Matched Pair Analysis Comparing Surgery Followed By Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression

The appropriate treatment for MSCC is controversial. A small randomized trial showed that decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone. That study was limited to highly selected patients. Additional studies comparing surgery plus radiotherapy to radiotherapy coul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2010-08, Vol.28 (22), p.3597-3604
Hauptverfasser: RADES, Dirk, HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan, DUNST, Juergen, BAJROVIC, Amira, KARSTENS, Johann H, RUDAT, Volker, SCHILD, Steven E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3604
container_issue 22
container_start_page 3597
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 28
creator RADES, Dirk
HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan
DUNST, Juergen
BAJROVIC, Amira
KARSTENS, Johann H
RUDAT, Volker
SCHILD, Steven E
description The appropriate treatment for MSCC is controversial. A small randomized trial showed that decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone. That study was limited to highly selected patients. Additional studies comparing surgery plus radiotherapy to radiotherapy could better clarify the role of surgery. Data from 108 patients receiving surgery plus radiotherapy were matched to 216 patients (1:2) receiving radiotherapy alone. Groups were matched for 11 potential prognostic factors and compared for post-treatment motor function, ambulatory status, regaining ambulatory status, local control, and survival. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients receiving adequate surgery (direct decompressive surgery plus stabilization of involved vertebrae), patients receiving laminectomy, patients with solid tumors, patients with solid tumors receiving adequate surgery, and patients with solid tumors receiving laminectomy. Improvement of motor function occurred in 27% of patients after surgery plus radiotherapy and 26% after radiotherapy alone (P = .92). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 69% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 68% after radiotherapy alone (P = .99). Of the nonambulatory patients, 30% and 26%, respectively, (P = .86) regained ambulatory status after treatment. One-year local control rates were 90% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 91% after radiotherapy alone (P = .48). One-year overall survival rates were 47% and 40%, respectively (P = .50). The subgroup analyses did not show significant differences between both groups. Surgery-related complications occurred in 11% of patients. In this study, the outcomes of the end points evaluated after radiotherapy alone appeared similar to those of surgery plus radiotherapy. A new randomized trial comparing both treatments is justified.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5635
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755136463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>755136463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-e268fa4ef1a8da31bb4fcf4d9763cab5286a70d50d400ce6b874591912b9ee6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCnRPyBXHK4o84do7LikKrVkUUJG7WxHF2XTlxamdV5cJvr5cuVD1VPoxsPfOMNS9C7yhZUkbIp_P11ZKRfGNqKSouXqAFFUwWUgrxEi2I5Kygiv8-Qscp3RBCS8XFa3TESJVPTRbozyVMZmtb_B1cxKsB_JxcwuvQjxDdsMHXu7ixccanwftwl8HPM_4BrQvT1kYYZwxD-_Rh5cNgcRcivrQTpAkmZ_D16LI7e2P7Vx5tSi4Mb9CrDnyybw_1BP06_fJz_a24uPp6tl5dFEYQMhWWVaqD0nYUVAucNk3Zma5sa1lxA41gqgJJWkHakhBjq0bJUtS0pqypra0sP0EfH7xjDLc7mybdu2Ss9zDYsEs674vyqqz482SpaqEkLzNJHkgTQ0rRdnqMroc4a0r0Ph6d49H7eDRTeh9Pbnl_kO-a3rb_G_7lkYEPBwCSAd9FGIxLjxwnSjFJH3-5dZvtnYtWpx68z1qmb0zI8xjTXNSS3wPbI6az</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748958734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Matched Pair Analysis Comparing Surgery Followed By Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>RADES, Dirk ; HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan ; DUNST, Juergen ; BAJROVIC, Amira ; KARSTENS, Johann H ; RUDAT, Volker ; SCHILD, Steven E</creator><creatorcontrib>RADES, Dirk ; HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan ; DUNST, Juergen ; BAJROVIC, Amira ; KARSTENS, Johann H ; RUDAT, Volker ; SCHILD, Steven E</creatorcontrib><description>The appropriate treatment for MSCC is controversial. A small randomized trial showed that decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone. That study was limited to highly selected patients. Additional studies comparing surgery plus radiotherapy to radiotherapy could better clarify the role of surgery. Data from 108 patients receiving surgery plus radiotherapy were matched to 216 patients (1:2) receiving radiotherapy alone. Groups were matched for 11 potential prognostic factors and compared for post-treatment motor function, ambulatory status, regaining ambulatory status, local control, and survival. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients receiving adequate surgery (direct decompressive surgery plus stabilization of involved vertebrae), patients receiving laminectomy, patients with solid tumors, patients with solid tumors receiving adequate surgery, and patients with solid tumors receiving laminectomy. Improvement of motor function occurred in 27% of patients after surgery plus radiotherapy and 26% after radiotherapy alone (P = .92). