A study of tropospheric ozone column enhancements over North America using satellite data and a global chemical transport model

Tropospheric ozone columns (TCOs) have been calculated from the differences between the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Total Ozone Mapping System (TOMS) total ozone (level 2 version 3) and the Aura Microwave Limb Sounding (MLS) measurements of stratospheric ozone (version 2.2). These OMI‐MLS...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2010-04, Vol.115 (D8), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Qing, Cunnold, Derek M., Choi, Yunsoo, Wang, Yuhang, Nam, Junsang, Wang, Hsiang-Jui, Froidevaux, Lucien, Thompson, Anne M., Bhartia, P. K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue D8
container_start_page
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
container_volume 115
creator Yang, Qing
Cunnold, Derek M.
Choi, Yunsoo
Wang, Yuhang
Nam, Junsang
Wang, Hsiang-Jui
Froidevaux, Lucien
Thompson, Anne M.
Bhartia, P. K.
description Tropospheric ozone columns (TCOs) have been calculated from the differences between the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Total Ozone Mapping System (TOMS) total ozone (level 2 version 3) and the Aura Microwave Limb Sounding (MLS) measurements of stratospheric ozone (version 2.2). These OMI‐MLS TCOs were compared against ozonesonde measurements from the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment (INTEX) Ozonesonde Network Study (IONS) campaign over North America in spring and summer, 2006. The OMI‐MLS potential vorticity mapped TCOs are smaller than IONS TCOs by 5.9 DU (9.9 ppb when expressed as volume mixing ratio) with a standard deviation of the differences of 8.4 DU (14.4 ppb) and a standard error of the mean differences of approximately 0.5 DU (0.7 ppb). Compared to previously published versions, these OMI‐MLS TCOs are an additional 2 DU smaller relative to ozonesonde measurements. The extra 2 DU arises from changes in OMI (∼−3 to −6 DU) and MLS (−1 to 3 DU), giving a net change of −2 DU. OMI‐MLS TCOs derived using OMI Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS) show similar differences in summer, but these TCOs are smaller than the sondes by only 2 DU (5 ppb) in spring. OMI‐MLS TCOs derived from TOMS total ozone retrievals lead to better results when validated against IONS data, with less noise and a better seasonal consistency. Tropospheric ozone columns were also compared to those from GEOS‐Chem model simulations in main distribution features. In the spring and summer of 2005 and 2006, the most dominant enhancement features are a tongue of enhancement stretching from around Yellow Sea northeastward into the Pacific and an enhancement band over the North America centered over the eastern United States and the adjacent ocean. The OMI‐MLS TCO enhancements over the western Pacific and over the eastern United States increased from March to June and then decreased. In the GEOS‐Chem model simulations, the monthly variation tendency is similar to that of satellite data over the west Pacific but the decrease tendency from June into August over eastern United States is less dramatic. A springtime TCO enhancement event of a few days duration over coastal California was investigated to demonstrate the ability of OMI‐MLS mapped TCO columns in capturing ozone enhancements associated with stratospheric intrusions and trans‐Pacific transport. Tagged ozone model simulations support the stratospheric contributions to the high TCOs over coastal Calif
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2009JD012616
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754561847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754561847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4075-8b06a1e02cf6aa80870ad7952a51f234913df0cf988089246de32d5ae3eb120b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxSMEEqu2Nz6AhYTgQGDs-E9yXHXblKoqEiriaM06k25KEi92AmwvfHW82qpCHDoXH-b33ozfZNkrDh84iOqjAKguV8CF5vpZthBc6VwIEM-zBXBZ5iCEeZmdxHgHqaTSEvgi-7NkcZqbHfMtm4Lf-rjdUOgc8_d-JOZ8Pw8jo3GDo6OBxiky_5MCu_Zh2rDlsGeRzbEbb1nEifq-m4g1OCHDsWHIbnu_xp65DQ2J7NMQHOM2qdngG-qPsxct9pFOHt6j7Ov52c3pRX71uf50urzKnQSj8nINGjmBcK1GLKE0gI2plEDFW1HIihdNC66tytSrhNQNFaJRSAWtuYB1cZS9Pfhug_8xU5zs0EWX1sWR_BytUSkRXkqTyHdPktwYkyyNqhL6-j_0zs9hTP-wpQYhoeI8Qe8PkAs-xkCt3YZuwLCzHOz-cvbfyyX8zYMnxpRXm-JyXXzUCFEKKfl-dnHgfnU97Z70tJf1lxVXpVRJlR9UXZzo96MKw3erTWGU_XZd23p1XuuLG21XxV-yqLWI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>860240911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A study of tropospheric ozone column enhancements over North America using satellite data and a global chemical transport model</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Yang, Qing ; Cunnold, Derek M. ; Choi, Yunsoo ; Wang, Yuhang ; Nam, Junsang ; Wang, Hsiang-Jui ; Froidevaux, Lucien ; Thompson, Anne M. ; Bhartia, P. K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qing ; Cunnold, Derek M. ; Choi, Yunsoo ; Wang, Yuhang ; Nam, Junsang ; Wang, Hsiang-Jui ; Froidevaux, Lucien ; Thompson, Anne M. ; Bhartia, P. K.