Mechanics of bite force production and its relationship to diet in bats
1. In vertebrates, bite force is a measure of whole organism performance that is associated with both cranial morphology and dietary ecology. Mechanistic studies of bite force production have identified morphological features associated with bite force, and linked bite force with diet, but this appr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Functional ecology 2010-08, Vol.24 (4), p.776-784 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 784 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 776 |
container_title | Functional ecology |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Santana, Sharlene E. Dumont, Elizabeth R. Davis, Julian L. |
description | 1. In vertebrates, bite force is a measure of whole organism performance that is associated with both cranial morphology and dietary ecology. Mechanistic studies of bite force production have identified morphological features associated with bite force, and linked bite force with diet, but this approach has rarely been used in mammals. 2. Mammals are a good system with which to investigate the function of the feeding apparatus because of the relative simplicity of their skulls and their high dietary diversity. Phyllostomid bats are one of the most trophically and morphologically diverse groups of mammals, but we know little about the relative importance of biomechanical variables in producing bite force or how these variables vary with diet. 3. We combined in vivo measurements of bite force with assessments of muscular and bony morphology to build and validate a model describing the mechanics of bite force production in 25 species of bats. We used this model to investigate how bats with different diets vary in biomechanical parameters that contribute to bite force. In addition to traditional dietary categories, we used a functional definition of diet that reflects the mechanical demands (hardness) of the food items in the natural diet. 4. Our model provided good predictions of in vivo bite forces and highlighted behavioural variation that is inherent in the in vivo data. The temporalis generates the highest moment about the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) axis, but the moment generated by the masseter is the most important variable in explaining variation among species. The dietary classification based on the hardness of the diet was more effective than traditional dietary categories in describing biomechanical differences among groups. The temporalis generated the highest proportion of the moment about the TMJ axis in species with very hard and hard diets, the masseter was most important for species with soft diets, and the medial pterygoid was most important for species with liquid diets. 5. Our results highlight the utility of combining a modelling approach with in vivo data when conducting ecomorphological studies, and the importance of ecological classifications that reflect functional importance of performance traits. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01703.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754558402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40863576</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40863576</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-6ed13c95baaf92975a8e862bf9524bdfb0dca0bd3aba4fa57051218994db79773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUMtu1DAUtRBIDIVPQHiDWGXq92PBAo3agtSKBXRtXTs29ShNBjujtn-P01Szxptr3fO4RwchTMmWtne-31KuZMcEl1tG2pZQTfj28RXanIDXaEOYsp0Rir9F72rdE0KsZGyDrm5iuIMxh4qnhH2eI05TCREfytQfw5ynEcPY4zxXXOIAy6Le5QOeJ9znOOM8Yg9zfY_eJBhq_PAyz9Dt5cXv3ffu-ufVj9236y4Io3mnYk95sNIDJMuslmCiUcynlkb4PnnSByC-5-BBJJCaSMqosVb0Xlut-Rn6svq2fH-Psc7uPtcQhwHGOB2r01JIaQRhjWlWZihTrSUmdyj5HsqTo8Qt1bm9WxpyS0Nuqc49V-cem_TzyxGoAYZUYAy5nvSMt_bY84mvK-8hD_Hpv_3d5cVu-TX9x1W_r_NUTnpBjOJSq4Z_WvEEk4M_pWW4_dWcOKFGKW4t_wcCBJPr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754558402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanics of bite force production and its relationship to diet in bats</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Santana, Sharlene E. ; Dumont, Elizabeth R. ; Davis, Julian L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Santana, Sharlene E. ; Dumont, Elizabeth R. ; Davis, Julian L.</creatorcontrib><description>1. In vertebrates, bite force is a measure of whole organism performance that is associated with both cranial morphology and dietary ecology. Mechanistic studies of bite force production have identified morphological features associated with bite force, and linked bite force with diet, but this approach has rarely been used in mammals. 2. Mammals are a good system with which to investigate the function of the feeding apparatus because of the relative simplicity of their skulls and their high dietary diversity. Phyllostomid bats are one of the most trophically and morphologically diverse groups of mammals, but we know little about the relative importance of biomechanical variables in producing bite force or how these variables vary with diet. 3. We combined in vivo measurements of bite force with assessments of muscular and bony morphology to build and validate a model describing the mechanics of bite force production in 25 species of bats. We used this model to investigate how bats with different diets vary in biomechanical parameters that contribute to bite force. In addition to traditional dietary categories, we used a functional definition of diet that reflects the