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 69% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 68% after radiotherapy alone (P = .99). Of the nonambulatory patients, 30% and 26%, respectively, (P = .86) regained ambulatory status after treatment. One-year local control rates were 90% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 91% after radiotherapy alone (P = .48). One-year overall survival rates were 47% and 40%, respectively (P = .50). The subgroup analyses did not show significant differences between both groups. Surgery-related complications occurred in 11% of patients. In this study, the outcomes of the end points evaluated after radiotherapy alone appeared similar to those of surgery plus radiotherapy. A new randomized trial comparing both treatments is justified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5635</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20606090</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria, VA: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Decompression, Surgical ; Female ; Humans ; Laminectomy ; Male ; Matched-Pair Analysis ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Motor Activity ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Cord Compression - etiology ; Spinal Cord Compression - mortality ; Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy ; Spinal Cord Compression - surgery ; Spinal Neoplasms - complications ; Spinal Neoplasms - secondary ; Tumors ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2010-08, Vol.28 (22), p.3597-3604</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-e268fa4ef1a8da31bb4fcf4d9763cab5286a70d50d400ce6b874591912b9ee6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-e268fa4ef1a8da31bb4fcf4d9763cab5286a70d50d400ce6b874591912b9ee6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3730,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23088271$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20606090$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RADES, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUNST, Juergen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAJROVIC, Amira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARSTENS, Johann H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUDAT, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHILD, Steven E</creatorcontrib><title>Matched Pair Analysis Comparing Surgery Followed By Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>The appropriate treatment for MSCC is controversial. A small randomized trial showed that decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone. That study was limited to highly selected patients. Additional studies comparing surgery plus radiotherapy to radiotherapy could better clarify the role of surgery. Data from 108 patients receiving surgery plus radiotherapy were matched to 216 patients (1:2) receiving radiotherapy alone. Groups were matched for 11 potential prognostic factors and compared for post-treatment motor function, ambulatory status, regaining ambulatory status, local control, and survival. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients receiving adequate surgery (direct decompressive surgery plus stabilization of involved vertebrae), patients receiving laminectomy, patients with solid tumors, patients with solid tumors receiving adequate surgery, and patients with solid tumors receiving laminectomy. Improvement of motor function occurred in 27% of patients after surgery plus radiotherapy and 26% after radiotherapy alone (P = .92). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 69% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 68% after radiotherapy alone (P = .99). Of the nonambulatory patients, 30% and 26%, respectively, (P = .86) regained ambulatory status after treatment. One-year local control rates were 90% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 91% after radiotherapy alone (P = .48). One-year overall survival rates were 47% and 40%, respectively (P = .50). The subgroup analyses did not show significant differences between both groups. Surgery-related complications occurred in 11% of patients. In this study, the outcomes of the end points evaluated after radiotherapy alone appeared similar to those of surgery plus radiotherapy. A new randomized trial comparing both treatments is justified.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Decompression, Surgical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laminectomy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Matched-Pair Analysis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - etiology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - mortality</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCnRPyBXHK4o84do7LikKrVkUUJG7WxHF2XTlxamdV5cJvr5cuVD1VPoxsPfOMNS9C7yhZUkbIp_P11ZKRfGNqKSouXqAFFUwWUgrxEi2I5Kygiv8-Qscp3RBCS8XFa3TESJVPTRbozyVMZmtb_B1cxKsB_JxcwuvQjxDdsMHXu7ixccanwftwl8HPM_4BrQvT1kYYZwxD-_Rh5cNgcRcivrQTpAkmZ_D16LI7e2P7Vx5tSi4Mb9CrDnyybw_1BP06_fJz_a24uPp6tl5dFEYQMhWWVaqD0nYUVAucNk3Zma5sa1lxA41gqgJJWkHakhBjq0bJUtS0pqypra0sP0EfH7xjDLc7mybdu2Ss9zDYsEs674vyqqz482SpaqEkLzNJHkgTQ0rRdnqMroc4a0r0Ph6d49H7eDRTeh9Pbnl_kO-a3rb_G_7lkYEPBwCSAd9FGIxLjxwnSjFJH3-5dZvtnYtWpx68z1qmb0zI8xjTXNSS3wPbI6az</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>RADES, Dirk</creator><creator>HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan</creator><creator>DUNST, Juergen</creator><creator>BAJROVIC, Amira</creator><creator>KARSTENS, Johann