identification of priority policy options for UK nature conservation

1. The conservation of biodiversity depends upon both policy and regulatory frameworks. Here, we identify priority policy developments that would support conservation in the UK in the light of technological developments, changes in knowledge or environmental change. 2. A team of seven representative...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of applied ecology 2010-10, Vol.47 (5), p.955-965
Hauptverfasser: Sutherland, William J, Albon, Steve D, Allison, Hilary, Armstrong-Brown, Sue, Bailey, Mark J, Brereton, Tom, Boyd, Ian L, Carey, Peter, Edwards, Joan, Gill, Maggie, Hill, David, Hodge, Ian, Hunt, Alexander J, Le Quesne, Will J.F, Macdonald, David W, Mee, Laurence D, Mitchell, Roger, Norman, Tim, Owen, Roger P, Parker, David, Prior, Stephanie V, Pullin, Andrew S, Rands, Michael R.W, Redpath, Steve, Spencer, Jonathan, Spray, Chris J, Thomas, Chris D, Tucker, Graham M, Watkinson, Andrew R, Clements, Andy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 965
container_issue 5
container_start_page 955
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 47
creator Sutherland, William J
Albon, Steve D
Allison, Hilary
Armstrong-Brown, Sue
Bailey, Mark J
Brereton, Tom
Boyd, Ian L
Carey, Peter
Edwards, Joan
Gill, Maggie
Hill, David
Hodge, Ian
Hunt, Alexander J
Le Quesne, Will J.F
Macdonald, David W
Mee, Laurence D
Mitchell, Roger
Norman, Tim
Owen, Roger P
Parker, David
Prior, Stephanie V
Pullin, Andrew S
Rands, Michael R.W
Redpath, Steve
Spencer, Jonathan
Spray, Chris J
Thomas, Chris D
Tucker, Graham M
Watkinson, Andrew R
Clements, Andy
description 1. The conservation of biodiversity depends upon both policy and regulatory frameworks. Here, we identify priority policy developments that would support conservation in the UK in the light of technological developments, changes in knowledge or environmental change. 2. A team of seven representatives from governmental organizations, 17 from non-governmental organizations and six academics provided an assessment of the priority issues. The representatives consulted widely and identified a long-list of 117 issues. 3. Following voting and discussion during a 2-day meeting, these were reduced to a final list of 25 issues and their potential policy options and research needs were identified. Many of the policies related to recent changes in approaches to conservation, such as increased interest in ecosystem services, adaptation to climate change and landscape ecology. 4. We anticipate that this paper will be useful for policy makers, nature conservation delivery agencies, the research community and conservation policy advocates. 5. Although many of the options have global significance, we suggest that other countries consider an equivalent exercise. We recommend that such an exercise be carried out in the UK at regular intervals, say every 5 years, to explore how biodiversity conservation can best be supported by linked policy development and research in a changing world. 6. Synthesis and applications. Opportunities for policy development were prioritized and for each of the top 25 we identified the current context, policy options and research questions. These largely addressed new issues relating to developing topics such as ecosystem services, landscape planning and nanotechnology. We envisage that this will largely be used by researchers wishing to make a contribution to potential policy debates.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01863.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755140263</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>755140263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f211t-a83392d4995f78344f56412221f5cf15d6d0500b8d3b20450c73e3fca82fc8d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMI34BunhLU3dpwjKlAQlThAz5Hr2MhViIOdIvr3GIrYy0jz2JGGEMqgZPmutyVDKQouZVVyyCwwJbH8OiKzf-GYzAA4K1QD7JScpbQFgEYgzsit7-wweeeNnnwYaHB0jD5EP-3pGHpv9jSMP0qiLkS6fqKDnnbRUpMpGz9_U-fkxOk-2Ys_nJP1_d3r4qFYPS8fFzerwnHGpkIrxIZ3VdMIVyusKidkxTjnzAnjmOhkBwJgozrccKgEmBotOqMVd0Z1Eufk6vB3jOFjZ9PUvvtkbN_rwYZdamshWAVcYnZeHpxOh1a_RZ_a9UueB_M6KhfW-A0dQllP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>755140263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>identification of priority policy options for UK nature conservation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sutherland, William J ; Albon, Steve D ; Allison, Hilary ; Armstrong-Brown, Sue ; Bailey, Mark J ; Brereton, Tom ; Boyd, Ian L ; Carey, Peter ; Edwards, Joan ; Gill, Maggie ; Hill, David ; Hodge, Ian ; Hunt, Alexander J ; Le Quesne, Will J.F ; Macdonald, David W ; Mee, Laurence D ; Mitchell, Roger ; Norman, Tim ; Owen, Roger P ; Parker, David ; Prior, Stephanie V ; Pullin, Andrew S ; Rands, Michael R.W ; Redpath, Steve ; Spencer, Jonathan ; Spray, Chris J ; Thomas, Chris D ; Tucker, Graham M ; Watkinson, Andrew R ; Clements, Andy</creator><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, William J ; Albon, Steve D ; Allison, Hilary ; Armstrong-Brown, Sue ; Bailey, Mark J ; Brereton, Tom ; Boyd, Ian L ; Carey, Peter ; Edwards, Joan ; Gill, Maggie ; Hill, David ; Hodge, Ian ; Hunt, Alexander J ; Le Quesne, Will J.F ; Macdonald, David W ; Mee, Laurence D ; Mitchell, Roger ; Norman, Tim ; Owen, Roger P ; Parker, David ; Prior, Stephanie V ; Pullin, Andrew S ; Rands, Michael R.W ; Redpath, Steve ; Spencer, Jonathan ; Spray, Chris J ; Thomas, Chris D ; Tucker, Graham M ; Watkinson, Andrew R ; Clements, Andy</creatorcontrib><description>1. The conservation of biodiversity depends upon both policy and regulatory frameworks. Here, we identify priority policy developments that would support conservation in the UK in the light of technological developments, changes in knowledge or environmental change. 2. A team of seven representatives from governmental organizations, 17 from non-governmental organizations and six academics provided an assessment of the priority issues. The representatives consulted widely and identified a long-list of 117 issues. 