Mesenteric duplex scanning: A blinded prospective study

Purpose: Based on retrospective comparisons of duplex scanning with arteriography of the celiac (CA) and superior mesenteric (SMA) arteries in 34 patients, we previously suggested that an SMA peak systolic velocity of 275 cm/sec or greater or no flow signal and a CA PSV of 200 cm/sec or greater or n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery 1993-01, Vol.17 (1), p.79-86
Hauptverfasser: Moneta, Gregory L., Lee, Raymond W., Yeager, Richard A., Taylor, Lloyd M., Porter, John M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 86
container_issue 1
container_start_page 79
container_title Journal of vascular surgery
container_volume 17
creator Moneta, Gregory L.
Lee, Raymond W.
Yeager, Richard A.
Taylor, Lloyd M.
Porter, John M.
description Purpose: Based on retrospective comparisons of duplex scanning with arteriography of the celiac (CA) and superior mesenteric (SMA) arteries in 34 patients, we previously suggested that an SMA peak systolic velocity of 275 cm/sec or greater or no flow signal and a CA PSV of 200 cm/sec or greater or no flow signal were reliable indicators of a 70% or greater angiographic stenosis of the SMA and CA, respectively. We now report the results of a blinded, prospective study in a larger patient group designed to determine the ability of mesenteric duplex scanning to visualize the CA and SMA and to validate our proposed duplex criteria for splanchnic artery stenosis. Methods: During an 18-month period 100 patients admitted to our vascular surgery service for aortography underwent routine mesenteric artery duplex scanning and lateral abdominal aortography regardless of abdominal symptoms. The lateral aortograms were evaluated to determine the presence or absence of a 70% or greater stenosis in the CA or SMA. Duplex-determined peak systolic velocities from the CA and SMA were recorded without knowledge of the angiographic results. Results: Aortography satisfactorily visualized 100% of the CAs and 99% of the SMAs. Of these, 93% of the SMAs and 83% of the CAs were visualized by duplex. According to the above criteria, duplex sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy for detection of a 70% or greater SMA stenosis were 92%, 96%, 80%, 99%, and 96% and for a 70% or greater CA stenosis 87%, 80%, 63%, 94%, and 82%. Conclusions: Mesenteric duplex scanning is feasible in the majority of patients. Prospective evaluation of duplex diagnostic criteria for 70% or greater stenosis indicates that mesenteric duplex scanning is sufficiently accurate to be clinically useful as a screening examination to detect SMA and CA stenosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0741-5214(93)90011-A
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75539123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>074152149390011A</els_id><sourcerecordid>75539123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-47c3f917c155e233d9e77823dccd9560f9e7cbb87d9c4670cfa058ff1f9d67763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo67r6DRR6Ej1UkyZpGg9CWfwHK170HNpkIpFutjbt4n57U3fZo6dhmDdv3vwQOif4hmCS32LBSMozwq4kvZYYE5KWB2hKsBRpXmB5iKZ7yTE6CeFr1PBCTNCkYBmhjE-ReIUAvofO6cQMbQM_SdCV985_3iVlUjfOGzBJ261CC7p3a0hCP5jNKTqyVRPgbFdn6OPx4X3-nC7enl7m5SLVDNM-ZUJTK4nQhHPIKDUShCgyarQ2kufYxl7XdSGM1CwXWNsK88JaYqXJhcjpDF1ufWOC7wFCr5YuaGiaysNqCEpwTiWJzjPEtkIdo4YOrGo7t6y6jSJYjbzUCEONMJSk6o-XKuPaxc5_qJdg9ks7QHF-v51DfHLtoFNBO_AajOsiD2VW7v8Dv8s0eQ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75539123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mesenteric duplex scanning: A blinded prospective study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Moneta, Gregory L. ; Lee, Raymond W. ; Yeager, Richard A. ; Taylor, Lloyd M. ; Porter, John M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moneta, Gregory L. ; Lee, Raymond W. ; Yeager, Richard A. ; Taylor, Lloyd M. ; Porter, John M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Based on retrospective comparisons of duplex scanning with arteriography of the celiac (CA) and superior mesenteric (SMA) arteries in 34 patients, we previously suggested that an SMA peak systolic velocity of 275 cm/sec or greater or no flow signal and a CA PSV of 200 cm/sec or greater or no flow signal were reliable indicators of a 70% or greater angiographic stenosis of the SMA and CA, respectively. We now report the results of a blinded, prospective study in a larger patient group designed to determine the ability of mesenteric duplex scanning to visualize the CA and SMA and to validate our proposed duplex criteria for splanchnic artery stenosis. Methods: During an 18-month period 100 patients admitted to our vascular surgery service for aortography underwent routine mesenteric artery duplex scanning and lateral abdominal aortography regardless of abdominal symptoms. The lateral aortograms were evaluated to determine the presence or absence of a 70% or greater stenosis in the CA or SMA. Duplex-determined peak systolic velocities from the CA and SMA were recorded without knowledge