Celiac Disease Diagnosis: Simple Rules Are Better Than Complicated Algorithms
Abstract Celiac disease is the only treatable autoimmune disease, provided that a correct diagnosis is achieved and a strict, lifelong gluten-free diet is implemented. The current diagnostic algorithm for celiac disease includes initial screening serological tests, followed by a confirmatory small i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of medicine 2010-08, Vol.123 (8), p.691-693 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 693 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 691 |
container_title | The American journal of medicine |
container_volume | 123 |
creator | Catassi, Carlo, MD, MPH Fasano, Alessio, MD |
description | Abstract Celiac disease is the only treatable autoimmune disease, provided that a correct diagnosis is achieved and a strict, lifelong gluten-free diet is implemented. The current diagnostic algorithm for celiac disease includes initial screening serological tests, followed by a confirmatory small intestinal biopsy showing the autoimmune insult typical of celiac disease. The biopsy, considered the diagnostic gold standard, has been recently questioned as a reliable and conclusive test for every case. Indeed, the wide variability of celiac disease-related findings suggests that it is difficult to conceptualize the diagnostic process into rigid algorithms that do not always cover the clinical complexity of this disease. Instead we find clinically useful the shifting to a quantitative approach that can be defined as the “4 out of 5” rule: the diagnosis of celiac disease is confirmed if at least 4 of the following 5 criteria are satisfied: typical symptoms of celiac disease; positivity of serum celiac disease immunoglobulin, A class autoantibodies at high titer; human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2 or DQ8 genotypes; celiac enteropathy at the small bowel biopsy; and response to the gluten-free diet. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.02.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754881176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0002934310003591</els_id><sourcerecordid>754881176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-90fbb2cf3883fb386c6cd4f1695b7dae2421daca7b52e7e2e2d065130f29d3e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhi0EotvCP0AoQkKcsszYsZNwQFq2fElFSLScLceZtF6cZLETpP57HO0WpF56GtvzzGuP32HsBcIaAdXb3dr0u57aNYd0BHwNWD9iK5RS5iUq_pitAIDntSjECTuNcZe2UEv1lJ1wUCWUWK3Yty15Z2x27iKZSCma62GMLr7LLl2_95T9mD3FbBMo-0DTRCG7ujFDth1T0lkzUZtt_PUY3HTTx2fsSWd8pOfHeMZ-fvp4tf2SX3z__HW7ucitBDnlNXRNw20nqkp0jaiUVbYtOlS1bMrWEC84tsaaspGcSuLEW1ASBXS8bgWhOGNvDrr7MP6eKU66d9GS92agcY66lEVVIZbqYbKoARFllchX98jdOIchtZEgVQgB1SJXHCAbxhgDdXofXG_CrUbQiy16pw-26MUWDVwnW1LZy6P23Cy5u6I7HxLw-giYaI3vghmsi_-5dHkp5SL0_sBR-t0_joKO1tFgqXWB7KTb0T30kvsC1rshGel_0S3Ffy2jjqlAXy4jtEwQpoWQNYq_Bi-_kw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>746433086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Celiac Disease Diagnosis: Simple Rules Are Better Than Complicated Algorithms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Catassi, Carlo, MD, MPH ; Fasano, Alessio, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Catassi, Carlo, MD, MPH ; Fasano, Alessio, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Celiac disease is the only treatable autoimmune disease, provided that a correct diagnosis is achieved and a strict, lifelong gluten-free diet is implemented. The current diagnostic algorithm for celiac disease includes initial screening serological tests, followed by a confirmatory small intestinal biopsy showing the autoimmune insult typical of celiac disease. The biopsy, considered the diagnostic gold standard, has been recently questioned as a reliable and conclusive test for every case. Indeed, the wide variability of celiac disease-related findings suggests that it is difficult to conceptualize the diagnostic process into rigid algorithms that do not always cover the clinical complexity of this disease. Instead we find clinically useful the shifting to a quantitative approach that can be defined as the “4 out of 5” rule: the diagnosis of celiac disease is confirmed if at least 4 of the following 5 criteria are satisfied: typical symptoms of celiac disease; positivity of serum celiac disease immunoglobulin, A class autoantibodies at high titer; human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2 or DQ8 genotypes; celiac enteropathy at the small bowel biopsy; and response to the gluten-free diet.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-7162</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.02.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20670718</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJMEAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithm ; Algorithms ; Autoantibodies - analysis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Celiac disease ; Celiac Disease - diagnosis ; Celiac Disease - genetics ; Celiac Disease - immunology ; Celiac Disease - pathology ; Diagnosis ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; General aspects ; HLA Antigens - analysis ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Intestinal biopsy ; Intestinal Mucosa - pathology ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><ispartof>The American journal of medicine, 2010-08, Vol.123 (8), p.691-693</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Aug 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-90fbb2cf3883fb386c6cd4f1695b7dae2421daca7b52e7e2e2d065130f29d3e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-90fbb2cf3883fb386c6cd4f1695b7dae2421daca7b52e7e2e2d065130f29d3e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.02.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23087559$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20670718$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catassi, Carlo, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasano, Alessio, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Celiac Disease Diagnosis: Simple Rules Are Better Than Complicated Algorithms</title><title>The American journal of medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Celiac disease is the only treatable autoimmune disease, provided that a correct diagnosis is achieved and a strict, lifelong gluten-free diet is implemented. The current diagnostic algorithm for celiac disease includes initial screening serological tests, followed by a confirmatory small intestinal biopsy showing the autoimmune insult typical of celiac disease. The biopsy, considered the diagnostic gold standard, has been recently questioned as a reliable and conclusive test for every case. Indeed, the wide variability of celiac disease-related findings suggests that it is difficult to conceptualize the diagnostic process into rigid algorithms that do not always cover the clinical complexity of this disease. Instead we find clinically useful the shifting to a quantitative approach that can be defined as the “4 out of 5” rule: the diagnosis of celiac disease is confirmed if at least 4 of the following 5 criteria are satisfied: typical symptoms of celiac disease; positivity of serum celiac disease immunoglobulin, A class autoantibodies at high titer; human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2 or DQ8 genotypes; celiac enteropathy at the small bowel biopsy; and response to the gluten-free diet.