Seasonality of monoterpene emission potentials in Quercus ilex and Pinus pinea: Implications for regional VOC emissions modeling

VOC emissions from terrestrial ecosystems provide one of the principal controls over oxidative photochemistry in the lower atmosphere and the resulting air pollution. Such atmospheric processes have strong seasonal cycles. Although similar seasonal cycles in VOC emissions from terrestrial ecosystems...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research. B. Solid Earth 2009-11, Vol.114 (D22), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Keenan, Trevor, Niinemets, Ülo, Sabate, Santi, Gracia, Carlos, Peñuelas, Josep
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue D22
container_start_page
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research. B. Solid Earth
container_volume 114
creator Keenan, Trevor
Niinemets, Ülo
Sabate, Santi
Gracia, Carlos
Peñuelas, Josep
description VOC emissions from terrestrial ecosystems provide one of the principal controls over oxidative photochemistry in the lower atmosphere and the resulting air pollution. Such atmospheric processes have strong seasonal cycles. Although similar seasonal cycles in VOC emissions from terrestrial ecosystems have been reported, regional emissions inventories generally omit the effect of seasonality on emissions. We compiled measurement data on seasonal variations in monoterpene emissions potentials for two evergreen species (Quercus ilex and Pinus pinea) and used these data to construct two contrasting seasonal response functions for the inclusion in monoterpene emission models. We included these responses in the Niinemets et al. model and compared simulation results to those of the MEGAN model, both with and without its predicted seasonality. The effect of seasonality on regional monoterpene emissions inventories for European Mediterranean forests dominated by these species was tested for both models, using the GOTILWA+ biosphere model platform. The consideration of seasonality in the Niinemets et al. model reduced total estimated annual monoterpene emissions by up to 65% in some regions, with largest reductions at lower latitudes. The MEGAN model demonstrated a much weaker seasonal response than that in the Niinemets et al. model, and did not capture the between species seasonality differences found in this study. Results suggest that previous regional model inventories based on one fixed emission factor likely overestimate regional emissions, and species‐specific expressions of seasonality may be necessary. The consideration of seasonality both largely reduces monoterpene emissions estimates, and changes their expected seasonal distribution.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2009JD011904
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754560510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754560510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5104-d704e3ea7dea87b2803d6a12dd84e2757f73e4e5b03a70ada86e7050614a18103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEEqvSGz_A4gAcCMz4I85yo1u6bVW15ftoucls5ZK1g52o3Rs_HYdFFeKwwhd7rOd9X2s8RfEU4TUCn7_hAPPTQ0Ccg3xQzDiqquQc-MNiBijrEjjXj4v9lG4gL6kqCTgrfn4im4K3nRs2LKzYOvgwUOzJE6O1S8kFz_p85Qdnu8ScZx9Gis2Yjx3dMetbdul8Lnvnyb5lJ-u-c40dsi6xVYgs0rWbAtjXi8W9ZcpBLXXOXz8pHq2yMe3_2feKL0fvPy-Oy7OL5cni3VnZKARZthokCbK6JVvrK16DaCuLvG1rSVwrvdKCJKkrEFaDbW1dkQYFFUqLNYLYK15sffsYfoyUBpOf0lDXWU9hTEar3BJQ_0NKpSF3r8rk852kqCTXHCfw5U4QtdaIHPWU_uwf9CaMMfcvmboCwRX_HfxqCzUxpBRpZfro1jZuDIKZpsH8PQ0ZF1v8Nv_ZZidrTpcfD1EpNanKrcqlge7uVTZ-N5UWWplv50tzCfxcLvWxORC_AErFxAU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>860325206</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seasonality of monoterpene emission potentials in Quercus ilex and Pinus pinea: Implications for regional VOC emissions modeling</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Keenan, Trevor ; Niinemets, Ülo ; Sabate, Santi ; Gracia, Carlos ; Peñuelas, Josep</creator><creatorcontrib>Keenan, Trevor ; Niinemets, Ülo ; Sabate, Santi ; Gracia, Carlos ; Peñuelas, Josep</creatorcontrib><description>VOC emissions from terrestrial ecosystems provide one of the principal controls over oxidative photochemistry in the lower atmosphere and the resulting air pollution. Such atmospheric processes have strong seasonal cycles. Although similar seasonal cycles in VOC emissions from terrestrial ecosystems have been reported, regional emissions inventories generally omit the effect of seasonality on emissions. We compiled measurement data on seasonal variations in monoterpene emissions potentials for two evergreen species (Quercus ilex and Pinus pinea) and used these data to construct two contrasting seasonal response functions for the inclusion in monoterpene emission models. We included these responses in the Niinemets et al. model and compared simulation results to those of the MEGAN model, both with and without its predicted seasonality. The effect of seasonality on regional monoterpene emissions inventories for European Mediterranean forests dominated by these species was tested for both models, using the GOTILWA+ biosphere model platform. The consideration of seasonality in the Niinemets et al. model reduced total estimated annual monoterpene emissions by up to 65% in some regions, with largest reductions at lower latitudes. The MEGAN model demonstrated a much weaker seasonal response than that in the Niinemets et al. model, and did not capture the between species seasonality differences found in this study. Results suggest