mechanical demands (hardness) of the food items in the natural diet. 4. Our model provided good predictions of in vivo bite forces and highlighted behavioural variation that is inherent in the in vivo data. The temporalis generates the highest moment about the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) axis, but the moment generated by the masseter is the most important variable in explaining variation among species. The dietary classification based on the hardness of the diet was more effective than traditional dietary categories in describing biomechanical differences among groups. The temporalis generated the highest proportion of the moment about the TMJ axis in species with very hard and hard diets, the masseter was most important for species with soft diets, and the medial pterygoid was most important for species with liquid diets. 5. Our results highlight the utility of combining a modelling approach with in vivo data when conducting ecomorphological studies, and the importance of ecological classifications that reflect functional importance of performance traits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01703.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal morphology ; Animal morphology and coloration ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Autoecology ; Bats ; Biological and medical sciences ; biomechanics ; Bite force ; Bites and stings ; Canines ; cranial muscles ; Diet ; Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Human ecology ; Mammalia ; modelling ; Phyllostomidae ; Skull ; Teeth ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2010-08, Vol.24 (4), p.776-784</ispartof><rights>2010 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-6ed13c95baaf92975a8e862bf9524bdfb0dca0bd3aba4fa57051218994db79773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-6ed13c95baaf92975a8e862bf9524bdfb0dca0bd3aba4fa57051218994db79773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40863576$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40863576$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,1418,1434,27929,27930,45579,45580,46414,46838,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23009202$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santana, Sharlene E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Elizabeth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Julian L.</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanics of bite force production and its relationship to diet in bats</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>1. In vertebrates, bite force is a measure of whole organism performance that is associated with both cranial morphology and dietary ecology. Mechanistic studies of bite force production have identified morphological features associated with bite force, and linked bite force with diet, but this approach has rarely been used in mammals. 2. Mammals are a good system with which to investigate the function of the feeding apparatus because of the relative simplicity of their skulls and their high dietary diversity. Phyllostomid bats are one of the most trophically and morphologically diverse groups of mammals, but we know little about the relative importance of biomechanical variables in producing bite force or how these variables vary with diet. 3. We combined in vivo measurements of bite force with assessments of muscular and bony morphology to build and validate a model describing the mechanics of bite force production in 25 species of bats. We used this model to investigate how bats with different diets vary in biomechanical parameters that contribute to bite force. In addition to traditional dietary categories, we used a functional definition of diet that reflects the mechanical demands (hardness) of the food items in the natural diet. 4. Our model provided good predictions of in vivo bite forces and highlighted behavioural variation that is inherent in the in vivo data. The temporalis generates the highest moment about the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) axis, but the moment generated by the masseter is the most important variable in explaining variation among species. The dietary classification based on the hardness of the diet was more effective than traditional dietary categories in describing biomechanical differences among groups. The temporalis generated the highest proportion of the moment about the TMJ axis in species with very hard and hard diets, the masseter was most important for species with soft diets, and the medial pterygoid was most important for species with liquid diets. 5. Our results highlight the utility of combining a modelling approach with in vivo data when conducting ecomorphological studies, and the importance of ecological classifications that reflect functional importance of performance traits.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal morphology</subject><subject>Animal morphology and coloration</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biomechanics</subject><subject>Bite force</subject><subject>Bites and stings</subject><subject>Canines</subject><subject>cranial muscles</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>modelling</subject><subject>Phyllostomidae</subject><subject>Skull</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUMtu1DAUtRBIDIVPQHiDWGXq92PBAo3agtSKBXRtXTs29ShNBjujtn-P01Szxptr3fO4RwchTMmWtne-31KuZMcEl1tG2pZQTfj28RXanIDXaEOYsp0Rir9F72rdE0KsZGyDrm5iuIMxh4qnhH2eI05TCREfytQfw5ynEcPY4zxXXOIAy6Le5QOeJ9znOOM8Yg9zfY_eJBhq_PAyz9Dt5cXv3ffu-ufVj9236y4Io3mnYk95sNIDJMuslmCiUcynlkb4PnnSByC-5-BBJJCaSMqosVb0Xlut-Rn6svq2fH-Psc7uPtcQhwHGOB2r01JIaQRhjWlWZihTrSUmdyj5HsqTo8Qt1bm9WxpyS0Nuqc49V-cem_TzyxGoAYZUYAy5nvSMt_bY84mvK-8hD_Hpv_3d5cVu-TX9x1W_r_NUTnpBjOJSq4Z_WvEEk4M_pWW4_dWcOKFGKW4t_wcCBJPr</recordid><startdate>201008</startdate><enddate>201008</enddate><creator>Santana, Sharlene E.