Matched Pair Analysis Comparing Surgery Followed By Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression
The appropriate treatment for MSCC is controversial. A small randomized trial showed that decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone. That study was limited to highly selected patients. Additional studies comparing surgery plus radiotherapy to radiotherapy coul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical oncology 2010-08, Vol.28 (22), p.3597-3604 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3604 |
---|---|
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | 3597 |
container_title | Journal of clinical oncology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | RADES, Dirk HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan DUNST, Juergen BAJROVIC, Amira KARSTENS, Johann H RUDAT, Volker SCHILD, Steven E |
description | The appropriate treatment for MSCC is controversial. A small randomized trial showed that decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone. That study was limited to highly selected patients. Additional studies comparing surgery plus radiotherapy to radiotherapy could better clarify the role of surgery.
Data from 108 patients receiving surgery plus radiotherapy were matched to 216 patients (1:2) receiving radiotherapy alone. Groups were matched for 11 potential prognostic factors and compared for post-treatment motor function, ambulatory status, regaining ambulatory status, local control, and survival. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients receiving adequate surgery (direct decompressive surgery plus stabilization of involved vertebrae), patients receiving laminectomy, patients with solid tumors, patients with solid tumors receiving adequate surgery, and patients with solid tumors receiving laminectomy.
Improvement of motor function occurred in 27% of patients after surgery plus radiotherapy and 26% after radiotherapy alone (P = .92). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 69% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 68% after radiotherapy alone (P = .99). Of the nonambulatory patients, 30% and 26%, respectively, (P = .86) regained ambulatory status after treatment. One-year local control rates were 90% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 91% after radiotherapy alone (P = .48). One-year overall survival rates were 47% and 40%, respectively (P = .50). The subgroup analyses did not show significant differences between both groups. Surgery-related complications occurred in 11% of patients.
In this study, the outcomes of the end points evaluated after radiotherapy alone appeared similar to those of surgery plus radiotherapy. A new randomized trial comparing both treatments is justified. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5635 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755136463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>755136463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-e268fa4ef1a8da31bb4fcf4d9763cab5286a70d50d400ce6b874591912b9ee6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCnRPyBXHK4o84do7LikKrVkUUJG7WxHF2XTlxamdV5cJvr5cuVD1VPoxsPfOMNS9C7yhZUkbIp_P11ZKRfGNqKSouXqAFFUwWUgrxEi2I5Kygiv8-Qscp3RBCS8XFa3TESJVPTRbozyVMZmtb_B1cxKsB_JxcwuvQjxDdsMHXu7ixccanwftwl8HPM_4BrQvT1kYYZwxD-_Rh5cNgcRcivrQTpAkmZ_D16LI7e2P7Vx5tSi4Mb9CrDnyybw_1BP06_fJz_a24uPp6tl5dFEYQMhWWVaqD0nYUVAucNk3Zma5sa1lxA41gqgJJWkHakhBjq0bJUtS0pqypra0sP0EfH7xjDLc7mybdu2Ss9zDYsEs674vyqqz482SpaqEkLzNJHkgTQ0rRdnqMroc4a0r0Ph6d49H7eDRTeh9Pbnl_kO-a3rb_G_7lkYEPBwCSAd9FGIxLjxwnSjFJH3-5dZvtnYtWpx68z1qmb0zI8xjTXNSS3wPbI6az</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748958734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Matched Pair Analysis Comparing Surgery Followed By Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>RADES, Dirk ; HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan ; DUNST, Juergen ; BAJROVIC, Amira ; KARSTENS, Johann H ; RUDAT, Volker ; SCHILD, Steven E</creator><creatorcontrib>RADES, Dirk ; HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan ; DUNST, Juergen ; BAJROVIC, Amira ; KARSTENS, Johann H ; RUDAT, Volker ; SCHILD, Steven E</creatorcontrib><description>The appropriate treatment for MSCC is controversial. A small randomized trial showed that decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone. That study was limited to highly selected patients. Additional studies comparing surgery plus radiotherapy to radiotherapy could better clarify the role of surgery.
