Human ventricular refractoriness: Effects of increasing current

The ventricular effective refractory period is commonly employed as a measurement of ventricular excitability. Because the current strength used to make this determination varies among laboratories, the relation of refractoriness and current was examined over a range of current strengths from 0.1 to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 1981-02, Vol.47 (2), p.244-250
Hauptverfasser: Greenspan, Allan M., Camardo, Joseph S., Horowitz, Leonard N., Spielman, Scott R., Josephson, Mark E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 250
container_issue 2
container_start_page 244
container_title The American journal of cardiology
container_volume 47
creator Greenspan, Allan M.
Camardo, Joseph S.
Horowitz, Leonard N.
Spielman, Scott R.
Josephson, Mark E.
description The ventricular effective refractory period is commonly employed as a measurement of ventricular excitability. Because the current strength used to make this determination varies among laboratories, the relation of refractoriness and current was examined over a range of current strengths from 0.1 to 10 mA. Sixty determinations of refractoriness at variable current strengths were made in 40 patients using the extrastimulus technique with a rectangular pulse of 1 ms duration. These data were obtained by measuring the effective refractory period at threshold current and at 0.25 to 0.50 mA increments from threshold up to 10 mA. In these studies the drive stimulus (S 1) and extrastimulus (S 2) were kept at the same amplitude. In all patients the ventricular effective refractory period decreased as the current increased. The total decrease ranged from 8 to 100 ms (mean ± standard deyiation 36.9 ± 17.1). The current strength at which the ventricular effective refractory period became fixed (that is, less than 2 ms change in ventricular effective refractory period with further increase in current strength) varied among the patients, but in all instances equaled or exceeded 1.8 mA, which in all but three patients was greater than three times threshold. The curves relating current strength and refractoriness were shifted to the left at shorter cycle lengths with no change in threshold. These data suggest that (1) current strength-effective refractory period curves more completely characterize ventricular excitability than does a ventricular effective refractory period at single current strength; and (2) studies of drug effects, alterations of autonomic tone, or reentrant arrhythmias, which may affect or are affected by ventricular refractoriness, may be enhanced by more complete measurements of refractoriness afforded by the current strength-effective refractoriness curves.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90393-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75534033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0002914981903933</els_id><sourcerecordid>75534033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-9544c354806de81bab8663cc6a83358e97b51390bd8980c621a9b1af1cd22cc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRaq3-A4WcRA_Rnewm2fWgSKlWKHjR87KZTGQlTXQ3KfjvTWzp0dPM8N6bYT7GzoHfAIfslnOexBqkvlJwrbnQIhYHbAoq1zFoEIdsurccs5MQPocRIM0mbJLLTMlcTtnDsl_bJtpQ03mHfW195KnyFrvWu4ZCuIsWVUXYhaitItegJxtc8xFh7_0QOmVHla0Dne3qjL0_Ld7my3j1-vwyf1zFKNK8i3Uq5dBJxbOSFBS2UFkmEDOrhEgV6bxIQWhelEorjlkCVhdgK8AySRCFmLHL7d4v3373FDqzdgGprm1DbR9MnqZCcjEa5daIvg1h-MV8ebe2_scANyM3M0IxIxSjwPxxM2PsYre_L9ZU7kM7UIN-v9VpeHLjyJuAjhqk0vmBjilb9_-BX290e-4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75534033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human ventricular refractoriness: Effects of increasing current</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Greenspan, Allan M. ; Camardo, Joseph S. ; Horowitz, Leonard N. ; Spielman, Scott R. ; Josephson, Mark E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Greenspan, Allan M. ; Camardo, Joseph S. ; Horowitz, Leonard N. ; Spielman, Scott R. ; Josephson, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><description>The ventricular effective refractory period is commonly employed as a measurement of ventricular excitability. Because the current strength used to make this determination varies among laboratories, the relation of refractoriness and current was examined over a range of current strengths from 0.1 to 10 mA. Sixty determinations of refractoriness at variable current strengths were made in 40 patients using the extrastimulus technique with a rectangular pulse of 1 ms duration. These data were obtained by measuring the effective refractory period at threshold current and at 0.25 to 0.50 mA increments from threshold up to 10 mA. In these studies the drive stimulus (S 1) and extrastimulus (S 2) were kept at the same amplitude. In all patients the ventricular effective refractory period decreased as the current increased. The total decrease ranged from 8 to 100 ms (mean ± standard deyiation 36.9 ± 17.1). The current strength at which the ventricular effective refractory period became fixed (that is, less than 2 ms change in ventricular effective refractory period with further increase in current strength) varied among the patients, but in all instances equaled or exceeded 1.8 mA, which in all but three patients was greater than three times threshold. The curves relating current strength and refractoriness were shifted to the left at shorter cycle lengths with no change in threshold. These data suggest that (1) current strength-effective refractory period curves more completely characterize ventricular excitability than does a ventricular effective refractory period at single current strength; and (2) studies of drug effects, alterations of autonomic tone, or reentrant arrhythmias, which may affect or are affected by ventricular refractoriness, may be enhanced by more complete measurements of refractoriness afforded by the current strength-effective refractoriness curves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90393-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7468474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Electric Stimulation ; Electrophysiology ; Female ; Heart Ventricles - physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscles - physiology ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 1981-02, Vol.47 (2), p.244-250</ispartof><rights>1981</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-9544c354806de81bab8663cc6a83358e97b51390bd8980c621a9b1af1cd22cc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-9544c354806de81bab8663cc6a83358e97b51390bd8980c621a9b1af1cd22cc33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(81)90393-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7468474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greenspan, Allan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camardo, Joseph S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horowitz, Leonard N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spielman, Scott R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josephson, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><title>Human ventricular refractoriness: Effects of increasing