Misoprostol as an adjunct to standard uterotonics for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage: a multicentre, double-blind randomised trial
Summary Background Post-partum haemorrhage is a leading cause of global maternal morbidity and mortality. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin analogue with uterotonic activity, is an attractive option for treatment because it is stable, active orally, and inexpensive. We aimed to assess the effectiveness o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2010-05, Vol.375 (9728), p.1808-1813 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1813 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9728 |
container_start_page | 1808 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 375 |
creator | Widmer, Mariana, MSc Blum, Jennifer, MPH Hofmeyr, G Justus, MD Carroli, Guillermo, MD Abdel-Aleem, Hany, Prof Lumbiganon, Pisake, Prof Ngoc, Nguyen Thi Nhu, MD Wojdyla, Daniel, MSc Thinkhamrop, Jadsada, Prof Singata, Mandisa, RN/RM Mignini, Luciano E, MD Abdel-Aleem, Mahmoud Ahmad, MD Thach, Tran Son, MD Winikoff, Beverly, MD |
description | Summary Background Post-partum haemorrhage is a leading cause of global maternal morbidity and mortality. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin analogue with uterotonic activity, is an attractive option for treatment because it is stable, active orally, and inexpensive. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of misoprostol as an adjunct to standard uterotonics compared with standard uterotonics alone for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage. Methods Women delivering vaginally who had clinically diagnosed post-partum haemorrhage due to uterine atony were enrolled from participating hospitals in Argentina, Egypt, South Africa, Thailand, and Vietnam between July, 2005, and August, 2008. Computer-generated randomisation was used to assign women to receive 600 μg misoprostol or matching placebo sublingually; both groups were also given routine injectable uterotonics. Allocation was concealed by distribution of sealed and sequentially numbered treatment packs in the order that women were enrolled. Providers and women were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was blood loss of 500 mL or more within 60 min after randomisation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN34455240. Findings 1422 women were assigned to receive misoprostol (n=705) or placebo (n=717). The proportion of women with blood loss of 500 mL or more within 60 min was similar between the misoprostol group (100 [14%]) and the placebo group (100 [14%]; relative risk 1·02, 95% CI 0·79–1·32). In the first 60 min, an increased proportion of women on misoprostol versus placebo, had shivering (455/704 [65%] vs 230/717 [32%]; 2·01, 1·79–2·27) and body temperature of 38°C or higher (303/704 [43%] vs 107/717 [15%]; 2·88, 2·37–2·50). Interpretation Findings from this study do not support clinical use of 600 μg sublingual misoprostol in addition to standard injectable uterotonics for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60348-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_VO9</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754870141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673610603480</els_id><sourcerecordid>754870141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6044-801abb6310a8c854626ae24925856ff8bebd4e281648e8b482c3dae51123e0413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksuKFDEUhgtRnHH0EZQgiAqWJpVLpV0oMniDERcquAup5NRMulNJm6Qc5g18bNMXW5iNrgqK7_845_xpmvsEPyeYiBdfMGG4FT0VTwh-KjBlssU3mmPCetZy1n-_2RwfkKPmTs5LjDETmN9ujjrMFqyn-Lj59cnluE4xl-iRzkgHpO1yDqagElEuOlidLJoLpFhicCajMSZUEugyQSgojmhd0-1apzJP6ELDFFO60OfwEmk0zb44U7kEz5CN8-ChHbwLFqVqjpPLYKvMaX-3uTVqn-He_nvSfHv39uvph_bs8_uPp2_OWiMwY63ERA-DoARraSRnohMaOrbouORiHOUAg2XQSSKYBDkw2RlqNXBCOgqYEXrSPN5569I_ZshF1SEMeK8DxDmrnjPZ18P9B0lpR7mkspIPr5HLOKdQ11CUCUJozxYV4jvI1GvnBKNaJzfpdKUIVptK1bZStelr82tbqcI192Avn4cJ7CH1p8MKPNoDOhvtx3pZ4_JfrpPdgnBRObrjLmPydtBhpeIawirESw_2HBLUIl2J24kWUihOOKup17sU1FJ-OkgqGwfBgHUJTFE2un8u8OqawdQX4OqoK7iCfDgVUblTeCfZOAjeGjD9DctD5Xg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>346113749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Misoprostol as an adjunct to standard uterotonics for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage: a multicentre, double-blind randomised trial</title><source>Open Knowledge Repository</source><creator>Widmer, Mariana, MSc ; Blum, Jennifer, MPH ; Hofmeyr, G Justus, MD ; Carroli, Guillermo, MD ; Abdel-Aleem, Hany, Prof ; Lumbiganon, Pisake, Prof ; Ngoc, Nguyen Thi Nhu, MD ; Wojdyla, Daniel, MSc ; Thinkhamrop, Jadsada, Prof ; Singata, Mandisa, RN/RM ; Mignini, Luciano E, MD ; Abdel-Aleem, Mahmoud Ahmad, MD ; Thach, Tran Son, MD ; Winikoff, Beverly, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Widmer, Mariana, MSc ; Blum, Jennifer, MPH ; Hofmeyr, G Justus, MD ; Carroli, Guillermo, MD ; Abdel-Aleem, Hany, Prof ; Lumbiganon, Pisake, Prof ; Ngoc, Nguyen Thi Nhu, MD ; Wojdyla, Daniel, MSc ; Thinkhamrop, Jadsada, Prof ; Singata, Mandisa, RN/RM ; Mignini, Luciano E, MD ; Abdel-Aleem, Mahmoud Ahmad, MD ; Thach, Tran Son, MD ; Winikoff, Beverly, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Post-partum haemorrhage is a leading cause of global maternal morbidity and mortality. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin analogue with uterotonic activity, is an attractive option for treatment because it is stable, active orally, and inexpensive. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of misoprostol as an adjunct to standard uterotonics compared with standard uterotonics alone for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage. Methods Women delivering vaginally who had clinically diagnosed post-partum haemorrhage due to uterine atony were enrolled from participating hospitals in Argentina, Egypt, South Africa, Thailand, and Vietnam between July, 2005, and August, 2008. Computer-generated randomisation was used to assign women to receive 600 μg misoprostol or matching placebo sublingually; both groups were also given routine injectable uterotonics. Allocation was concealed by distribution of sealed and sequentially numbered treatment packs in the order that women were enrolled. Providers and women were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was blood loss of 500 mL or more within 60 min after randomisation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN34455240. Findings 1422 women were assigned to receive misoprostol (n=705) or placebo (n=717). The proportion of women with blood loss of 500 mL or more within 60 min was similar between the misoprostol group (100 [14%]) and the placebo group (100 [14%]; relative risk 1·02, 95% CI 0·79–1·32). In the first 60 min, an increased proportion of women on misoprostol versus placebo, had shivering (455/704 [65%] vs 230/717 [32%]; 2·01, 1·79–2·27) and body temperature of 38°C or higher (303/704 [43%] vs 107/717 [15%]; 2·88, 2·37–2·50). Interpretation Findings from this study do not support clinical use of 600 μg sublingual misoprostol in addition to standard injectable uterotonics for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60348-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20494730</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood ; Body temperature ; Clinical trials ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; General aspects ; Hemophilia ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Labor Stage, Third ; Maternal mortality ; Medical sciences ; Misoprostol ; Misoprostol - therapeutic use ; Oxytocics ; Oxytocics - therapeutic use ; Postpartum Hemorrhage ; Postpartum Hemorrhage - drug therapy ; Pregnancy ; R&D ; Research & development ; Risk</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2010-05, Vol.375 (9728), p.1808-1813</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>World Bank</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited May 22-May 28, 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6044-801abb6310a8c854626ae24925856ff8bebd4e281648e8b482c3dae51123e0413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6044-801abb6310a8c854626ae24925856ff8bebd4e281648e8b482c3dae51123e0413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673610603480$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,18961,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10986/5154$$EView_record_in_World_Bank$$FView_record_in_$$GWorld_Bank</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22829156$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20494730$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Widmer, Mariana, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Jennifer, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmeyr, G Justus, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroli, Guillermo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Aleem, Hany, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbiganon, Pisake, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngoc, Nguyen Thi Nhu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojdyla, Daniel, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thinkhamrop, Jadsada, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singata, Mandisa, RN/RM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mignini, Luciano E, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Aleem, Mahmoud Ahmad, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thach, Tran Son, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winikoff, Beverly, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Misoprostol as an adjunct to standard uterotonics for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage: a multicentre, double-blind randomised trial</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Summary Background Post-partum haemorrhage is a leading cause of global maternal morbidity and mortality. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin analogue with uterotonic activity, is an attractive option for treatment because it is stable, active orally, and inexpensive. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of misoprostol as an adjunct to standard uterotonics compared with standard uterotonics alone for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage. Methods Women delivering vaginally who had clinically diagnosed post-partum haemorrhage due to uterine atony were enrolled from participating hospitals in Argentina, Egypt, South Africa, Thailand, and Vietnam between July, 2005, and August, 2008. Computer-generated randomisation was used to assign women to receive 600 μg misoprostol or matching placebo sublingually; both groups were also given routine injectable uterotonics. Allocation was concealed by distribution of sealed and sequentially numbered treatment packs in the order that women were enrolled. Providers and women were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was blood loss of 500 mL or more within 60 min after randomisation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN34455240. Findings 1422 women were assigned to receive misoprostol (n=705) or placebo (n=717). The proportion of women with blood loss of 500 mL or more within 60 min was similar between the misoprostol group (100 [14%]) and the placebo group (100 [14%]; relative risk 1·02, 95% CI 0·79–1·32). In the first 60 min, an increased proportion of women on misoprostol versus placebo, had shivering (455/704 [65%] vs 230/717 [32%]; 2·01, 1·79–2·27) and body temperature of 38°C or higher (303/704 [43%] vs 107/717 [15%]; 2·88, 2·37–2·50). Interpretation Findings from this study do not support clinical use of 600 μg sublingual misoprostol in addition to standard injectable uterotonics for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Body temperature</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hemophilia</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Labor Stage, Third</subject><subject>Maternal mortality</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Misoprostol</subject><subject>Misoprostol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Oxytocics</subject><subject>Oxytocics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Postpartum Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Postpartum Hemorrhage - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Risk</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>VO9</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksuKFDEUhgtRnHH0EZQgiAqWJpVLpV0oMniDERcquAup5NRMulNJm6Qc5g18bNMXW5iNrgqK7_845_xpmvsEPyeYiBdfMGG4FT0VTwh-KjBlssU3mmPCetZy1n-_2RwfkKPmTs5LjDETmN9ujjrMFqyn-Lj59cnluE4xl-iRzkgHpO1yDqagElEuOlidLJoLpFhicCajMSZUEugyQSgojmhd0-1apzJP6ELDFFO60OfwEmk0zb44U7kEz5CN8-ChHbwLFqVqjpPLYKvMaX-3uTVqn-He_nvSfHv39uvph_bs8_uPp2_OWiMwY63ERA-DoARraSRnohMaOrbouORiHOUAg2XQSSKYBDkw2RlqNXBCOgqYEXrSPN5569I_ZshF1SEMeK8DxDmrnjPZ18P9B0lpR7mkspIPr5HLOKdQ11CUCUJozxYV4jvI1GvnBKNaJzfpdKUIVptK1bZStelr82tbqcI192Avn4cJ7CH1p8MKPNoDOhvtx3pZ4_JfrpPdgnBRObrjLmPydtBhpeIawirESw_2HBLUIl2J24kWUihOOKup17sU1FJ-OkgqGwfBgHUJTFE2un8u8OqawdQX4OqoK7iCfDgVUblTeCfZOAjeGjD9DctD5Xg</recordid><startdate>20100522</startdate><enddate>20100522</enddate><creator>Widmer, Mariana, MSc</creator><creator>Blum, Jennifer, MPH</creator><creator>Hofmeyr, G Justus, MD</creator><creator>Carroli, Guillermo, MD</creator><creator>Abdel-Aleem, Hany, Prof</creator><creator>Lumbiganon, Pisake, Prof</creator><creator>Ngoc, Nguyen Thi Nhu, MD</creator><creator>Wojdyla, Daniel, MSc</creator><creator>Thinkhamrop, Jadsada, Prof</creator><creator>Singata, Mandisa, RN/RM</creator><creator>Mignini, Luciano E, MD</creator><creator>Abdel-Aleem, Mahmoud Ahmad, MD</creator><creator>Thach, Tran Son, MD</creator><creator>Winikoff, Beverly, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>VO9</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100522</creationdate><title>Misoprostol as an adjunct to standard uterotonics for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage: a multicentre, double-blind randomised trial</title><author>Widmer, Mariana, MSc ; Blum, Jennifer, MPH ; Hofmeyr, G Justus, MD ; Carroli, Guillermo, MD ; Abdel-Aleem, Hany, Prof ; Lumbiganon, Pisake, Prof ; Ngoc, Nguyen Thi Nhu, MD ; Wojdyla, Daniel, MSc ; Thinkhamrop, Jadsada, Prof ; Singata, Mandisa, RN/RM ; Mignini, Luciano E, MD ; Abdel-Aleem, Mahmoud Ahmad, MD ; Thach, Tran Son, MD ; Winikoff, Beverly, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6044-801abb6310a8c854626ae24925856ff8bebd4e281648e8b482c3dae51123e0413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Body temperature</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hemophilia</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Labor Stage, Third</topic><topic>Maternal mortality</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Misoprostol</topic><topic>Misoprostol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Oxytocics</topic><topic>Oxytocics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Postpartum Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Postpartum Hemorrhage - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Widmer, Mariana, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Jennifer, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmeyr, G Justus, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroli, Guillermo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Aleem, Hany, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbiganon, Pisake, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngoc, Nguyen