Incorporation of covariates in multipoint model-free linkage analysis of binary traits: how important are unaffecteds?

When the mode of inheritance is unknown, genetic linkage analysis of binary trait is commonly performed using affected-sib-pair approaches. When there is evidence that some covariates influence the phenotype, incorporation of this information is expected to increase the power of the analysis since i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of human genetics : EJHG 2001-08, Vol.9 (8), p.613-620
Hauptverfasser: Alcaïs, A, Abel, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 620
container_issue 8
container_start_page 613
container_title European journal of human genetics : EJHG
container_volume 9
creator Alcaïs, A
Abel, L
description When the mode of inheritance is unknown, genetic linkage analysis of binary trait is commonly performed using affected-sib-pair approaches. When there is evidence that some covariates influence the phenotype, incorporation of this information is expected to increase the power of the analysis since it allows (1) a better specification of the phenotype and (2) to take into account unaffected subjects. Here, we show how to account for covariates in the sibship-oriented Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial (MLB) linkage method by means of Pearson's logistic regression residuals which are computed using phenotypic and covariate information on both affected and unaffected subjects. These residuals are subsequently analysed as a quantitative phenotype with the corresponding extension of the MLB approach which can be used without any assumption on the distribution of these residuals. Then, a large simulation study is performed to study the relative power of incorporating or not unaffected sibs. To this aim, two different strategies in the multipoint analysis of family data are compared: (1) using residuals of the whole sibships (ie both covariate and genotypic information on unaffecteds is needed), and (2) using affecteds only (no information on unaffecteds is needed), under different generating models according to genetic and covariate effects. The results show that there is a clear increment in the power to detect the susceptibility locus when making use of the information carried by unaffecteds, in particular for dominant mode of inheritance and when values of the covariates influencing the disease are shared by all the members of the family.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200682
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754894801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754894801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-542901e4f2f2d5e2ca5fc7d5b898595fcaa08ed70752f38d625f08297c59b0153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2LFDEQxYMo7oeevUnw4J56tpJ0Jmkviyx-LCx40XPIpCu7abuTMUmv7H9vhh0QPHiqgvq9B_UeIW8YbBgIfVmmDU73dxvJAbaaPyOnrFfbTvZCP287MN31mokTclbKBNCOir0kJ4xJriWoU_JwE13K-5RtDSnS5KlLDzYHW7HQEOmyzjXsU4iVLmnEufMZkc4h_rR3SG2082MJ5aDbhWjzI63Zhlo-0Pv0m4alGVfbtDYjXaP1Hl3FsVy9Ii-8nQu-Ps5z8uPzp-_XX7vbb19urj_edk4MorY_-AAMe889HyVyZ6V3apQ7PWg5tN1a0DgqUJJ7occtlx40H5STww6YFOfk4sl3n9OvFUs1SygO59lGTGsxSvZ66DWwRr7_P8mY4IrzBr77B5zSmlsQxXCmtBDAoUGXT5DLqZSM3uxzWFo-hoE5NGfKZA7NmWNzTfH2aLvuFhz_8seqxB-3nZaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217833020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incorporation of covariates in multipoint model-free linkage analysis of binary traits: how important are unaffecteds?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Alcaïs, A ; Abel, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Alcaïs, A ; Abel, L</creatorcontrib><description>When the mode of inheritance is unknown, genetic linkage analysis of binary trait is commonly performed using affected-sib-pair approaches. When there is evidence that some covariates influence the phenotype, incorporation of this information is expected to increase the power of the analysis since it allows (1) a better specification of the phenotype and (2) to take into account unaffected subjects. Here, we show how to account for covariates in the sibship-oriented Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial (MLB) linkage method by means of Pearson's logistic regression residuals which are computed using phenotypic and covariate information on both affected and unaffected subjects. These residuals are subsequently analysed as a quantitative phenotype with the corresponding extension of the MLB approach which can be used without any assumption on the distribution of these residuals. Then, a large simulation study is performed to study the relative power of incorporating or not unaffected sibs. To this aim, two different strategies in the multipoint analysis of family data are compared: (1) using residuals of the whole sibships (ie both covariate and genotypic information on unaffecteds is needed), and (2) using affecteds only (no information on unaffecteds is needed), under different generating models according to genetic and covariate effects. The results show that there is a clear increment in the power to detect the susceptibility locus when making use of the information carried by unaffecteds, in particular for dominant mode of inheritance and when values of the covariates influencing the disease are shared by all the members of the family.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1018-4813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200682</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11528507</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Nature Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Computer Simulation ; Genetic Linkage - genetics ; Genotype ; Humans ; Models, Genetic ; Models, Statistical ; Multifactorial Inheritance ; Nuclear Family ; Phenotype ; Quantitative Trait, Heritable</subject><ispartof>European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2001-08, Vol.9 (8), p.613-620</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-542901e4f2f2d5e2ca5fc7d5b898595fcaa08ed70752f38d625f08297c59b0153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-542901e4f2f2d5e2ca5fc7d5b898595fcaa08ed70752f38d625f08297c59b0153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11528507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alcaïs, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abel, L</creatorcontrib><title>Incorporation of covariates in multipoint model-free linkage analysis of binary traits: how important are unaffecteds?