Is cytokine removal by continuous hemofiltration feasible?

Is cytokine removal by continuous hemofiltration feasible? Patients who are critically ill with acute renal failure and sepsis have extremely high mortality rates. While it seems reasonable that eliminating the inflammatory mediators (such as cytokines, chemokines, tumor necrosis factor-α, etc.) by...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kidney international 1999-11, Vol.56 (72), p.S79-S83
Hauptverfasser: Sieberth, Heinz-Günter, Kierdorf, Horst P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S83
container_issue 72
container_start_page S79
container_title Kidney international
container_volume 56
creator Sieberth, Heinz-Günter
Kierdorf, Horst P.
description Is cytokine removal by continuous hemofiltration feasible? Patients who are critically ill with acute renal failure and sepsis have extremely high mortality rates. While it seems reasonable that eliminating the inflammatory mediators (such as cytokines, chemokines, tumor necrosis factor-α, etc.) by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) would be effective, studies show that only insubstantial numbers of these mediators are removed in comparison with endogenous clearance. Mass removal seems only to be effective when highly permeable membranes (sieving coefficient of approximately 1.0) are used, there is a filtrate volume greater than 2 liters/hour, and when the half-life of the substance to be eliminated is greater than 60 minutes. Removal of cytokines by membrane adsorption is another possibility. However, because the membrane surfaces are saturated after a few hours, frequent filter changes are necessary for them to generate effective adsorption of these mediators. Despite filter changes, only a brief and transient drop in the TNF plasma level has been observed. Controlled clinical trials are needed to determine whether or not CRRT actually has a beneficial effect on the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1523-1755.56.s72.14.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755131801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S008525381546675X</els_id><sourcerecordid>755131801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-83789d37abf3f34e5aff4c3caaea17b29ab039de67fc1d7bdc55974a3da5df2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwCpAbpwQ7juOEC0IVP5UqcYGz5dhr4ZLExU6r9u1xlQpx47Ta0ezO7ofQDcEZwUV5t8oIy2lKOGMZK7PA84wU2e4ETX_1UzTFuGJpzmg1QRchrHDsa4rP0YRgVuKK5FN0vwiJ2g_uy_aQeOjcVrZJs0-U6wfbb9wmJJ9RNbYdvBys6xMDMtimhYdLdGZkG-DqWGfo4_npff6aLt9eFvPHZaqKohrSivKq1pTLxlBDC2DSmEJRJSVIwpu8lg2mtYaSG0U0b7RirOaFpFoybXJDZ-h23Lv27nsDYRCdDQraVvYQ7xPxV0JJhUl08tGpvAvBgxFrbzvp94JgceAmVuLARxz4CFaKyE2QQuzi5PUxY9N0oP_MjaCi4XE0QPx0a8GLoCz0CrT1oAahnf035Af2NYEn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>755131801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is cytokine removal by continuous hemofiltration feasible?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sieberth, Heinz-Günter ; Kierdorf, Horst P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sieberth, Heinz-Günter ; Kierdorf, Horst P.</creatorcontrib><description>Is cytokine removal by continuous hemofiltration feasible? Patients who are critically ill with acute renal failure and sepsis have extremely high mortality rates. While it seems reasonable that eliminating the inflammatory mediators (such as cytokines, chemokines, tumor necrosis factor-α, etc.) by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) would be effective, studies show that only insubstantial numbers of these mediators are removed in comparison with endogenous clearance. Mass removal seems only to be effective when highly permeable membranes (sieving coefficient of approximately 1.0) are used, there is a filtrate volume greater than 2 liters/hour, and when the half-life of the substance to be eliminated is greater than 60 minutes. Removal of cytokines by membrane adsorption is another possibility. However, because the membrane surfaces are saturated after a few hours, frequent filter changes are necessary for them to generate effective adsorption of these mediators. Despite filter changes, only a brief and transient drop in the TNF plasma level has been observed. Controlled clinical trials are needed to determine whether or not CRRT actually has a beneficial effect on the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0085-2538</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0098-6577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.56.s72.14.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10560812</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acute Kidney Injury - therapy ; acute renal failure ; Critical Illness - therapy ; cytokines ; Cytokines - pharmacokinetics ; Hemofiltration - standards ; Humans ; mass transfer ; sepsis ; Sepsis - therapy ; SIRS ; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome - etiology ; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Kidney international, 1999-11, Vol.56 (72), p.S79-S83</ispartof><rights>1999 International Society of Nephrology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-83789d37abf3f34e5aff4c3caaea17b29ab039de67fc1d7bdc55974a3da5df2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-83789d37abf3f34e5aff4c3caaea17b29ab039de67fc1d7bdc55974a3da5df2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10560812$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sieberth, Heinz-Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kierdorf, Horst P.</creatorcontrib><title>Is cytokine removal by continuous hemofiltration feasible?