Interaction of a Cationic Gemini Surfactant with DNA and with Sodium Poly(styrene sulphonate) at the Air/Water Interface: A Neutron Reflectometry Study

The interactions between a dicationic gemini surfactant with a six-hydrocarbon spacer (1,2-bis(dodecyldimethylammonio)hexane dibromide, C12C6C12Br2) and anionic polyelectrolyte DNA or sodium(polystyrene sulfonate) (NaPSS) at the air/solution interface have been studied and compared using neutron ref...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Langmuir 2009-04, Vol.25 (7), p.4027-4035
Hauptverfasser: Vongsetskul, T, Taylor, D. J. F, Zhang, J, Li, P. X, Thomas, R. K, Penfold, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4035
container_issue 7
container_start_page 4027
container_title Langmuir
container_volume 25
creator Vongsetskul, T
Taylor, D. J. F
Zhang, J
Li, P. X
Thomas, R. K
Penfold, J
description The interactions between a dicationic gemini surfactant with a six-hydrocarbon spacer (1,2-bis(dodecyldimethylammonio)hexane dibromide, C12C6C12Br2) and anionic polyelectrolyte DNA or sodium(polystyrene sulfonate) (NaPSS) at the air/solution interface have been studied and compared using neutron reflectometry together with surface tension. In the presence of the dichained cationic gemini surfactant, DNA and NaPSS display very different adsorption behaviors. The DNA/gemini mixtures show adsorption behavior very similar to that of DNA/C12TAB mixtures, with enhanced surfactant adsorption at low concentrations and thick structured layers at higher concentrations. However, for the NaPSS/gemini mixtures the amount of gemini at the surface is reduced relative to that in the absence of NaPSS at concentrations below the cmc. These differences in adsorption behavior are attributed to differences in the molecular structure and flexibility of the two polyanions. NaPSS is relatively hydrophobic and flexible enough to form bulk-phase polymer−micelle complexes with the gemini surfactant at low surfactant concentrations, whereas the adsorption of surface complexes is much less favorable because the dications on the gemini would require adjacent bulky pendant charges on the NaPSS to be oriented toward the surface. This would force the NaPSS to bend significantly whereas it is more favorable for the NaPSS to adopt an extended conformation at the surface. Thus, surfactant is actually removed from the surface to form bulk-phase complexes. In contrast with NaPSS, DNA has a far more rigid structure, and the charges on the backbone are at fixed intervals, factors that make the formation of surface DNA−monomer complexes much more favorable than bulk-phase DNA−micelle complexes. Finally, a short-chain sample of NaPSS consisting of only five to six segments adsorbs very strongly at the surface with the gemini to form more extensive layered structures than have previously been observed, consisting of approximately five sublayers.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/la802816s
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754546094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754546094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-37b1238adc6d0881e018908e6edff4d767b1b132372e42ee516d4f27f41227103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c1u1DAQB3ALgehSOPACyBegPYT62wm31QJtpaogFsQx8iZjravEXmxHKE_C6-J2V-2l4uSP-Wn-0gxCryn5QAmjZ4OpCaupSk_QgkpGKlkz_RQtiBa80kLxI_QipRtCSMNF8xwd0UZTUcwC_b30GaLpsgseB4sNXpnbu-vwOYzOO7yeoi114zP-4_IWf7peYuP7_WMdejeN-FsY5pOU5wgecJqG3TZ4k-EUm4zzFvDSxbNf5SPiu7jSDz7iJb6GKceS-x3sAF0OI-Q443We-vklembNkODV4TxGP798_rG6qK6-nl-ulleV4VrmiusNZbw2fad6UtcUCK0bUoOC3lrRa1XqG8oZ1wwEA5BU9cIybQVlTFPCj9H7fd9dDL8nSLkdXepgGIyHMKVWSyGFIo0o8t1_pdKKCkllgad72MWQUgTb7qIbTZxbStrbfbX3-yr2zaHptBmhf5CHBRXw9gBM6sxgo_GdS_eOUS440_LBmS61N2GKvkztkcB_EK6pTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67614515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interaction of a Cationic Gemini Surfactant with DNA and with Sodium Poly(styrene sulphonate) at the Air/Water Interface: A Neutron Reflectometry Study</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Vongsetskul, T ; Taylor, D. J. F ; Zhang, J ; Li, P. X ; Thomas, R. K ; Penfold, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Vongsetskul, T ; Taylor, D. J. F ; Zhang, J ; Li, P. X ; Thomas, R. K ; Penfold, J</creatorcontrib><description>The interactions between a dicationic gemini surfactant with a six-hydrocarbon