Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: an analysis of semantic strategies

Five experiments (N = 25, 49, 25, 27, & 24 undergraduates) were conducted to examine two distinct patterns of context effects: (1) facilitation for target words in a related context, & (2) interference for target words in an unrelated context. The overall characteristics of the stimulus list...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Memory & cognition 1980-11, Vol.8 (6), p.493-512
1. Verfasser: Becker, C A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 512
container_issue 6
container_start_page 493
container_title Memory & cognition
container_volume 8
creator Becker, C A
description Five experiments (N = 25, 49, 25, 27, & 24 undergraduates) were conducted to examine two distinct patterns of context effects: (1) facilitation for target words in a related context, & (2) interference for target words in an unrelated context. The overall characteristics of the stimulus list were found to be the controlling factor. Facilitation dominance was found for materials with semantic relationships of consistent strength & interference dominance for materials with a wide range of semantic relationship strengths. The two patterns are attributed to two strategies available to Ss for using context information. 5 Tables, 5 Figures, 22 References. Modified HA
doi_str_mv 10.3758/BF03213769
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75472940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>58127772</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-f2a03333dbdc223a1fe56d272c522d5842a9ff710bc1ee2859f52153f9b11c163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLxTAQBeAgil4fG_dCQHAhVDOTpmncqfgCwYWK7kpumkikt9Ek9fHvrXhVcOMwMJuPA8MhZBPYHpei3j86ZRyBy0otkAkIjoVQZbVIJowpVgiG9ytkNaVHxpgQqlomyxJBgWQTcndtZ7rP3lAT-mzfMrXOWZMT9T198WnQHX0NsaXRmvDQ--xDf0B1P67u3pNPNDiavjNSjjrbB2_TOllyukt2Y37XyO3pyc3xeXF5dXZxfHhZmBLqXDjUjI_TTluDyDU4K6oWJRqB2Iq6RK2ck8CmBqzFWigncPzQqSmAgYqvkZ2v3KcYngebcjPzydiu070NQ2qkKCWqkv0LRQ0opcQRbv-Bj2GI47epAVQceCVAjmr3S5kYUorWNU_Rz3R8b4A1n6U0v6WMeGseOUxntv2h8xb4B7FLhfU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1293136517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: an analysis of semantic strategies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Becker, C A</creator><creatorcontrib>Becker, C A</creatorcontrib><description>Five experiments (N = 25, 49, 25, 27, &amp; 24 undergraduates) were conducted to examine two distinct patterns of context effects: (1) facilitation for target words in a related context, &amp; (2) interference for target words in an unrelated context. The overall characteristics of the stimulus list were found to be the controlling factor. Facilitation dominance was found for materials with semantic relationships of consistent strength &amp; interference dominance for materials with a wide range of semantic relationship strengths. The two patterns are attributed to two strategies available to Ss for using context information. 5 Tables, 5 Figures, 22 References. Modified HA</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/BF03213769</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7219170</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MYCGAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Psychonomic Society</publisher><subject>Communication disorders ; Humans ; Psycholinguistics ; Reading ; Semantics ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Memory &amp; cognition, 1980-11, Vol.8 (6), p.493-512</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-f2a03333dbdc223a1fe56d272c522d5842a9ff710bc1ee2859f52153f9b11c163</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7219170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becker, C A</creatorcontrib><title>Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: an analysis of semantic strategies</title><title>Memory &amp; cognition</title><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><description>Five experiments (N = 25, 49, 25, 27, &amp; 24 undergraduates) were conducted to examine two distinct patterns of context effects: (1) facilitation for target words in a related context, &amp; (2) interference for target words in an unrelated context. The overall characteristics of the stimulus list were found to be the controlling factor. Facilitation dominance was found for materials with semantic relationships of consistent strength &amp; interference dominance for materials with a wide range of semantic relationship strengths. The two patterns are attributed to two strategies available to Ss for using context information. 5 Tables, 5 Figures, 22 References. Modified HA</description><subject>Communication disorders</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtLxTAQBeAgil4fG_dCQHAhVDOTpmncqfgCwYWK7kpumkikt9Ek9fHvrXhVcOMwMJuPA8MhZBPYHpei3j86ZRyBy0otkAkIjoVQZbVIJowpVgiG9ytkNaVHxpgQqlomyxJBgWQTcndtZ7rP3lAT-mzfMrXOWZMT9T198WnQHX0NsaXRmvDQ--xDf0B1P67u3pNPNDiavjNSjjrbB2_TOllyukt2Y37XyO3pyc3xeXF5dXZxfHhZmBLqXDjUjI_TTluDyDU4K6oWJRqB2Iq6RK2ck8CmBqzFWigncPzQqSmAgYqvkZ2v3KcYngebcjPzydiu070NQ2qkKCWqkv0LRQ0opcQRbv-Bj2GI47epAVQceCVAjmr3S5kYUorWNU_Rz3R8b4A1n6U0v6WMeGseOUxntv2h8xb4B7FLhfU</recordid><startdate>198011</startdate><enddate>198011</enddate><creator>Becker, C A</creator><general>Psychonomic Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SDSKB</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198011</creationdate><title>Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: an analysis of semantic strategies</title><author>Becker, C A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-f2a03333dbdc223a1fe56d272c522d5842a9ff710bc1ee2859f52153f9b11c163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Communication disorders</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becker, C A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 43</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Memory &amp; cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becker, C A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: an analysis of semantic strategies</atitle><jtitle>Memory &amp; cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><date>1980-11</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>493-512</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><coden>MYCGAO</coden><abstract>Five experiments (N = 25, 49, 25, 27, &amp; 24 undergraduates) were conducted to examine two distinct patterns of context effects: (1) facilitation for target words in a related context, &amp; (2) interference for target words in an unrelated context. The overall characteristics of the stimulus list were found to be the controlling factor. Facilitation dominance was found for materials with semantic relationships of consistent strength &amp; interference dominance for materials with a wide range of semantic relationship strengths. The two patterns are attributed to two strategies available to Ss for using context information. 5 Tables, 5 Figures, 22 References. Modified HA</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society</pub><pmid>7219170</pmid><doi>10.3758/BF03213769</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-502X
ispartof Memory & cognition, 1980-11, Vol.8 (6), p.493-512
issn 0090-502X
1532-5946
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75472940
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Communication disorders
Humans
Psycholinguistics
Reading
Semantics
Visual Perception
title Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: an analysis of semantic strategies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T02%3A47%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Semantic%20context%20effects%20in%20visual%20word%20recognition:%20an%20analysis%20of%20semantic%20strategies&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=Becker,%20C%20A&rft.date=1980-11&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=493-512&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft.coden=MYCGAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/BF03213769&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58127772%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1293136517&rft_id=info:pmid/7219170&rfr_iscdi=true