</description><subject>Algorithm</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Autoantibodies - analysis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Celiac disease</subject><subject>Celiac Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Celiac Disease - genetics</subject><subject>Celiac Disease - immunology</subject><subject>Celiac Disease - pathology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>HLA Antigens - analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Intestinal biopsy</subject><subject>Intestinal Mucosa - pathology</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><issn>0002-9343</issn><issn>1555-7162</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhi0EotvCP0AoQkKcsszYsZNwQFq2fElFSLScLceZtF6cZLETpP57HO0WpF56GtvzzGuP32HsBcIaAdXb3dr0u57aNYd0BHwNWD9iK5RS5iUq_pitAIDntSjECTuNcZe2UEv1lJ1wUCWUWK3Yty15Z2x27iKZSCma62GMLr7LLl2_95T9mD3FbBMo-0DTRCG7ujFDth1T0lkzUZtt_PUY3HTTx2fsSWd8pOfHeMZ-fvp4tf2SX3z__HW7ucitBDnlNXRNw20nqkp0jaiUVbYtOlS1bMrWEC84tsaaspGcSuLEW1ASBXS8bgWhOGNvDrr7MP6eKU66d9GS92agcY66lEVVIZbqYbKoARFllchX98jdOIchtZEgVQgB1SJXHCAbxhgDdXofXG_CrUbQiy16pw-26MUWDVwnW1LZy6P23Cy5u6I7HxLw-giYaI3vghmsi_-5dHkp5SL0_sBR-t0_joKO1tFgqXWB7KTb0T30kvsC1rshGel_0S3Ffy2jjqlAXy4jtEwQpoWQNYq_Bi-_kw</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Catassi, Carlo, MD, MPH</creator><creator>Fasano, Alessio, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Celiac Disease Diagnosis: Simple Rules Are Better Than Complicated Algorithms</title><author>Catassi, Carlo, MD, MPH ; Fasano, Alessio, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-90fbb2cf3883fb386c6cd4f1695b7dae2421daca7b52e7e2e2d065130f29d3e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Algorithm</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Autoantibodies - analysis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Celiac disease</topic><topic>Celiac Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Celiac Disease - genetics</topic><topic>Celiac Disease - immunology</topic><topic>Celiac Disease - pathology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>HLA Antigens - analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Intestinal biopsy</topic><topic>Intestinal Mucosa - pathology</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catassi, Carlo, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasano, Alessio, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catassi, Carlo, MD, MPH</au><au>Fasano, Alessio, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Celiac Disease Diagnosis: Simple Rules Are Better Than Complicated Algorithms</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Med</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>693</epage><pages>691-693</pages><issn>0002-9343</issn><eissn>1555-7162</eissn><coden>AJMEAZ</coden><abstract>Abstract Celiac disease is the only treatable autoimmune disease, provided that a correct diagnosis is achieved and a strict, lifelong gluten-free diet is implemented. The current diagnostic algorithm for celiac disease includes initial screening serological tests, followed by a confirmatory small intestinal biopsy showing the autoimmune insult typical of celiac disease. The biopsy, considered the diagnostic gold standard, has been recently questioned as a reliable and conclusive test for every case. Indeed, the wide variability of celiac disease-related findings suggests that it is difficult to conceptualize the diagnostic process into rigid algorithms that do not always cover the clinical complexity of this disease. Instead we find clinically useful the shifting to a quantitative approach that can be defined as the “4 out of 5” rule: the diagnosis of celiac disease is confirmed if at least 4 of the following 5 criteria are satisfied: typical symptoms of celiac disease; positivity of serum celiac disease immunoglobulin, A class autoantibodies at high titer; human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2 or DQ8 genotypes; celiac enteropathy at the small bowel biopsy; and response to the gluten-free diet.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20670718</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.02.019</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9343 |
ispartof | The American journal of medicine, 2010-08, Vol.123 (8), p.691-693 |
issn | 0002-9343 1555-7162 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754881176 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Algorithm Algorithms Autoantibodies - analysis Biological and medical sciences Biopsy Celiac disease Celiac Disease - diagnosis Celiac Disease - genetics Celiac Disease - immunology Celiac Disease - pathology Diagnosis Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen General aspects HLA Antigens - analysis Humans Internal Medicine Intestinal biopsy Intestinal Mucosa - pathology Medical diagnosis Medical sciences Medical treatment Other diseases. Semiology Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus |
title | Celiac Disease Diagnosis: Simple Rules Are Better Than Complicated Algorithms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A58%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Celiac%20Disease%20Diagnosis:%20Simple%20Rules%20Are%20Better%20Than%20Complicated%20Algorithms&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Catassi,%20Carlo,%20MD,%20MPH&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=693&rft.pages=691-693&rft.issn=0002-9343&rft.eissn=1555-7162&rft.coden=AJMEAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.02.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754881176%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=746433086&rft_id=info:pmid/20670718&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0002934310003591&rfr_iscdi=true |