Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) Reduction in Domestic Wastewater by Fly Ash and Brick Kiln Ash

The potential of fly ash, brick kiln ash and commercial activated carbon is determined for the reduction of chemical oxygen demand (COD) from domestic wastewater. Laboratory experiments are conducted for investigating the effect of treatment time, adsorbent dose, pH of the media, initial COD concent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water, air, and soil pollution air, and soil pollution, 2006-07, Vol.174 (1-4), p.33-46
Hauptverfasser: Devi, R, Dahiya, R.P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 46
container_issue 1-4
container_start_page 33
container_title Water, air, and soil pollution
container_volume 174
creator Devi, R
Dahiya, R.P
description The potential of fly ash, brick kiln ash and commercial activated carbon is determined for the reduction of chemical oxygen demand (COD) from domestic wastewater. Laboratory experiments are conducted for investigating the effect of treatment time, adsorbent dose, pH of the media, initial COD concentration, agitation speed and particle size of adsorbents on the COD reduction from the domestic wastewater. Starting with an initial COD concentration of 1080 mg/l the maximum COD reduction achieved for fly ash was 87.84%, brick kiln ash was 83.22% and commercial activated carbon was 99.35 %. These values were achieved when the wastewater was treated with activated carbon for 180 min, fly ash 250 min and brick kiln ash 300 min and the adsorbent dose was kept respectively at 40 g/l, 60 g/l and 45 g/l for activated carbon, fly ash and brick kiln ash. Agitation speed was kept constant at 600 rpm and the pH was maintained at 2 for activated carbon and fly ash and 5 for brick kiln ash. The maximum percent reduction is for 0.053 mm or smaller size of the particles. Though the adsorption capacity of the ash for reducing the COD is lower than that of the commercial activated carbon, the low material cost can make it an attractive option for the treatment of domestic wastewater.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11270-005-9022-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755134465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2120963631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-13255daba0ab1266adeb0b22cb60ec50116a8a173a47f5ad1eedc3b07e16faa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFEEQhgdRcI35ATnZCGo8TKzqz-lj3BgVAwsm4sFDU9PTk0ycj9g9i-6_t4cNCB7Sl4Ku5y2qeIriCOEEAcy7hMgNlACqtMB5aR8VK1RGlNwK_rhYAUhbamvs0-JZSreQn63MqvixvglD56lnmz-76zCyszDQ2LDj9ebsLfsamq2fu2lkXe5MQ0hz59l3SnP4TXOIrN6x837HTtMNW1LvY-d_si9dPy5fz4snLfUpHN7Xg-Lq_MPV-lN5sfn4eX16UXrJ-Vyi4Eo1VBNQjVxrakINNee-1hC8AkRNFaERJE2rqMEQGi9qMAF1SyQOijf7sXdx-rXNK7qhSz70PY1h2iZnlEIhpVaZfP0giVahRpQZPH4YNMag1Cgwoy__Q2-nbRzzvc5IwyVUFWQI95CPU0oxtO4udgPFnUNwiz-39-eyP7f4czZnXt0PppT9tJFG36V_QWNN9rkc9WLPtTQ5uo6Z-XbJAQUgVFZoKf4CzbOhGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>747240880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) Reduction in Domestic Wastewater by Fly Ash and Brick Kiln Ash</title><source>Springer journals</source><creator>Devi, R ; Dahiya, R.P</creator><creatorcontrib>Devi, R ; Dahiya, R.P</creatorcontrib><description>The potential of fly ash, brick kiln ash and commercial activated carbon is determined for the reduction of chemical oxygen demand (COD) from domestic wastewater. Laboratory experiments are conducted for investigating the effect of treatment time, adsorbent dose, pH of the media, initial COD concentration, agitation speed and particle size of adsorbents on the COD reduction from the domestic wastewater. Starting with an initial COD concentration of 1080 mg/l the maximum COD reduction achieved for fly ash was 87.84%, brick kiln ash was 83.22% and commercial activated carbon was 99.35 %. These values were achieved when the wastewater was treated with activated carbon for 180 min, fly ash 250 min and brick kiln ash 300 min and the adsorbent dose was kept respectively at 40 g/l, 60 g/l and 45 g/l for activated carbon, fly ash and brick kiln ash. Agitation speed was kept constant at 600 rpm and the pH was maintained at 2 for activated carbon and fly ash and 5 for brick kiln ash. The maximum percent reduction is for 0.053 mm or smaller size of the particles. Though the adsorption capacity of the ash for reducing the COD is lower than that of the commercial activated carbon, the low material cost can make it an attractive option for the treatment of domestic wastewater.