Comparison of Short and Long Versions of the Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test and the K-BIT in Participants with Intellectual Impairment
The Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test (PCFT) directly measures the cognitive abilities of people with intellectual impairment. This study examined the relationship between this instrument and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) and two shorter versions of the same scale. High correlations betw...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2010-08, Vol.40 (8), p.1000-1005 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1005 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 1000 |
| container_title | Journal of autism and developmental disorders |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Tyrer, Stephen P. Wigham, Ann Cicchetti, Domenic Margallo-Lana, Marisa Moore, P. Brian Reid, Barbara E. |
| description | The Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test (PCFT) directly measures the cognitive abilities of people with intellectual impairment. This study examined the relationship between this instrument and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) and two shorter versions of the same scale. High correlations between the verbal and performance sections of the K-BIT and the Long PCFT were found with correlation coefficients of 0.85 and 0.78, respectively. Extremely high correlations between the Short versions of the PCFT and the Long version were obtained at 0.97 for Form A and 0.98 for Form B, illustrating that both Short forms and the Long form are essentially interchangeable. The PCFT is a reliable and robust schedule in the assessment of cognitive function in this population. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10803-010-0949-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754883431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A342570929</galeid><ericid>EJ891268</ericid><sourcerecordid>A342570929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-f7b0d4c97ea9d1952ebd5c39e0488aa1e1e88cc92855dc0c42a73ab3c5c730d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0l-L1DAQAPAiireefgBBJJyI-NAzf9pt83gud1pd8PBWX0M2nXZztMmapP75BH5tU7resbKi9KHQ-c1kMp0keUzwKcG4eOUJLjFLMcEp5hlP2Z1kRvKCpSxj9G4yw2ROU0bz4ih54P01xpiXlN5PjigmGSNZMUt-Lmy_lU57a5Bt0NXGuoCkqdHSmhZ9Bue1NX4MhQ2gSzfUGwtoYVujg_4K6GIwKkSCVuCnxNG9T19XK6QNupQuaKW30gSPvumwQZUJ0HWgwiA7VMWztevBhIfJvUZ2Hh7t3sfJp4vz1eJtuvzwplqcLVM1p1lIm2KN60zxAiSvCc8prOtcMQ44K0spCRAoS6U4LfO8VlhlVBZMrpnKVcFwTdhx8mKqu3X2yxB7Fr32KnYkDdjBiyKPheL4_kuSLMNR_1MyxkuG81Ge_CGv7eBMvLCYk3LOKaZ5RM8m1MoOhDaNDU6qsaQ4Y1n8m5hTHlV6QLVgwMnOGmh0_LznTw_4-NTQa3Uw4eVeQjQBvodWDt6L6urjviWTVc5676ARW6d76X4IgsW4qmJaVRFXVYyrKljMebqbxbDuob7J-L2bETzfAemV7BonjdL-1jFclCQfD38yOXBa3YTP35Wc0Pk4czqFfQyZFtztzP_e3C_gNgaV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>618692025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Short and Long Versions of the Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test and the K-BIT in Participants with Intellectual Impairment</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tyrer, Stephen P. ; Wigham, Ann ; Cicchetti, Domenic ; Margallo-Lana, Marisa ; Moore, P. Brian ; Reid, Barbara E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tyrer, Stephen P. ; Wigham, Ann ; Cicchetti, Domenic ; Margallo-Lana, Marisa ; Moore, P. Brian ; Reid, Barbara E.</creatorcontrib><description>The Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test (PCFT) directly measures the cognitive abilities of people with intellectual impairment. This study examined the relationship between this instrument and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) and two shorter versions of the same scale. High correlations between the verbal and performance sections of the K-BIT and the Long PCFT were found with correlation coefficients of 0.85 and 0.78, respectively. Extremely high correlations between the Short versions of the PCFT and the Long version were obtained at 0.97 for Form A and 0.98 for Form B, illustrating that both Short forms and the Long form are essentially interchangeable. The PCFT is a reliable and robust schedule in the assessment of cognitive function in this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-3257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3432</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10803-010-0949-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20143147</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JADDDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Assessment ; Autism ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child and School Psychology ; Cognition ; Cognitive abilities ; Cognitive Ability ; Cognitive functioning ; Computation ; Correlation ; Correlation coefficients ; Dementia ; Evaluation Methods ; Female ; Humans ; Intellectual Disability ; Intellectual Disability - diagnosis ; Intellectual Disability - psychology ; Intelligence