Data from 108 patients receiving surgery plus radiotherapy were matched to 216 patients (1:2) receiving radiotherapy alone. Groups were matched for 11 potential prognostic factors and compared for post-treatment motor function, ambulatory status, regaining ambulatory status, local control, and survival. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients receiving adequate surgery (direct decompressive surgery plus stabilization of involved vertebrae), patients receiving laminectomy, patients with solid tumors, patients with solid tumors receiving adequate surgery, and patients with solid tumors receiving laminectomy.
Improvement of motor function occurred in 27% of patients after surgery plus radiotherapy and 26% after radiotherapy alone (P = .92). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 69% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 68% after radiotherapy alone (P = .99). Of the nonambulatory patients, 30% and 26%, respectively, (P = .86) regained ambulatory status after treatment. One-year local control rates were 90% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 91% after radiotherapy alone (P = .48). One-year overall survival rates were 47% and 40%, respectively (P = .50). The subgroup analyses did not show significant differences between both groups. Surgery-related complications occurred in 11% of patients.
In this study, the outcomes of the end points evaluated after radiotherapy alone appeared similar to those of surgery plus radiotherapy. A new randomized trial comparing both treatments is justified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5635</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20606090</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria, VA: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Decompression, Surgical ; Female ; Humans ; Laminectomy ; Male ; Matched-Pair Analysis ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Motor Activity ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Cord Compression - etiology ; Spinal Cord Compression - mortality ; Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy ; Spinal Cord Compression - surgery ; Spinal Neoplasms - complications ; Spinal Neoplasms - secondary ; Tumors ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2010-08, Vol.28 (22), p.3597-3604</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-e268fa4ef1a8da31bb4fcf4d9763cab5286a70d50d400ce6b874591912b9ee6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-e268fa4ef1a8da31bb4fcf4d9763cab5286a70d50d400ce6b874591912b9ee6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3730,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23088271$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20606090$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RADES, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUNST, Juergen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAJROVIC, Amira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARSTENS, Johann H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUDAT, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHILD, Steven E</creatorcontrib><title>Matched Pair Analysis Comparing Surgery Followed By Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>The appropriate treatment for MSCC is controversial. A small randomized trial showed that decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone. That study was limited to highly selected patients. Additional studies comparing surgery plus radiotherapy to radiotherapy could better clarify the role of surgery.
Data from 108 patients receiving surgery plus radiotherapy were matched to 216 patients (1:2) receiving radiotherapy alone. Groups were matched for 11 potential prognostic factors and compared for post-treatment motor function, ambulatory status, regaining ambulatory status, local control, and survival. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients receiving adequate surgery (direct decompressive surgery plus stabilization of involved vertebrae), patients receiving laminectomy, patients with solid tumors, patients with solid tumors receiving adequate surgery, and patients with solid tumors receiving laminectomy.
Improvement of motor function occurred in 27% of patients after surgery plus radiotherapy and 26% after radiotherapy alone (P = .92). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 69% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 68% after radiotherapy alone (P = .99). Of the nonambulatory patients, 30% and 26%, respectively, (P = .86) regained ambulatory status after treatment. One-year local control rates were 90% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 91% after radiotherapy alone (P = .48). One-year overall survival rates were 47% and 40%, respectively (P = .50). The subgroup analyses did not show significant differences between both groups. Surgery-related complications occurred in 11% of patients.
