Evaluation of posttetanic motor evoked potentials--the influences of repetitive use, the residual effects of tetanic stimulation to peripheral nerve, and the variability

Recently, we developed a new technique to augment myogenic motor evoked potentials (MEPs), called as posttetanic MEPs (p-MEPs), in which tetanic stimulation is applied to peripheral nerve before transcranial stimulation. However, the data on p-MEPs are limited. This study was conducted; (1) to evalu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology 2010-01, Vol.22 (1), p.6-10
Hauptverfasser: Yamamoto, Yuri, Kawaguchi, Masahiko, Hayashi, Hironobu, Abe, Ryuichi, Inoue, Satoki, Nakase, Hiroyuki, Sakaki, Toshisuke, Furuya, Hitoshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue 1
container_start_page 6
container_title Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology
container_volume 22
creator Yamamoto, Yuri
Kawaguchi, Masahiko
Hayashi, Hironobu
Abe, Ryuichi
Inoue, Satoki
Nakase, Hiroyuki
Sakaki, Toshisuke
Furuya, Hitoshi
description Recently, we developed a new technique to augment myogenic motor evoked potentials (MEPs), called as posttetanic MEPs (p-MEPs), in which tetanic stimulation is applied to peripheral nerve before transcranial stimulation. However, the data on p-MEPs are limited. This study was conducted; (1) to evaluate the influences of repetitive use of p-MEPs on p-MEP amplitudes, (2) to evaluate the residual effects of use of p-MEPs on subsequent conventional MEPs (c-MEPs), and (3) to compare the variability of p-MEPs with that of c-MEPs. Sixty patients under propofol/fentanyl anesthesia with partial neuromuscular blockade were enrolled. For p-MEP measurements, tetanic stimulation was applied to posterior tibial nerve 1 second before transcranial stimulation. In study 1, p-MEPs were repetitively recorded with intervals of 10 or 60 seconds. In study 2, the amplitudes of c-MEPs recorded 15, 30, 60, and 120 seconds after p-MEP recordings were compared with those of control. In study 3, the coefficients of variation of c-MEP and p-MEP responses were compared. The repetitive use of p-MEP with an interval of 10 seconds, but not 60 seconds, induced a significant reduction of p-MEP amplitude. Amplitudes of c-MEP were significantly increased when applied within 60 seconds after p-MEP recordings. The coefficient of variations of p-MEPs was similar to those of c-MEPs. The results indicated that the amplitudes of p-MEP and c-MEP might be affected when applied with a short interval after p-MEP recording.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181b9dd3a
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754542383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733831769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-51d6f65a1d9c8a71f494791267b8cac751bc1185f5b8f60b09cdf32d7c260623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1q3TAQhUVpSG6TvEEp2nVTpxrLsqzlJaQ_ENpN9kaWRkStbbmSbMgj9S2jm3tLoZuuRjDfOWfQIeQtsBtgSn7cf9vfsIEBRw4dDMparl-RHQguK1A1vCY71qmuasr7grxJ6QdjTNVCnpMLUFIq3sod-X236XHV2YeZBkeXkHLGrGdv6BRyiBS38BNtWWScs9djqqr8iNTPblxxNpgOsogLZp_9hnRN-IEeiIjJ21WPFJ1Dk1-4P9Yp-2kdj6k50AWjXx4xFnjGuBUDPdsXk01Hrwc_-vx0Rc5cicfr07wkD5_uHm6_VPffP3-93d9XhvMuVwJs61qhwSrTaQmuUY1UULdy6Iw2UsBgADrhxNC5tnygMtbx2kpTt6yt-SV5f7RdYvi1Ysr95JPBcdQzhjX1UjSiqXnH_0-WezjIVhWyOZImhpQiun6JftLxqQfWH8rsS5n9v2UW2btTwDpMaP-KTu3xZ03aoJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733831769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of posttetanic motor evoked potentials--the influences of repetitive use, the residual effects of tetanic stimulation to peripheral nerve, and the variability</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Yamamoto, Yuri ; Kawaguchi, Masahiko ; Hayashi, Hironobu ; Abe, Ryuichi ; Inoue, Satoki ; Nakase, Hiroyuki ; Sakaki, Toshisuke ; Furuya, Hitoshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yuri ; Kawaguchi, Masahiko ; Hayashi, Hironobu ; Abe, Ryuichi ; Inoue, Satoki ; Nakase, Hiroyuki ; Sakaki, Toshisuke ; Furuya, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, we developed a new technique to augment myogenic motor evoked potentials (MEPs), called as posttetanic MEPs (p-MEPs), in which tetanic stimulation is applied to peripheral nerve before transcranial stimulation. However, the data on p-MEPs are limited. This study was conducted; (1) to evaluate the influences of repetitive use of p-MEPs on p-MEP amplitudes, (2) to evaluate the residual effects of use of p-MEPs on subsequent conventional MEPs (c-MEPs), and (3) to compare the variability of p-MEPs with that of c-MEPs. Sixty patients under propofol/fentanyl anesthesia with partial neuromuscular blockade were enrolled. For p-MEP measurements, tetanic stimulation was applied to posterior tibial nerve 1 second before transcranial stimulation. In study 1, p-MEPs were repetitively recorded with intervals of 10 or 60 seconds. In study 2, the amplitudes of c-MEPs recorded 15, 30, 60, and 120 seconds after p-MEP recordings were compared with those of control. In study 3, the coefficients of variation of c-MEP and p-MEP responses were compared. The repetitive use of p-MEP with an interval of 10 seconds, but not 60 seconds, induced a significant reduction of p-MEP amplitude. Amplitudes of c-MEP were significantly increased when applied within 60 seconds after p-MEP recordings. The coefficient of variations of p-MEPs was similar to those of c-MEPs. The results indicated that the amplitudes of p-MEP and c-MEP might be affected when applied with a short interval after p-MEP recording.