Surgical Outcomes of Decompression, Decompression With Limited Fusion, and Decompression With Full Curve Fusion for Degenerative Scoliosis With Radiculopathy

A retrospective clinical cohort study at a single spine center of patients with degenerative scoliosis and radiculopathy severe enough to require surgery. To evaluate the functional outcomes of 3 surgeries for degenerative scoliosis with radiculopathy; decompression alone, decompression and limited...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2010-09, Vol.35 (20), p.1872-1875
Hauptverfasser: TRANSFELDT, Ensor E, TOPP, Raymond, MEHBOD, Amir A, WINTER, Robert B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1875
container_issue 20
container_start_page 1872
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 35
creator TRANSFELDT, Ensor E
TOPP, Raymond
MEHBOD, Amir A
WINTER, Robert B
description A retrospective clinical cohort study at a single spine center of patients with degenerative scoliosis and radiculopathy severe enough to require surgery. To evaluate the functional outcomes of 3 surgeries for degenerative scoliosis with radiculopathy; decompression alone, decompression and limited fusion, and decompression and full curve fusion. Although these 3 surgical treatments have all been described for this problem, there exists little information as to what outcomes to expect. The study cohort consisted of 85 patients who met the inclusion criteria of degenerative scoliosis and radiculopathy, who had undergone 1 of the above 3 surgeries, who had not had any previous lumbar spine surgery, who had a minimum follow-up of at least 2 years, and who had filled out preoperative and postoperative functional evaluation forms including SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index, Roland Morris Scores, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to predict the likelihood of success as related to decompression alone of rotatory olisthetic segments, extent of fusion, and postoperative sagittal balance. Patient demographics including curve magnitude, operative blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, and need for revision surgeries were analyzed. The patients having decompression alone had the highest mean age (76.4 years) compared to decompression and limited fusion (70.4), and decompression and full curve fusion (62.5). Cobb scoliosis angles remained unchanged in the 2 groups not having full curve fusion, while the full curve fusion group changed from a mean 39° before surgery to 19° at follow-up. The complication rate was highest (56%) in the full fusion group, was 40% in the limited fusion group, and 10% in the decompression alone group. The overall SF-36 analysis showed significant improvement in bodily pain, social function, role emotional, mental health, and mental composite domains. Oswestry Disability Indexes improved significantly in the decompression alone and limited fusion groups, but not in the full fusion group. In contrast, the satisfaction questionnaire showed the highest success to be in the full-curve fusion group and the lowest in the decompression-only group.Regression analysis revealed that sacrum to curve apex fusions and positive postoperative sagittal imbalance were associated with poor outcomes. Both good and poor results were seen with each of the 3 procedures.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce63a2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755190237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>755190237</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-59424d550468912937e9b300153e096c97da34e73d6e925958a5975dde3734823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkcFO3DAQhi1EBVvKGyCUC-JCqO2Jk_gIC1sqrYTEgjhGXnsCRkm82HGlfZi-a13tAirqaTzW93tG_gg5YvScUVl9v7xbnNMlZYDAaqaxBMV3yIQJXueMCblLJhRKnvMCyn3yNYQXSmkJTO6RfU5rykHWE_J7Ef2T1arLbuOoXY8hc212hem48hiCdcPZv232aMfnbG57O6LJZnGDqMH8D5vFrsum0f_CLZm1zifwCQf0arTpfqFdZ12wYZO4U8bq2LmVGp_X38iXVnUBD7f1gDzMru-nN_n89sfP6cU811CKMRey4IURghZlLRmXUKFcAqVMAFJZalkZBQVWYEqUXEhRKyErYQxCBUXN4YCcbt5defcaMYxNb4PGrlMDuhiaSggm049ViSw2pPYuBI9ts_K2V37dMNr89dIkL81nLyl2vB0Qlz2a99CbiAScbAEVko3Wq0Hb8MEBT4tKAX8AujKYtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>755190237</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical Outcomes of Decompression, Decompression With Limited Fusion, and Decompression With Full Curve Fusion for Degenerative Scoliosis With Radiculopathy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>TRANSFELDT, Ensor E ; TOPP, Raymond ; MEHBOD, Amir A ; WINTER, Robert B</creator><creatorcontrib>TRANSFELDT, Ensor E ; TOPP, Raymond ; MEHBOD, Amir A ; WINTER, Robert B</creatorcontrib><description>A retrospective clinical cohort study at a single spine center of patients with degenerative scoliosis and radiculopathy severe enough to require surgery. To evaluate the functional outcomes of 3 surgeries for degenerative scoliosis with radiculopathy; decompression alone, decompression and limited fusion, and decompression and full curve fusion. Although these 3 surgical treatments have all been described for this problem, there exists little information as to what outcomes to expect. The study cohort consisted of 85 patients who met the inclusion criteria of degenerative scoliosis and radiculopathy, who had undergone 1 of the above 3 surgeries, who had not had any previous lumbar spine surgery, who had a minimum follow-up of at least 2 years, and who had filled out preoperative and postoperative functional evaluation forms including SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index, Roland Morris Scores, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to predict the likelihood of success as related to decompression alone of rotatory olisthetic segments, extent of fusion, and postoperative sagittal balance. Patient demographics including curve magnitude, operative blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, and need for revision surgeries were analyzed. The patients having