Imported fire ant field reaction and immunotherapy safety characteristics: The IFACS study

Background Imported fire ants (IFAs) are endemic in the southeastern United States, including Texas; can sting multiple times; and are a well-known cause of anaphylaxis. There are few data available on how many stings typically lead to systemic reactions (SRs). Likewise, there are no reports current...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 2010-06, Vol.125 (6), p.1294-1299
Hauptverfasser: La Shell, Mark S., MD, Calabria, Christopher W., MD, Quinn, James M., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1299
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1294
container_title Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
container_volume 125
creator La Shell, Mark S., MD
Calabria, Christopher W., MD
Quinn, James M., MD
description Background Imported fire ants (IFAs) are endemic in the southeastern United States, including Texas; can sting multiple times; and are a well-known cause of anaphylaxis. There are few data available on how many stings typically lead to systemic reactions (SRs). Likewise, there are no reports currently in the literature that characterize the safety of IFA subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). Objective We sought to analyze a case-cohort sample of patients for IFA SCIT risk factors and to characterize the index field reactions of these patients. Methods A case-cohort study based on a 3-year retrospective chart review (2005-2008) at a single institution was performed for patients receiving IFA SCIT. Field reactions leading to initiation of IFA SCIT were also reviewed. Results Seventy-seven patients (40 female patients; mean age, 34 years) received 1,887 injections, and 7 patients experienced 8 SRs, for a rate of 0.4% per injection and 9.1% per patient. SRs were mild. Having an SR to skin testing was associated with increased odds of having an SR to IFA SCIT (odds ratio, 4.75; 95% CI, 1.13-20.0), as were large local reactions (odds ratio, 34.5; 95% CI, 6.52-182). No other risk factors were identified. Of the index field reactions leading to IFA SCIT, 59% were the result of 1 sting, and 87% of subjects experienced only 1 SR before initiation of IFA SCIT. Two of 4 patients who experienced loss of consciousness during the index field reaction required an increased maintenance dose for optimal response. Conclusions IFA SCIT is safe; however, having an SR to skin testing or the presence of large local reactions increases the odds of having an SR to IFA SCIT. The majority of SRs to IFA field stings resulted from 1 sting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.02.041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754869240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091674910005075</els_id><sourcerecordid>754869240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-76b543639fe16e83d7f2baac0496b63d28afdd19920184eab5d6a1332a9bdcc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuLFDEUhYMoTs_oH3AhBSKzqjbvSmQQhsbRhgEXM27chFRyi05bjzapEurfm7JbB2ahqySX79zk5FyEXhG8JpjId_v13rqwpjgXMF1jTp6gFcG6KqWi4ilaYaxJKSuuz9B5Snucz0zp5-iMYi6IVmqFvm27wxBH8EUTIhS2H_MGWl9EsG4MQ59LvghdN_XDuINoD3ORbAPjXLidjZmBGNIYXHpf3O-g2N5cb-6KNE5-foGeNbZN8PK0XqCvNx_vN5_L2y-ftpvr29IJKceykrXgTDLdAJGgmK8aWlvrMNeylsxTZRvvidbZp-Jga-GlJYxRq2vvnGQX6PLY9xCHHxOk0XQhOWhb28MwJVMJrqSmHP-fZIwwIbHK5JtH5H6YYp9tGCIwV0RjVmWKHikXh5QiNOYQQ2fjbAg2S0Rmb5aIzBKRwdTkiLLo9an1VHfg_0r-ZJKBtyfAJmfbJtrehfTAUU04_81dHTnIn_szQDTJBegd-JykG40fwr_f8eGR3LWhD_nG7zBDevBrUhaYu2WYllkieYwErgT7BSurwr0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504819037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imported fire ant field reaction and immunotherapy safety characteristics: The IFACS study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>La Shell, Mark S., MD ; Calabria, Christopher W., MD ; Quinn, James M., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>La Shell, Mark S., MD ; Calabria, Christopher W., MD ; Quinn, James M., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Imported fire ants (IFAs) are endemic in the southeastern United States, including Texas; can sting multiple times; and are a well-known cause of anaphylaxis. There are few data available on how many stings typically lead to systemic reactions (SRs). Likewise, there are no reports currently in the literature that characterize the safety of IFA subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). Objective We sought to analyze a case-cohort sample of patients for IFA SCIT risk factors and to characterize the index field reactions of these patients. Methods A case-cohort study based on a 3-year retrospective chart review (2005-2008) at a single institution was performed for patients receiving IFA SCIT. Field reactions leading to initiation of IFA SCIT were also reviewed. Results Seventy-seven patients (40 female patients; mean age, 34 years) received 1,887 injections, and 7 patients experienced 8 SRs, for a rate of 0.4% per injection and 9.1% per patient. SRs were mild. Having an SR to skin testing was associated with increased odds of having an SR to IFA SCIT (odds ratio, 4.75; 95% CI, 1.13-20.0), as were large local reactions (odds ratio, 34.5; 95% CI, 6.52-182). No other risk factors were identified. Of the index field reactions leading to IFA SCIT, 59% were the result of 1 sting, and 87% of subjects experienced only 1 SR before initiation of IFA SCIT. Two of 4 patients who experienced loss of consciousness during the index field reaction required an increased maintenance dose for optimal response. Conclusions IFA SCIT is safe; however, having an SR to skin testing or the presence of large local reactions increases the odds of having an SR to IFA SCIT. The majority of SRs to IFA field stings resulted from 1 sting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.02.