Good Research Practices for Measuring Drug Costs in Cost Effectiveness Analyses: Issues and Recommendations: The ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force Report—Part I

Abstract Objectives The assignment of prices or costs to pharmaceuticals can be crucial to results and conclusions that are derived from pharmacoeconomic cost effectiveness analyses (CEAs). Although numerous pharmacoeconomic practice guidelines are available in the literature and have been promulgat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Value in health 2010, Vol.13 (1), p.3-7
Hauptverfasser: Hay, Joel W., PhD, Smeeding, Jim, RPh, MBA, Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD, Drummond, Michael, PhD, Garrison, Louis P., PhD, Mansley, Edward C., PhD, Mullins, C. Daniel, PhD, Mycka, Jack M., BS, Seal, Brian, PhD, RPh, MBA, Shi, Lizheng, PhD, MS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Value in health
container_volume 13
creator Hay, Joel W., PhD
Smeeding, Jim, RPh, MBA
Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD
Drummond, Michael, PhD
Garrison, Louis P., PhD
Mansley, Edward C., PhD
Mullins, C. Daniel, PhD
Mycka, Jack M., BS
Seal, Brian, PhD, RPh, MBA
Shi, Lizheng, PhD, MS
description Abstract Objectives The assignment of prices or costs to pharmaceuticals can be crucial to results and conclusions that are derived from pharmacoeconomic cost effectiveness analyses (CEAs). Although numerous pharmacoeconomic practice guidelines are available in the literature and have been promulgated in many countries, these guidelines are either vague or silent about how drug costs should be established or measured. This is particularly problematic in pharmacoeconomic studies performed from the “societal” perspective, because typically the measured cost of a brand name pharmaceutical is not a true economic cost but also includes transfer payments from some members of society (patients and third party payers) to other members of society (pharmaceutical manufacturer stockholders) in large part as a reward for biomedical innovation. Moreover, there are numerous and complex institutional factors that influence how drug costs should be measured from other CEA perspectives, both internationally and within the domestic US context. The objective of this report is to provide guidance and recommendations on how drug costs should be measured for CEAs performed from a number of key analytic perspectives. Methods ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (Drug Cost Task Force [DCTF]) was appointed with the advice and consent of the ISPOR Board of Directors. Members were experienced developers or users of CEA models, worked in academia, industry, and as advisors to governments, and came from several countries. Because how drug costs should be measured for CEAs depend on the perspectives, five Task Force subgroups were created to develop drug cost standards from the societal, managed care, US government, industry, and international perspective. The ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (DCTF) subgroups met to develop core assumptions and an outline before preparing six draft reports. They solicited comments on the outline and drafts from a core group of 174 external reviewers and more broadly from the membership of ISPOR at two ISPOR meetings and via the ISPOR web site. Results Drug cost measurements should be fully transparent and reflect the net payment most relevant to the user's perspective. The Task Force recommends that for CEAs of brand name drugs performed from a societal perspective, either 1) CEA analysts use a cost that more accurately reflects true so
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00663.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754136160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1098301510603865</els_id><sourcerecordid>754136160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5633-aefa588ffe7b3436f9bbfc80a8c59782b86ec35e26bf1e7004642c338a20cc103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwCsg3TlnsOE4chJDaZduuVNRVu3C1HGfSepvEiycp3RsPwY2340lwuisqcVpfPJK___do_okiwuiEhfN-NWEiSeM053ySUFpMKM0yPnl4Fh3-e3gealrImFMmDqJXiCsaKJ6Il9EBK2SeipwdRr_PnKvIFSBob27JwmvTWwNIaufJF9A4eNvdkM9-uCFThz0S2z0WZFbXENh76ACRHHe62SDgBzJHHIJed6OtcW0LXaV767rwtrwFMr9eXF49GZKlxjty6ryBwK-d7__8_LXQvifz19GLWjcIb3b3UfT1dLacnscXl2fz6fFFbETGeayh1kLK0E5e8pRndVGWtZFUSyOKXCalzMBwAUlW1gxyStMsTQznUifUGEb5UfRu67v27nvovVetRQNNoztwA6pcpIxnLNuDTGUhOc1EIOWWNN4heqjV2ttW-41iVI0ZqpUao1JjVGrMUD1mqB6C9O3uk6FsoXoS7kILwMct8MM2sNnbWH07n4UiyE-2cggzvbfgFRoLnYHK-pCoqpzdp8lP_5mYxnbW6OYONoArN_iwEaiYwkRRdT2u4riJjIYxyjCgv5hx1c4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748983065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Good Research Practices for Measuring Drug Costs in Cost Effectiveness Analyses: Issues and Recommendations: The ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force Report—Part I</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hay, Joel W., PhD ; Smeeding, Jim, RPh, MBA ; Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD ; Drummond, Michael, PhD ; Garrison, Louis P., PhD ; Mansley, Edward C., PhD ; Mullins, C. Daniel, PhD ; Mycka, Jack M., BS ; Seal, Brian, PhD, RPh, MBA ; Shi, Lizheng, PhD, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Hay, Joel W., PhD ; Smeeding, Jim, RPh, MBA ; Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD ; Drummond, Michael, PhD ; Garrison, Louis P., PhD ; Mansley, Edward C., PhD ; Mullins, C. Daniel, PhD ; Mycka, Jack M., BS ; Seal, Brian, PhD, RPh, MBA ; Shi, Lizheng, PhD, MS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The assignment of prices or costs to pharmaceuticals can be crucial to results and conclusions that are derived from pharmacoeconomic