</creatorcontrib><description>Tropospheric ozone columns (TCOs) have been calculated from the differences between the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Total Ozone Mapping System (TOMS) total ozone (level 2 version 3) and the Aura Microwave Limb Sounding (MLS) measurements of stratospheric ozone (version 2.2). These OMI‐MLS TCOs were compared against ozonesonde measurements from the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment (INTEX) Ozonesonde Network Study (IONS) campaign over North America in spring and summer, 2006. The OMI‐MLS potential vorticity mapped TCOs are smaller than IONS TCOs by 5.9 DU (9.9 ppb when expressed as volume mixing ratio) with a standard deviation of the differences of 8.4 DU (14.4 ppb) and a standard error of the mean differences of approximately 0.5 DU (0.7 ppb). Compared to previously published versions, these OMI‐MLS TCOs are an additional 2 DU smaller relative to ozonesonde measurements. The extra 2 DU arises from changes in OMI (∼−3 to −6 DU) and MLS (−1 to 3 DU), giving a net change of −2 DU. OMI‐MLS TCOs derived using OMI Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS) show similar differences in summer, but these TCOs are smaller than the sondes by only 2 DU (5 ppb) in spring. OMI‐MLS TCOs derived from TOMS total ozone retrievals lead to better results when validated against IONS data, with less noise and a better seasonal consistency. Tropospheric ozone columns were also compared to those from GEOS‐Chem model simulations in main distribution features. In the spring and summer of 2005 and 2006, the most dominant enhancement features are a tongue of enhancement stretching from around Yellow Sea northeastward into the Pacific and an enhancement band over the North America centered over the eastern United States and the adjacent ocean. The OMI‐MLS TCO enhancements over the western Pacific and over the eastern United States increased from March to June and then decreased. In the GEOS‐Chem model simulations, the monthly variation tendency is similar to that of satellite data over the west Pacific but the decrease tendency from June into August over eastern United States is less dramatic. A springtime TCO enhancement event of a few days duration over coastal California was investigated to demonstrate the ability of OMI‐MLS mapped TCO columns in capturing ozone enhancements associated with stratospheric intrusions and trans‐Pacific transport. Tagged ozone model simulations support the stratospheric contributions to the high TCOs over coastal California and over the Baja peninsula, and meteorological fields indicate that the stratospheric intrusions are associated with Rossby wave breaking events. Furthermore, back trajectory studies and comparisons of GEOS‐Chem standard simulations and sensitivity runs with Asia anthropogenic emissions turned off provide evidence that the high tropospheric ozone columns over coastal California near Santa Barbara, California, has been influenced by cross‐Pacific transport. Two‐day‐average maps of tropospheric ozone columns from Aura OMI‐MLS TCOs also indicate cross‐Pacific propagating features.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2009JD012616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Absorption spectroscopy ; Americas ; Anthropogenic factors ; Atmospheric sciences ; Chemical transport ; Coastal ; Computer simulation ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Emission measurements ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geophysics ; Intrusion ; Ions ; Marine ; Monitoring instruments ; Ozone ; Remote sensing ; Spring ; Springs ; Summer ; Transport ; Troposphere ; tropospheric ozone column</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2010-04, Vol.115 (D8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 by American Geophysical Union</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4075-8b06a1e02cf6aa80870ad7952a51f234913df0cf988089246de32d5ae3eb120b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4075-8b06a1e02cf6aa80870ad7952a51f234913df0cf988089246de32d5ae3eb120b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2009JD012616$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2009JD012616$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11494,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46446,46811,46870</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22824419$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunnold, Derek M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yunsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yuhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Junsang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hsiang-Jui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froidevaux, Lucien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhartia, P. K.</creatorcontrib><title>A study of tropospheric ozone column enhancements over North America using satellite data and a global chemical transport model</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Tropospheric ozone columns (TCOs) have been calculated from the differences between the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Total Ozone Mapping System (TOMS) total ozone (level 2 version 3) and the Aura Microwave Limb Sounding (MLS) measurements of stratospheric ozone (version 2.2). These OMI‐MLS TCOs were compared against ozonesonde measurements from the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment (INTEX) Ozonesonde Network Study (IONS) campaign over North America in spring and summer, 2006. The OMI‐MLS potential vorticity mapped TCOs are smaller than IONS TCOs by 5.9 DU (9.9 ppb