Evaluation of the long-term results of rat cranial bone repair using a particular xenograft

Bone defects that cannot be healed completely are termed critical-sized defects and can be used to test bone grafts for medicine, dentistry, and periodontology. The aim of the present study was to detect the effects of a xenograft (Unilab Surgibone) on bone building in experimentally created parieta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of oral implantology 2010-01, Vol.36 (3), p.167-173
Hauptverfasser: Develioglu, Hakan, Saraydin, Serpilünver, Kartal, Unal, Taner, Levent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 173
container_issue 3
container_start_page 167
container_title The Journal of oral implantology
container_volume 36
creator Develioglu, Hakan
Saraydin, Serpilünver
Kartal, Unal
Taner, Levent
description Bone defects that cannot be healed completely are termed critical-sized defects and can be used to test bone grafts for medicine, dentistry, and periodontology. The aim of the present study was to detect the effects of a xenograft (Unilab Surgibone) on bone building in experimentally created parietal bone defects in rats. Standardized parietal bone defects were created in 16 rats, and each defect had a circular morphology 6 mm in diameter. The right defect sites were filled with porous particle material, and the left site was used as control. After the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months, rats were killed and tissue samples obtained from the related site of the cranium. Subsequently, histological sections were taken and stained with different stains for evaluation under light microscope. The rate of bone formation was assessed using a semiquantitative method. These results showed that dense collagenous tissue was observed in the control area during the third month, whereas xenograft particles were surrounded by a fibrous tissue layer at the implantation site. Osteoclast-like cells were also observed. There was also no significant bone repair at other observation periods. It can be concluded that the material used had no evidence of resorption and does not enhance bone formation. However, it seems biocompatible, osteoconductive, and could be used in a limited manner as a material for filling osseous defects in clinical practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00064
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754541158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733980412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-ab532efdaae26be5667c1196d81f67ec0d182dfcd6c1b35ee8ca9a09287d65f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1P3DAURS1UBMPHL6hUWd2wcusXx3ayHDFAp0JiQ1ddWC_OyzQoE09tB5V_TwZoF92weot77pWeDmMfQX4BbdTX5XK9Et_v1mIlZC2klKY8YAvQZSVAKfOBLSQYKUxti2N2ktKDlIXWGo7YcSG1VmDlgv28esRhwtyHkYeO51_EhzBuRKa45ZHSNOS0DyJm7iOOPQ68CSPN2Q77yKfUjxuOfIcx934aMPI_NIZNxC6fscMOh0Tnb_eU_bi-ur_8Jm7vbtaXy1vhlVFZYKNVQV2LSIVpSBtjPUBt2go6Y8nLFqqi7XxrPDRKE1Uea5R1UdnW6E6rU3bxuruL4fdEKbttnzwNA44UpuSsLnUJoKv3SaXqSpZQzOTn_8iHMMVxfsNpa422qoQZUq-QjyGlSJ3bxX6L8cmBdHtHbu_IzY7cysnavTiaW5_epqdmS-2_zl8p6hm2LY3I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>577657341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the long-term results of rat cranial bone repair using a particular xenograft</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Develioglu, Hakan ; Saraydin, Serpilünver ; Kartal, Unal ; Taner, Levent</creator><creatorcontrib>Develioglu, Hakan ; Saraydin, Serpilünver ; Kartal, Unal ; Taner, Levent</creatorcontrib><description>Bone defects that cannot be healed completely are termed critical-sized defects and can be used to test bone grafts for medicine, dentistry, and periodontology. The aim of the present study was to detect the effects of a xenograft (Unilab Surgibone) on bone building in experimentally created parietal bone defects in rats. Standardized parietal bone defects were created in 16 rats, and each defect had a circular morphology 6 mm in diameter. The right defect sites were filled with porous particle material, and the left site was used as control. After the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months, rats were killed and tissue samples obtained from the related site of the cranium. Subsequently, histological sections were taken and stained with different stains for evaluation under light microscope. The rate of bone formation was assessed using a semiquantitative method. These results showed that dense collagenous tissue was observed in the control area during the third month, whereas xenograft particles were surrounded by a fibrous tissue layer at the implantation site. Osteoclast-like cells were also observed. There was also no significant bone repair at other observation periods. It can be concluded that the material used had no evidence of resorption and does not enhance bone formation. However, it seems biocompatible, osteoconductive, and could be used in a limited manner as a material for filling osseous defects in clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-6972</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-1336</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00064</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20553170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Allen