3. Following voting and discussion during a 2-day meeting, these were reduced to a final list of 25 issues and their potential policy options and research needs were identified. Many of the policies related to recent changes in approaches to conservation, such as increased interest in ecosystem services, adaptation to climate change and landscape ecology. 4. We anticipate that this paper will be useful for policy makers, nature conservation delivery agencies, the research community and conservation policy advocates. 5. Although many of the options have global significance, we suggest that other countries consider an equivalent exercise. We recommend that such an exercise be carried out in the UK at regular intervals, say every 5 years, to explore how biodiversity conservation can best be supported by linked policy development and research in a changing world. 6. Synthesis and applications. Opportunities for policy development were prioritized and for each of the top 25 we identified the current context, policy options and research questions. These largely addressed new issues relating to developing topics such as ecosystem services, landscape planning and nanotechnology. We envisage that this will largely be used by researchers wishing to make a contribution to potential policy debates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01863.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2010-10, Vol.47 (5), p.955-965</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albon, Steve D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allison, Hilary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong-Brown, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brereton, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Ian L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Maggie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodge, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Alexander J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Quesne, Will J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mee, Laurence D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Roger P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prior, Stephanie V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullin, Andrew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rands, Michael R.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redpath, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spray, Chris J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Chris D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Graham M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkinson, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clements, Andy</creatorcontrib><title>identification of priority policy options for UK nature conservation</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. The conservation of biodiversity depends upon both policy and regulatory frameworks. Here, we identify priority policy developments that would support conservation in the UK in the light of technological developments, changes in knowledge or environmental change. 2. A team of seven representatives from governmental organizations, 17 from non-governmental organizations and six academics provided an assessment of the priority issues. The representatives consulted widely and identified a long-list of 117 issues. 3. Following voting and discussion during a 2-day meeting, these were reduced to a final list of 25 issues and their potential policy options and research needs were identified. Many of the policies related to recent changes in approaches to conservation, such as increased interest in ecosystem services, adaptation to climate change and landscape ecology. 4. We anticipate that this paper will be useful for policy makers, nature conservation delivery agencies, the research community and conservation policy advocates. 5. Although many of the options have global significance, we suggest that other countries consider an equivalent exercise. We recommend that such an exercise be carried out in the UK at regular intervals, say every 5 years, to explore how biodiversity conservation can best be supported by linked policy development and research in a changing world. 6. Synthesis and applications. Opportunities for policy development were prioritized and for each of the top 25 we identified the current context, policy options and research questions. These largely addressed new issues relating to developing topics such as ecosystem services, landscape planning and nanotechnology. We envisage that this will largely be used by researchers wishing to make a contribution to potential policy debates.</description><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMI34BunhLU3dpwjKlAQlThAz5Hr2MhViIOdIvr3GIrYy0jz2JGGEMqgZPmutyVDKQouZVVyyCwwJbH8OiKzf-GYzAA4K1QD7JScpbQFgEYgzsit7-wweeeNnnwYaHB0jD5EP-3pGHpv9jSMP0qiLkS6fqKDnnbRUpMpGz9_U-fkxOk-2Ys_nJP1_d3r4qFYPS8fFzerwnHGpkIrxIZ3VdMIVyusKidkxTjnzAnjmOhkBwJgozrccKgEmBotOqMVd0Z1Eufk6vB3jOFjZ9PUvvtkbN_rwYZdamshWAVcYnZeHpxOh1a_RZ_a9UueB_M6KhfW-A0dQllP</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Sutherland, William J</creator><creator>Albon, Steve D</creator><creator>Allison, Hilary</creator><creator>Armstrong-Brown, Sue</creator><creator>Bailey, Mark J</creator><creator>Brereton, Tom</creator><creator>Boyd, Ian L</creator><creator>Carey, Peter</creator><creator>Edwards, Joan</creator><creator>Gill, Maggie</creator><creator>Hill, David</creator><creator>Hodge, Ian</creator><creator>Hunt, Alexander J</creator><creator>Le Quesne, Will J.F</creator><creator>Macdonald, David W</creator><creator>Mee, Laurence D</creator><creator>Mitchell, Roger</creator><creator>Norman, Tim</creator><creator>Owen, Roger P</creator><creator>Parker, David</creator><creator>Prior, Stephanie V</creator><creator>Pullin, Andrew S</creator><creator>Rands, Michael R.W</creator><creator>Redpath, Steve</creator><creator>Spencer, Jonathan</creator><creator>Spray, Chris