The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy

The focus of health promotion is moving from the level of individuals to organizations, communities and broader social policy. Traditional quantitative methods (e.g. social surverys and experimental designs) which are variously appropriate at the level of individual behavior change require adaptatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science & medicine (1982) 1993, Vol.36 (2), p.109-117
1. Verfasser: McKinlay, John B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 117
container_issue 2
container_start_page 109
container_title Social science & medicine (1982)
container_volume 36
creator McKinlay, John B.
description The focus of health promotion is moving from the level of individuals to organizations, communities and broader social policy. Traditional quantitative methods (e.g. social surverys and experimental designs) which are variously appropriate at the level of individual behavior change require adaptation and refinement when sociopolitical change becomes the mechanism for health promotion. Because of their training and experience health services researchers and health educators (especially psychologists) are understandably resistant to necessary methodologic changes. Well designed and carefully conducted qualitative studies (e.g. ethnographic interviewing, participant observation, case studies and focus group activities) are required to complement quantitative approaches, and can fill gaps where quantitative techniques are suboptimal or even inappropriate: hard qualitative techniques can support soft quantitative methods. Their utility in process evaluation is now beyond dispute. Recent work at the New England Research Institute (NERI) is used to illustrate the role of qualitative research in the evaluation of health promotion through planned sociopolitical change.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90202-F
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75556464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>027795369390202F</els_id><sourcerecordid>57687085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-b60d6de84c157781b6382cb4e52e46bd23b919c1b897f4ccfdfe67117b7d6b683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEKtvCPwDJB4TgELDj7x6Q0KrLhypxKWfLsSeNURIHO1tp_z0Ou-yRHka2Zp53NDNvVb0i-APBRHzEjZS15lS80_S9xg1u6t2TakOUpDWnTD6tNmfkeXWZ8y-MMcGKXlQXijVEKrmp7F0PaE5xjEuIE4od6sEOS4-WPsX9fY_mwU4TeJSjC3GOQ1iCswNyvZ3u4RptezsMUL4ZdTGhBBlscj2yk0cr7Q4vqmedHTK8PL1X1c_dzd32a33748u37efb2nFBlroV2AsPijnCpVSkFVQ1rmXAG2Ci9Q1tNdGOtErLjjnX-Q6EJES20otWKHpVvT32Ldv83kNezBiyg6HMD3GfjeScCybYo6AglHFF9aMgl0JJrHgB2RF0KeacoDNzCqNNB0OwWb0yqxFmNcJoav56ZXZF9v0oSzCDO2sAoBx7BG8eDLVFQu2hBNFFSm0o0ZSY1xTWplzA9MtYmr0-DbtvV-2_bienS_3NqW5zMbBLdnIhnzHGNJEUF-zTEYNi1UOAZLILMDnwIYFbjI_h_0v9AerayZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57687085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>McKinlay, John B.</creator><creatorcontrib>McKinlay, John B.</creatorcontrib><description>The focus of health promotion is moving from the level of individuals to organizations, communities and broader social policy. Traditional quantitative methods (e.g. social surverys and experimental designs) which are variously appropriate at the level of individual behavior change require adaptation and refinement when sociopolitical change becomes the mechanism for health promotion. Because of their training and experience health services researchers and health educators (especially psychologists) are understandably resistant to necessary methodologic changes. Well designed and carefully conducted qualitative studies (e.g. ethnographic interviewing, participant observation, case studies and focus group activities) are required to complement quantitative approaches, and can fill gaps where quantitative techniques are suboptimal or even inappropriate: hard qualitative techniques can support soft quantitative methods. Their utility in process evaluation is now beyond dispute. Recent work at the New England Research Institute (NERI) is used to illustrate the role of qualitative research in the evaluation of health promotion through planned sociopolitical change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90202-F</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8421787</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSMDEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Delivery Systems ; Educational Programs ; evaluation research ; General aspects ; Health Behavior ; Health Policy - trends ; Health promotion ; Health Promotion - trends ; health promotion evaluation research quantitative and qualitative methods ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation ; Political Factors ; Politics ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; quantitative and qualitative methods ; Risk Factors ; Social Change ; Social Environment ; Sociopolitical aspects ; United States ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>Social science &amp; medicine (1982), 1993, Vol.36 (2), p.109-117</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-b60d6de84c157781b6382cb4e52e46bd23b919c1b897f4ccfdfe67117b7d6b683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-b60d6de84c157781b6382cb4e52e46bd23b919c1b897f4ccfdfe67117b7d6b683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90202-F$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,4024,27923,27924,27925,31000,33775,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4491730$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8421787$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeesocmed/v_3a36_3ay_3a1993_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a109-117.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKinlay, John B.