</creator><creator>Dumont, Elizabeth R.</creator><creator>Davis, Julian L.</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201008</creationdate><title>Mechanics of bite force production and its relationship to diet in bats</title><author>Santana, Sharlene E. ; Dumont, Elizabeth R. ; Davis, Julian L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-6ed13c95baaf92975a8e862bf9524bdfb0dca0bd3aba4fa57051218994db79773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal morphology</topic><topic>Animal morphology and coloration</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biomechanics</topic><topic>Bite force</topic><topic>Bites and stings</topic><topic>Canines</topic><topic>cranial muscles</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>modelling</topic><topic>Phyllostomidae</topic><topic>Skull</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santana, Sharlene E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Elizabeth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Julian L.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santana, Sharlene E.</au><au>Dumont, Elizabeth R.</au><au>Davis, Julian L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanics of bite force production and its relationship to diet in bats</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2010-08</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>776</spage><epage>784</epage><pages>776-784</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>1. In vertebrates, bite force is a measure of whole organism performance that is associated with both cranial morphology and dietary ecology. Mechanistic studies of bite force production have identified morphological features associated with bite force, and linked bite force with diet, but this approach has rarely been used in mammals. 2. Mammals are a good system with which to investigate the function of the feeding apparatus because of the relative simplicity of their skulls and their high dietary diversity. Phyllostomid bats are one of the most trophically and morphologically diverse groups of mammals, but we know little about the relative importance of biomechanical variables in producing bite force or how these variables vary with diet. 3. We combined in vivo measurements of bite force with assessments of muscular and bony morphology to build and validate a model describing the mechanics of bite force production in 25 species of bats. We used this model to investigate how bats with different diets vary in biomechanical parameters that contribute to bite force. In addition to traditional dietary categories, we used a functional definition of diet that reflects the mechanical demands (hardness) of the food items in the natural diet. 4. Our model provided good predictions of in vivo bite forces and highlighted behavioural variation that is inherent in the in vivo data. The temporalis generates the highest moment about the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) axis, but the moment generated by the masseter is the most important variable in explaining variation among species. The dietary classification based on the hardness of the diet was more effective than traditional dietary categories in describing biomechanical differences among groups. The temporalis generated the highest proportion of the moment about the TMJ axis in species with very hard and hard diets, the masseter was most important for species with soft diets, and the medial pterygoid was most important for species with liquid diets. 5. Our results highlight the utility of combining a modelling approach with in vivo data when conducting ecomorphological studies, and the importance of ecological classifications that reflect functional importance of performance traits.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01703.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8463 |
ispartof | Functional ecology, 2010-08, Vol.24 (4), p.776-784 |
issn | 0269-8463 1365-2435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754558402 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal morphology Animal morphology and coloration Animal, plant and microbial ecology Autoecology Bats Biological and medical sciences biomechanics Bite force Bites and stings Canines cranial muscles Diet Ecology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Human ecology Mammalia modelling Phyllostomidae Skull Teeth Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution |
title | Mechanics of bite force production and its relationship to diet in bats |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T07%3A18%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanics%20of%20bite%20force%20production%20and%20its%20relationship%20to%20diet%20in%20bats&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Santana,%20Sharlene%20E.&rft.date=2010-08&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=776&rft.epage=784&rft.pages=776-784&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01703.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40863576%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754558402&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40863576&rfr_iscdi=true |