Quotient ; Intelligence Tests ; Intelligence Tests - standards ; Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mental Retardation ; Middle Aged ; Mild Intellectual Disability ; Neurosciences ; Original Paper ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Performance Based Assessment ; Psychiatry ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Public Health ; Reproducibility of Results ; Severe Disabilities ; Short forms ; Techniques and methods ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2010-08, Vol.40 (8), p.1000-1005</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-f7b0d4c97ea9d1952ebd5c39e0488aa1e1e88cc92855dc0c42a73ab3c5c730d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-f7b0d4c97ea9d1952ebd5c39e0488aa1e1e88cc92855dc0c42a73ab3c5c730d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10803-010-0949-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10803-010-0949-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27901,27902,30976,30977,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ891268$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23078159$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20143147$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tyrer, Stephen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wigham, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cicchetti, Domenic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margallo-Lana, Marisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, P. Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Barbara E.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Short and Long Versions of the Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test and the K-BIT in Participants with Intellectual Impairment</title><title>Journal of autism and developmental disorders</title><addtitle>J Autism Dev Disord</addtitle><addtitle>J Autism Dev Disord</addtitle><description>The Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test (PCFT) directly measures the cognitive abilities of people with intellectual impairment. This study examined the relationship between this instrument and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) and two shorter versions of the same scale. High correlations between the verbal and performance sections of the K-BIT and the Long PCFT were found with correlation coefficients of 0.85 and 0.78, respectively. Extremely high correlations between the Short versions of the PCFT and the Long version were obtained at 0.97 for Form A and 0.98 for Form B, illustrating that both Short forms and the Long form are essentially interchangeable. The PCFT is a reliable and robust schedule in the assessment of cognitive function in this population.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Autism</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive abilities</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Cognitive functioning</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - psychology</subject><subject>Intelligence Quotient</subject><subject>Intelligence Tests</subject><subject>Intelligence Tests - standards</subject><subject>Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental Retardation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mild Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Performance Based Assessment</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Severe Disabilities</subject><subject>Short forms</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0162-3257</issn><issn>1573-3432</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0l-L1DAQAPAiireefgBBJJyI-NAzf9pt83gud1pd8PBWX0M2nXZztMmapP75BH5tU7resbKi9KHQ-c1kMp0keUzwKcG4eOUJLjFLMcEp5hlP2Z1kRvKCpSxj9G4yw2ROU0bz4ih54P01xpiXlN5PjigmGSNZMUt-Lmy_lU57a5Bt0NXGuoCkqdHSmhZ9Bue1NX4MhQ2gSzfUGwtoYVujg_4K6GIwKkSCVuCnxNG9T19XK6QNupQuaKW30gSPvumwQZUJ0HWgwiA7VMWztevBhIfJvUZ2Hh7t3sfJp4vz1eJtuvzwplqcLVM1p1lIm2KN60zxAiSvCc8prOtcMQ44K0spCRAoS6U4LfO8VlhlVBZMrpnKVcFwTdhx8mKqu3X2yxB7Fr32KnYkDdjBiyKPheL4_kuSLMNR_1MyxkuG81Ge_CGv7eBMvLCYk3LOKaZ5RM8m1MoOhDaNDU6qsaQ4Y1n8m5hTHlV6QLVgwMnOGmh0_LznTw_4-NTQa3Uw4eVeQjQBvodWDt6L6urjviWTVc5676ARW6d76X4IgsW4qmJaVRFXVYyrKljMebqbxbDuob7J-L2bETzfAemV7BonjdL-1jFclCQfD38yOXBa3YTP35Wc0Pk4czqFfQyZFtztzP_e3C_gNgaV</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Tyrer, Stephen P.</creator><creator>Wigham, Ann</creator><creator>Cicchetti, Domenic</creator><creator>Margallo-Lana, Marisa</creator><creator>Moore, P. Brian</creator><creator>Reid, Barbara E.