Efficiency and justice revisited

At first sight, modern economics and justice seem not to fit together. Whereas the former primarily deals with individual self-interest and extrinsic incentives, the latter deals with other-regardingness and intrinsic social motives. However, recent findings, mainly from the field of experimental ec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European Journal of Political Economy 2010-09, Vol.26 (3), p.311-319
Hauptverfasser: Holler, Manfred J., Leroch, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 319
container_issue 3
container_start_page 311
container_title European Journal of Political Economy
container_volume 26
creator Holler, Manfred J.
Leroch, Martin
description At first sight, modern economics and justice seem not to fit together. Whereas the former primarily deals with individual self-interest and extrinsic incentives, the latter deals with other-regardingness and intrinsic social motives. However, recent findings, mainly from the field of experimental economics, reintroduce aspects of justice into economic modeling. Other theories, evolutionary models for instance, take up the key findings and apply the economic rationale in order to find out why human traits which apparently run counter to individual self-interest may have survived. In this introductory note we date this discussion back to the days of Adam Smith and argue that he already set the basis for such a discussion. Apparently, Smith was well aware that principles of justice and the market may, at times, be contradictory. However, he also found that both served a common purpose, or so we will argue. We further aim at bringing together Smith's classical position with recent ideas, for instance Binmore's theory of justice, and see whether the one can be fruitful for the other.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.11.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755157732</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0176268009000962</els_id><sourcerecordid>755157732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-5d633f58cf9c962a55aae85836bb961a087b931b867196c9b9332569543945903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWGq_gvTmadfMTpNsbkqp_yh40XNIs7OYpe2uybbQb2_WVq8NTGYG3nsMP8ZugefAQd43OTVduybX5gXnOgfIOVcXbASlwkwojpdsxEHJrJAlv2aTGBue3kwXpcYRmy7q2jtPW3eY2m01bXax946mgfY--p6qG3ZV23WkyamP2efT4mP-ki3fn1_nj8vMCS77TFQSsRalq7XTsrBCWEulKFGuVlqC5aVaaYRVKRVo6XRasBBSixnqmdAcx-zumNuF9ntHsTcbHx2t13ZL7S4aJQQIpbA4r5whRw2gklIelS60MQaqTRf8xoaDAW4GfKYxf_jMgM8AmIQvGd-OxkAduX8XEZ3Ee4O2kOk7DANPcWh9KkzVDT0FIWjz1W9S2MMxjBK-vadg4i9wqnwg15uq9efu-QEOeZH2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>743039117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficiency and justice revisited</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Holler, Manfred J. ; Leroch, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Holler, Manfred J. ; Leroch, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>At first sight, modern economics and justice seem not to fit together. Whereas the former primarily deals with individual self-interest and extrinsic incentives, the latter deals with other-regardingness and intrinsic social motives. However, recent findings, mainly from the field of experimental economics, reintroduce aspects of justice into economic modeling. Other theories, evolutionary models for instance, take up the key findings and apply the economic rationale in order to find out why human traits which apparently run counter to individual self-interest may have survived. In this introductory note we date this discussion back to the days of Adam Smith and argue that he already set the basis for such a discussion. Apparently, Smith was well aware that principles of justice and the market may, at times, be contradictory. However, he also found that both served a common purpose, or so we will argue. We further aim at bringing together Smith's classical position with recent ideas, for instance Binmore's theory of justice, and see whether the one can be fruitful for the other.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0176-2680</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.11.007</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJECE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adam Smith ; Economic behaviour ; Economic Models ; Efficiency ; Ethics ; Ethics and economics ; Experimental economics ; Fairness ; Impartial spectator ; Incentives ; Justice ; Justice Fairness Ethics and economics Impartial spectator Adam Smith ; Markets ; Microeconomics ; Smith, Adam</subject><ispartof>European Journal of Political Economy, 2010-09, Vol.26 (3), p.311-319</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-5d633f58cf9c962a55aae85836bb961a087b931b867196c9b9332569543945903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-5d633f58cf9c962a55aae85836bb961a087b931b867196c9b9332569543945903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268009000962$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeepoleco/v_3a26_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a311-319.