cost effectiveness analyses (CEAs). Although numerous pharmacoeconomic practice guidelines are available in the literature and have been promulgated in many countries, these guidelines are either vague or silent about how drug costs should be established or measured. This is particularly problematic in pharmacoeconomic studies performed from the “societal” perspective, because typically the measured cost of a brand name pharmaceutical is not a true economic cost but also includes transfer payments from some members of society (patients and third party payers) to other members of society (pharmaceutical manufacturer stockholders) in large part as a reward for biomedical innovation. Moreover, there are numerous and complex institutional factors that influence how drug costs should be measured from other CEA perspectives, both internationally and within the domestic US context. The objective of this report is to provide guidance and recommendations on how drug costs should be measured for CEAs performed from a number of key analytic perspectives. Methods ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (Drug Cost Task Force [DCTF]) was appointed with the advice and consent of the ISPOR Board of Directors. Members were experienced developers or users of CEA models, worked in academia, industry, and as advisors to governments, and came from several countries. Because how drug costs should be measured for CEAs depend on the perspectives, five Task Force subgroups were created to develop drug cost standards from the societal, managed care, US government, industry, and international perspective. The ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (DCTF) subgroups met to develop core assumptions and an outline before preparing six draft reports. They solicited comments on the outline and drafts from a core group of 174 external reviewers and more broadly from the membership of ISPOR at two ISPOR meetings and via the ISPOR web site. Results Drug cost measurements should be fully transparent and reflect the net payment most relevant to the user's perspective. The Task Force recommends that for CEAs of brand name drugs performed from a societal perspective, either 1) CEA analysts use a cost that more accurately reflects true societal drug costs (e.g., 20–60% of average sales price), or when that is too unrealistic to be meaningful for decision-makers, 2) refer to their analyses as from a “limited societal perspective.” CEAs performed from a payer perspective should use drug prices actually paid by the relevant payer net of all rebates, copays, or other adjustments. When such price adjustments are confidential, the analyst should apply a typical or average discount that preserves this confidentiality. Conclusions Drug transaction prices not only ration current use of medication but also ration future biomedical research and development. CEA researchers should tailor the appropriate measure of drug costs to the analytic perspective, maintain clarity and transparency on drug cost measurement, and report the sensitivity of CEA results to reasonable drug cost measurement alternatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00663.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19874571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - economics ; Cost effectiveness ; cost effectiveness analysis ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods ; Drug Costs ; Drug Evaluation - economics ; Drug Industry - economics ; drug research and development ; Economics, Pharmaceutical ; Government agencies ; Guidelines as Topic ; health-care market segmentation ; health-care reimbursement ; Humans ; Insurance, Health - economics ; Insurance, Health - organization &amp; administration ; Internal Medicine ; Measurement ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; payer perspective ; Payments ; Prices ; Task forces</subject><ispartof>Value in health, 2010, Vol.13 (1), p.3-7</ispartof><rights>International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR)</rights><rights>2010 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR)</rights><rights>2009, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5633-aefa588ffe7b3436f9bbfc80a8c59782b86ec35e26bf1e7004642c338a20cc103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5633-aefa588ffe7b3436f9bbfc80a8c59782b86ec35e26bf1e7004642c338a20cc103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1524-4733.2009.00663.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301510603865$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,30977,45550,45551,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19874571$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hay, Joel W., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smeeding, Jim, RPh, MBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, Michael, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrison, Louis P., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansley, Edward C., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullins, C. Daniel, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mycka, Jack M., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seal, Brian, PhD, RPh, MBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Lizheng, PhD, MS</creatorcontrib><title>Good Research Practices for Measuring Drug Costs in Cost Effectiveness Analyses: Issues and Recommendations: The ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force Report—Part I</title><title>Value in health</title><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The assignment of prices or costs to pharmaceuticals can be crucial to results and conclusions that are derived from pharmacoeconomic cost effectiveness analyses (CEAs). Although numerous