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Comparison of Short and Long Versions of the Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test and the K-BIT in Participants with Intellectual Impairment</title><author>Tyrer, Stephen P. ; Wigham, Ann ; Cicchetti, Domenic ; Margallo-Lana, Marisa ; Moore, P. Brian ; Reid, Barbara E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-f7b0d4c97ea9d1952ebd5c39e0488aa1e1e88cc92855dc0c42a73ab3c5c730d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Autism</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive abilities</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Cognitive functioning</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - psychology</topic><topic>Intelligence Quotient</topic><topic>Intelligence Tests</topic><topic>Intelligence Tests - standards</topic><topic>Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental Retardation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mild Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Performance Based Assessment</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Severe Disabilities</topic><topic>Short forms</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tyrer, Stephen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wigham, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cicchetti, Domenic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margallo-Lana, Marisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, P. Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Barbara E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of autism and developmental disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tyrer, Stephen P.</au><au>Wigham, Ann</au><au>Cicchetti, Domenic</au><au>Margallo-Lana, Marisa</au><au>Moore, P. Brian</au><au>Reid, Barbara E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ891268</ericid><atitle>Comparison of Short and Long Versions of the Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test and the K-BIT in Participants with Intellectual Impairment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of autism and developmental disorders</jtitle><stitle>J Autism Dev Disord</stitle><addtitle>J Autism Dev Disord</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1000</spage><epage>1005</epage><pages>1000-1005</pages><issn>0162-3257</issn><eissn>1573-3432</eissn><coden>JADDDQ</coden><abstract>The Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test (PCFT) directly measures the cognitive abilities of people with intellectual impairment. This study examined the relationship between this instrument and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) and two shorter versions of the same scale. High correlations between the verbal and performance sections of the K-BIT and the Long PCFT were found with correlation coefficients of 0.85 and 0.78, respectively. Extremely high correlations between the Short versions of the PCFT and the Long version were obtained at 0.97 for Form A and 0.98 for Form B, illustrating that both Short forms and the Long form are essentially interchangeable. The PCFT is a reliable and robust schedule in the assessment of cognitive function in this population.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>20143147</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10803-010-0949-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0162-3257 |
| ispartof | Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2010-08, Vol.40 (8), p.1000-1005 |
| issn | 0162-3257 1573-3432 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754883431 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Assessment Autism Behavioral Science and Psychology Biological and medical sciences Child and School Psychology Cognition Cognitive abilities Cognitive Ability Cognitive functioning Computation Correlation Correlation coefficients Dementia Evaluation Methods Female Humans Intellectual Disability Intellectual Disability - diagnosis Intellectual Disability - psychology Intelligence Quotient Intelligence Tests Intelligence Tests - standards Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test Male Medical sciences Mental Retardation Middle Aged Mild Intellectual Disability Neurosciences Original Paper Patients Pediatrics Performance Based Assessment Psychiatry Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Public Health Reproducibility of Results Severe Disabilities Short forms Techniques and methods Test Reliability Test Validity Young Adult |
| title | Comparison of Short and Long Versions of the Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test and the K-BIT in Participants with Intellectual Impairment |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A56%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Short%20and%20Long%20Versions%20of%20the%20Prudhoe%20Cognitive%20Function%20Test%20and%20the%20K-BIT%20in%20Participants%20with%20Intellectual%20Impairment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20autism%20and%20developmental%20disorders&rft.au=Tyrer,%20Stephen%20P.&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1000&rft.epage=1005&rft.pages=1000-1005&rft.issn=0162-3257&rft.eissn=1573-3432&rft.coden=JADDDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10803-010-0949-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA342570929%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=618692025&rft_id=info:pmid/20143147&rft_galeid=A342570929&rft_ericid=EJ891268&rfr_iscdi=true |