Arsenic and Mercury Partitioning in Fly Ash at a Kentucky Power Plant

Coal and fly ash samples were collected from a 500-MW unit at a Kentucky power plant, with the objective of studying the distribution of arsenic, mercury, and other trace elements in fly ash. The coal feed was low-sulfur, high volatile A bituminous central West Virginia coal. The plant produced a re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy & fuels 2003-07, Vol.17 (4), p.1028-1033
Hauptverfasser: Sakulpitakphon, Tanaporn, Hower, James C, Trimble, Alan S, Schram, William H, Thomas, Gerald A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1033
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1028
container_title Energy & fuels
container_volume 17
creator Sakulpitakphon, Tanaporn
Hower, James C
Trimble, Alan S
Schram, William H
Thomas, Gerald A
description Coal and fly ash samples were collected from a 500-MW unit at a Kentucky power plant, with the objective of studying the distribution of arsenic, mercury, and other trace elements in fly ash. The coal feed was low-sulfur, high volatile A bituminous central West Virginia coal. The plant produced a relatively low-carbon fly ash. In contrast to power plants with high-mercury feed coal, the fly ashes from the lower-mercury feed coal had low mercury values, generally not exceeding 0.01 ppm Hg. Mercury capture by fly ash varies with both the amount and type of carbon and the collection temperature; mercury capture is more efficient at lower temperatures. Arsenic in the feed coal and in the flue gas is of concern to the utility, because of the potential for catalyst poisoning in the selective catalytic reduction system (in the planning stage at the time of the sampling). Arsenic is captured in the fly ash, increasing in concentration in the more-distant (from the boiler) reaches of the electrostatic precipitator system.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ef030001n
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754549263</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754549263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-6cc015a5096995f560a1379ebcf60eba8c7dacb0b24bd2bb41f33e38c4e611323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A-8IMQQONuxk4wV4rMFCpTZurgOGIIDdiLovyeoqF2Ybrjn3vf0ELLP4JgBZye2AgEAzG-QAZMcEgm82CQDyPMsAcXTbbIT42uPKJHLATkbhWi9MxT9nN7YYLqwoFMMrWtd451_ps7T83pBR_GFYkuRjq1vO_PWU82XDXRao293yVaFdbR7f3NIns7PZqeXyeTu4up0NEkw5aJNlDHAJEooVFHISipAJrLClqZSYEvMTTZHU0LJ03LOyzJllRBW5Ca1ijHBxZAcLnM_QvPZ2djqdxeNrfsfbNNFnclUpgVXoiePlqQJTYzBVvojuHcMC81A_5rSK1M9e_CXitFgXQX0xsX1Qa9QgvxtT5aci639Xu0xvGmViUzq2fRRP1yPc7h_uNXpOhdN1K9NF3zv5p_-H_5fgek</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754549263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Arsenic and Mercury Partitioning in Fly Ash at a Kentucky Power Plant</title><source>ACS Journals: American Chemical Society Web Editions</source><creator>Sakulpitakphon, Tanaporn ; Hower, James C ; Trimble, Alan S ; Schram, William H ; Thomas, Gerald A</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakulpitakphon, Tanaporn ; Hower, James C ; Trimble, Alan S ; Schram, William H ; Thomas, Gerald A</creatorcontrib><description>Coal and fly ash samples were collected from a 500-MW unit at a Kentucky power plant, with the objective of studying the distribution of arsenic, mercury, and other trace elements in fly ash. The coal feed was low-sulfur, high volatile A bituminous central West Virginia coal. The plant produced a relatively low-carbon fly ash. In contrast to power plants with high-mercury feed coal, the fly ashes from the lower-mercury feed coal had low mercury values, generally not exceeding 0.01 ppm Hg. Mercury capture by fly ash varies with both the amount and type of carbon and the collection temperature; mercury capture is more efficient at lower temperatures. Arsenic in the feed coal and in the flue gas is of concern to the utility, because of the potential for catalyst poisoning in the selective catalytic reduction system (in the planning stage at the time of the sampling). Arsenic is captured in the fly ash, increasing in concentration in the more-distant (from the boiler) reaches of the electrostatic precipitator system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-0624</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ef030001n</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENFUEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries ; Applied sciences ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Exact sciences and technology ; Metering. Control</subject><ispartof>Energy &amp; fuels, 2003-07, Vol.17 (4), p.1028-1033</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-6cc015a5096995f560a1379ebcf60eba8c7dacb0b24bd2bb41f33e38c4e611323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-6cc015a5096995f560a1379ebcf60eba8c7dacb0b24bd2bb41f33e38c4e611323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ef030001n$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ef030001n$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15025052$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakulpitakphon, Tanaporn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hower, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimble, Alan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schram, William H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Gerald A</creatorcontrib><title>Arsenic and Mercury Partitioning in Fly Ash at a Kentucky Power Plant</title><title>Energy &amp; fuels</title><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><description>Coal and fly ash samples were collected from a 500-MW unit at a Kentucky power plant, with the objective of studying the distribution of arsenic, mercury, and other trace elements in fly ash. The coal feed was low-sulfur, high volatile A bituminous central West Virginia coal. The plant produced a relatively low-carbon fly ash. In contrast to power plants with high-mercury feed coal, the fly ashes from the lower-mercury feed coal had low mercury values, generally not exceeding 0.01 ppm Hg. Mercury capture by fly ash varies with both the amount and type of carbon and the collection temperature; mercury capture is more efficient at lower temperatures. Arsenic in the feed coal and in the flue gas is of concern to the utility, because of the potential for catalyst poisoning in the selective catalytic reduction system (in the planning stage at the time of the sampling). Arsenic is captured in the fly ash, increasing in concentration in the more-distant (from the boiler) reaches of the electrostatic precipitator system.</description><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Metering. Control</subject><issn>0887-0624</issn><issn>1520-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A-8IMQQONuxk4wV4rMFCpTZurgOGIIDdiLovyeoqF2Ybrjn3vf0ELLP4JgBZye2AgEAzG-QAZMcEgm82CQDyPMsAcXTbbIT42uPKJHLATkbhWi9MxT9nN7YYLqwoFMMrWtd451_ps7T83pBR_GFYkuRjq1vO_PWU82XDXRao293yVaFdbR7f3NIns7PZqeXyeTu4up0NEkw5aJNlDHAJEooVFHISipAJrLClqZSYEvMTTZHU0LJ03LOyzJllRBW5Ca1ijHBxZAcLnM_QvPZ2djqdxeNrfsfbNNFnclUpgVXoiePlqQJTYzBVvojuHcMC81A_5rSK1M9e_CXitFgXQX0xsX1Qa9QgvxtT5aci639Xu0xvGmViUzq2fRRP1yPc7h_uNXpOhdN1K9NF3zv5p_-H_5fgek</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Sakulpitakphon, Tanaporn</creator><creator>Hower, James C</creator><creator>Trimble, Alan S</creator><creator>Schram, William H</creator><creator>Thomas, Gerald A</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Arsenic and Mercury Partitioning in Fly Ash at a Kentucky Power Plant</title><author>Sakulpitakphon, Tanaporn ; Hower, James C ; Trimble, Alan S ; Schram, William H ; Thomas, Gerald A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-6cc015a5096995f560a1379ebcf60eba8c7dacb0b24bd2bb41f33e38c4e611323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Metering. Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakulpitakphon, Tanaporn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hower, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimble, Alan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schram, William H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Gerald A</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Energy &amp; fuels</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakulpitakphon, Tanaporn</au><au>Hower, James C</au><au>Trimble, Alan S</au><au>Schram, William H</au><au>Thomas, Gerald A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Arsenic and Mercury Partitioning in Fly Ash at a Kentucky Power Plant</atitle><jtitle>Energy &amp; fuels</jtitle><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1028</spage><epage>1033</epage><pages>1028-1033</pages><issn>0887-0624</issn><eissn>1520-5029</eissn><coden>ENFUEM</coden><abstract>Coal and fly ash samples were collected from a 500-MW unit at a Kentucky power plant, with the objective of studying the distribution of arsenic, mercury, and other trace elements in fly ash. The coal feed was low-sulfur, high volatile A bituminous central West Virginia coal. The plant produced a relatively low-carbon fly ash. In contrast to power plants with high-mercury feed coal, the fly ashes from the lower-mercury feed coal had low mercury values, generally not exceeding 0.01 ppm Hg. Mercury capture by fly ash varies with both the amount and type of carbon and the collection temperature; mercury capture is more efficient at lower temperatures. Arsenic in the feed coal and in the flue gas is of concern to the utility, because of the potential for catalyst poisoning in the selective catalytic reduction system (in the planning stage at the time of the sampling). Arsenic is captured in the fly ash, increasing in concentration in the more-distant (from the boiler) reaches of the electrostatic precipitator system.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/ef030001n</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-0624
ispartof Energy & fuels, 2003-07, Vol.17 (4), p.1028-1033
issn 0887-0624
1520-5029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754549263
source ACS Journals: American Chemical Society Web Editions
subjects Air pollution caused by fuel industries
Applied sciences
Energy
Energy. Thermal use of fuels
Exact sciences and technology
Metering. Control
title Arsenic and Mercury Partitioning in Fly Ash at a Kentucky Power Plant
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A43%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arsenic%20and%20Mercury%20Partitioning%20in%20Fly%20Ash%20at%20a%20Kentucky%20Power%20Plant&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20fuels&rft.au=Sakulpitakphon,%20Tanaporn&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1028&rft.epage=1033&rft.pages=1028-1033&rft.issn=0887-0624&rft.eissn=1520-5029&rft.coden=ENFUEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ef030001n&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754549263%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754549263&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true