</title><title>European journal of human genetics : EJHG</title><addtitle>Eur J Hum Genet</addtitle><description>When the mode of inheritance is unknown, genetic linkage analysis of binary trait is commonly performed using affected-sib-pair approaches. When there is evidence that some covariates influence the phenotype, incorporation of this information is expected to increase the power of the analysis since it allows (1) a better specification of the phenotype and (2) to take into account unaffected subjects. Here, we show how to account for covariates in the sibship-oriented Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial (MLB) linkage method by means of Pearson's logistic regression residuals which are computed using phenotypic and covariate information on both affected and unaffected subjects. These residuals are subsequently analysed as a quantitative phenotype with the corresponding extension of the MLB approach which can be used without any assumption on the distribution of these residuals. Then, a large simulation study is performed to study the relative power of incorporating or not unaffected sibs. To this aim, two different strategies in the multipoint analysis of family data are compared: (1) using residuals of the whole sibships (ie both covariate and genotypic information on unaffecteds is needed), and (2) using affecteds only (no information on unaffecteds is needed), under different generating models according to genetic and covariate effects. The results show that there is a clear increment in the power to detect the susceptibility locus when making use of the information carried by unaffecteds, in particular for dominant mode of inheritance and when values of the covariates influencing the disease are shared by all the members of the family.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Genetic Linkage - genetics</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Multifactorial Inheritance</subject><subject>Nuclear Family</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Quantitative Trait, Heritable</subject><issn>1018-4813</issn><issn>1476-5438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2LFDEQxYMo7oeevUnw4J56tpJ0Jmkviyx-LCx40XPIpCu7abuTMUmv7H9vhh0QPHiqgvq9B_UeIW8YbBgIfVmmDU73dxvJAbaaPyOnrFfbTvZCP287MN31mokTclbKBNCOir0kJ4xJriWoU_JwE13K-5RtDSnS5KlLDzYHW7HQEOmyzjXsU4iVLmnEufMZkc4h_rR3SG2082MJ5aDbhWjzI63Zhlo-0Pv0m4alGVfbtDYjXaP1Hl3FsVy9Ii-8nQu-Ps5z8uPzp-_XX7vbb19urj_edk4MorY_-AAMe889HyVyZ6V3apQ7PWg5tN1a0DgqUJJ7occtlx40H5STww6YFOfk4sl3n9OvFUs1SygO59lGTGsxSvZ66DWwRr7_P8mY4IrzBr77B5zSmlsQxXCmtBDAoUGXT5DLqZSM3uxzWFo-hoE5NGfKZA7NmWNzTfH2aLvuFhz_8seqxB-3nZaI</recordid><startdate>20010801</startdate><enddate>20010801</enddate><creator>Alcaïs, A</creator><creator>Abel, L</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010801</creationdate><title>Incorporation of covariates in multipoint model-free linkage analysis of binary traits: how important are unaffecteds?</title><author>Alcaïs, A ; Abel, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-542901e4f2f2d5e2ca5fc7d5b898595fcaa08ed70752f38d625f08297c59b0153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Genetic Linkage - genetics</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Multifactorial Inheritance</topic><topic>Nuclear Family</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Quantitative Trait, Heritable</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alcaïs, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abel, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of human genetics : EJHG</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alcaïs, A</au><au>Abel, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incorporation of covariates in multipoint model-free linkage analysis of binary traits: how important are unaffecteds?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of human genetics : EJHG</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Hum Genet</addtitle><date>2001-08-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>620</epage><pages>613-620</pages><issn>1018-4813</issn><eissn>1476-5438</eissn><abstract>When the mode of inheritance is unknown, genetic linkage analysis of binary trait is commonly performed using affected-sib-pair approaches. When there is evidence that some covariates influence the phenotype, incorporation of this information is expected to increase the power of the analysis since it allows (1) a better specification of the phenotype and (2) to take into account unaffected subjects. Here, we show how to account for covariates in the sibship-oriented Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial (MLB) linkage method by means of Pearson's logistic regression residuals which are computed using phenotypic and covariate information on both affected and unaffected subjects. These residuals are subsequently analysed as a quantitative phenotype with the corresponding extension of the MLB approach which can be used without any assumption on the distribution of these residuals. Then, a large simulation study is performed to study the relative power of incorporating or not unaffected sibs. To this aim, two different strategies in the multipoint analysis of family data are compared: (1) using residuals of the whole sibships (ie both covariate and genotypic information on unaffecteds is needed), and (2) using affecteds only (no information on unaffecteds is needed), under different generating models according to genetic and covariate effects. The results show that there is a clear increment in the power to detect the susceptibility locus when making use of the information carried by unaffecteds, in particular for dominant mode of inheritance and when values of the covariates influencing the disease are shared by all the members of the family.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group</pub><pmid>11528507</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200682</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1018-4813
ispartof European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2001-08, Vol.9 (8), p.613-620
issn 1018-4813
1476-5438
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754894801
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Analysis of Variance
Computer Simulation
Genetic Linkage - genetics
Genotype
Humans
Models, Genetic
Models, Statistical
Multifactorial Inheritance
Nuclear Family
Phenotype
Quantitative Trait, Heritable
title Incorporation of covariates in multipoint model-free linkage analysis of binary traits: how important are unaffecteds?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A53%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incorporation%20of%20covariates%20in%20multipoint%20model-free%20linkage%20analysis%20of%20binary%20traits:%20how%20important%20are%20unaffecteds?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20human%20genetics%20:%20EJHG&rft.au=Alca%C3%AFs,%20A&rft.date=2001-08-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=620&rft.pages=613-620&rft.issn=1018-4813&rft.eissn=1476-5438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200682&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754894801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217833020&rft_id=info:pmid/11528507&rfr_iscdi=true