spacer (1,2-bis(dodecyldimethylammonio)hexane dibromide, C12C6C12Br2) and anionic polyelectrolyte DNA or sodium(polystyrene sulfonate) (NaPSS) at the air/solution interface have been studied and compared using neutron reflectometry together with surface tension. In the presence of the dichained cationic gemini surfactant, DNA and NaPSS display very different adsorption behaviors. The DNA/gemini mixtures show adsorption behavior very similar to that of DNA/C12TAB mixtures, with enhanced surfactant adsorption at low concentrations and thick structured layers at higher concentrations. However, for the NaPSS/gemini mixtures the amount of gemini at the surface is reduced relative to that in the absence of NaPSS at concentrations below the cmc. These differences in adsorption behavior are attributed to differences in the molecular structure and flexibility of the two polyanions. NaPSS is relatively hydrophobic and flexible enough to form bulk-phase polymer−micelle complexes with the gemini surfactant at low surfactant concentrations, whereas the adsorption of surface complexes is much less favorable because the dications on the gemini would require adjacent bulky pendant charges on the NaPSS to be oriented toward the surface. This would force the NaPSS to bend significantly whereas it is more favorable for the NaPSS to adopt an extended conformation at the surface. Thus, surfactant is actually removed from the surface to form bulk-phase complexes. In contrast with NaPSS, DNA has a far more rigid structure, and the charges on the backbone are at fixed intervals, factors that make the formation of surface DNA−monomer complexes much more favorable than bulk-phase DNA−micelle complexes. Finally, a short-chain sample of NaPSS consisting of only five to six segments adsorbs very strongly at the surface with the gemini to form more extensive layered structures than have previously been observed, consisting of approximately five sublayers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0743-7463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/la802816s</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19714827</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANGD5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Air ; Chemistry ; Colloidal state and disperse state ; DNA - chemistry ; Exact sciences and technology ; General and physical chemistry ; Interfaces: Adsorption, Reactions, Films, Forces ; Micelles. Thin films ; Molecular Weight ; Neutron Diffraction ; Polystyrenes - chemistry ; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - chemistry ; Surface physical chemistry ; Surface Tension ; Surface-Active Agents - chemistry ; Water - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Langmuir, 2009-04, Vol.25 (7), p.4027-4035</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-37b1238adc6d0881e018908e6edff4d767b1b132372e42ee516d4f27f41227103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-37b1238adc6d0881e018908e6edff4d767b1b132372e42ee516d4f27f41227103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/la802816s$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/la802816s$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21343275$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19714827$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vongsetskul, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, D. J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, P. X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, R. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penfold, J</creatorcontrib><title>Interaction of a Cationic Gemini Surfactant with DNA and with Sodium Poly(styrene sulphonate) at the Air/Water Interface: A Neutron Reflectometry Study</title><title>Langmuir</title><addtitle>Langmuir</addtitle><description>The interactions between a dicationic gemini surfactant with a six-hydrocarbon spacer (1,2-bis(dodecyldimethylammonio)hexane dibromide, C12C6C12Br2) and anionic polyelectrolyte DNA or sodium(polystyrene sulfonate) (NaPSS) at the air/solution interface have been studied and compared using neutron reflectometry together with surface tension. In the presence of the dichained cationic gemini surfactant, DNA and NaPSS display very different adsorption behaviors. The DNA/gemini mixtures show adsorption behavior very similar to that of DNA/C12TAB mixtures, with enhanced surfactant adsorption