Press Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Azo Compounds ; Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use ; Biomedical materials ; Bone Diseases - pathology ; Bone Diseases - surgery ; Bone Matrix - pathology ; Bone Regeneration - physiology ; Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use ; Cattle ; Clinical medicine ; Collagen - therapeutic use ; Coloring Agents ; Connective Tissue - pathology ; Craniotomy ; Dentistry ; Durapatite - therapeutic use ; Eosine Yellowish-(YS) ; Fluorescent Dyes ; Hematoxylin ; Methyl Green ; Osteoblasts - pathology ; Osteoclasts - pathology ; Osteocytes - pathology ; Osteogenesis - physiology ; Parietal Bone - pathology ; Parietal Bone - surgery ; Pore size ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Rodents ; Time Factors ; Transplantation, Heterologous</subject><ispartof>The Journal of oral implantology, 2010-01, Vol.36 (3), p.167-173</ispartof><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-ab532efdaae26be5667c1196d81f67ec0d182dfcd6c1b35ee8ca9a09287d65f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-ab532efdaae26be5667c1196d81f67ec0d182dfcd6c1b35ee8ca9a09287d65f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20553170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Develioglu, Hakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraydin, Serpilünver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kartal, Unal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taner, Levent</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the long-term results of rat cranial bone repair using a particular xenograft</title><title>The Journal of oral implantology</title><addtitle>J Oral Implantol</addtitle><description>Bone defects that cannot be healed completely are termed critical-sized defects and can be used to test bone grafts for medicine, dentistry, and periodontology. The aim of the present study was to detect the effects of a xenograft (Unilab Surgibone) on bone building in experimentally created parietal bone defects in rats. Standardized parietal bone defects were created in 16 rats, and each defect had a circular morphology 6 mm in diameter. The right defect sites were filled with porous particle material, and the left site was used as control. After the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months, rats were killed and tissue samples obtained from the related site of the cranium. Subsequently, histological sections were taken and stained with different stains for evaluation under light microscope. The rate of bone formation was assessed using a semiquantitative method. These results showed that dense collagenous tissue was observed in the control area during the third month, whereas xenograft particles were surrounded by a fibrous tissue layer at the implantation site. Osteoclast-like cells were also observed. There was also no significant bone repair at other observation periods. It can be concluded that the material used had no evidence of resorption and does not enhance bone formation. However, it seems biocompatible, osteoconductive, and could be used in a limited manner as a material for filling osseous defects in clinical practice.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Azo Compounds</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Bone Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Bone Matrix - pathology</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Collagen - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Coloring Agents</subject><subject>Connective Tissue - pathology</subject><subject>Craniotomy</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Durapatite - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Eosine Yellowish-(YS)</subject><subject>Fluorescent Dyes</subject><subject>Hematoxylin</subject><subject>Methyl Green</subject><subject>Osteoblasts - pathology</subject><subject>Osteoclasts - pathology</subject><subject>Osteocytes - pathology</subject><subject>Osteogenesis - physiology</subject><subject>Parietal Bone - pathology</subject><subject>Parietal Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Pore size</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterologous</subject><issn>0160-6972</issn><issn>1548-1336</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1P3DAURS1UBMPHL6hUWd2wcusXx3ayHDFAp0JiQ1ddWC_OyzQoE09tB5V_TwZoF92weot77pWeDmMfQX4BbdTX5XK9Et_v1mIlZC2klKY8YAvQZSVAKfOBLSQYKUxti2N2ktKDlIXWGo7YcSG1VmDlgv28esRhwtyHkYeO51_EhzBuRKa45ZHSNOS0DyJm7iOOPQ68CSPN2Q77yKfUjxuOfIcx934aMPI_NIZNxC6fscMOh0Tnb_eU_bi-ur_8Jm7vbtaXy1vhlVFZYKNVQV2LSIVpSBtjPUBt2go6Y8nLFqqi7XxrPDRKE1Uea5R1UdnW6E6rU3bxuruL4fdEKbttnzwNA44UpuSsLnUJoKv3SaXqSpZQzOTn_8iHMMVxfsNpa422qoQZUq-QjyGlSJ3bxX6L8cmBdHtHbu_IzY7cysnavTiaW5_epqdmS-2_zl8p6hm2LY3I</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Develioglu, Hakan</creator><creator>Saraydin, Serpilünver</creator><creator>Kartal, Unal</creator><creator>Taner, Levent</creator><general>Allen Press Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the long-term results of rat cranial bone repair using a particular xenograft</title><author>Develioglu, Hakan ; Saraydin, Serpilünver ; Kartal, Unal ; Taner, Levent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-ab532efdaae26be5667c1196d81f67ec0d182dfcd6c1b35ee8ca9a09287d65f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Azo