pharmacoeconomic practice guidelines are available in the literature and have been promulgated in many countries, these guidelines are either vague or silent about how drug costs should be established or measured. This is particularly problematic in pharmacoeconomic studies performed from the “societal” perspective, because typically the measured cost of a brand name pharmaceutical is not a true economic cost but also includes transfer payments from some members of society (patients and third party payers) to other members of society (pharmaceutical manufacturer stockholders) in large part as a reward for biomedical innovation. Moreover, there are numerous and complex institutional factors that influence how drug costs should be measured from other CEA perspectives, both internationally and within the domestic US context. The objective of this report is to provide guidance and recommendations on how drug costs should be measured for CEAs performed from a number of key analytic perspectives. Methods ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (Drug Cost Task Force [DCTF]) was appointed with the advice and consent of the ISPOR Board of Directors. Members were experienced developers or users of CEA models, worked in academia, industry, and as advisors to governments, and came from several countries. Because how drug costs should be measured for CEAs depend on the perspectives, five Task Force subgroups were created to develop drug cost standards from the societal, managed care, US government, industry, and international perspective. The ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (DCTF) subgroups met to develop core assumptions and an outline before preparing six draft reports. They solicited comments on the outline and drafts from a core group of 174 external reviewers and more broadly from the membership of ISPOR at two ISPOR meetings and via the ISPOR web site. Results Drug cost measurements should be fully transparent and reflect the net payment most relevant to the user's perspective. The Task Force recommends that for CEAs of brand name drugs performed from a societal perspective, either 1) CEA analysts use a cost that more accurately reflects true societal drug costs (e.g., 20–60% of average sales price), or when that is too unrealistic to be meaningful for decision-makers, 2) refer to their analyses as from a “limited societal perspective.” CEAs performed from a payer perspective should use drug prices actually paid by the relevant payer net of all rebates, copays, or other adjustments. When such price adjustments are confidential, the analyst should apply a typical or average discount that preserves this confidentiality. Conclusions Drug transaction prices not only ration current use of medication but also ration future biomedical research and development. CEA researchers should tailor the appropriate measure of drug costs to the analytic perspective, maintain clarity and transparency on drug cost measurement, and report the sensitivity of CEA results to reasonable drug cost measurement alternatives.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - economics</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>cost effectiveness analysis</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Drug Costs</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation - economics</subject><subject>Drug Industry - economics</subject><subject>drug research and development</subject><subject>Economics, Pharmaceutical</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>health-care market segmentation</subject><subject>health-care reimbursement</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - economics</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>payer perspective</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Task forces</subject><issn>1098-3015</issn><issn>1524-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwCsg3TlnsOE4chJDaZduuVNRVu3C1HGfSepvEiycp3RsPwY2340lwuisqcVpfPJK___do_okiwuiEhfN-NWEiSeM053ySUFpMKM0yPnl4Fh3-e3gealrImFMmDqJXiCsaKJ6Il9EBK2SeipwdRr_PnKvIFSBob27JwmvTWwNIaufJF9A4eNvdkM9-uCFThz0S2z0WZFbXENh76ACRHHe62SDgBzJHHIJed6OtcW0LXaV767rwtrwFMr9eXF49GZKlxjty6ryBwK-d7__8_LXQvifz19GLWjcIb3b3UfT1dLacnscXl2fz6fFFbETGeayh1kLK0E5e8pRndVGWtZFUSyOKXCalzMBwAUlW1gxyStMsTQznUifUGEb5UfRu67v27nvovVetRQNNoztwA6pcpIxnLNuDTGUhOc1EIOWWNN4heqjV2ttW-41iVI0ZqpUao1JjVGrMUD1mqB6C9O3uk6FsoXoS7kILwMct8MM2sNnbWH07n4UiyE-2cggzvbfgFRoLnYHK-pCoqpzdp8lP_5mYxnbW6OYONoArN_iwEaiYwkRRdT2u4riJjIYxyjCgv5hx1c4</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Hay, Joel W., PhD</creator><creator>Smeeding, Jim, RPh, MBA</creator><creator>Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD</creator><creator>Drummond, Michael, PhD</creator><creator>Garrison, Louis P., PhD</creator><creator>Mansley, Edward C., PhD</creator><creator>Mullins, C. Daniel, PhD</creator><creator>Mycka, Jack M., BS</creator><creator>Seal, Brian, PhD, RPh, MBA</creator><creator>Shi, Lizheng, PhD, MS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Good Research Practices for Measuring Drug Costs in Cost Effectiveness Analyses: Issues and Recommendations: The ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force Report—Part I</title><author>Hay, Joel W., PhD ; Smeeding, Jim, RPh, MBA ; Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD ; Drummond, Michael, PhD ; Garrison, Louis P., PhD ; Mansley, Edward C., PhD ; Mullins, C. Daniel, PhD ; Mycka, Jack M., BS ; Seal, Brian, PhD, RPh, MBA ; Shi, Lizheng, PhD, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5633-aefa588ffe7b3436f9bbfc80a8c59782b86ec35e26bf1e7004642c338a20cc103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - economics</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>cost effectiveness