when expressed as volume mixing ratio) with a standard deviation of the differences of 8.4 DU (14.4 ppb) and a standard error of the mean differences of approximately 0.5 DU (0.7 ppb). Compared to previously published versions, these OMI‐MLS TCOs are an additional 2 DU smaller relative to ozonesonde measurements. The extra 2 DU arises from changes in OMI (∼−3 to −6 DU) and MLS (−1 to 3 DU), giving a net change of −2 DU. OMI‐MLS TCOs derived using OMI Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS) show similar differences in summer, but these TCOs are smaller than the sondes by only 2 DU (5 ppb) in spring. OMI‐MLS TCOs derived from TOMS total ozone retrievals lead to better results when validated against IONS data, with less noise and a better seasonal consistency. Tropospheric ozone columns were also compared to those from GEOS‐Chem model simulations in main distribution features. In the spring and summer of 2005 and 2006, the most dominant enhancement features are a tongue of enhancement stretching from around Yellow Sea northeastward into the Pacific and an enhancement band over the North America centered over the eastern United States and the adjacent ocean. The OMI‐MLS TCO enhancements over the western Pacific and over the eastern United States increased from March to June and then decreased. In the GEOS‐Chem model simulations, the monthly variation tendency is similar to that of satellite data over the west Pacific but the decrease tendency from June into August over eastern United States is less dramatic. A springtime TCO enhancement event of a few days duration over coastal California was investigated to demonstrate the ability of OMI‐MLS mapped TCO columns in capturing ozone enhancements associated with stratospheric intrusions and trans‐Pacific transport. Tagged ozone model simulations support the stratospheric contributions to the high TCOs over coastal California and over the Baja peninsula, and meteorological fields indicate that the stratospheric intrusions are associated with Rossby wave breaking events. Furthermore, back trajectory studies and comparisons of GEOS‐Chem standard simulations and sensitivity runs with Asia anthropogenic emissions turned off provide evidence that the high tropospheric ozone columns over coastal California near Santa Barbara, California, has been influenced by cross‐Pacific transport. Two‐day‐average maps of tropospheric ozone columns from Aura OMI‐MLS TCOs also indicate cross‐Pacific propagating features.</description><subject>Absorption spectroscopy</subject><subject>Americas</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Atmospheric sciences</subject><subject>Chemical transport</subject><subject>Coastal</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Intrusion</subject><subject>Ions</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Monitoring instruments</subject><subject>Ozone</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Springs</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Troposphere</subject><subject>tropospheric ozone column</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxSMEEqu2Nz6AhYTgQGDs-E9yXHXblKoqEiriaM06k25KEi92AmwvfHW82qpCHDoXH-b33ozfZNkrDh84iOqjAKguV8CF5vpZthBc6VwIEM-zBXBZ5iCEeZmdxHgHqaTSEvgi-7NkcZqbHfMtm4Lf-rjdUOgc8_d-JOZ8Pw8jo3GDo6OBxiky_5MCu_Zh2rDlsGeRzbEbb1nEifq-m4g1OCHDsWHIbnu_xp65DQ2J7NMQHOM2qdngG-qPsxct9pFOHt6j7Ov52c3pRX71uf50urzKnQSj8nINGjmBcK1GLKE0gI2plEDFW1HIihdNC66tytSrhNQNFaJRSAWtuYB1cZS9Pfhug_8xU5zs0EWX1sWR_BytUSkRXkqTyHdPktwYkyyNqhL6-j_0zs9hTP-wpQYhoeI8Qe8PkAs-xkCt3YZuwLCzHOz-cvbfyyX8zYMnxpRXm-JyXXzUCFEKKfl-dnHgfnU97Z70tJf1lxVXpVRJlR9UXZzo96MKw3erTWGU_XZd23p1XuuLG21XxV-yqLWI</recordid><startdate>20100427</startdate><enddate>20100427</enddate><creator>Yang, Qing</creator><creator>Cunnold, Derek M.</creator><creator>Choi, Yunsoo</creator><creator>Wang, Yuhang</creator><creator>Nam, Junsang</creator><creator>Wang, Hsiang-Jui</creator><creator>Froidevaux, Lucien</creator><creator>Thompson, Anne M.</creator><creator>Bhartia, P. K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100427</creationdate><title>A study of tropospheric ozone column enhancements over North America using satellite data and a global chemical transport model</title><author>Yang, Qing ; Cunnold, Derek M. ; Choi, Yunsoo ; Wang, Yuhang ; Nam, Junsang ; Wang, Hsiang-Jui ; Froidevaux, Lucien ; Thompson, Anne M. ; Bhartia, P. K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4075-8b06a1e02cf6aa80870ad7952a51f234913df0cf988089246de32d5ae3eb120b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Absorption spectroscopy</topic><topic>Americas</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Atmospheric sciences</topic><topic>Chemical transport</topic><topic>Coastal</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Intrusion</topic><topic>Ions</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Monitoring instruments</topic><topic>Ozone</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Springs</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Troposphere</topic><topic>tropospheric ozone column</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunnold, Derek M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yunsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yuhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Junsang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hsiang-Jui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froidevaux, Lucien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhartia, P. K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Qing</au><au>Cunnold, Derek M.