Nonclinical influences, beyond diagnosis and severity, on clinical decision making in dermatology: understanding the gap between guidelines and practice

Summary Background  Clinical decision making in dermatology is a complex process and might be influenced by a wide range of nonclinical factors. Objectives  The aim of this study was to explore the role of nonclinical influences, beyond diagnosis and severity, on clinical decision making in dermatol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of dermatology (1951) 2010-10, Vol.163 (4), p.789-799
Hauptverfasser: Hajjaj, F.M., Salek, M.S., Basra, M.K.A., Finlay, A.Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 799
container_issue 4
container_start_page 789
container_title British journal of dermatology (1951)
container_volume 163
creator Hajjaj, F.M.
Salek, M.S.
Basra, M.K.A.
Finlay, A.Y.
description Summary Background  Clinical decision making in dermatology is a complex process and might be influenced by a wide range of nonclinical factors. Objectives  The aim of this study was to explore the role of nonclinical influences, beyond diagnosis and severity, on clinical decision making in dermatology. Methods  Semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 46 clinicians working in departments of dermatology of nine different hospitals in Wales. Interviews were audio‐recorded and later transcribed and their contents analysed. Results  Nonclinical factors influencing patient management decisions in dermatology that were identified related to patients, clinicians and practice characteristics. Patient‐related factors included place of residence, socioeconomic circumstances, education and intelligence, ethnicity, age, treatment adherence, expectations from treatment, quality of life, concerns and worries, difficult patients, and family members or friends. Clinician‐related factors included time constraints in clinic, clinicians’ personal circumstances, relationship with colleagues, and relationship with pharmaceutical companies. Practice‐related factors included working in private practice, cost of treatment to the National Health Service (NHS), prescribing bureaucracy, and availability of treatment service in the work place. There was a difference between the consultants’ views and those of the other clinicians over the impact of pharmaceutical companies on clinicians’ prescribing and the awareness of treatment costs to the NHS. Most of the factors identified could potentially influence the clinicians’ decision‐making process subconsciously. Some clinicians highlighted that these factors are untaught in the medical curriculum, and are usually ignored in clinical guidelines, and therefore represent a challenge to the practice of evidence‐based medicine. Conclusions  This study has described one aspect of the reality of medical decision making beyond the conventional evidence‐based guidelines approach. Proper understanding of nonclinical influences on decision making is of paramount importance for the best patient‐centred treatment outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09868.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755165072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>755165072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-a47d5619e23a407183948832dffa994e9f772b80473ccc86641ea165e418fabd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUctu2zAQJIoWjev2Fwpeil4ihy-JVIEeGufVIEgPfd4ImlqpdCTKFaXG-pN8bqjacXkgubszs8AMQpiSBY3nZL2gPEsTRjlfMBK7JFeZWmyfodlh8BzNCCEyIXnGj9CrENaEUE5S8hIdMaJSIQiboYfb1tvaeWdNjZ0v6wG8hXCMVzC2vsCFM5VvgwvYxCrAX-hcPx7j1uMDrQDrgoudxtw5X0WZ2Ooa07d1W40f8OBjGfooME3734Ars4kL-nsAj6vBFRClYLdi0xnbOwuv0YvS1AHe7N85-n5x_m15ldx8ufy8_HSTWK6kSoyQRZrRHBg3gkiqeC6U4qwoS5PnAvJSSrZSREhurVVZJigYmqUgqCrNquBz9H6nu-naPwOEXjcuWKhr46EdgpZpGuFEsoh8u0cOqwYKvelcY7pRP5kZAe_2ABOiL2VnfDTmP45zwrJ4z9HHHe7e1TAe5pToKVy91lOGespQT-Hqf-HqrT69Ppt-kZ_s-C70sD3wTXenM8llqn_eXurlryv-9cfZhT7lj2zCqPc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>755165072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nonclinical influences, beyond diagnosis and severity, on clinical decision making in dermatology: understanding the gap between guidelines and practice</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hajjaj, F.M. ; Salek, M.S. ; Basra, M.K.A. ; Finlay, A.Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hajjaj, F.M. ; Salek, M.S. ; Basra, M.K.A. ; Finlay, A.Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background  Clinical decision making in dermatology is a complex process and might be influenced by a wide range of nonclinical factors. Objectives  The aim of this study was to explore the role of nonclinical influences, beyond diagnosis and severity, on clinical decision making in dermatology. Methods  Semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 46 clinicians working in departments of dermatology of nine different hospitals in Wales. Interviews were audio‐recorded and later transcribed and their contents analysed. Results  Nonclinical factors influencing patient management decisions in dermatology that were identified related to patients, clinicians and practice characteristics. Patient‐related factors included place of residence, socioeconomic circumstances, education and intelligence, ethnicity, age, treatment adherence, expectations from treatment, quality of life, concerns and worries, difficult patients, and family members or friends. Clinician‐related factors included time constraints in clinic, clinicians’ personal circumstances, relationship with colleagues, and relationship with pharmaceutical companies. Practice‐related factors included working in private practice, cost of treatment to the National Health Service (NHS), prescribing bureaucracy, and availability of treatment service in the work place. There was a difference between the consultants’ views and those of the other clinicians over the impact of pharmaceutical companies on clinicians’ prescribing and the awareness of treatment costs to the NHS. Most of the factors identified could potentially influence the clinicians’ decision‐making process subconsciously. Some clinicians highlighted that these factors are untaught in the medical curriculum, and are usually ignored in clinical guidelines, and therefore represent a challenge to the practice of evidence‐based medicine. Conclusions  This study has described one aspect of the reality of medical decision making beyond the conventional evidence‐based guidelines approach. Proper understanding of nonclinical influences on decision making is of paramount importance for the best patient‐centred treatment outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09868.