The anatomic suitability of the C2 vertebra for intralaminar and pedicular fixation: a computed tomography study
Abstract Background context Several methods have been used to stabilize the atlantoaxial joint, including the use of C2 pedicle and laminar screws. No report has used computed tomography (CT) angiograms to compare the risk to the vertebral artery or assess the suitability for each fixation technique...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The spine journal 2010-10, Vol.10 (10), p.896-899 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 899 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 896 |
container_title | The spine journal |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Bhatnagar, Rishi, MD Yu, Warren D., MD Bergin, Patrick F., MD Matteini, Lauren E., MD O'Brien, Joseph R., MD, MPH |
description | Abstract Background context Several methods have been used to stabilize the atlantoaxial joint, including the use of C2 pedicle and laminar screws. No report has used computed tomography (CT) angiograms to compare the risk to the vertebral artery or assess the suitability for each fixation technique. Purpose To compare the suitability of C2 pedicle versus laminar screws using CT angiograms. Study design We retrospectively evaluated the anatomic dimensions of the C2 lamina and pedicle in 50 patients using CT angiograms. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the last 50 patients admitted who underwent CT angiograms of the head and neck. Data recorded included the pedicle length and width and the laminar length and width. Vertebral artery anatomy was also assessed to determine if an aberrant location would preclude pedicle fixation. Results Mean pedicle length and width were 15.5±3.5 and 4.7±1.7 mm, respectively, with 24% of patients having anatomy that would preclude 3.5-mm pedicle screw fixation. The mean lamina length and width were 25.2±3.6 and 5.5±1.4 mm, and more than 90% of patients could tolerate a 3.5-mm C2 laminar screw. Conclusion Preoperative CT angiography or noncontrast CT is an excellent method to delineate the anatomy at C2 to determine the suitability for pedicle or intralaminar fixation. In cases where vertebral artery anatomy precludes C2 pedicle fixation, more than 90% of patients may be a candidate for C2 intralaminar fixation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.06.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755404271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1529943010004304</els_id><sourcerecordid>755404271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-fd463202e8e0cbecf01f695a3ee169fe5b16262302c39caab5ea8d15d524935d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAUtBBVW0r_AUK-ccpiO7GTcEBCK76kSj1QztaL_Uy9JHGwnar593i1hQMXTuOPmXl6M4S84mzHGVdvD7u0-BlxJ1h5YmpX4Bm55F3bVVzV4nk5S9FXfVOzC_IipQNjrGu5OCcXgikuW9lfkuXuHinMkMPkDU2rzzD40eeNBkdz-dsL-oAx4xCBuhCpn3OEESY_QyxCSxe03qxjuTn_CNmH-R0FasK0rBktLcbhR4TlfqMpr3Z7Sc4cjAmvn_CKfP_08W7_pbq5_fx1_-GmMg1XuXK2KTswgR0yM6BxjDvVS6gRueodyoEroUTNhKl7AzBIhM5yaaVo-lra-oq8OfkuMfxaMWU9-WRwHGHGsCbdStmwRrS8MJsT08SQUkSnl-gniJvmTB-j1gd9ilofo9ZM6QJF9vppwDpMaP-K_mRbCO9PBCxrPniMOhmPsyl5RTRZ2-D_N-FfAzP62RsYf-KG6RDWOJcINddJaKa_Hes-ts1L0QWa-jfri6gJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>755404271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The anatomic suitability of the C2 vertebra for intralaminar and pedicular fixation: a computed tomography study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Bhatnagar, Rishi, MD ; Yu, Warren D., MD ; Bergin, Patrick F., MD ; Matteini, Lauren E., MD ; O'Brien, Joseph R., MD, MPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, Rishi, MD ; Yu, Warren D., MD ; Bergin, Patrick F., MD ; Matteini, Lauren E., MD ; O'Brien, Joseph R., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background context Several methods have been used to stabilize the atlantoaxial joint, including the use of C2 pedicle and laminar screws. No report has used computed tomography (CT) angiograms to compare the risk to the vertebral artery or assess the suitability for each fixation technique. Purpose To compare the suitability of C2 pedicle versus laminar screws using CT angiograms. Study design We retrospectively evaluated the anatomic dimensions of the C2 lamina and pedicle in 50 patients using CT angiograms. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the last 50 patients admitted who underwent CT angiograms of the head and neck. Data recorded included the pedicle length and width and the laminar length and width. Vertebral artery anatomy was also assessed to determine if an aberrant location would preclude pedicle fixation. Results Mean pedicle length and width were 15.5±3.5 and 4.7±1.7 mm, respectively, with 24% of patients having anatomy that would preclude 3.5-mm pedicle screw fixation. The mean lamina length and width were 25.2±3.6 and 5.5±1.4 mm, and more than 90% of patients could tolerate a 3.5-mm C2 laminar screw. Conclusion Preoperative CT angiography or noncontrast CT is an excellent method to delineate the anatomy at C2 to determine the suitability for pedicle or intralaminar fixation. In cases where vertebral artery anatomy precludes C2 pedicle fixation, more than 90% of patients may be a candidate for C2 intralaminar fixation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.06.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20615759</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Atlanto-Axial Joint - anatomy & histology ; Atlanto-Axial Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Atlanto-Axial Joint - surgery ; Bone Screws ; C2 fixation ; C2 lamina screw ; C2 pedicle screw ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Orthopedics ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2010-10, Vol.10 (10), p.896-899</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-fd463202e8e0cbecf01f695a3ee169fe5b16262302c39caab5ea8d15d524935d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-fd463202e8e0cbecf01f695a3ee169fe5b16262302c39caab5ea8d15d524935d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.06.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20615759$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, Rishi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Warren D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergin, Patrick F., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matteini, Lauren E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Joseph R., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><title>The anatomic suitability of the C2 vertebra for intralaminar and pedicular fixation: a computed tomography study</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Abstract Background context Several methods have been used to stabilize the atlantoaxial joint, including the use of C2 pedicle and laminar screws. No report has used computed tomography (CT) angiograms to compare the risk to the vertebral artery or assess the suitability for each fixation technique. Purpose To compare the suitability of C2 pedicle versus laminar screws using CT angiograms. Study design We retrospectively evaluated the anatomic dimensions of the C2 lamina and pedicle in 50 patients using CT angiograms. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the last 50 patients admitted who underwent CT angiograms of the head and neck. Data recorded included the pedicle length and width and the laminar length and width. Vertebral artery anatomy was also assessed to determine if an aberrant location would preclude pedicle fixation. Results Mean pedicle length and width were 15.5±3.5 and 4.7±1.7 mm, respectively, with 24% of patients having anatomy that would preclude 3.5-mm pedicle screw fixation. The mean lamina length and width were 25.2±3.6 and 5.5±1.4 mm, and more than 90% of patients could tolerate a 3.5-mm C2 laminar screw. Conclusion Preoperative CT angiography or noncontrast CT is an excellent method to delineate the anatomy at C2 to determine the suitability for pedicle or intralaminar fixation. In cases where vertebral artery anatomy precludes C2 pedicle fixation, more than 90% of patients may be a candidate for C2 intralaminar fixation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Atlanto-Axial Joint - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Atlanto-Axial Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Atlanto-Axial Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>C2 fixation</subject><subject>C2 lamina screw</subject><subject>C2 pedicle screw</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAUtBBVW0r_AUK-ccpiO7GTcEBCK76kSj1QztaL_Uy9JHGwnar593i1hQMXTuOPmXl6M4S84mzHGVdvD7u0-BlxJ1h5YmpX4Bm55F3bVVzV4nk5S9FXfVOzC_IipQNjrGu5OCcXgikuW9lfkuXuHinMkMPkDU2rzzD40eeNBkdz-dsL-oAx4xCBuhCpn3OEESY_QyxCSxe03qxjuTn_CNmH-R0FasK0rBktLcbhR4TlfqMpr3Z7Sc4cjAmvn_CKfP_08W7_pbq5_fx1_-GmMg1XuXK2KTswgR0yM6BxjDvVS6gRueodyoEroUTNhKl7AzBIhM5yaaVo-lra-oq8OfkuMfxaMWU9-WRwHGHGsCbdStmwRrS8MJsT08SQUkSnl-gniJvmTB-j1gd9ilofo9ZM6QJF9vppwDpMaP-K_mRbCO9PBCxrPniMOhmPsyl5RTRZ2-D_N-FfAzP62RsYf-KG6RDWOJcINddJaKa_Hes-ts1L0QWa-jfri6gJ</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Bhatnagar, Rishi, MD</creator><creator>Yu, Warren D., MD</creator><creator>Bergin, Patrick F., MD</creator><creator>Matteini, Lauren