decompression alone had the highest mean age (76.4 years) compared to decompression and limited fusion (70.4), and decompression and full curve fusion (62.5). Cobb scoliosis angles remained unchanged in the 2 groups not having full curve fusion, while the full curve fusion group changed from a mean 39° before surgery to 19° at follow-up. The complication rate was highest (56%) in the full fusion group, was 40% in the limited fusion group, and 10% in the decompression alone group. The overall SF-36 analysis showed significant improvement in bodily pain, social function, role emotional, mental health, and mental composite domains. Oswestry Disability Indexes improved significantly in the decompression alone and limited fusion groups, but not in the full fusion group. In contrast, the satisfaction questionnaire showed the highest success to be in the full-curve fusion group and the lowest in the decompression-only group.Regression analysis revealed that sacrum to curve apex fusions and positive postoperative sagittal imbalance were associated with poor outcomes. Both good and poor results were seen with each of the 3 procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce63a2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20802398</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPINDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord ; Cohort Studies ; Comorbidity ; Decompression, Surgical - methods ; Disability Evaluation ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Orthopedic surgery ; Patient Satisfaction ; Radiculopathy - epidemiology ; Radiculopathy - surgery ; Regression Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Scoliosis - epidemiology ; Scoliosis - surgery ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2010-09, Vol.35 (20), p.1872-1875</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-59424d550468912937e9b300153e096c97da34e73d6e925958a5975dde3734823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-59424d550468912937e9b300153e096c97da34e73d6e925958a5975dde3734823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23234895$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20802398$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>TRANSFELDT, Ensor E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOPP, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEHBOD, Amir A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINTER, Robert B</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical Outcomes of Decompression, Decompression With Limited Fusion, and Decompression With Full Curve Fusion for Degenerative Scoliosis With Radiculopathy</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>A retrospective clinical cohort study at a single spine center of patients with degenerative scoliosis and radiculopathy severe enough to require surgery. To evaluate the functional outcomes of 3 surgeries for degenerative scoliosis with radiculopathy; decompression alone, decompression and limited fusion, and decompression and full curve fusion. Although these 3 surgical treatments have all been described for this problem, there exists little information as to what outcomes to expect. The study cohort consisted of 85 patients who met the inclusion criteria of degenerative scoliosis and radiculopathy, who had undergone 1 of the above 3 surgeries, who had not had any previous lumbar spine surgery, who had a minimum follow-up of at least 2 years, and who had filled out preoperative and postoperative functional evaluation forms including SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index, Roland Morris Scores, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to predict the likelihood of success as related to decompression alone of rotatory olisthetic segments, extent of fusion, and postoperative sagittal balance. Patient demographics including curve magnitude, operative blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, and need for revision surgeries were analyzed. The patients having decompression alone had the highest mean age (76.4 years) compared to decompression and limited fusion (70.4), and decompression and full curve fusion (62.5). Cobb scoliosis angles remained unchanged in the 2 groups not having full curve fusion, while the full curve fusion group changed from a mean 39° before surgery to 19° at follow-up. The complication rate was highest (56%) in the full fusion group, was 40% in the limited fusion group, and 10% in the decompression alone group. The overall SF-36 analysis showed significant improvement in bodily pain, social function, role emotional, mental health, and mental composite domains. Oswestry Disability Indexes improved significantly in the decompression alone and limited fusion groups, but not in the full fusion group. In contrast, the satisfaction questionnaire showed the highest success to be in the full-curve fusion group and the lowest in the decompression-only group.Regression analysis revealed that sacrum to curve apex fusions and positive postoperative sagittal imbalance were associated with poor outcomes. Both good and poor results were seen with each of the 3 procedures.