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holler, Manfred J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leroch, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Efficiency and justice revisited</title><title>European Journal of Political Economy</title><description>At first sight, modern economics and justice seem not to fit together. Whereas the former primarily deals with individual self-interest and extrinsic incentives, the latter deals with other-regardingness and intrinsic social motives. However, recent findings, mainly from the field of experimental economics, reintroduce aspects of justice into economic modeling. Other theories, evolutionary models for instance, take up the key findings and apply the economic rationale in order to find out why human traits which apparently run counter to individual self-interest may have survived. In this introductory note we date this discussion back to the days of Adam Smith and argue that he already set the basis for such a discussion. Apparently, Smith was well aware that principles of justice and the market may, at times, be contradictory. However, he also found that both served a common purpose, or so we will argue. We further aim at bringing together Smith's classical position with recent ideas, for instance Binmore's theory of justice, and see whether the one can be fruitful for the other.</description><subject>Adam Smith</subject><subject>Economic behaviour</subject><subject>Economic Models</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics and economics</subject><subject>Experimental economics</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Impartial spectator</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Justice Fairness Ethics and economics Impartial spectator Adam Smith</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Smith, Adam</subject><issn>0176-2680</issn><issn>1873-5703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWGq_gvTmadfMTpNsbkqp_yh40XNIs7OYpe2uybbQb2_WVq8NTGYG3nsMP8ZugefAQd43OTVduybX5gXnOgfIOVcXbASlwkwojpdsxEHJrJAlv2aTGBue3kwXpcYRmy7q2jtPW3eY2m01bXax946mgfY--p6qG3ZV23WkyamP2efT4mP-ki3fn1_nj8vMCS77TFQSsRalq7XTsrBCWEulKFGuVlqC5aVaaYRVKRVo6XRasBBSixnqmdAcx-zumNuF9ntHsTcbHx2t13ZL7S4aJQQIpbA4r5whRw2gklIelS60MQaqTRf8xoaDAW4GfKYxf_jMgM8AmIQvGd-OxkAduX8XEZ3Ee4O2kOk7DANPcWh9KkzVDT0FIWjz1W9S2MMxjBK-vadg4i9wqnwg15uq9efu-QEOeZH2</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Holler, Manfred J.</creator><creator>Leroch, Martin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Efficiency and justice revisited</title><author>Holler, Manfred J. ; Leroch, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-5d633f58cf9c962a55aae85836bb961a087b931b867196c9b9332569543945903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adam Smith</topic><topic>Economic behaviour</topic><topic>Economic Models</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics and economics</topic><topic>Experimental economics</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Impartial spectator</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Justice Fairness Ethics and economics Impartial spectator Adam Smith</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Smith, Adam</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holler, Manfred J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leroch, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European Journal of Political Economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holler, Manfred J.</au><au>Leroch, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficiency and justice revisited</atitle><jtitle>European Journal of Political Economy</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>319</epage><pages>311-319</pages><issn>0176-2680</issn><eissn>1873-5703</eissn><coden>EJECE3</coden><abstract>At first sight, modern economics and justice seem not to fit together. Whereas the former primarily deals with individual self-interest and extrinsic incentives, the latter deals with other-regardingness and intrinsic social motives. However, recent findings, mainly from the field of experimental economics, reintroduce aspects of justice into economic modeling. Other theories, evolutionary models for instance, take up the key findings and apply the economic rationale in order to find out why human traits which apparently run counter to individual self-interest may have survived. In this introductory note we date this discussion back to the days of Adam Smith and argue that he already set the basis for such a discussion. Apparently, Smith was well aware that principles of justice and the market may, at times, be contradictory. However, he also found that both served a common purpose, or so we will argue. We further aim at bringing together Smith's classical position with recent ideas, for instance Binmore's theory of justice, and see whether the one can be fruitful for the other.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.11.007</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0176-2680
ispartof European Journal of Political Economy, 2010-09, Vol.26 (3), p.311-319
issn 0176-2680
1873-5703
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755157732
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Adam Smith
Economic behaviour
Economic Models
Efficiency
Ethics
Ethics and economics
Experimental economics
Fairness
Impartial spectator
Incentives
Justice
Justice Fairness Ethics and economics Impartial spectator Adam Smith
Markets
Microeconomics
Smith, Adam
title Efficiency and justice revisited
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T09%3A48%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficiency%20and%20justice%20revisited&rft.jtitle=European%20Journal%20of%20Political%20Economy&rft.au=Holler,%20Manfred%20J.&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=319&rft.pages=311-319&rft.issn=0176-2680&rft.eissn=1873-5703&rft.coden=EJECE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.11.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E755157732%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=743039117&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0176268009000962&rfr_iscdi=true