Good Research Practices for Measuring Drug Costs in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Managed Care Perspective: The ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force Report—Part III

Abstract Objectives The objective of this report is to provide guidance and recommendations on how drug costs should be measured for cost-effectiveness analyses conducted from the perspective of a managed care organization (MCO). Methods The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes R...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Value in health 2010, Vol.13 (1), p.14-17
Hauptverfasser: Mansley, Edward C., PhD, Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD, Chen, Kristina S., PharmD, MS, Shah, Nilay D., PhD, Piech, Catherine Tak, MBA, Hay, Joel W., PhD, Smeeding, James, RPh, MBA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 14
container_title Value in health
container_volume 13
creator Mansley, Edward C., PhD
Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD
Chen, Kristina S., PharmD, MS
Shah, Nilay D., PhD
Piech, Catherine Tak, MBA
Hay, Joel W., PhD
Smeeding, James, RPh, MBA
description Abstract Objectives The objective of this report is to provide guidance and recommendations on how drug costs should be measured for cost-effectiveness analyses conducted from the perspective of a managed care organization (MCO). Methods The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Task Force on Good Research Practices—Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (DCTF) was appointed by the ISPOR Board of Directors. Members were experienced developers or users of CEA models. The DCTF met to develop core assumptions and an outline before preparing a draft report. They solicited comments on drafts from external reviewers and from the ISPOR membership at ISPOR meetings and via the ISPOR Web site. Results The cost of a drug to an MCO equals the amount it pays to the dispenser for the drug's ingredient cost and dispensing fee minus the patient copay and any rebates paid by the drug's manufacturer. The amount that an MCO reimburses for each of these components can differ substantially across a number of factors that include type of drug (single vs. multisource), dispensing site (retail vs. mail order), and site of administration (self-administered vs. physician's office). Accurately estimating the value of cost components is difficult because they are determined by proprietary and confidential contracts. Conclusion Estimates of drug cost from the MCO perspective should include amounts paid for medication ingredients and dispensing fees, and net out copays, rebates, and other drug price reductions. Because of the evolving nature of drug pricing, ISPOR should publish a Web site where current DCTF costing recommendations are updated as new information becomes available.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00661.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754138964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1098301510603889</els_id><sourcerecordid>748981514</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5631-eb1694552b47cdde12af0e9135c8175781291a1a3f4bc2affb735825e9475aec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFuEzEQhlcIREvhFZBvnDbYa3vXWyGkENI2UqtGbeBqOd7Z1OlmHTzZ0tx4CK68HE-Ct4moxIX64pHm-3-P_E-SEEYHLJ73ywGTmUhFwfkgo7QcUJrnbHD_LDn823gea1qqlFMmD5JXiEsaKZ7Jl8kBK5XigorD5Nep9xW5AgQT7A2ZBmM3zgKS2gdyAQa74NoF-Ry6BRl53CBx7UORjusaInsHLSCSYWuaLQIekyG5MK1ZQEVGJgCZQsD1Djwmsxsgk-vp5dWjIZkZvCUnPliIY6x92Pz-8XNqwoZMJpPXyYvaNAhv9vdR8uVkPBudpeeXp5PR8Dy1MucshTnLSyFlNheFrSpgmakplIxLq1ghC8WykhlmeC3mNvbqecGlyiSUopAGLD9K3u1818F_6wA3euXQQtOYFnyHupCCcVXm4v-kUKVikvWk2pE2eMQAtV4HtzJhqxnVfYp6qfuwdB-W7lPUDynq-yh9u3-km6-gehTuY4vAhx3w3TWwfbKx_no2jkWUf9rJIf7pnYOg0TpoLVQuxKh05d1Thvz4j4ltXOusaW5hC7j0XYg7gZppzDTV1_0y9rvIaE65UiX_A-l21UI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748981514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Good Research Practices for Measuring Drug Costs in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Managed Care Perspective: The ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force Report—Part III</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mansley, Edward C., PhD ; Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD ; Chen, Kristina S., PharmD, MS ; Shah, Nilay D., PhD ; Piech, Catherine Tak, MBA ; Hay, Joel W., PhD ; Smeeding, James, RPh, MBA</creator><creatorcontrib>Mansley, Edward C., PhD ; Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD ; Chen, Kristina S., PharmD, MS ; Shah, Nilay D., PhD ; Piech, Catherine Tak, MBA ; Hay, Joel W., PhD ; Smeeding, James, RPh, MBA</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The objective of this report is to provide guidance and recommendations on how drug costs should be measured for cost-effectiveness analyses conducted from the perspective of a managed care organization (MCO). Methods The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Task Force on Good Research Practices—Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (DCTF) was appointed by the ISPOR Board of Directors. Members were experienced developers or users of CEA models. The DCTF met to develop core assumptions and an outline before preparing a draft report. They solicited comments on drafts from external reviewers and from the ISPOR membership at ISPOR meetings and via the ISPOR Web site. Results The cost of a drug to an MCO equals the amount it pays to the dispenser for the drug's ingredient cost and dispensing fee minus the patient copay and any rebates paid by the drug's manufacturer. The amount that an MCO reimburses for each of these components can differ substantially across a number of factors that include type of drug (single vs. multisource), dispensing site (retail vs. mail order), and site of administration (self-administered vs. physician's office). Accurately estimating the value of cost components is difficult because they are determined by proprietary and confidential contracts. Conclusion Estimates of drug cost from the MCO perspective should include amounts paid for medication ingredients and dispensing fees, and net out copays, rebates, and other drug price reductions. Because of the evolving nature of drug pricing, ISPOR should publish a Web site where current DCTF costing recommendations are updated as new information becomes available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00661.