</au><au>Choi, Yunsoo</au><au>Wang, Yuhang</au><au>Nam, Junsang</au><au>Wang, Hsiang-Jui</au><au>Froidevaux, Lucien</au><au>Thompson, Anne M.</au><au>Bhartia, P. K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A study of tropospheric ozone column enhancements over North America using satellite data and a global chemical transport model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2010-04-27</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>D8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Tropospheric ozone columns (TCOs) have been calculated from the differences between the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Total Ozone Mapping System (TOMS) total ozone (level 2 version 3) and the Aura Microwave Limb Sounding (MLS) measurements of stratospheric ozone (version 2.2). These OMI‐MLS TCOs were compared against ozonesonde measurements from the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment (INTEX) Ozonesonde Network Study (IONS) campaign over North America in spring and summer, 2006. The OMI‐MLS potential vorticity mapped TCOs are smaller than IONS TCOs by 5.9 DU (9.9 ppb when expressed as volume mixing ratio) with a standard deviation of the differences of 8.4 DU (14.4 ppb) and a standard error of the mean differences of approximately 0.5 DU (0.7 ppb). Compared to previously published versions, these OMI‐MLS TCOs are an additional 2 DU smaller relative to ozonesonde measurements. The extra 2 DU arises from changes in OMI (∼−3 to −6 DU) and MLS (−1 to 3 DU), giving a net change of −2 DU. OMI‐MLS TCOs derived using OMI Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS) show similar differences in summer, but these TCOs are smaller than the sondes by only 2 DU (5 ppb) in spring. OMI‐MLS TCOs derived from TOMS total ozone retrievals lead to better results when validated against IONS data, with less noise and a better seasonal consistency. Tropospheric ozone columns were also compared to those from GEOS‐Chem model simulations in main distribution features. In the spring and summer of 2005 and 2006, the most dominant enhancement features are a tongue of enhancement stretching from around Yellow Sea northeastward into the Pacific and an enhancement band over the North America centered over the eastern United States and the adjacent ocean. The OMI‐MLS TCO enhancements over the western Pacific and over the eastern United States increased from March to June and then decreased. In the GEOS‐Chem model simulations, the monthly variation tendency is similar to that of satellite data over the west Pacific but the decrease tendency from June into August over eastern United States is less dramatic. A springtime TCO enhancement event of a few days duration over coastal California was investigated to demonstrate the ability of OMI‐MLS mapped TCO columns in capturing ozone enhancements associated with stratospheric intrusions and trans‐Pacific transport. Tagged ozone model simulations support the stratospheric contributions to the high TCOs over coastal California and over the Baja peninsula, and meteorological fields indicate that the stratospheric intrusions are associated with Rossby wave breaking events. Furthermore, back trajectory studies and comparisons of GEOS‐Chem standard simulations and sensitivity runs with Asia anthropogenic emissions turned off provide evidence that the high tropospheric ozone columns over coastal California near Santa Barbara, California, has been influenced by cross‐Pacific transport. Two‐day‐average maps of tropospheric ozone columns from Aura OMI‐MLS TCOs also indicate cross‐Pacific propagating features.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2009JD012616</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2010-04, Vol.115 (D8), p.n/a
issn 0148-0227
2169-897X
2156-2202
2169-8996
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754561847
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Absorption spectroscopy
Americas
Anthropogenic factors
Atmospheric sciences
Chemical transport
Coastal
Computer simulation
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Emission measurements
Exact sciences and technology
Geophysics
Intrusion
Ions
Marine
Monitoring instruments
Ozone
Remote sensing
Spring
Springs
Summer
Transport
Troposphere
tropospheric ozone column
title A study of tropospheric ozone column enhancements over North America using satellite data and a global chemical transport model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A54%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20study%20of%20tropospheric%20ozone%20column%20enhancements%20over%20North%20America%20using%20satellite%20data%20and%20a%20global%20chemical%20transport%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research:%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Yang,%20Qing&rft.date=2010-04-27&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=D8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2009JD012616&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754561847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=860240911&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true