J</creator><creator>Thomas, Chris D</creator><creator>Tucker, Graham M</creator><creator>Watkinson, Andrew R</creator><creator>Clements, Andy</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>identification of priority policy options for UK nature conservation</title><author>Sutherland, William J ; Albon, Steve D ; Allison, Hilary ; Armstrong-Brown, Sue ; Bailey, Mark J ; Brereton, Tom ; Boyd, Ian L ; Carey, Peter ; Edwards, Joan ; Gill, Maggie ; Hill, David ; Hodge, Ian ; Hunt, Alexander J ; Le Quesne, Will J.F ; Macdonald, David W ; Mee, Laurence D ; Mitchell, Roger ; Norman, Tim ; Owen, Roger P ; Parker, David ; Prior, Stephanie V ; Pullin, Andrew S ; Rands, Michael R.W ; Redpath, Steve ; Spencer, Jonathan ; Spray, Chris J ; Thomas, Chris D ; Tucker, Graham M ; Watkinson, Andrew R ; Clements, Andy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f211t-a83392d4995f78344f56412221f5cf15d6d0500b8d3b20450c73e3fca82fc8d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albon, Steve D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allison, Hilary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong-Brown, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brereton, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Ian L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Maggie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodge, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Alexander J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Quesne, Will J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mee, Laurence D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Roger P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prior, Stephanie V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullin, Andrew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rands, Michael R.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redpath, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spray, Chris J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Chris D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Graham M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkinson, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clements, Andy</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sutherland, William J</au><au>Albon, Steve D</au><au>Allison, Hilary</au><au>Armstrong-Brown, Sue</au><au>Bailey, Mark J</au><au>Brereton, Tom</au><au>Boyd, Ian L</au><au>Carey, Peter</au><au>Edwards, Joan</au><au>Gill, Maggie</au><au>Hill, David</au><au>Hodge, Ian</au><au>Hunt, Alexander J</au><au>Le Quesne, Will J.F</au><au>Macdonald, David W</au><au>Mee, Laurence D</au><au>Mitchell, Roger</au><au>Norman, Tim</au><au>Owen, Roger P</au><au>Parker, David</au><au>Prior, Stephanie V</au><au>Pullin, Andrew S</au><au>Rands, Michael R.W</au><au>Redpath, Steve</au><au>Spencer, Jonathan</au><au>Spray, Chris J</au><au>Thomas, Chris D</au><au>Tucker, Graham M</au><au>Watkinson, Andrew R</au><au>Clements, Andy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>identification of priority policy options for UK nature conservation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>955</spage><epage>965</epage><pages>955-965</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><abstract>1. The conservation of biodiversity depends upon both policy and regulatory frameworks. Here, we identify priority policy developments that would support conservation in the UK in the light of technological developments, changes in knowledge or environmental change. 2. A team of seven representatives from governmental organizations, 17 from non-governmental organizations and six academics provided an assessment of the priority issues. The representatives consulted widely and identified a long-list of 117 issues. 3. Following voting and discussion during a 2-day meeting, these were reduced to a final list of 25 issues and their potential policy options and research needs were identified. Many of the policies related to recent changes in approaches to conservation, such as increased interest in ecosystem services, adaptation to climate change and landscape ecology. 4. We anticipate that this paper will be useful for policy makers, nature conservation delivery agencies, the research community and conservation policy advocates. 5. Although many of the options have global significance, we suggest that other countries consider an equivalent exercise. We recommend that such an exercise be carried out in the UK at regular intervals, say every 5 years, to explore how biodiversity conservation can best be supported by linked policy development and research in a changing world. 6. Synthesis and applications. Opportunities for policy development were prioritized and for each of the top 25 we identified the current context, policy options and research questions. These largely addressed new issues relating to developing topics such as ecosystem services, landscape planning and nanotechnology. We envisage that this will largely be used by researchers wishing to make a contribution to potential policy debates.</abstract><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01863.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2010-10, Vol.47 (5), p.955-965
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755140263
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title identification of priority policy options for UK nature conservation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A28%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=identification%20of%20priority%20policy%20options%20for%20UK%20nature%20conservation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Sutherland,%20William%20J&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=955&rft.epage=965&rft.pages=955-965&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01863.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_fao_a%3E755140263%3C/proquest_fao_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=755140263&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true