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19883404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cost effectiveness ; Cost Sharing - economics ; Cost Sharing - standards ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods ; cost-effectiveness analysis ; costs ; Drafts ; Drug Costs ; economic analysis ; Economics, Pharmaceutical ; Guidance ; Humans ; Insurance, Health, Reimbursement - economics ; Insurance, Health, Reimbursement - standards ; Internal Medicine ; Managed care ; Managed Care Programs - economics ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - standards ; Task forces ; Web sites</subject><ispartof>Value in health, 2010, Vol.13 (1), p.14-17</ispartof><rights>International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR)</rights><rights>2010 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR)</rights><rights>2009, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5631-eb1694552b47cdde12af0e9135c8175781291a1a3f4bc2affb735825e9475aec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5631-eb1694552b47cdde12af0e9135c8175781291a1a3f4bc2affb735825e9475aec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1524-4733.2009.00661.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00661.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,3549,4023,27922,27923,27924,30999,45573,45574,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19883404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mansley, Edward C., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kristina S., PharmD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Nilay D., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piech, Catherine Tak, MBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, Joel W., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smeeding, James, RPh, MBA</creatorcontrib><title>Good Research Practices for Measuring Drug Costs in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Managed Care Perspective: The ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force Report—Part III</title><title>Value in health</title><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The objective of this report is to provide guidance and recommendations on how drug costs should be measured for cost-effectiveness analyses conducted from the perspective of a managed care organization (MCO). Methods The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Task Force on Good Research Practices—Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (DCTF) was appointed by the ISPOR Board of Directors. Members were experienced developers or users of CEA models. The DCTF met to develop core assumptions and an outline before preparing a draft report. They solicited comments on drafts from external reviewers and from the ISPOR membership at ISPOR meetings and via the ISPOR Web site. Results The cost of a drug to an MCO equals the amount it pays to the dispenser for the drug's ingredient cost and dispensing fee minus the patient copay and any rebates paid by the drug's manufacturer. The amount that an MCO reimburses for each of these components can differ substantially across a number of factors that include type of drug (single vs. multisource), dispensing site (retail vs. mail order), and site of administration (self-administered vs. physician's office). Accurately estimating the value of cost components is difficult because they are determined by proprietary and confidential contracts. Conclusion Estimates of drug cost from the MCO perspective should include amounts paid for medication ingredients and dispensing fees, and net out copays, rebates, and other drug price reductions. Because of the evolving nature of drug pricing, ISPOR should publish a Web site where current DCTF costing recommendations are updated as new information becomes available.</description><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Cost Sharing - economics</subject><subject>Cost Sharing - standards</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods</subject><subject>cost-effectiveness analysis</subject><subject>costs</subject><subject>Drafts</subject><subject>Drug Costs</subject><subject>economic analysis</subject><subject>Economics, Pharmaceutical</subject><subject>Guidance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health, Reimbursement - economics</subject><subject>Insurance, Health, Reimbursement - standards</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Managed care</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs - economics</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - standards</subject><subject>Task forces</subject><subject>Web sites</subject><issn>1098-3015</issn><issn>1524-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFuEzEQhlcIREvhFZBvnDbYa3vXWyGkENI2UqtGbeBqOd7Z1OlmHTzZ0tx4CK68HE-Ct4moxIX64pHm-3-P_E-SEEYHLJ73ywGTmUhFwfkgo7QcUJrnbHD_LDn823gea1qqlFMmD5JXiEsaKZ7Jl8kBK5XigorD5Nep9xW5AgQT7A2ZBmM3zgKS2gdyAQa74NoF-Ry6BRl53CBx7UORjusaInsHLSCSYWuaLQIekyG5MK1ZQEVGJgCZQsD1Djwmsxsgk-vp5dWjIZkZvCUnPliIY6x92Pz-8XNqwoZMJpPXyYvaNAhv9vdR8uVkPBudpeeXp5PR8Dy1MucshTnLSyFlNheFrSpgmakplIxLq1ghC8WykhlmeC3mNvbqecGlyiSUopAGLD9K3u1818F_6wA3euXQQtOYFnyHupCCcVXm4v-kUKVikvWk2pE2eMQAtV4HtzJhqxnVfYp6qfuwdB-W7lPUDynq-yh9u3-km6-gehTuY4vAhx3w3TWwfbKx_no2jkWUf9rJIf7pnYOg0TpoLVQuxKh05d1Thvz4j4ltXOusaW5hC7j0XYg7gZppzDTV1_0y9rvIaE65UiX_A-l21UI</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Mansley, Edward C., PhD</creator><creator>Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD</creator><creator>Chen, Kristina S., PharmD, MS</creator><creator>Shah, Nilay D., PhD</creator><creator>Piech, Catherine Tak, MBA</creator><creator>Hay, Joel