H</creator><creator>RUDAT, Volker</creator><creator>SCHILD, Steven E</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Matched Pair Analysis Comparing Surgery Followed By Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</title><author>RADES, Dirk ; HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan ; DUNST, Juergen ; BAJROVIC, Amira ; KARSTENS, Johann H ; RUDAT, Volker ; SCHILD, Steven E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-e268fa4ef1a8da31bb4fcf4d9763cab5286a70d50d400ce6b874591912b9ee6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Decompression, Surgical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laminectomy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Matched-Pair Analysis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - etiology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - mortality</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RADES, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUNST, Juergen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAJROVIC, Amira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARSTENS, Johann H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUDAT, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHILD, Steven E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RADES, Dirk</au><au>HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan</au><au>DUNST, Juergen</au><au>BAJROVIC, Amira</au><au>KARSTENS, Johann H</au><au>RUDAT, Volker</au><au>SCHILD, Steven E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Matched Pair Analysis Comparing Surgery Followed By Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>3597</spage><epage>3604</epage><pages>3597-3604</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>The appropriate treatment for MSCC is controversial. A small randomized trial showed that decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone. That study was limited to highly selected patients. Additional studies comparing surgery plus radiotherapy to radiotherapy could better clarify the role of surgery. Data from 108 patients receiving surgery plus radiotherapy were matched to 216 patients (1:2) receiving radiotherapy alone. Groups were matched for 11 potential prognostic factors and compared for post-treatment motor function, ambulatory status, regaining ambulatory status, local control, and survival. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients receiving adequate surgery (direct decompressive surgery plus stabilization of involved vertebrae), patients receiving laminectomy, patients with solid tumors, patients with solid tumors receiving adequate surgery, and patients with solid tumors receiving laminectomy. Improvement of motor function occurred in 27% of patients after surgery plus radiotherapy and 26% after radiotherapy alone (P = .92). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 69% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 68% after radiotherapy alone (P = .99). Of the nonambulatory patients, 30% and 26%, respectively, (P = .86) regained ambulatory status after treatment. One-year local control rates were 90% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 91% after radiotherapy alone (P = .48). One-year overall survival rates were 47% and 40%, respectively (P = .50). The subgroup analyses did not show significant differences between both groups. Surgery-related complications occurred in 11% of patients. In this study, the outcomes of the end points evaluated after radiotherapy alone appeared similar to those of surgery plus radiotherapy. A new randomized trial comparing both treatments is justified.</abstract><cop>Alexandria, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>20606090</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5635</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2010-08, Vol.28 (22), p.3597-3604
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755136463
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord
Combined Modality Therapy
Decompression, Surgical
Female
Humans
Laminectomy
Male
Matched-Pair Analysis
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Motor Activity
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
Retrospective Studies
Spinal Cord Compression - etiology
Spinal Cord Compression - mortality
Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy
Spinal Cord Compression - surgery
Spinal Neoplasms - complications
Spinal Neoplasms - secondary
Tumors
Walking
title Matched Pair Analysis Comparing Surgery Followed By Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T08%3A50%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Matched%20Pair%20Analysis%20Comparing%20Surgery%20Followed%20By%20Radiotherapy%20and%20Radiotherapy%20Alone%20for%20Metastatic%20Spinal%20Cord%20Compression&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=RADES,%20Dirk&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=3597&rft.epage=3604&rft.pages=3597-3604&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5635&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E755136463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748958734&rft_id=info:pmid/20606090&rfr_iscdi=true