that previous regional model inventories based on one fixed emission factor likely overestimate regional emissions, and species‐specific expressions of seasonality may be necessary. The consideration of seasonality both largely reduces monoterpene emissions estimates, and changes their expected seasonal distribution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2009JD011904</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Atmospheric aerosols ; Atmospheric sciences ; Biosphere ; Climate change ; Earth ; Ecosystems ; Emission ; Emission inventories ; Emission measurements ; Emissions control ; Geobiology ; Geophysics ; Holm oak ; Inventories ; Italian stone pine ; Mathematical models ; Photochemistry ; Pinus pinea ; Quercus ilex ; Regional ; regional inventory ; Seasonal distribution ; Seasonal variations ; seasonality ; Stockpiling ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; VOC emissions ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research. B. Solid Earth, 2009-11, Vol.114 (D22), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>Copyright 2009 by American Geophysical Union</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5104-d704e3ea7dea87b2803d6a12dd84e2757f73e4e5b03a70ada86e7050614a18103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5104-d704e3ea7dea87b2803d6a12dd84e2757f73e4e5b03a70ada86e7050614a18103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2009JD011904$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2009JD011904$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46468,46833,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keenan, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niinemets, Ülo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabate, Santi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gracia, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peñuelas, Josep</creatorcontrib><title>Seasonality of monoterpene emission potentials in Quercus ilex and Pinus pinea: Implications for regional VOC emissions modeling</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research. B. Solid Earth</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>VOC emissions from terrestrial ecosystems provide one of the principal controls over oxidative photochemistry in the lower atmosphere and the resulting air pollution. Such atmospheric processes have strong seasonal cycles. Although similar seasonal cycles in VOC emissions from terrestrial ecosystems have been reported, regional emissions inventories generally omit the effect of seasonality on emissions. We compiled measurement data on seasonal variations in monoterpene emissions potentials for two evergreen species (Quercus ilex and Pinus pinea) and used these data to construct two contrasting seasonal response functions for the inclusion in monoterpene emission models. We included these responses in the Niinemets et al. model and compared simulation results to those of the MEGAN model, both with and without its predicted seasonality. The effect of seasonality on regional monoterpene emissions inventories for European Mediterranean forests dominated by these species was tested for both models, using the GOTILWA+ biosphere model platform. The consideration of seasonality in the Niinemets et al. model reduced total estimated annual monoterpene emissions by up to 65% in some regions, with largest reductions at lower latitudes. The MEGAN model demonstrated a much weaker seasonal response than that in the Niinemets et al. model, and did not capture the between species seasonality differences found in this study. Results suggest that previous regional model inventories based on one fixed emission factor likely overestimate regional emissions, and species‐specific expressions of seasonality may be necessary. The consideration of seasonality both largely reduces monoterpene emissions estimates, and changes their expected seasonal distribution.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric aerosols</subject><subject>Atmospheric sciences</subject><subject>Biosphere</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>Emission inventories</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Geobiology</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Holm oak</subject><subject>Inventories</subject><subject>Italian stone pine</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Photochemistry</subject><subject>Pinus pinea</subject><subject>Quercus ilex</subject><subject>Regional</subject><subject>regional inventory</subject><subject>Seasonal distribution</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>seasonality</subject><subject>Stockpiling</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>VOC emissions</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEEqvSGz_A4gAcCMz4I85yo1u6bVW15ftoucls5ZK1g52o3Rs_HYdFFeKwwhd7rOd9X2s8RfEU4TUCn7_hAPPTQ0Ccg3xQzDiqquQc-MNiBijrEjjXj4v9lG4gL6kqCTgrfn4im4K3nRs2LKzYOvgwUOzJE6O1S8kFz_p85Qdnu8ScZx9Gis2Yjx3dMetbdul8Lnvnyb5lJ-u-c40dsi6xVYgs0rWbAtjXi8W9ZcpBLXXOXz8pHq2yMe3_2feKL0fvPy-Oy7OL5cni3VnZKARZthokCbK6JVvrK16DaCuLvG1rSVwrvdKCJKkrEFaDbW1dkQYFFUqLNYLYK15sffsYfoyUBpOf0lDXWU9hTEar3BJQ_0NKpSF3r8rk852kqCTXHCfw5U4QtdaIHPWU_uwf9CaMMfcvmboCwRX_HfxqCzUxpBRpZfro1jZuDIKZpsH8PQ0ZF1v8Nv_ZZidrTpcfD1EpNanKrcqlge7uVTZ-N5UWWplv50tzCfxcLvWxORC_AErFxAU</recordid><startdate>20091127</startdate><enddate>20091127</enddate><creator>Keenan, Trevor</creator><creator>Niinemets, Ülo</creator><creator>Sabate, Santi</creator><creator>Gracia, Carlos</creator><creator>Peñuelas, Josep</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091127</creationdate><title>Seasonality