In this study, the outcomes of the end points evaluated after radiotherapy alone appeared similar to those of surgery plus radiotherapy. A new randomized trial comparing both treatments is justified.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Decompression, Surgical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laminectomy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Matched-Pair Analysis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - etiology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - mortality</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCnRPyBXHK4o84do7LikKrVkUUJG7WxHF2XTlxamdV5cJvr5cuVD1VPoxsPfOMNS9C7yhZUkbIp_P11ZKRfGNqKSouXqAFFUwWUgrxEi2I5Kygiv8-Qscp3RBCS8XFa3TESJVPTRbozyVMZmtb_B1cxKsB_JxcwuvQjxDdsMHXu7ixccanwftwl8HPM_4BrQvT1kYYZwxD-_Rh5cNgcRcivrQTpAkmZ_D16LI7e2P7Vx5tSi4Mb9CrDnyybw_1BP06_fJz_a24uPp6tl5dFEYQMhWWVaqD0nYUVAucNk3Zma5sa1lxA41gqgJJWkHakhBjq0bJUtS0pqypra0sP0EfH7xjDLc7mybdu2Ss9zDYsEs674vyqqz482SpaqEkLzNJHkgTQ0rRdnqMroc4a0r0Ph6d49H7eDRTeh9Pbnl_kO-a3rb_G_7lkYEPBwCSAd9FGIxLjxwnSjFJH3-5dZvtnYtWpx68z1qmb0zI8xjTXNSS3wPbI6az</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>RADES, Dirk</creator><creator>HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan</creator><creator>DUNST, Juergen</creator><creator>BAJROVIC, Amira</creator><creator>KARSTENS, Johann H</creator><creator>RUDAT, Volker</creator><creator>SCHILD, Steven E</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Matched Pair Analysis Comparing Surgery Followed By Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</title><author>RADES, Dirk ; HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan ; DUNST, Juergen ; BAJROVIC, Amira ; KARSTENS, Johann H ; RUDAT, Volker ; SCHILD, Steven E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-e268fa4ef1a8da31bb4fcf4d9763cab5286a70d50d400ce6b874591912b9ee6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Decompression, Surgical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laminectomy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Matched-Pair Analysis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - etiology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - mortality</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RADES, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUNST, Juergen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAJROVIC, Amira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARSTENS, Johann H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUDAT, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHILD, Steven E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RADES, Dirk</au><au>HUTTENLOCHER, Stefan</au><au>DUNST, Juergen</au><au>BAJROVIC, Amira</au><au>KARSTENS, Johann H</au><au>RUDAT, Volker</au><au>SCHILD, Steven E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Matched Pair Analysis Comparing Surgery Followed By Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>3597</spage><epage>3604</epage><pages>3597-3604</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>The appropriate treatment for MSCC is controversial. A small randomized trial showed that decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy was superior to radiotherapy alone. That study was limited to highly selected patients. Additional studies comparing surgery plus radiotherapy to radiotherapy could better clarify the role of surgery.
Data from 108 patients receiving surgery plus radiotherapy were matched to 216 patients (1:2) receiving radiotherapy alone. Groups were matched for 11 potential prognostic factors and compared for post-treatment motor function, ambulatory status, regaining ambulatory status, local control, and survival. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients receiving adequate surgery (direct decompressive surgery plus stabilization of involved vertebrae), patients receiving laminectomy, patients with solid tumors, patients with solid tumors receiving adequate surgery, and patients with solid tumors receiving laminectomy.
Improvement of motor function occurred in 27% of patients after surgery plus radiotherapy and 26% after radiotherapy alone (P = .92). Post-treatment ambulatory rates were 69% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 68% after radiotherapy alone (P = .99). Of the nonambulatory patients, 30% and 26%, respectively, (P = .86) regained ambulatory status after treatment. One-year local control rates were 90% after surgery plus radiotherapy and 91% after radiotherapy alone (P = .48). One-year overall survival rates were 47% and 40%, respectively (P = .50). The subgroup analyses did not show significant differences between both groups. Surgery-related complications occurred in 11% of patients.
In this study, the outcomes of the end points evaluated after radiotherapy alone appeared similar to those of surgery plus radiotherapy. A new randomized trial comparing both treatments is justified.</abstract><cop>Alexandria, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>20606090</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5635</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0732-183X |
ispartof | Journal of clinical oncology, 2010-08, Vol.28 (22), p.3597-3604 |
issn | 0732-183X 1527-7755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755136463 |
source | MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord Combined Modality Therapy Decompression, Surgical Female Humans Laminectomy Male Matched-Pair Analysis Medical sciences Middle Aged Motor Activity Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) Neurology Retrospective Studies Spinal Cord Compression - etiology Spinal Cord Compression - mortality Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy Spinal Cord Compression - surgery Spinal Neoplasms - complications Spinal Neoplasms - secondary Tumors Walking |
title | Matched Pair Analysis Comparing Surgery Followed By Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T08%3A50%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Matched%20Pair%20Analysis%20Comparing%20Surgery%20Followed%20By%20Radiotherapy%20and%20Radiotherapy%20Alone%20for%20Metastatic%20Spinal%20Cord%20Compression&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=RADES,%20Dirk&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=3597&rft.epage=3604&rft.pages=3597-3604&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5635&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E755136463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748958734&rft_id=info:pmid/20606090&rfr_iscdi=true |