Thi Nhu, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojdyla, Daniel, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thinkhamrop, Jadsada, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singata, Mandisa, RN/RM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mignini, Luciano E, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Aleem, Mahmoud Ahmad, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thach, Tran Son, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winikoff, Beverly, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Knowledge Repository</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Widmer, Mariana, MSc</au><au>Blum, Jennifer, MPH</au><au>Hofmeyr, G Justus, MD</au><au>Carroli, Guillermo, MD</au><au>Abdel-Aleem, Hany, Prof</au><au>Lumbiganon, Pisake, Prof</au><au>Ngoc, Nguyen Thi Nhu, MD</au><au>Wojdyla, Daniel, MSc</au><au>Thinkhamrop, Jadsada, Prof</au><au>Singata, Mandisa, RN/RM</au><au>Mignini, Luciano E, MD</au><au>Abdel-Aleem, Mahmoud Ahmad, MD</au><au>Thach, Tran Son, MD</au><au>Winikoff, Beverly, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Misoprostol as an adjunct to standard uterotonics for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage: a multicentre, double-blind randomised trial</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2010-05-22</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>375</volume><issue>9728</issue><spage>1808</spage><epage>1813</epage><pages>1808-1813</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Background Post-partum haemorrhage is a leading cause of global maternal morbidity and mortality. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin analogue with uterotonic activity, is an attractive option for treatment because it is stable, active orally, and inexpensive. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of misoprostol as an adjunct to standard uterotonics compared with standard uterotonics alone for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage. Methods Women delivering vaginally who had clinically diagnosed post-partum haemorrhage due to uterine atony were enrolled from participating hospitals in Argentina, Egypt, South Africa, Thailand, and Vietnam between July, 2005, and August, 2008. Computer-generated randomisation was used to assign women to receive 600 μg misoprostol or matching placebo sublingually; both groups were also given routine injectable uterotonics. Allocation was concealed by distribution of sealed and sequentially numbered treatment packs in the order that women were enrolled. Providers and women were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was blood loss of 500 mL or more within 60 min after randomisation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN34455240. Findings 1422 women were assigned to receive misoprostol (n=705) or placebo (n=717). The proportion of women with blood loss of 500 mL or more within 60 min was similar between the misoprostol group (100 [14%]) and the placebo group (100 [14%]; relative risk 1·02, 95% CI 0·79–1·32). In the first 60 min, an increased proportion of women on misoprostol versus placebo, had shivering (455/704 [65%] vs 230/717 [32%]; 2·01, 1·79–2·27) and body temperature of 38°C or higher (303/704 [43%] vs 107/717 [15%]; 2·88, 2·37–2·50). Interpretation Findings from this study do not support clinical use of 600 μg sublingual misoprostol in addition to standard injectable uterotonics for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20494730</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60348-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2010-05, Vol.375 (9728), p.1808-1813 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754870141 |
source | Open Knowledge Repository |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Blood Body temperature Clinical trials Double-Blind Method Female General aspects Hemophilia Hospitals Humans Internal Medicine Labor Stage, Third Maternal mortality Medical sciences Misoprostol Misoprostol - therapeutic use Oxytocics Oxytocics - therapeutic use Postpartum Hemorrhage Postpartum Hemorrhage - drug therapy Pregnancy R&D Research & development Risk |
title | Misoprostol as an adjunct to standard uterotonics for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage: a multicentre, double-blind randomised trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A24%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_VO9&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Misoprostol%20as%20an%20adjunct%20to%20standard%20uterotonics%20for%20treatment%20of%20post-partum%20haemorrhage:%20a%20multicentre,%20double-blind%20randomised%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Widmer,%20Mariana,%20MSc&rft.date=2010-05-22&rft.volume=375&rft.issue=9728&rft.spage=1808&rft.epage=1813&rft.pages=1808-1813&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60348-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_VO9%3E754870141%3C/proquest_VO9%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=346113749&rft_id=info:pmid/20494730&rft_els_id=S0140673610603480&rfr_iscdi=true |