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Decompression, Surgical - methods</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Radiculopathy - epidemiology</subject><subject>Radiculopathy - surgery</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scoliosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Scoliosis - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkcFO3DAQhi1EBVvKGyCUC-JCqO2Jk_gIC1sqrYTEgjhGXnsCRkm82HGlfZi-a13tAirqaTzW93tG_gg5YvScUVl9v7xbnNMlZYDAaqaxBMV3yIQJXueMCblLJhRKnvMCyn3yNYQXSmkJTO6RfU5rykHWE_J7Ef2T1arLbuOoXY8hc212hem48hiCdcPZv232aMfnbG57O6LJZnGDqMH8D5vFrsum0f_CLZm1zifwCQf0arTpfqFdZ12wYZO4U8bq2LmVGp_X38iXVnUBD7f1gDzMru-nN_n89sfP6cU811CKMRey4IURghZlLRmXUKFcAqVMAFJZalkZBQVWYEqUXEhRKyErYQxCBUXN4YCcbt5defcaMYxNb4PGrlMDuhiaSggm049ViSw2pPYuBI9ts_K2V37dMNr89dIkL81nLyl2vB0Qlz2a99CbiAScbAEVko3Wq0Hb8MEBT4tKAX8AujKYtg</recordid><startdate>20100915</startdate><enddate>20100915</enddate><creator>TRANSFELDT, Ensor E</creator><creator>TOPP, Raymond</creator><creator>MEHBOD, Amir A</creator><creator>WINTER, Robert B</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100915</creationdate><title>Surgical Outcomes of Decompression, Decompression With Limited Fusion, and Decompression With Full Curve Fusion for Degenerative Scoliosis With Radiculopathy</title><author>TRANSFELDT, Ensor E ; TOPP, Raymond ; MEHBOD, Amir A ; WINTER, Robert B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-59424d550468912937e9b300153e096c97da34e73d6e925958a5975dde3734823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Decompression, Surgical - methods</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Radiculopathy - epidemiology</topic><topic>Radiculopathy - surgery</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scoliosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Scoliosis - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TRANSFELDT, Ensor E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOPP, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEHBOD, Amir A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINTER, Robert B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TRANSFELDT, Ensor E</au><au>TOPP, Raymond</au><au>MEHBOD, Amir A</au><au>WINTER, Robert B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical Outcomes of Decompression, Decompression With Limited Fusion, and Decompression With Full Curve Fusion for Degenerative Scoliosis With Radiculopathy</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>2010-09-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>1872</spage><epage>1875</epage><pages>1872-1875</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><coden>SPINDD</coden><abstract>A retrospective clinical cohort study at a single spine center of patients with degenerative scoliosis and radiculopathy severe enough to require surgery. To evaluate the functional outcomes of 3 surgeries for degenerative scoliosis with radiculopathy; decompression alone, decompression and limited fusion, and decompression and full curve fusion. Although these 3 surgical treatments have all been described for this problem, there exists little information as to what outcomes to expect. The study cohort consisted of 85 patients who met the inclusion criteria of degenerative scoliosis and radiculopathy, who had undergone 1 of the above 3 surgeries, who had not had any previous lumbar spine surgery, who had a minimum follow-up of at least 2 years, and who had filled out preoperative and postoperative functional evaluation forms including SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index, Roland Morris Scores, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to predict the likelihood of success as related to decompression alone of rotatory olisthetic segments, extent of fusion, and postoperative sagittal balance. Patient demographics including curve magnitude, operative blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, and need for revision surgeries were analyzed. The patients having decompression alone had the highest mean age (76.4 years) compared to decompression and limited fusion (70.4), and decompression and full curve fusion (62.5). Cobb scoliosis angles remained unchanged in the 2 groups not having full curve fusion, while the full curve fusion group changed from a mean 39° before surgery to 19° at follow-up. The complication rate was highest (56%) in the full fusion group, was 40% in the limited fusion group, and 10% in the decompression alone group. The overall SF-36 analysis showed significant improvement in bodily pain, social function, role emotional, mental health, and mental composite domains. Oswestry Disability Indexes improved significantly in the decompression alone and limited fusion groups, but not in the full fusion group. In contrast, the satisfaction questionnaire showed the highest success to be in the full-curve fusion group and the lowest in the decompression-only group.Regression analysis revealed that sacrum to curve apex fusions and positive postoperative sagittal imbalance were associated with poor outcomes. Both good and poor results were seen with each of the 3 procedures.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>20802398</pmid><doi>10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce63a2</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2010-09, Vol.35 (20), p.1872-1875
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755190237
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord
Cohort Studies
Comorbidity
Decompression, Surgical - methods
Disability Evaluation
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
Orthopedic surgery
Patient Satisfaction
Radiculopathy - epidemiology
Radiculopathy - surgery
Regression Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Scoliosis - epidemiology
Scoliosis - surgery
Spinal Fusion - methods
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Treatment Outcome
title Surgical Outcomes of Decompression, Decompression With Limited Fusion, and Decompression With Full Curve Fusion for Degenerative Scoliosis With Radiculopathy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A59%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20Outcomes%20of%20Decompression,%20Decompression%20With%20Limited%20Fusion,%20and%20Decompression%20With%20Full%20Curve%20Fusion%20for%20Degenerative%20Scoliosis%20With%20Radiculopathy&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=TRANSFELDT,%20Ensor%20E&rft.date=2010-09-15&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=1872&rft.epage=1875&rft.pages=1872-1875&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft.coden=SPINDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce63a2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E755190237%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=755190237&rft_id=info:pmid/20802398&rfr_iscdi=true