Compounds</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Bone Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Bone Matrix - pathology</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Collagen - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Coloring Agents</topic><topic>Connective Tissue - pathology</topic><topic>Craniotomy</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Durapatite - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Eosine Yellowish-(YS)</topic><topic>Fluorescent Dyes</topic><topic>Hematoxylin</topic><topic>Methyl Green</topic><topic>Osteoblasts - pathology</topic><topic>Osteoclasts - pathology</topic><topic>Osteocytes - pathology</topic><topic>Osteogenesis - physiology</topic><topic>Parietal Bone - pathology</topic><topic>Parietal Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Pore size</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterologous</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Develioglu, Hakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraydin, Serpilünver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kartal, Unal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taner, Levent</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of oral implantology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Develioglu, Hakan</au><au>Saraydin, Serpilünver</au><au>Kartal, Unal</au><au>Taner, Levent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the long-term results of rat cranial bone repair using a particular xenograft</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of oral implantology</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Implantol</addtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>167-173</pages><issn>0160-6972</issn><eissn>1548-1336</eissn><abstract>Bone defects that cannot be healed completely are termed critical-sized defects and can be used to test bone grafts for medicine, dentistry, and periodontology. The aim of the present study was to detect the effects of a xenograft (Unilab Surgibone) on bone building in experimentally created parietal bone defects in rats. Standardized parietal bone defects were created in 16 rats, and each defect had a circular morphology 6 mm in diameter. The right defect sites were filled with porous particle material, and the left site was used as control. After the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months, rats were killed and tissue samples obtained from the related site of the cranium. Subsequently, histological sections were taken and stained with different stains for evaluation under light microscope. The rate of bone formation was assessed using a semiquantitative method. These results showed that dense collagenous tissue was observed in the control area during the third month, whereas xenograft particles were surrounded by a fibrous tissue layer at the implantation site. Osteoclast-like cells were also observed. There was also no significant bone repair at other observation periods. It can be concluded that the material used had no evidence of resorption and does not enhance bone formation. However, it seems biocompatible, osteoconductive, and could be used in a limited manner as a material for filling osseous defects in clinical practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Allen Press Inc</pub><pmid>20553170</pmid><doi>10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00064</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-6972
ispartof The Journal of oral implantology, 2010-01, Vol.36 (3), p.167-173
issn 0160-6972
1548-1336
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754541158
source MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Azo Compounds
Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use
Biomedical materials
Bone Diseases - pathology
Bone Diseases - surgery
Bone Matrix - pathology
Bone Regeneration - physiology
Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use
Cattle
Clinical medicine
Collagen - therapeutic use
Coloring Agents
Connective Tissue - pathology
Craniotomy
Dentistry
Durapatite - therapeutic use
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
Fluorescent Dyes
Hematoxylin
Methyl Green
Osteoblasts - pathology
Osteoclasts - pathology
Osteocytes - pathology
Osteogenesis - physiology
Parietal Bone - pathology
Parietal Bone - surgery
Pore size
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Rodents
Time Factors
Transplantation, Heterologous
title Evaluation of the long-term results of rat cranial bone repair using a particular xenograft
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A35%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20long-term%20results%20of%20rat%20cranial%20bone%20repair%20using%20a%20particular%20xenograft&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20oral%20implantology&rft.au=Develioglu,%20Hakan&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=167-173&rft.issn=0160-6972&rft.eissn=1548-1336&rft_id=info:doi/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00064&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733980412%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=577657341&rft_id=info:pmid/20553170&rfr_iscdi=true