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-4921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-1921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181b9dd3a</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19779367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Fentanyl - administration &amp; dosage ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peripheral Nerves - physiology ; Propofol - administration &amp; dosage ; Tibial Nerve - physiology ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology, 2010-01, Vol.22 (1), p.6-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-51d6f65a1d9c8a71f494791267b8cac751bc1185f5b8f60b09cdf32d7c260623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-51d6f65a1d9c8a71f494791267b8cac751bc1185f5b8f60b09cdf32d7c260623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19779367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaguchi, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Hironobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Ryuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Satoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakase, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakaki, Toshisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furuya, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of posttetanic motor evoked potentials--the influences of repetitive use, the residual effects of tetanic stimulation to peripheral nerve, and the variability</title><title>Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology</title><addtitle>J Neurosurg Anesthesiol</addtitle><description>Recently, we developed a new technique to augment myogenic motor evoked potentials (MEPs), called as posttetanic MEPs (p-MEPs), in which tetanic stimulation is applied to peripheral nerve before transcranial stimulation. However, the data on p-MEPs are limited. This study was conducted; (1) to evaluate the influences of repetitive use of p-MEPs on p-MEP amplitudes, (2) to evaluate the residual effects of use of p-MEPs on subsequent conventional MEPs (c-MEPs), and (3) to compare the variability of p-MEPs with that of c-MEPs. Sixty patients under propofol/fentanyl anesthesia with partial neuromuscular blockade were enrolled. For p-MEP measurements, tetanic stimulation was applied to posterior tibial nerve 1 second before transcranial stimulation. In study 1, p-MEPs were repetitively recorded with intervals of 10 or 60 seconds. In study 2, the amplitudes of c-MEPs recorded 15, 30, 60, and 120 seconds after p-MEP recordings were compared with those of control. In study 3, the coefficients of variation of c-MEP and p-MEP responses were compared. The repetitive use of p-MEP with an interval of 10 seconds, but not 60 seconds, induced a significant reduction of p-MEP amplitude. Amplitudes of c-MEP were significantly increased when applied within 60 seconds after p-MEP recordings. The coefficient of variations of p-MEPs was similar to those of c-MEPs. The results indicated that the amplitudes of p-MEP and c-MEP might be affected when applied with a short interval after p-MEP recording.</description><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Fentanyl - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerves - physiology</subject><subject>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Tibial Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0898-4921</issn><issn>1537-1921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1q3TAQhUVpSG6TvEEp2nVTpxrLsqzlJaQ_ENpN9kaWRkStbbmSbMgj9S2jm3tLoZuuRjDfOWfQIeQtsBtgSn7cf9vfsIEBRw4dDMparl-RHQguK1A1vCY71qmuasr7grxJ6QdjTNVCnpMLUFIq3sod-X236XHV2YeZBkeXkHLGrGdv6BRyiBS38BNtWWScs9djqqr8iNTPblxxNpgOsogLZp_9hnRN-IEeiIjJ21WPFJ1Dk1-4P9Yp-2kdj6k50AWjXx4xFnjGuBUDPdsXk01Hrwc_-vx0Rc5cicfr07wkD5_uHm6_VPffP3-93d9XhvMuVwJs61qhwSrTaQmuUY1UULdy6Iw2UsBgADrhxNC5tnygMtbx2kpTt6yt-SV5f7RdYvi1Ysr95JPBcdQzhjX1UjSiqXnH_0-WezjIVhWyOZImhpQiun6JftLxqQfWH8rsS5n9v2UW2btTwDpMaP-KTu3xZ03aoJA</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Yamamoto, Yuri</creator><creator>Kawaguchi, Masahiko</creator><creator>Hayashi, Hironobu</creator><creator>Abe, Ryuichi</creator><creator>Inoue, Satoki</creator><creator>Nakase, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Sakaki, Toshisuke</creator><creator>Furuya, Hitoshi</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Evaluation