</title><title>Kidney international</title><addtitle>Kidney Int Suppl</addtitle><description>Is cytokine removal by continuous hemofiltration feasible? Patients who are critically ill with acute renal failure and sepsis have extremely high mortality rates. While it seems reasonable that eliminating the inflammatory mediators (such as cytokines, chemokines, tumor necrosis factor-α, etc.) by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) would be effective, studies show that only insubstantial numbers of these mediators are removed in comparison with endogenous clearance. Mass removal seems only to be effective when highly permeable membranes (sieving coefficient of approximately 1.0) are used, there is a filtrate volume greater than 2 liters/hour, and when the half-life of the substance to be eliminated is greater than 60 minutes. Removal of cytokines by membrane adsorption is another possibility. However, because the membrane surfaces are saturated after a few hours, frequent filter changes are necessary for them to generate effective adsorption of these mediators. Despite filter changes, only a brief and transient drop in the TNF plasma level has been observed. Controlled clinical trials are needed to determine whether or not CRRT actually has a beneficial effect on the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).</description><subject>Acute Kidney Injury - therapy</subject><subject>acute renal failure</subject><subject>Critical Illness - therapy</subject><subject>cytokines</subject><subject>Cytokines - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Hemofiltration - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>mass transfer</subject><subject>sepsis</subject><subject>Sepsis - therapy</subject><subject>SIRS</subject><subject>Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome - etiology</subject><subject>Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0085-2538</issn><issn>0098-6577</issn><issn>1523-1755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwCpAbpwQ7juOEC0IVP5UqcYGz5dhr4ZLExU6r9u1xlQpx47Ta0ezO7ofQDcEZwUV5t8oIy2lKOGMZK7PA84wU2e4ETX_1UzTFuGJpzmg1QRchrHDsa4rP0YRgVuKK5FN0vwiJ2g_uy_aQeOjcVrZJs0-U6wfbb9wmJJ9RNbYdvBys6xMDMtimhYdLdGZkG-DqWGfo4_npff6aLt9eFvPHZaqKohrSivKq1pTLxlBDC2DSmEJRJSVIwpu8lg2mtYaSG0U0b7RirOaFpFoybXJDZ-h23Lv27nsDYRCdDQraVvYQ7xPxV0JJhUl08tGpvAvBgxFrbzvp94JgceAmVuLARxz4CFaKyE2QQuzi5PUxY9N0oP_MjaCi4XE0QPx0a8GLoCz0CrT1oAahnf035Af2NYEn</recordid><startdate>19991101</startdate><enddate>19991101</enddate><creator>Sieberth, Heinz-Günter</creator><creator>Kierdorf, Horst P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991101</creationdate><title>Is cytokine removal by continuous hemofiltration feasible?</title><author>Sieberth, Heinz-Günter ; Kierdorf, Horst P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-83789d37abf3f34e5aff4c3caaea17b29ab039de67fc1d7bdc55974a3da5df2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Acute Kidney Injury - therapy</topic><topic>acute renal failure</topic><topic>Critical Illness - therapy</topic><topic>cytokines</topic><topic>Cytokines - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Hemofiltration - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>mass transfer</topic><topic>sepsis</topic><topic>Sepsis - therapy</topic><topic>SIRS</topic><topic>Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome - etiology</topic><topic>Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sieberth, Heinz-Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kierdorf, Horst P.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sieberth, Heinz-Günter</au><au>Kierdorf, Horst P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is cytokine removal by continuous hemofiltration feasible?</atitle><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle><addtitle>Kidney Int Suppl</addtitle><date>1999-11-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>72</issue><spage>S79</spage><epage>S83</epage><pages>S79-S83</pages><issn>0085-2538</issn><issn>0098-6577</issn><eissn>1523-1755</eissn><abstract>Is cytokine removal by continuous hemofiltration feasible? Patients who are critically ill with acute renal failure and sepsis have extremely high mortality rates. While it seems reasonable that eliminating the inflammatory mediators (such as cytokines, chemokines, tumor necrosis factor-α, etc.) by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) would be effective, studies show that only insubstantial numbers of these mediators are removed in comparison with endogenous clearance. Mass removal seems only to be effective when highly permeable membranes (sieving coefficient of approximately 1.0) are used, there is a filtrate volume greater than 2 liters/hour, and when the half-life of the substance to be eliminated is greater than 60 minutes. Removal of cytokines by membrane adsorption is another possibility. However, because the membrane surfaces are saturated after a few hours, frequent filter changes are necessary for them to generate effective adsorption of these mediators. Despite filter changes, only a brief and transient drop in the TNF plasma level has been observed. Controlled clinical trials are needed to determine whether or not CRRT actually has a beneficial effect on the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10560812</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1523-1755.56.s72.14.x</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0085-2538
ispartof Kidney international, 1999-11, Vol.56 (72), p.S79-S83
issn 0085-2538
0098-6577
1523-1755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_755131801
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acute Kidney Injury - therapy
acute renal failure
Critical Illness - therapy
cytokines
Cytokines - pharmacokinetics
Hemofiltration - standards
Humans
mass transfer
sepsis
Sepsis - therapy
SIRS
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome - etiology
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome - prevention & control
title Is cytokine removal by continuous hemofiltration feasible?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T04%3A37%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20cytokine%20removal%20by%20continuous%20hemofiltration%20feasible?&rft.jtitle=Kidney%20international&rft.au=Sieberth,%20Heinz-G%C3%BCnter&rft.date=1999-11-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=72&rft.spage=S79&rft.epage=S83&rft.pages=S79-S83&rft.issn=0085-2538&rft.eissn=1523-1755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1523-1755.56.s72.14.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E755131801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=755131801&rft_id=info:pmid/10560812&rft_els_id=S008525381546675X&rfr_iscdi=true