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-6979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11270-005-9022-9</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WAPLAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Activated carbon ; Adsorbents ; adsorption ; Agitation ; Applied sciences ; ash ; Ashes ; Carbon ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Crack opening displacement ; Domestic ; Domestic wastewater ; Environmental monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fly ash ; hydrochemistry ; Kilns ; Other wastewaters ; physicochemical properties ; Pollution ; Reduction ; Waste water ; Wastewater ; wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; Water treatment ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water, air, and soil pollution, 2006-07, Vol.174 (1-4), p.33-46</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-13255daba0ab1266adeb0b22cb60ec50116a8a173a47f5ad1eedc3b07e16faa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-13255daba0ab1266adeb0b22cb60ec50116a8a173a47f5ad1eedc3b07e16faa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17976975$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Devi, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahiya, R.P</creatorcontrib><title>Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) Reduction in Domestic Wastewater by Fly Ash and Brick Kiln Ash</title><title>Water, air, and soil pollution</title><description>The potential of fly ash, brick kiln ash and commercial activated carbon is determined for the reduction of chemical oxygen demand (COD) from domestic wastewater. Laboratory experiments are conducted for investigating the effect of treatment time, adsorbent dose, pH of the media, initial COD concentration, agitation speed and particle size of adsorbents on the COD reduction from the domestic wastewater. Starting with an initial COD concentration of 1080 mg/l the maximum COD reduction achieved for fly ash was 87.84%, brick kiln ash was 83.22% and commercial activated carbon was 99.35 %. These values were achieved when the wastewater was treated with activated carbon for 180 min, fly ash 250 min and brick kiln ash 300 min and the adsorbent dose was kept respectively at 40 g/l, 60 g/l and 45 g/l for activated carbon, fly ash and brick kiln ash. Agitation speed was kept constant at 600 rpm and the pH was maintained at 2 for activated carbon and fly ash and 5 for brick kiln ash. The maximum percent reduction is for 0.053 mm or smaller size of the particles. Though the adsorption capacity of the ash for reducing the COD is lower than that of the commercial activated carbon, the low material cost can make it an attractive option for the treatment of domestic wastewater.</description><subject>Activated carbon</subject><subject>Adsorbents</subject><subject>adsorption</subject><subject>Agitation</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>ash</subject><subject>Ashes</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Crack opening displacement</subject><subject>Domestic</subject><subject>Domestic wastewater</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fly ash</subject><subject>hydrochemistry</subject><subject>Kilns</subject><subject>Other wastewaters</subject><subject>physicochemical properties</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0049-6979</issn><issn>1573-2932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rFEEQhgdRcI35ATnZCGo8TKzqz-lj3BgVAwsm4sFDU9PTk0ycj9g9i-6_t4cNCB7Sl4Ku5y2qeIriCOEEAcy7hMgNlACqtMB5aR8VK1RGlNwK_rhYAUhbamvs0-JZSreQn63MqvixvglD56lnmz-76zCyszDQ2LDj9ebsLfsamq2fu2lkXe5MQ0hz59l3SnP4TXOIrN6x837HTtMNW1LvY-d_si9dPy5fz4snLfUpHN7Xg-Lq_MPV-lN5sfn4eX16UXrJ-Vyi4Eo1VBNQjVxrakINNee-1hC8AkRNFaERJE2rqMEQGi9qMAF1SyQOijf7sXdx-rXNK7qhSz70PY1h2iZnlEIhpVaZfP0giVahRpQZPH4YNMag1Cgwoy__Q2-nbRzzvc5IwyVUFWQI95CPU0oxtO4udgPFnUNwiz-39-eyP7f4czZnXt0PppT9tJFG36V_QWNN9rkc9WLPtTQ5uo6Z-XbJAQUgVFZoKf4CzbOhGQ</recordid><startdate>20060701</startdate><enddate>20060701</enddate><creator>Devi, R</creator><creator>Dahiya, R.P</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060701</creationdate><title>Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) Reduction