Monitoring does not always count
The gross under-resourcing of conservation endeavours has placed an increasing emphasis on spending accountability. Increased accountability has led to monitoring forming a central element of conservation programs. Although there is little doubt that information obtained from monitoring can improve...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) 2010-10, Vol.25 (10), p.547-550 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 550 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 547 |
| container_title | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | McDonald-Madden, Eve Baxter, Peter W.J. Fuller, Richard A. Martin, Tara G. Game, Edward T. Montambault, Jensen Possingham, Hugh P. |
| description | The gross under-resourcing of conservation endeavours has placed an increasing emphasis on spending accountability. Increased accountability has led to monitoring forming a central element of conservation programs. Although there is little doubt that information obtained from monitoring can improve management of biodiversity, the cost (in time and/or money) of gaining this knowledge is rarely considered when making decisions about allocation of resources to monitoring. We present a simple framework allowing managers and policy advisors to make decisions about when to invest in monitoring to improve management. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755193695</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169534710001576</els_id><sourcerecordid>755193695</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-8045a6afda075ea8a996b812ccb61fa8dcf1620fcb28a462ee33e99be0e3c4493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotlZfwIXMztWMuUxu4EaKN6i40XXIZM5IynRSk6nStzel1aVnc-Dw_T-cD6FLgiuCibhZVmMEqCjOBywrjOkRmhIlaamYYsdomiFdclbLCTpLaYnz6FqfognFkkpB6ikqXsLgxxD98FG0AVIxhLGw_bfdpsKFzTCeo5PO9gkuDnuG3h_u3-ZP5eL18Xl-tygd43wsFa65FbZrLZYcrLJai0YR6lwjSGdV6zoiKO5cQ5WtBQVgDLRuAANzda3ZDF3ve9cxfG4gjWblk4O-twOETTKSc6KZ0DyTdE-6GFKK0Jl19Csbt4ZgsxNjlmYnxuzEGCxNFpNDV4f6TbOC9i_yayIDt3sA8pNfHqJJzsPgoPUR3Gja4P_r_wGP4XN3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>755193695</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monitoring does not always count</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>McDonald-Madden, Eve ; Baxter, Peter W.J. ; Fuller, Richard A. ; Martin, Tara G. ; Game, Edward T. ; Montambault, Jensen ; Possingham, Hugh P.</creator><creatorcontrib>McDonald-Madden, Eve ; Baxter, Peter W.J. ; Fuller, Richard A. ; Martin, Tara G. ; Game, Edward T. ; Montambault, Jensen ; Possingham, Hugh P.</creatorcontrib><description>The gross under-resourcing of conservation endeavours has placed an increasing emphasis on spending accountability. Increased accountability has led to monitoring forming a central element of conservation programs. Although there is little doubt that information obtained from monitoring can improve management of biodiversity, the cost (in time and/or money) of gaining this knowledge is rarely considered when making decisions about allocation of resources to monitoring. We present a simple framework allowing managers and policy advisors to make decisions about when to invest in monitoring to improve management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5347</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20727614</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Conservation of Natural Resources - economics ; Decision Trees ; Environmental Monitoring - economics ; Marsupialia ; Songbirds ; Whale, Killer</subject><ispartof>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 2010-10, Vol.25 (10), p.547-550</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-8045a6afda075ea8a996b812ccb61fa8dcf1620fcb28a462ee33e99be0e3c4493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-8045a6afda075ea8a996b812ccb61fa8dcf1620fcb28a462ee33e99be0e3c4493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534710001576$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20727614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDonald-Madden, Eve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, Peter W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Tara G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Game, Edward T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montambault, Jensen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Possingham, Hugh P.