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20854402</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJDEAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>art of medicine ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitude to Health ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Competence ; clinical guidelines ; Decision Making ; Dermatology ; Dermatology - methods ; Dermatology - standards ; evidence-based medicine (EBM) ; Female ; Guideline Adherence ; Health Services Research - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology ; Miscellaneous ; nonclinical influences ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Professional Autonomy ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Skin Diseases - therapy ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Wales</subject><ispartof>British journal of dermatology (1951), 2010-10, Vol.163 (4), p.789-799</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-a47d5619e23a407183948832dffa994e9f772b80473ccc86641ea165e418fabd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2133.2010.09868.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2133.2010.09868.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23302623$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20854402$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hajjaj, F.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salek, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basra, M.K.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finlay, A.Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Nonclinical influences, beyond diagnosis and severity, on clinical decision making in dermatology: understanding the gap between guidelines and practice</title><title>British journal of dermatology (1951)</title><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><description>Summary Background  Clinical decision making in dermatology is a complex process and might be influenced by a wide range of nonclinical factors. Objectives  The aim of this study was to explore the role of nonclinical influences, beyond diagnosis and severity, on clinical decision making in dermatology. Methods  Semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 46 clinicians working in departments of dermatology of nine different hospitals in Wales. Interviews were audio‐recorded and later transcribed and their contents analysed. Results  Nonclinical factors influencing patient management decisions in dermatology that were identified related to patients, clinicians and practice characteristics. Patient‐related factors included place of residence, socioeconomic circumstances, education and intelligence, ethnicity, age, treatment adherence, expectations from treatment, quality of life, concerns and worries, difficult patients, and family members or friends. Clinician‐related factors included time constraints in clinic, clinicians’ personal circumstances, relationship with colleagues, and relationship with pharmaceutical companies. Practice‐related factors included working in private practice, cost of treatment to the National Health Service (NHS), prescribing bureaucracy, and availability of treatment service in the work place. There was a difference between the consultants’ views and those of the other clinicians over the impact of pharmaceutical companies on clinicians’ prescribing and the awareness of treatment costs to the NHS. Most of the factors identified could potentially influence the clinicians’ decision‐making process subconsciously. Some clinicians highlighted that these factors are untaught in the medical curriculum, and are usually ignored in clinical guidelines, and therefore represent a challenge to the practice of evidence‐based medicine. Conclusions  This study has described one aspect of the reality of medical decision making beyond the conventional evidence‐based guidelines approach. Proper understanding of nonclinical influences on decision making is of paramount importance for the best patient‐centred treatment outcomes.</description><subject>art of medicine</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>clinical guidelines</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dermatology - methods</subject><subject>Dermatology - standards</subject><subject>evidence-based medicine (EBM)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Health Services Research - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>nonclinical influences</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Professional Autonomy</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Skin Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Wales</subject><issn>0007-0963</issn><issn>1365-2133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUctu2zAQJIoWjev2Fwpeil4ihy-JVIEeGufVIEgPfd4ImlqpdCTKFaXG-pN8bqjacXkgubszs8AMQpiSBY3nZL2gPEsTRjlfMBK7JFeZWmyfodlh8BzNCCEyIXnGj9CrENaEUE5S8hIdMaJSIQiboYfb1tvaeWdNjZ0v6wG8hXCMVzC2vsCFM5VvgwvYxCrAX-hcPx7j1uMDrQDrgoudxtw5X0WZ2Ooa07d1W40f8OBjGfooME3734Ars4kL-nsAj6vBFRClYLdi0xnbOwuv0YvS1AHe7N85-n5x_m15ldx8ufy8_HSTWK6kSoyQRZrRHBg3gkiqeC6U4qwoS5PnAvJSSrZSREhurVVZJigYmqUgqCrNquBz9H6nu-naPwOEXjcuWKhr46EdgpZpGuFEsoh8u0cOqwYKvelcY7pRP5kZAe_2ABOiL2VnfDTmP45zwrJ4z9HHHe7e1TAe5pToKVy91lOGespQT-Hqf-HqrT69Ppt-kZ_s-C70sD3wTXenM8llqn_eXurlryv-9cfZhT7lj2zCqPc</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Hajjaj, F.M.</creator><creator>Salek, M.S.