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20451988</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACIBY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Administration, Sublingual ; Adult ; Age ; Airway management ; Allergens - therapeutic use ; Allergy and Immunology ; anaphylaxis ; Anaphylaxis - etiology ; Anaphylaxis - immunology ; Anaphylaxis - therapy ; Animals ; Ant ; Ant Venoms - therapeutic use ; Ants - immunology ; Asthma ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Climate change ; Desensitization, Immunologic ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Formicidae ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fundamental immunology ; Humans ; Immunopathology ; immunotherapy ; insect ; Insect Bites and Stings - complications ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Patients ; Phenols ; Retrospective Studies ; risk factors ; safety ; Sarcoidosis. Granulomatous diseases of unproved etiology. Connective tissue diseases. Elastic tissue diseases. Vasculitis ; Skin ; skin test ; Skin Tests ; sting ; systemic reactions ; Unconsciousness ; Venom</subject><ispartof>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2010-06, Vol.125 (6), p.1294-1299</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology</rights><rights>2010 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2010 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jun 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-76b543639fe16e83d7f2baac0496b63d28afdd19920184eab5d6a1332a9bdcc63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-76b543639fe16e83d7f2baac0496b63d28afdd19920184eab5d6a1332a9bdcc63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2010.02.041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22914488$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20451988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>La Shell, Mark S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calabria, Christopher W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, James M., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Imported fire ant field reaction and immunotherapy safety characteristics: The IFACS study</title><title>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</title><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><description>Background Imported fire ants (IFAs) are endemic in the southeastern United States, including Texas; can sting multiple times; and are a well-known cause of anaphylaxis. There are few data available on how many stings typically lead to systemic reactions (SRs). Likewise, there are no reports currently in the literature that characterize the safety of IFA subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). Objective We sought to analyze a case-cohort sample of patients for IFA SCIT risk factors and to characterize the index field reactions of these patients. Methods A case-cohort study based on a 3-year retrospective chart review (2005-2008) at a single institution was performed for patients receiving IFA SCIT. Field reactions leading to initiation of IFA SCIT were also reviewed. Results Seventy-seven patients (40 female patients; mean age, 34 years) received 1,887 injections, and 7 patients experienced 8 SRs, for a rate of 0.4% per injection and 9.1% per patient. SRs were mild. Having an SR to skin testing was associated with increased odds of having an SR to IFA SCIT (odds ratio, 4.75; 95% CI, 1.13-20.0), as were large local reactions (odds ratio, 34.5; 95% CI, 6.52-182). No other risk factors were identified. Of the index field reactions leading to IFA SCIT, 59% were the result of 1 sting, and 87% of subjects experienced only 1 SR before initiation of IFA SCIT. Two of 4 patients who experienced loss of consciousness during the index field reaction required an increased maintenance dose for optimal response. Conclusions IFA SCIT is safe; however, having an SR to skin testing or the presence of large local reactions increases the odds of having an SR to IFA SCIT. The majority of SRs to IFA field stings resulted from 1 sting.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Administration, Sublingual</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Allergens - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Allergy and Immunology</subject><subject>anaphylaxis</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis - etiology</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis - immunology</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis - therapy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ant</subject><subject>Ant Venoms - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Ants - immunology</subject><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Desensitization, Immunologic</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Formicidae</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental immunology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunopathology</subject><subject>immunotherapy</subject><subject>insect</subject><subject>Insect Bites and Stings - complications</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>risk factors</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>Sarcoidosis. Granulomatous diseases of unproved etiology. Connective tissue diseases. Elastic tissue diseases. Vasculitis</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>skin test</subject><subject>Skin Tests</subject><subject>sting</subject><subject>systemic reactions</subject><subject>Unconsciousness</subject><subject>Venom</subject><issn>0091-6749</issn><issn>1097-6825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuLFDEUhYMoTs_oH3AhBSKzqjbvSmQQhsbRhgEXM27chFRyi05bjzapEurfm7JbB2ahqySX79zk5FyEXhG8JpjId_v13rqwpjgXMF1jTp6gFcG6KqWi4ilaYaxJKSuuz9B5Snucz0zp5-iMYi6IVmqFvm27wxBH8EUTIhS2H_MGWl9EsG4MQ59LvghdN_XDuINoD3ORbAPjXLidjZmBGNIYXHpf3O-g2N5cb-6KNE5-foGeNbZN8PK0XqCvNx_vN5_L2y-ftpvr29IJKceykrXgTDLdAJGgmK8aWlvrMNeylsxTZRvvidbZp-Jga-GlJYxRq2vvnGQX6PLY9xCHHxOk0XQhOWhb28MwJVMJrqSmHP-fZIwwIbHK5JtH5H6YYp9tGCIwV0RjVmWKHikXh5QiNOYQQ2fjbAg2S0Rmb5aIzBKRwdTkiLLo9an1VHfg_0r-ZJKBtyfAJmfbJtrehfTAUU04_81dHTnIn_szQDTJBegd-JykG40fwr_f8eGR3LWhD_nG7zBDevBrUhaYu2WYllkieYwErgT7BSurwr0</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>La Shell, Mark S., MD</creator><creator>Calabria, Christopher W., MD</creator><creator>Quinn, James M., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Imported fire ant field reaction and immunotherapy safety characteristics: The IFACS study</title><author>La Shell, Mark S., MD ; Calabria, Christopher W., MD ; Quinn, James M., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-76b543639fe16e83d7f2baac0496b63d28afdd19920184eab5d6a1332a9bdcc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Administration, Sublingual</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Allergens - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Allergy and Immunology</topic><topic>anaphylaxis</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis - etiology</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis - immunology</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis - therapy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ant</topic><topic>Ant Venoms - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Ants - immunology</topic><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Desensitization, Immunologic</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Formicidae</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental immunology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunopathology</topic><topic>immunotherapy</topic><topic>insect</topic><topic>Insect Bites and Stings - complications</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>risk factors</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>Sarcoidosis. Granulomatous diseases of unproved etiology. Connective tissue diseases. Elastic tissue diseases. Vasculitis</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>skin test</topic><topic>Skin Tests</topic><topic>sting</topic><topic>systemic reactions</topic><topic>Unconsciousness</topic><topic>Venom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>La Shell, Mark S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calabria, Christopher W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, James M., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>La Shell, Mark S., MD</au><au>Calabria, Christopher W., MD</au><au>Quinn, James M., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imported fire ant field reaction and immunotherapy safety characteristics: The IFACS study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1294</spage><epage>1299</epage><pages>1294-1299</pages><issn>0091-6749</issn><eissn>1097-6825</eissn><coden>JACIBY</coden><abstract>Background Imported fire ants (IFAs) are endemic in the southeastern United States, including Texas; can sting multiple times; and are a well-known cause of anaphylaxis. There are few data available on how many stings typically lead to systemic reactions (SRs). Likewise, there are no reports currently in the literature that characterize the safety of IFA subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). Objective We sought to analyze a case-cohort sample of patients for IFA SCIT risk factors and to characterize the index field reactions of these patients. Methods A case-cohort study based on a 3-year retrospective chart review (2005-2008) at a single institution was performed for patients receiving IFA SCIT. Field reactions leading to initiation of IFA SCIT were also reviewed. Results Seventy-seven patients (40 female patients; mean age, 34 years) received 1,887 injections, and 7 patients experienced 8 SRs, for a rate of 0.4% per injection and 9.1% per patient. SRs were mild. Having an SR to skin testing was associated with increased odds of having an SR to IFA SCIT (odds ratio, 4.75; 95% CI, 1.13-20.0), as were large local reactions (odds ratio, 34.5; 95% CI, 6.52-182). No other risk factors were identified. Of the index field reactions leading to IFA SCIT, 59% were the result of 1 sting, and 87% of subjects experienced only 1 SR before initiation of IFA SCIT. Two of 4 patients who experienced loss of consciousness during the index field reaction required an increased maintenance dose for optimal response. Conclusions IFA SCIT is safe; however, having an SR to skin testing or the presence of large local reactions increases the odds of having an SR to IFA SCIT. The majority of SRs to IFA field stings resulted from 1 sting.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20451988</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaci.2010.02.041</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-6749
ispartof Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2010-06, Vol.125 (6), p.1294-1299
issn 0091-6749
1097-6825
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754869240
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Abdomen
Administration, Sublingual
Adult
Age
Airway management
Allergens - therapeutic use
Allergy and Immunology
anaphylaxis
Anaphylaxis - etiology
Anaphylaxis - immunology
Anaphylaxis - therapy
Animals
Ant
Ant Venoms - therapeutic use
Ants - immunology
Asthma
Biological and medical sciences
Case-Control Studies
Climate change
Desensitization, Immunologic
Feasibility Studies
Female
Formicidae
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fundamental immunology
Humans
Immunopathology
immunotherapy
insect
Insect Bites and Stings - complications
Male
Medical sciences
Patients
Phenols
Retrospective Studies
risk factors
safety
Sarcoidosis. Granulomatous diseases of unproved etiology. Connective tissue diseases. Elastic tissue diseases. Vasculitis
Skin
skin test
Skin Tests
sting
systemic reactions
Unconsciousness
Venom
title Imported fire ant field reaction and immunotherapy safety characteristics: The IFACS study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A05%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imported%20fire%20ant%20field%20reaction%20and%20immunotherapy%20safety%20characteristics:%20The%20IFACS%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20allergy%20and%20clinical%20immunology&rft.au=La%20Shell,%20Mark%20S.,%20MD&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1294&rft.epage=1299&rft.pages=1294-1299&rft.issn=0091-6749&rft.eissn=1097-6825&rft.coden=JACIBY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaci.2010.02.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754869240%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504819037&rft_id=info:pmid/20451988&rft_els_id=S0091674910005075&rfr_iscdi=true