</creatorcontrib><title>Monitoring does not always count</title><title>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>The gross under-resourcing of conservation endeavours has placed an increasing emphasis on spending accountability. Increased accountability has led to monitoring forming a central element of conservation programs. Although there is little doubt that information obtained from monitoring can improve management of biodiversity, the cost (in time and/or money) of gaining this knowledge is rarely considered when making decisions about allocation of resources to monitoring. We present a simple framework allowing managers and policy advisors to make decisions about when to invest in monitoring to improve management.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</subject><subject>Decision Trees</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - economics</subject><subject>Marsupialia</subject><subject>Songbirds</subject><subject>Whale, Killer</subject><issn>0169-5347</issn><issn>1872-8383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotlZfwIXMztWMuUxu4EaKN6i40XXIZM5IynRSk6nStzel1aVnc-Dw_T-cD6FLgiuCibhZVmMEqCjOBywrjOkRmhIlaamYYsdomiFdclbLCTpLaYnz6FqfognFkkpB6ikqXsLgxxD98FG0AVIxhLGw_bfdpsKFzTCeo5PO9gkuDnuG3h_u3-ZP5eL18Xl-tygd43wsFa65FbZrLZYcrLJai0YR6lwjSGdV6zoiKO5cQ5WtBQVgDLRuAANzda3ZDF3ve9cxfG4gjWblk4O-twOETTKSc6KZ0DyTdE-6GFKK0Jl19Csbt4ZgsxNjlmYnxuzEGCxNFpNDV4f6TbOC9i_yayIDt3sA8pNfHqJJzsPgoPUR3Gja4P_r_wGP4XN3</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>McDonald-Madden, Eve</creator><creator>Baxter, Peter W.J.</creator><creator>Fuller, Richard A.</creator><creator>Martin, Tara G.</creator><creator>Game, Edward T.</creator><creator>Montambault, Jensen</creator><creator>Possingham, Hugh P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Monitoring does not always count</title><author>McDonald-Madden, Eve ; Baxter, Peter W.J. ; Fuller, Richard A. ; Martin, Tara G. ; Game, Edward T. ; Montambault, Jensen ; Possingham, Hugh P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-8045a6afda075ea8a996b812ccb61fa8dcf1620fcb28a462ee33e99be0e3c4493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</topic><topic>Decision Trees</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - economics</topic><topic>Marsupialia</topic><topic>Songbirds</topic><topic>Whale, Killer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDonald-Madden, Eve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, Peter W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Tara G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Game, Edward T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montambault, Jensen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Possingham, Hugh P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDonald-Madden, Eve</au><au>Baxter, Peter W.J.</au><au>Fuller, Richard A.</au><au>Martin, Tara G.</au><au>Game, Edward T.</au><au>Montambault, Jensen</au><au>Possingham, Hugh P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monitoring does not always count</atitle><jtitle>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>550</epage><pages>547-550</pages><issn>0169-5347</issn><eissn>1872-8383</eissn><abstract>The gross under-resourcing of conservation endeavours has placed an increasing emphasis on spending accountability. Increased accountability has led to monitoring forming a central element of conservation programs. Although there is little doubt that information obtained from monitoring can improve management of biodiversity, the cost (in time and/or money) of gaining this knowledge is rarely considered when making decisions about allocation of resources to monitoring. We present a simple framework allowing managers and policy advisors to make decisions about when to invest in monitoring to improve management.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20727614</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.002</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0169-5347 |
| ispartof | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 2010-10, Vol.25 (10), p.547-550 |
| issn | 0169-5347 1872-8383 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755193695 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Animals Conservation of Natural Resources - economics Decision Trees Environmental Monitoring - economics Marsupialia Songbirds Whale, Killer |
| title | Monitoring does not always count |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T21%3A17%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monitoring%20does%20not%20always%20count&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20ecology%20&%20evolution%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=McDonald-Madden,%20Eve&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=550&rft.pages=547-550&rft.issn=0169-5347&rft.eissn=1872-8383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E755193695%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=755193695&rft_id=info:pmid/20727614&rft_els_id=S0169534710001576&rfr_iscdi=true |