E., MD</creator><creator>O'Brien, Joseph R., MD, MPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>The anatomic suitability of the C2 vertebra for intralaminar and pedicular fixation: a computed tomography study</title><author>Bhatnagar, Rishi, MD ; Yu, Warren D., MD ; Bergin, Patrick F., MD ; Matteini, Lauren E., MD ; O'Brien, Joseph R., MD, MPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-fd463202e8e0cbecf01f695a3ee169fe5b16262302c39caab5ea8d15d524935d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Atlanto-Axial Joint - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Atlanto-Axial Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Atlanto-Axial Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>C2 fixation</topic><topic>C2 lamina screw</topic><topic>C2 pedicle screw</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, Rishi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Warren D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergin, Patrick F., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matteini, Lauren E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Joseph R., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhatnagar, Rishi, MD</au><au>Yu, Warren D., MD</au><au>Bergin, Patrick F., MD</au><au>Matteini, Lauren E., MD</au><au>O'Brien, Joseph R., MD, MPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The anatomic suitability of the C2 vertebra for intralaminar and pedicular fixation: a computed tomography study</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>896</spage><epage>899</epage><pages>896-899</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background context Several methods have been used to stabilize the atlantoaxial joint, including the use of C2 pedicle and laminar screws. No report has used computed tomography (CT) angiograms to compare the risk to the vertebral artery or assess the suitability for each fixation technique. Purpose To compare the suitability of C2 pedicle versus laminar screws using CT angiograms. Study design We retrospectively evaluated the anatomic dimensions of the C2 lamina and pedicle in 50 patients using CT angiograms. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the last 50 patients admitted who underwent CT angiograms of the head and neck. Data recorded included the pedicle length and width and the laminar length and width. Vertebral artery anatomy was also assessed to determine if an aberrant location would preclude pedicle fixation. Results Mean pedicle length and width were 15.5±3.5 and 4.7±1.7 mm, respectively, with 24% of patients having anatomy that would preclude 3.5-mm pedicle screw fixation. The mean lamina length and width were 25.2±3.6 and 5.5±1.4 mm, and more than 90% of patients could tolerate a 3.5-mm C2 laminar screw. Conclusion Preoperative CT angiography or noncontrast CT is an excellent method to delineate the anatomy at C2 to determine the suitability for pedicle or intralaminar fixation. In cases where vertebral artery anatomy precludes C2 pedicle fixation, more than 90% of patients may be a candidate for C2 intralaminar fixation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20615759</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2010.06.010</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1529-9430 |
ispartof | The spine journal, 2010-10, Vol.10 (10), p.896-899 |
issn | 1529-9430 1878-1632 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755404271 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Atlanto-Axial Joint - anatomy & histology Atlanto-Axial Joint - diagnostic imaging Atlanto-Axial Joint - surgery Bone Screws C2 fixation C2 lamina screw C2 pedicle screw Female Humans Male Orthopedics Retrospective Studies Spinal Fusion - instrumentation Spinal Fusion - methods Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | The anatomic suitability of the C2 vertebra for intralaminar and pedicular fixation: a computed tomography study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A44%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20anatomic%20suitability%20of%20the%20C2%20vertebra%20for%20intralaminar%20and%20pedicular%20fixation:%20a%20computed%20tomography%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Bhatnagar,%20Rishi,%20MD&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=896&rft.epage=899&rft.pages=896-899&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.06.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E755404271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=755404271&rft_id=info:pmid/20615759&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1529943010004304&rfr_iscdi=true |