of the angiographic results. Results: Aortography satisfactorily visualized 100% of the CAs and 99% of the SMAs. Of these, 93% of the SMAs and 83% of the CAs were visualized by duplex. According to the above criteria, duplex sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy for detection of a 70% or greater SMA stenosis were 92%, 96%, 80%, 99%, and 96% and for a 70% or greater CA stenosis 87%, 80%, 63%, 94%, and 82%. Conclusions: Mesenteric duplex scanning is feasible in the majority of patients. Prospective evaluation of duplex diagnostic criteria for 70% or greater stenosis indicates that mesenteric duplex scanning is sufficiently accurate to be clinically useful as a screening examination to detect SMA and CA stenosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0741-5214(93)90011-A</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8421345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Arterial Occlusive Diseases - epidemiology ; Celiac Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Intestines - blood supply ; Ischemia - diagnostic imaging ; Ischemia - epidemiology ; Mesenteric Artery, Superior - diagnostic imaging ; Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion - diagnostic imaging ; Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion - epidemiology ; Middle Aged ; Oregon - epidemiology ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 1993-01, Vol.17 (1), p.79-86</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-47c3f917c155e233d9e77823dccd9560f9e7cbb87d9c4670cfa058ff1f9d67763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-47c3f917c155e233d9e77823dccd9560f9e7cbb87d9c4670cfa058ff1f9d67763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(93)90011-A$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8421345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moneta, Gregory L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Raymond W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeager, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Lloyd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, John M.</creatorcontrib><title>Mesenteric duplex scanning: A blinded prospective study</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose: Based on retrospective comparisons of duplex scanning with arteriography of the celiac (CA) and superior mesenteric (SMA) arteries in 34 patients, we previously suggested that an SMA peak systolic velocity of 275 cm/sec or greater or no flow signal and a CA PSV of 200 cm/sec or greater or no flow signal were reliable indicators of a 70% or greater angiographic stenosis of the SMA and CA, respectively. We now report the results of a blinded, prospective study in a larger patient group designed to determine the ability of mesenteric duplex scanning to visualize the CA and SMA and to validate our proposed duplex criteria for splanchnic artery stenosis. Methods: During an 18-month period 100 patients admitted to our vascular surgery service for aortography underwent routine mesenteric artery duplex scanning and lateral abdominal aortography regardless of abdominal symptoms. The lateral aortograms were evaluated to determine the presence or absence of a 70% or greater stenosis in the CA or SMA. Duplex-determined peak systolic velocities from the CA and SMA were recorded without knowledge of the angiographic results. Results: Aortography satisfactorily visualized 100% of the CAs and 99% of the SMAs. Of these, 93% of the SMAs and 83% of the CAs were visualized by duplex. According to the above criteria, duplex sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy for detection of a 70% or greater SMA stenosis were 92%, 96%, 80%, 99%, and 96% and for a 70% or greater CA stenosis 87%, 80%, 63%, 94%, and 82%. Conclusions: Mesenteric duplex scanning is feasible in the majority of patients. Prospective evaluation of duplex diagnostic criteria for 70% or greater stenosis indicates that mesenteric duplex scanning is sufficiently accurate to be clinically useful as a screening examination to detect SMA and CA stenosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Celiac Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestines - blood supply</subject><subject>Ischemia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ischemia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Mesenteric Artery, Superior - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion - epidemiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oregon - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo67r6DRR6Ej1UkyZpGg9CWfwHK170HNpkIpFutjbt4n57U3fZo6dhmDdv3vwQOif4hmCS32LBSMozwq4kvZYYE5KWB2hKsBRpXmB5iKZ7yTE6CeFr1PBCTNCkYBmhjE-ReIUAvofO6cQMbQM_SdCV985_3iVlUjfOGzBJ261CC7p3a0hCP5jNKTqyVRPgbFdn6OPx4X3-nC7enl7m5SLVDNM-ZUJTK4nQhHPIKDUShCgyarQ2kufYxl7XdSGM1CwXWNsK88JaYqXJhcjpDF1ufWOC7wFCr5YuaGiaysNqCEpwTiWJzjPEtkIdo4YOrGo7t6y6jSJYjbzUCEONMJSk6o-XKuPaxc5_qJdg9ks7QHF-v51DfHLtoFNBO_AajOsiD2VW7v8Dv8s0eQ8</recordid><startdate>199301</startdate><enddate>199301</enddate><creator>Moneta, Gregory L.</creator><creator>Lee, Raymond W.