W., PhD</creator><creator>Smeeding, James, RPh, MBA</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Good Research Practices for Measuring Drug Costs in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Managed Care Perspective: The ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force Report—Part III</title><author>Mansley, Edward C., PhD ; Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD ; Chen, Kristina S., PharmD, MS ; Shah, Nilay D., PhD ; Piech, Catherine Tak, MBA ; Hay, Joel W., PhD ; Smeeding, James, RPh, MBA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5631-eb1694552b47cdde12af0e9135c8175781291a1a3f4bc2affb735825e9475aec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Cost Sharing - economics</topic><topic>Cost Sharing - standards</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods</topic><topic>cost-effectiveness analysis</topic><topic>costs</topic><topic>Drafts</topic><topic>Drug Costs</topic><topic>economic analysis</topic><topic>Economics, Pharmaceutical</topic><topic>Guidance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health, Reimbursement - economics</topic><topic>Insurance, Health, Reimbursement - standards</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Managed care</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs - economics</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - standards</topic><topic>Task forces</topic><topic>Web sites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mansley, Edward C., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kristina S., PharmD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Nilay D., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piech, Catherine Tak, MBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, Joel W., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smeeding, James, RPh, MBA</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mansley, Edward C., PhD</au><au>Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD</au><au>Chen, Kristina S., PharmD, MS</au><au>Shah, Nilay D., PhD</au><au>Piech, Catherine Tak, MBA</au><au>Hay, Joel W., PhD</au><au>Smeeding, James, RPh, MBA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Good Research Practices for Measuring Drug Costs in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Managed Care Perspective: The ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force Report—Part III</atitle><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>14-17</pages><issn>1098-3015</issn><eissn>1524-4733</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The objective of this report is to provide guidance and recommendations on how drug costs should be measured for cost-effectiveness analyses conducted from the perspective of a managed care organization (MCO). Methods The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Task Force on Good Research Practices—Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (DCTF) was appointed by the ISPOR Board of Directors. Members were experienced developers or users of CEA models. The DCTF met to develop core assumptions and an outline before preparing a draft report. They solicited comments on drafts from external reviewers and from the ISPOR membership at ISPOR meetings and via the ISPOR Web site. Results The cost of a drug to an MCO equals the amount it pays to the dispenser for the drug's ingredient cost and dispensing fee minus the patient copay and any rebates paid by the drug's manufacturer. The amount that an MCO reimburses for each of these components can differ substantially across a number of factors that include type of drug (single vs. multisource), dispensing site (retail vs. mail order), and site of administration (self-administered vs. physician's office). Accurately estimating the value of cost components is difficult because they are determined by proprietary and confidential contracts. Conclusion Estimates of drug cost from the MCO perspective should include amounts paid for medication ingredients and dispensing fees, and net out copays, rebates, and other drug price reductions. Because of the evolving nature of drug pricing, ISPOR should publish a Web site where current DCTF costing recommendations are updated as new information becomes available.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19883404</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00661.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-3015
ispartof Value in health, 2010, Vol.13 (1), p.14-17
issn 1098-3015
1524-4733
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754138964
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cost effectiveness
Cost Sharing - economics
Cost Sharing - standards
Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods
cost-effectiveness analysis
costs
Drafts
Drug Costs
economic analysis
Economics, Pharmaceutical
Guidance
Humans
Insurance, Health, Reimbursement - economics
Insurance, Health, Reimbursement - standards
Internal Medicine
Managed care
Managed Care Programs - economics
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - standards
Task forces
Web sites
title Good Research Practices for Measuring Drug Costs in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Managed Care Perspective: The ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force Report—Part III
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A09%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Good%20Research%20Practices%20for%20Measuring%20Drug%20Costs%20in%20Cost-Effectiveness%20Analyses:%20A%20Managed%20Care%20Perspective:%20The%20ISPOR%20Drug%20Cost%20Task%20Force%20Report%E2%80%94Part%20III&rft.jtitle=Value%20in%20health&rft.au=Mansley,%20Edward%20C.,%20PhD&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=14-17&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.eissn=1524-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00661.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E748981514%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748981514&rft_id=info:pmid/19883404&rft_els_id=S1098301510603889&rfr_iscdi=true