of monoterpene emission potentials in Quercus ilex and Pinus pinea: Implications for regional VOC emissions modeling</title><author>Keenan, Trevor ; Niinemets, Ülo ; Sabate, Santi ; Gracia, Carlos ; Peñuelas, Josep</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5104-d704e3ea7dea87b2803d6a12dd84e2757f73e4e5b03a70ada86e7050614a18103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric aerosols</topic><topic>Atmospheric sciences</topic><topic>Biosphere</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>Emission inventories</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Geobiology</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Holm oak</topic><topic>Inventories</topic><topic>Italian stone pine</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Photochemistry</topic><topic>Pinus pinea</topic><topic>Quercus ilex</topic><topic>Regional</topic><topic>regional inventory</topic><topic>Seasonal distribution</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>seasonality</topic><topic>Stockpiling</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>VOC emissions</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keenan, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niinemets, Ülo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabate, Santi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gracia, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peñuelas, Josep</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. B. Solid Earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keenan, Trevor</au><au>Niinemets, Ülo</au><au>Sabate, Santi</au><au>Gracia, Carlos</au><au>Peñuelas, Josep</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seasonality of monoterpene emission potentials in Quercus ilex and Pinus pinea: Implications for regional VOC emissions modeling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. B. Solid Earth</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2009-11-27</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>D22</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>VOC emissions from terrestrial ecosystems provide one of the principal controls over oxidative photochemistry in the lower atmosphere and the resulting air pollution. Such atmospheric processes have strong seasonal cycles. Although similar seasonal cycles in VOC emissions from terrestrial ecosystems have been reported, regional emissions inventories generally omit the effect of seasonality on emissions. We compiled measurement data on seasonal variations in monoterpene emissions potentials for two evergreen species (Quercus ilex and Pinus pinea) and used these data to construct two contrasting seasonal response functions for the inclusion in monoterpene emission models. We included these responses in the Niinemets et al. model and compared simulation results to those of the MEGAN model, both with and without its predicted seasonality. The effect of seasonality on regional monoterpene emissions inventories for European Mediterranean forests dominated by these species was tested for both models, using the GOTILWA+ biosphere model platform. The consideration of seasonality in the Niinemets et al. model reduced total estimated annual monoterpene emissions by up to 65% in some regions, with largest reductions at lower latitudes. The MEGAN model demonstrated a much weaker seasonal response than that in the Niinemets et al. model, and did not capture the between species seasonality differences found in this study. Results suggest that previous regional model inventories based on one fixed emission factor likely overestimate regional emissions, and species‐specific expressions of seasonality may be necessary. The consideration of seasonality both largely reduces monoterpene emissions estimates, and changes their expected seasonal distribution.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2009JD011904</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research. B. Solid Earth, 2009-11, Vol.114 (D22), p.n/a
issn 0148-0227
2169-897X
2156-2202
2169-8996
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754560510
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Air pollution
Atmospheric aerosols
Atmospheric sciences
Biosphere
Climate change
Earth
Ecosystems
Emission
Emission inventories
Emission measurements
Emissions control
Geobiology
Geophysics
Holm oak
Inventories
Italian stone pine
Mathematical models
Photochemistry
Pinus pinea
Quercus ilex
Regional
regional inventory
Seasonal distribution
Seasonal variations
seasonality
Stockpiling
Terrestrial ecosystems
VOC emissions
VOCs
Volatile organic compounds
title Seasonality of monoterpene emission potentials in Quercus ilex and Pinus pinea: Implications for regional VOC emissions modeling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T01%3A36%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seasonality%20of%20monoterpene%20emission%20potentials%20in%20Quercus%20ilex%20and%20Pinus%20pinea:%20Implications%20for%20regional%20VOC%20emissions%20modeling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research.%20B.%20Solid%20Earth&rft.au=Keenan,%20Trevor&rft.date=2009-11-27&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=D22&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2009JD011904&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754560510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=860325206&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true