</creatorcontrib><title>The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy</title><title>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>The focus of health promotion is moving from the level of individuals to organizations, communities and broader social policy. Traditional quantitative methods (e.g. social surverys and experimental designs) which are variously appropriate at the level of individual behavior change require adaptation and refinement when sociopolitical change becomes the mechanism for health promotion. Because of their training and experience health services researchers and health educators (especially psychologists) are understandably resistant to necessary methodologic changes. Well designed and carefully conducted qualitative studies (e.g. ethnographic interviewing, participant observation, case studies and focus group activities) are required to complement quantitative approaches, and can fill gaps where quantitative techniques are suboptimal or even inappropriate: hard qualitative techniques can support soft quantitative methods. Their utility in process evaluation is now beyond dispute. Recent work at the New England Research Institute (NERI) is used to illustrate the role of qualitative research in the evaluation of health promotion through planned sociopolitical change.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Educational Programs</subject><subject>evaluation research</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Policy - trends</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health Promotion - trends</subject><subject>health promotion evaluation research quantitative and qualitative methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</subject><subject>Political Factors</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>quantitative and qualitative methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Social Change</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Sociopolitical aspects</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEKtvCPwDJB4TgELDj7x6Q0KrLhypxKWfLsSeNURIHO1tp_z0Ou-yRHka2Zp53NDNvVb0i-APBRHzEjZS15lS80_S9xg1u6t2TakOUpDWnTD6tNmfkeXWZ8y-MMcGKXlQXijVEKrmp7F0PaE5xjEuIE4od6sEOS4-WPsX9fY_mwU4TeJSjC3GOQ1iCswNyvZ3u4RptezsMUL4ZdTGhBBlscj2yk0cr7Q4vqmedHTK8PL1X1c_dzd32a33748u37efb2nFBlroV2AsPijnCpVSkFVQ1rmXAG2Ci9Q1tNdGOtErLjjnX-Q6EJES20otWKHpVvT32Ldv83kNezBiyg6HMD3GfjeScCybYo6AglHFF9aMgl0JJrHgB2RF0KeacoDNzCqNNB0OwWb0yqxFmNcJoav56ZXZF9v0oSzCDO2sAoBx7BG8eDLVFQu2hBNFFSm0o0ZSY1xTWplzA9MtYmr0-DbtvV-2_bienS_3NqW5zMbBLdnIhnzHGNJEUF-zTEYNi1UOAZLILMDnwIYFbjI_h_0v9AerayZE</recordid><startdate>1993</startdate><enddate>1993</enddate><creator>McKinlay, John B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1993</creationdate><title>The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy</title><author>McKinlay, John B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-b60d6de84c157781b6382cb4e52e46bd23b919c1b897f4ccfdfe67117b7d6b683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Educational Programs</topic><topic>evaluation research</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Policy - trends</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health Promotion - trends</topic><topic>health promotion evaluation research quantitative and qualitative methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</topic><topic>Political Factors</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>quantitative and qualitative methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Social Change</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Sociopolitical aspects</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKinlay, John B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKinlay, John B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy</atitle><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>1993</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>109-117</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSMDEP</coden><abstract>The focus of health promotion is moving from the level of individuals to organizations, communities and broader social policy. Traditional quantitative methods (e.g. social surverys and experimental designs) which are variously appropriate at the level of individual behavior change require adaptation and refinement when sociopolitical change becomes the mechanism for health promotion. Because of their training and experience health services researchers and health educators (especially psychologists) are understandably resistant to necessary methodologic changes. Well designed and carefully conducted qualitative studies (e.g. ethnographic interviewing, participant observation, case studies and focus group activities) are required to complement quantitative approaches, and can fill gaps where quantitative techniques are suboptimal or even inappropriate: hard qualitative techniques can support soft quantitative methods. Their utility in process evaluation is now beyond dispute. Recent work at the New England Research Institute (NERI) is used to illustrate the role of qualitative research in the evaluation of health promotion through planned sociopolitical change.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>8421787</pmid><doi>10.1016/0277-9536(93)90202-F</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-9536
ispartof Social science & medicine (1982), 1993, Vol.36 (2), p.109-117
issn 0277-9536
1873-5347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75556464
source MEDLINE; RePEc; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Delivery Systems
Educational Programs
evaluation research
General aspects
Health Behavior
Health Policy - trends
Health promotion
Health Promotion - trends
health promotion evaluation research quantitative and qualitative methods
Humans
Medical sciences
Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation
Political Factors
Politics
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
quantitative and qualitative methods
Risk Factors
Social Change
Social Environment
Sociopolitical aspects
United States
United States of America
title The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A19%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20promotion%20of%20health%20through%20planned%20sociopolitical%20change:%20Challenges%20for%20research%20and%20policy&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=McKinlay,%20John%20B.&rft.date=1993&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=109-117&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSMDEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90202-F&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57687085%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57687085&rft_id=info:pmid/8421787&rft_els_id=027795369390202F&rfr_iscdi=true