</creator><creator>Yeager, Richard A.</creator><creator>Taylor, Lloyd M.</creator><creator>Porter, John M.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199301</creationdate><title>Mesenteric duplex scanning: A blinded prospective study</title><author>Moneta, Gregory L. ; Lee, Raymond W. ; Yeager, Richard A. ; Taylor, Lloyd M. ; Porter, John M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-47c3f917c155e233d9e77823dccd9560f9e7cbb87d9c4670cfa058ff1f9d67763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Celiac Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestines - blood supply</topic><topic>Ischemia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ischemia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Mesenteric Artery, Superior - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion - epidemiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oregon - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moneta, Gregory L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Raymond W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeager, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Lloyd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, John M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moneta, Gregory L.</au><au>Lee, Raymond W.</au><au>Yeager, Richard A.</au><au>Taylor, Lloyd M.</au><au>Porter, John M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mesenteric duplex scanning: A blinded prospective study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>1993-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>79-86</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Based on retrospective comparisons of duplex scanning with arteriography of the celiac (CA) and superior mesenteric (SMA) arteries in 34 patients, we previously suggested that an SMA peak systolic velocity of 275 cm/sec or greater or no flow signal and a CA PSV of 200 cm/sec or greater or no flow signal were reliable indicators of a 70% or greater angiographic stenosis of the SMA and CA, respectively. We now report the results of a blinded, prospective study in a larger patient group designed to determine the ability of mesenteric duplex scanning to visualize the CA and SMA and to validate our proposed duplex criteria for splanchnic artery stenosis. Methods: During an 18-month period 100 patients admitted to our vascular surgery service for aortography underwent routine mesenteric artery duplex scanning and lateral abdominal aortography regardless of abdominal symptoms. The lateral aortograms were evaluated to determine the presence or absence of a 70% or greater stenosis in the CA or SMA. Duplex-determined peak systolic velocities from the CA and SMA were recorded without knowledge of the angiographic results. Results: Aortography satisfactorily visualized 100% of the CAs and 99% of the SMAs. Of these, 93% of the SMAs and 83% of the CAs were visualized by duplex. According to the above criteria, duplex sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy for detection of a 70% or greater SMA stenosis were 92%, 96%, 80%, 99%, and 96% and for a 70% or greater CA stenosis 87%, 80%, 63%, 94%, and 82%. Conclusions: Mesenteric duplex scanning is feasible in the majority of patients. Prospective evaluation of duplex diagnostic criteria for 70% or greater stenosis indicates that mesenteric duplex scanning is sufficiently accurate to be clinically useful as a screening examination to detect SMA and CA stenosis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>8421345</pmid><doi>10.1016/0741-5214(93)90011-A</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-5214
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery, 1993-01, Vol.17 (1), p.79-86
issn 0741-5214
1097-6809
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75539123
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Arterial Occlusive Diseases - epidemiology
Celiac Artery - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Intestines - blood supply
Ischemia - diagnostic imaging
Ischemia - epidemiology
Mesenteric Artery, Superior - diagnostic imaging
Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion - diagnostic imaging
Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion - epidemiology
Middle Aged
Oregon - epidemiology
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Radiography
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ultrasonography
title Mesenteric duplex scanning: A blinded prospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A33%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mesenteric%20duplex%20scanning:%20A%20blinded%20prospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Moneta,%20Gregory%20L.&rft.date=1993-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=79-86&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0741-5214(93)90011-A&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75539123%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75539123&rft_id=info:pmid/8421345&rft_els_id=074152149390011A&rfr_iscdi=true