of posttetanic motor evoked potentials--the influences of repetitive use, the residual effects of tetanic stimulation to peripheral nerve, and the variability</title><author>Yamamoto, Yuri ; Kawaguchi, Masahiko ; Hayashi, Hironobu ; Abe, Ryuichi ; Inoue, Satoki ; Nakase, Hiroyuki ; Sakaki, Toshisuke ; Furuya, Hitoshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-51d6f65a1d9c8a71f494791267b8cac751bc1185f5b8f60b09cdf32d7c260623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Fentanyl - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerves - physiology</topic><topic>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Tibial Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaguchi, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Hironobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Ryuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Satoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakase, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakaki, Toshisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furuya, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yamamoto, Yuri</au><au>Kawaguchi, Masahiko</au><au>Hayashi, Hironobu</au><au>Abe, Ryuichi</au><au>Inoue, Satoki</au><au>Nakase, Hiroyuki</au><au>Sakaki, Toshisuke</au><au>Furuya, Hitoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of posttetanic motor evoked potentials--the influences of repetitive use, the residual effects of tetanic stimulation to peripheral nerve, and the variability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosurg Anesthesiol</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>6-10</pages><issn>0898-4921</issn><eissn>1537-1921</eissn><abstract>Recently, we developed a new technique to augment myogenic motor evoked potentials (MEPs), called as posttetanic MEPs (p-MEPs), in which tetanic stimulation is applied to peripheral nerve before transcranial stimulation. However, the data on p-MEPs are limited. This study was conducted; (1) to evaluate the influences of repetitive use of p-MEPs on p-MEP amplitudes, (2) to evaluate the residual effects of use of p-MEPs on subsequent conventional MEPs (c-MEPs), and (3) to compare the variability of p-MEPs with that of c-MEPs. Sixty patients under propofol/fentanyl anesthesia with partial neuromuscular blockade were enrolled. For p-MEP measurements, tetanic stimulation was applied to posterior tibial nerve 1 second before transcranial stimulation. In study 1, p-MEPs were repetitively recorded with intervals of 10 or 60 seconds. In study 2, the amplitudes of c-MEPs recorded 15, 30, 60, and 120 seconds after p-MEP recordings were compared with those of control. In study 3, the coefficients of variation of c-MEP and p-MEP responses were compared. The repetitive use of p-MEP with an interval of 10 seconds, but not 60 seconds, induced a significant reduction of p-MEP amplitude. Amplitudes of c-MEP were significantly increased when applied within 60 seconds after p-MEP recordings. The coefficient of variations of p-MEPs was similar to those of c-MEPs. The results indicated that the amplitudes of p-MEP and c-MEP might be affected when applied with a short interval after p-MEP recording.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>19779367</pmid><doi>10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181b9dd3a</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-4921
ispartof Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology, 2010-01, Vol.22 (1), p.6-10
issn 0898-4921
1537-1921
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754542383
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration & dosage
Electric Stimulation - methods
Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology
Fentanyl - administration & dosage
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Peripheral Nerves - physiology
Propofol - administration & dosage
Tibial Nerve - physiology
Time Factors
title Evaluation of posttetanic motor evoked potentials--the influences of repetitive use, the residual effects of tetanic stimulation to peripheral nerve, and the variability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T01%3A14%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20posttetanic%20motor%20evoked%20potentials--the%20influences%20of%20repetitive%20use,%20the%20residual%20effects%20of%20tetanic%20stimulation%20to%20peripheral%20nerve,%20and%20the%20variability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurosurgical%20anesthesiology&rft.au=Yamamoto,%20Yuri&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=6-10&rft.issn=0898-4921&rft.eissn=1537-1921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181b9dd3a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733831769%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733831769&rft_id=info:pmid/19779367&rfr_iscdi=true