at low concentrations and thick structured layers at higher concentrations. However, for the NaPSS/gemini mixtures the amount of gemini at the surface is reduced relative to that in the absence of NaPSS at concentrations below the cmc. These differences in adsorption behavior are attributed to differences in the molecular structure and flexibility of the two polyanions. NaPSS is relatively hydrophobic and flexible enough to form bulk-phase polymer−micelle complexes with the gemini surfactant at low surfactant concentrations, whereas the adsorption of surface complexes is much less favorable because the dications on the gemini would require adjacent bulky pendant charges on the NaPSS to be oriented toward the surface. This would force the NaPSS to bend significantly whereas it is more favorable for the NaPSS to adopt an extended conformation at the surface. Thus, surfactant is actually removed from the surface to form bulk-phase complexes. In contrast with NaPSS, DNA has a far more rigid structure, and the charges on the backbone are at fixed intervals, factors that make the formation of surface DNA−monomer complexes much more favorable than bulk-phase DNA−micelle complexes. Finally, a short-chain sample of NaPSS consisting of only five to six segments adsorbs very strongly at the surface with the gemini to form more extensive layered structures than have previously been observed, consisting of approximately five sublayers.</description><subject>Air</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Colloidal state and disperse state</subject><subject>DNA - chemistry</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General and physical chemistry</subject><subject>Interfaces: Adsorption, Reactions, Films, Forces</subject><subject>Micelles. Thin films</subject><subject>Molecular Weight</subject><subject>Neutron Diffraction</subject><subject>Polystyrenes - chemistry</subject><subject>Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - chemistry</subject><subject>Surface physical chemistry</subject><subject>Surface Tension</subject><subject>Surface-Active Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>Water - chemistry</subject><issn>0743-7463</issn><issn>1520-5827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90c1u1DAQB3ALgehSOPACyBegPYT62wm31QJtpaogFsQx8iZjravEXmxHKE_C6-J2V-2l4uSP-Wn-0gxCryn5QAmjZ4OpCaupSk_QgkpGKlkz_RQtiBa80kLxI_QipRtCSMNF8xwd0UZTUcwC_b30GaLpsgseB4sNXpnbu-vwOYzOO7yeoi114zP-4_IWf7peYuP7_WMdejeN-FsY5pOU5wgecJqG3TZ4k-EUm4zzFvDSxbNf5SPiu7jSDz7iJb6GKceS-x3sAF0OI-Q443We-vklembNkODV4TxGP798_rG6qK6-nl-ulleV4VrmiusNZbw2fad6UtcUCK0bUoOC3lrRa1XqG8oZ1wwEA5BU9cIybQVlTFPCj9H7fd9dDL8nSLkdXepgGIyHMKVWSyGFIo0o8t1_pdKKCkllgad72MWQUgTb7qIbTZxbStrbfbX3-yr2zaHptBmhf5CHBRXw9gBM6sxgo_GdS_eOUS440_LBmS61N2GKvkztkcB_EK6pTg</recordid><startdate>20090407</startdate><enddate>20090407</enddate><creator>Vongsetskul, T</creator><creator>Taylor, D. J. F</creator><creator>Zhang, J</creator><creator>Li, P. X</creator><creator>Thomas, R. K</creator><creator>Penfold, J</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090407</creationdate><title>Interaction of a Cationic Gemini Surfactant with DNA and with Sodium Poly(styrene sulphonate) at the Air/Water Interface: A Neutron Reflectometry Study</title><author>Vongsetskul, T ; Taylor, D. J. F ; Zhang, J ; Li, P. X ; Thomas, R. K ; Penfold, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-37b1238adc6d0881e018908e6edff4d767b1b132372e42ee516d4f27f41227103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Air</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Colloidal state and disperse state</topic><topic>DNA - chemistry</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General and physical chemistry</topic><topic>Interfaces: Adsorption, Reactions, Films, Forces</topic><topic>Micelles. Thin films</topic><topic>Molecular Weight</topic><topic>Neutron Diffraction</topic><topic>Polystyrenes - chemistry</topic><topic>Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - chemistry</topic><topic>Surface physical chemistry</topic><topic>Surface Tension</topic><topic>Surface-Active Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>Water - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vongsetskul, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, D. J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, P. X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, R. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penfold, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Langmuir</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vongsetskul, T</au><au>Taylor, D. J. F</au><au>Zhang, J</au><au>Li, P. X</au><au>Thomas, R. K</au><au>Penfold, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interaction of a Cationic Gemini Surfactant with DNA and with Sodium Poly(styrene sulphonate) at the Air/Water Interface: A Neutron Reflectometry Study</atitle><jtitle>Langmuir</jtitle><addtitle>Langmuir</addtitle><date>2009-04-07</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>4027</spage><epage>4035</epage><pages>4027-4035</pages><issn>0743-7463</issn><eissn>1520-5827</eissn><coden>LANGD5</coden><abstract>The interactions between a dicationic gemini surfactant with a six-hydrocarbon spacer (1,2-bis(dodecyldimethylammonio)hexane dibromide, C12C6C12Br2) and anionic polyelectrolyte DNA or sodium(polystyrene sulfonate) (NaPSS) at the air/solution interface have been studied and compared using neutron reflectometry together with surface tension. In the presence of the dichained cationic gemini surfactant, DNA and NaPSS display very different adsorption behaviors. The DNA/gemini mixtures show adsorption behavior very similar to that of DNA/C12TAB mixtures, with enhanced surfactant adsorption at low concentrations and thick structured layers at higher concentrations. However, for the NaPSS/gemini mixtures the amount of gemini at the surface is reduced relative to that in the absence of NaPSS at concentrations below the cmc. These differences in adsorption behavior are attributed to differences in the molecular structure and flexibility of the two polyanions. NaPSS is relatively hydrophobic and flexible enough to form bulk-phase polymer−micelle complexes with the gemini surfactant at low surfactant concentrations, whereas the adsorption of surface complexes is much less favorable because the dications on the gemini would require adjacent bulky pendant charges on the NaPSS to be oriented toward the surface. This would force the NaPSS to bend significantly whereas it is more favorable for the NaPSS to adopt an extended conformation at the surface. Thus, surfactant is actually removed from the surface to form bulk-phase complexes. In contrast with NaPSS, DNA has a far more rigid structure, and the charges on the backbone are at fixed intervals, factors that make the formation of surface DNA−monomer complexes much more favorable than bulk-phase DNA−micelle complexes. Finally, a short-chain sample of NaPSS consisting of only five to six segments adsorbs very strongly at the surface with the gemini to form more extensive layered structures than have previously been observed, consisting of approximately five sublayers.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>19714827</pmid><doi>10.1021/la802816s</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0743-7463
ispartof Langmuir, 2009-04, Vol.25 (7), p.4027-4035
issn 0743-7463
1520-5827
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754546094
source ACS Publications; MEDLINE
subjects Air
Chemistry
Colloidal state and disperse state
DNA - chemistry
Exact sciences and technology
General and physical chemistry
Interfaces: Adsorption, Reactions, Films, Forces
Micelles. Thin films
Molecular Weight
Neutron Diffraction
Polystyrenes - chemistry
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - chemistry
Surface physical chemistry
Surface Tension
Surface-Active Agents - chemistry
Water - chemistry
title Interaction of a Cationic Gemini Surfactant with DNA and with Sodium Poly(styrene sulphonate) at the Air/Water Interface: A Neutron Reflectometry Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A07%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interaction%20of%20a%20Cationic%20Gemini%20Surfactant%20with%20DNA%20and%20with%20Sodium%20Poly(styrene%20sulphonate)%20at%20the%20Air/Water%20Interface:%20A%20Neutron%20Reflectometry%20Study&rft.jtitle=Langmuir&rft.au=Vongsetskul,%20T&rft.date=2009-04-07&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=4027&rft.epage=4035&rft.pages=4027-4035&rft.issn=0743-7463&rft.eissn=1520-5827&rft.coden=LANGD5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/la802816s&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754546094%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67614515&rft_id=info:pmid/19714827&rfr_iscdi=true