLINE; RePEc; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Delivery Systems Educational Programs evaluation research General aspects Health Behavior Health Policy - trends Health promotion Health Promotion - trends health promotion evaluation research quantitative and qualitative methods Humans Medical sciences Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation Political Factors Politics Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine quantitative and qualitative methods Risk Factors Social Change Social Environment Sociopolitical aspects United States United States of America |
title | The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A19%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20promotion%20of%20health%20through%20planned%20sociopolitical%20change:%20Challenges%20for%20research%20and%20policy&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=McKinlay,%20John%20B.&rft.date=1993&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=109-117&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSMDEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90202-F&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57687085%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57687085&rft_id=info:pmid/8421787&rft_els_id=027795369390202F&rfr_iscdi=true |