</creator><creator>Basra, M.K.A.</creator><creator>Finlay, A.Y.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Nonclinical influences, beyond diagnosis and severity, on clinical decision making in dermatology: understanding the gap between guidelines and practice</title><author>Hajjaj, F.M. ; Salek, M.S. ; Basra, M.K.A. ; Finlay, A.Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-a47d5619e23a407183948832dffa994e9f772b80473ccc86641ea165e418fabd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>art of medicine</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>clinical guidelines</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dermatology - methods</topic><topic>Dermatology - standards</topic><topic>evidence-based medicine (EBM)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Health Services Research - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>nonclinical influences</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Professional Autonomy</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Skin Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Wales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hajjaj, F.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salek, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basra, M.K.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finlay, A.Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hajjaj, F.M.</au><au>Salek, M.S.</au><au>Basra, M.K.A.</au><au>Finlay, A.Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nonclinical influences, beyond diagnosis and severity, on clinical decision making in dermatology: understanding the gap between guidelines and practice</atitle><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>163</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>789</spage><epage>799</epage><pages>789-799</pages><issn>0007-0963</issn><eissn>1365-2133</eissn><coden>BJDEAZ</coden><abstract>Summary Background  Clinical decision making in dermatology is a complex process and might be influenced by a wide range of nonclinical factors. Objectives  The aim of this study was to explore the role of nonclinical influences, beyond diagnosis and severity, on clinical decision making in dermatology. Methods  Semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 46 clinicians working in departments of dermatology of nine different hospitals in Wales. Interviews were audio‐recorded and later transcribed and their contents analysed. Results  Nonclinical factors influencing patient management decisions in dermatology that were identified related to patients, clinicians and practice characteristics. Patient‐related factors included place of residence, socioeconomic circumstances, education and intelligence, ethnicity, age, treatment adherence, expectations from treatment, quality of life, concerns and worries, difficult patients, and family members or friends. Clinician‐related factors included time constraints in clinic, clinicians’ personal circumstances, relationship with colleagues, and relationship with pharmaceutical companies. Practice‐related factors included working in private practice, cost of treatment to the National Health Service (NHS), prescribing bureaucracy, and availability of treatment service in the work place. There was a difference between the consultants’ views and those of the other clinicians over the impact of pharmaceutical companies on clinicians’ prescribing and the awareness of treatment costs to the NHS. Most of the factors identified could potentially influence the clinicians’ decision‐making process subconsciously. Some clinicians highlighted that these factors are untaught in the medical curriculum, and are usually ignored in clinical guidelines, and therefore represent a challenge to the practice of evidence‐based medicine. Conclusions  This study has described one aspect of the reality of medical decision making beyond the conventional evidence‐based guidelines approach. Proper understanding of nonclinical influences on decision making is of paramount importance for the best patient‐centred treatment outcomes.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20854402</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09868.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0963
ispartof British journal of dermatology (1951), 2010-10, Vol.163 (4), p.789-799
issn 0007-0963
1365-2133
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755165072
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects art of medicine
Attitude of Health Personnel
Attitude to Health
Biological and medical sciences
Clinical Competence
clinical guidelines
Decision Making
Dermatology
Dermatology - methods
Dermatology - standards
evidence-based medicine (EBM)
Female
Guideline Adherence
Health Services Research - methods
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology
Miscellaneous
nonclinical influences
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data
Professional Autonomy
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Skin Diseases - therapy
Socioeconomic Factors
Wales
title Nonclinical influences, beyond diagnosis and severity, on clinical decision making in dermatology: understanding the gap between guidelines and practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A14%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nonclinical%20influences,%20beyond%20diagnosis%20and%20severity,%20on%20clinical%20decision%20making%20in%20dermatology:%20understanding%20the%20gap%20between%20guidelines%20and%20practice&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20dermatology%20(1951)&rft.au=Hajjaj,%20F.M.&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=163&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=789&rft.epage=799&rft.pages=789-799&rft.issn=0007-0963&rft.eissn=1365-2133&rft.coden=BJDEAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09868.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E755165072%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=755165072&rft_id=info:pmid/20854402&rfr_iscdi=true