in Domestic Wastewater by Fly Ash and Brick Kiln Ash</title><author>Devi, R ; Dahiya, R.P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-13255daba0ab1266adeb0b22cb60ec50116a8a173a47f5ad1eedc3b07e16faa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Activated carbon</topic><topic>Adsorbents</topic><topic>adsorption</topic><topic>Agitation</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>ash</topic><topic>Ashes</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Crack opening displacement</topic><topic>Domestic</topic><topic>Domestic wastewater</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fly ash</topic><topic>hydrochemistry</topic><topic>Kilns</topic><topic>Other wastewaters</topic><topic>physicochemical properties</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Devi, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahiya, R.P</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Devi, R</au><au>Dahiya, R.P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) Reduction in Domestic Wastewater by Fly Ash and Brick Kiln Ash</atitle><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle><date>2006-07-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>174</volume><issue>1-4</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>33-46</pages><issn>0049-6979</issn><eissn>1573-2932</eissn><coden>WAPLAC</coden><abstract>The potential of fly ash, brick kiln ash and commercial activated carbon is determined for the reduction of chemical oxygen demand (COD) from domestic wastewater. Laboratory experiments are conducted for investigating the effect of treatment time, adsorbent dose, pH of the media, initial COD concentration, agitation speed and particle size of adsorbents on the COD reduction from the domestic wastewater. Starting with an initial COD concentration of 1080 mg/l the maximum COD reduction achieved for fly ash was 87.84%, brick kiln ash was 83.22% and commercial activated carbon was 99.35 %. These values were achieved when the wastewater was treated with activated carbon for 180 min, fly ash 250 min and brick kiln ash 300 min and the adsorbent dose was kept respectively at 40 g/l, 60 g/l and 45 g/l for activated carbon, fly ash and brick kiln ash. Agitation speed was kept constant at 600 rpm and the pH was maintained at 2 for activated carbon and fly ash and 5 for brick kiln ash. The maximum percent reduction is for 0.053 mm or smaller size of the particles. Though the adsorption capacity of the ash for reducing the COD is lower than that of the commercial activated carbon, the low material cost can make it an attractive option for the treatment of domestic wastewater.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11270-005-9022-9</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-6979
ispartof Water, air, and soil pollution, 2006-07, Vol.174 (1-4), p.33-46
issn 0049-6979
1573-2932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755134465
source Springer journals
subjects Activated carbon
Adsorbents
adsorption
Agitation
Applied sciences
ash
Ashes
Carbon
Chemical oxygen demand
Crack opening displacement
Domestic
Domestic wastewater
Environmental monitoring
Exact sciences and technology
Fly ash
hydrochemistry
Kilns
Other wastewaters
physicochemical properties
Pollution
Reduction
Waste water
Wastewater
wastewater treatment
Wastewaters
Water treatment
Water treatment and pollution
title Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) Reduction in Domestic Wastewater by Fly Ash and Brick Kiln Ash
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A38%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chemical%20Oxygen%20Demand%20(COD)%20Reduction%20in%20Domestic%20Wastewater%20by%20Fly%20Ash%20and%20Brick%20Kiln%20Ash&rft.jtitle=Water,%20air,%20and%20soil%20pollution&rft.au=Devi,%20R&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.volume=174&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=33-46&rft.issn=0049-6979&rft.eissn=1573-2932&rft.coden=WAPLAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11270-005-9022-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2120963631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=747240880&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true