current</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>The ventricular effective refractory period is commonly employed as a measurement of ventricular excitability. Because the current strength used to make this determination varies among laboratories, the relation of refractoriness and current was examined over a range of current strengths from 0.1 to 10 mA. Sixty determinations of refractoriness at variable current strengths were made in 40 patients using the extrastimulus technique with a rectangular pulse of 1 ms duration. These data were obtained by measuring the effective refractory period at threshold current and at 0.25 to 0.50 mA increments from threshold up to 10 mA. In these studies the drive stimulus (S 1) and extrastimulus (S 2) were kept at the same amplitude. In all patients the ventricular effective refractory period decreased as the current increased. The total decrease ranged from 8 to 100 ms (mean ± standard deyiation 36.9 ± 17.1). The current strength at which the ventricular effective refractory period became fixed (that is, less than 2 ms change in ventricular effective refractory period with further increase in current strength) varied among the patients, but in all instances equaled or exceeded 1.8 mA, which in all but three patients was greater than three times threshold. The curves relating current strength and refractoriness were shifted to the left at shorter cycle lengths with no change in threshold. These data suggest that (1) current strength-effective refractory period curves more completely characterize ventricular excitability than does a ventricular effective refractory period at single current strength; and (2) studies of drug effects, alterations of autonomic tone, or reentrant arrhythmias, which may affect or are affected by ventricular refractoriness, may be enhanced by more complete measurements of refractoriness afforded by the current strength-effective refractoriness curves.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscles - physiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRaq3-A4WcRA_Rnewm2fWgSKlWKHjR87KZTGQlTXQ3KfjvTWzp0dPM8N6bYT7GzoHfAIfslnOexBqkvlJwrbnQIhYHbAoq1zFoEIdsurccs5MQPocRIM0mbJLLTMlcTtnDsl_bJtpQ03mHfW195KnyFrvWu4ZCuIsWVUXYhaitItegJxtc8xFh7_0QOmVHla0Dne3qjL0_Ld7my3j1-vwyf1zFKNK8i3Uq5dBJxbOSFBS2UFkmEDOrhEgV6bxIQWhelEorjlkCVhdgK8AySRCFmLHL7d4v3373FDqzdgGprm1DbR9MnqZCcjEa5daIvg1h-MV8ebe2_scANyM3M0IxIxSjwPxxM2PsYre_L9ZU7kM7UIN-v9VpeHLjyJuAjhqk0vmBjilb9_-BX290e-4</recordid><startdate>198102</startdate><enddate>198102</enddate><creator>Greenspan, Allan M.</creator><creator>Camardo, Joseph S.</creator><creator>Horowitz, Leonard N.</creator><creator>Spielman, Scott R.</creator><creator>Josephson, Mark E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198102</creationdate><title>Human ventricular refractoriness: Effects of increasing current</title><author>Greenspan, Allan M. ; Camardo, Joseph S. ; Horowitz, Leonard N. ; Spielman, Scott R. ; Josephson, Mark E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-9544c354806de81bab8663cc6a83358e97b51390bd8980c621a9b1af1cd22cc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscles - physiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greenspan, Allan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camardo, Joseph S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horowitz, Leonard N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spielman, Scott R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josephson, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greenspan, Allan M.</au><au>Camardo, Joseph S.</au><au>Horowitz, Leonard N.</au><au>Spielman, Scott R.</au><au>Josephson, Mark E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human ventricular refractoriness: Effects of increasing current</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>1981-02</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>244</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>244-250</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><abstract>The ventricular effective refractory period is commonly employed as a measurement of ventricular excitability. Because the current strength used to make this determination varies among laboratories, the relation of refractoriness and current was examined over a range of current strengths from 0.1 to 10 mA. Sixty determinations of refractoriness at variable current strengths were made in 40 patients using the extrastimulus technique with a rectangular pulse of 1 ms duration. These data were obtained by measuring the effective refractory period at threshold current and at 0.25 to 0.50 mA increments from threshold up to 10 mA. In these studies the drive stimulus (S 1) and extrastimulus (S 2) were kept at the same amplitude. In all patients the ventricular effective refractory period decreased as the current increased. The total decrease ranged from 8 to 100 ms (mean ± standard deyiation 36.9 ± 17.1). The current strength at which the ventricular effective refractory period became fixed (that is, less than 2 ms change in ventricular effective refractory period with further increase in current strength) varied among the patients, but in all instances equaled or exceeded 1.8 mA, which in all but three patients was greater than three times threshold. The curves relating current strength and refractoriness were shifted to the left at shorter cycle lengths with no change in threshold. These data suggest that (1) current strength-effective refractory period curves more completely characterize ventricular excitability than does a ventricular effective refractory period at single current strength; and (2) studies of drug effects, alterations of autonomic tone, or reentrant arrhythmias, which may affect or are affected by ventricular refractoriness, may be enhanced by more complete measurements of refractoriness afforded by the current strength-effective refractoriness curves.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7468474</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9149(81)90393-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9149
ispartof The American journal of cardiology, 1981-02, Vol.47 (2), p.244-250
issn 0002-9149
1879-1913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75534033
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Electric Stimulation
Electrophysiology
Female
Heart Ventricles - physiopathology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Muscles - physiology
Time Factors
title Human ventricular refractoriness: Effects of increasing current
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T14%3A50%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20ventricular%20refractoriness:%20Effects%20of%20increasing%20current&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Greenspan,%20Allan%20M.&rft.date=1981-02&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=244&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=244-250&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9149(81)90393-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75534033%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75534033&rft_id=info:pmid/7468474&rft_els_id=0002914981903933&rfr_iscdi=true