analysis</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Drug Costs</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation - economics</topic><topic>Drug Industry - economics</topic><topic>drug research and development</topic><topic>Economics, Pharmaceutical</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>health-care market segmentation</topic><topic>health-care reimbursement</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - economics</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>payer perspective</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Task forces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hay, Joel W., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smeeding, Jim, RPh, MBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, Michael, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrison, Louis P., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansley, Edward C., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullins, C. Daniel, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mycka, Jack M., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seal, Brian, PhD, RPh, MBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Lizheng, PhD, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hay, Joel W., PhD</au><au>Smeeding, Jim, RPh, MBA</au><au>Carroll, Norman V., RPh, PhD</au><au>Drummond, Michael, PhD</au><au>Garrison, Louis P., PhD</au><au>Mansley, Edward C., PhD</au><au>Mullins, C. Daniel, PhD</au><au>Mycka, Jack M., BS</au><au>Seal, Brian, PhD, RPh, MBA</au><au>Shi, Lizheng, PhD, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Good Research Practices for Measuring Drug Costs in Cost Effectiveness Analyses: Issues and Recommendations: The ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force Report—Part I</atitle><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>3-7</pages><issn>1098-3015</issn><eissn>1524-4733</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The assignment of prices or costs to pharmaceuticals can be crucial to results and conclusions that are derived from pharmacoeconomic cost effectiveness analyses (CEAs). Although numerous pharmacoeconomic practice guidelines are available in the literature and have been promulgated in many countries, these guidelines are either vague or silent about how drug costs should be established or measured. This is particularly problematic in pharmacoeconomic studies performed from the “societal” perspective, because typically the measured cost of a brand name pharmaceutical is not a true economic cost but also includes transfer payments from some members of society (patients and third party payers) to other members of society (pharmaceutical manufacturer stockholders) in large part as a reward for biomedical innovation. Moreover, there are numerous and complex institutional factors that influence how drug costs should be measured from other CEA perspectives, both internationally and within the domestic US context. The objective of this report is to provide guidance and recommendations on how drug costs should be measured for CEAs performed from a number of key analytic perspectives. Methods ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (Drug Cost Task Force [DCTF]) was appointed with the advice and consent of the ISPOR Board of Directors. Members were experienced developers or users of CEA models, worked in academia, industry, and as advisors to governments, and came from several countries. Because how drug costs should be measured for CEAs depend on the perspectives, five Task Force subgroups were created to develop drug cost standards from the societal, managed care, US government, industry, and international perspective. The ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (DCTF) subgroups met to develop core assumptions and an outline before preparing six draft reports. They solicited comments on the outline and drafts from a core group of 174 external reviewers and more broadly from the membership of ISPOR at two ISPOR meetings and via the ISPOR web site. Results Drug cost measurements should be fully transparent and reflect the net payment most relevant to the user's perspective. The Task Force recommends that for CEAs of brand name drugs performed from a societal perspective, either 1) CEA analysts use a cost that more accurately reflects true societal drug costs (e.g., 20–60% of average sales price), or when that is too unrealistic to be meaningful for decision-makers, 2) refer to their analyses as from a “limited societal perspective.” CEAs performed from a payer perspective should use drug prices actually paid by the relevant payer net of all rebates, copays, or other adjustments. When such price adjustments are confidential, the analyst should apply a typical or average discount that preserves this confidentiality. Conclusions Drug transaction prices not only ration current use of medication but also ration future biomedical research and development. CEA researchers should tailor the appropriate measure of drug costs to the analytic perspective, maintain clarity and transparency on drug cost measurement, and report the sensitivity of CEA results to reasonable drug cost measurement alternatives.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19874571</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00663.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-3015
ispartof Value in health, 2010, Vol.13 (1), p.3-7
issn 1098-3015
1524-4733
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754136160
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biomedical Research - economics
Cost effectiveness
cost effectiveness analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods
Drug Costs
Drug Evaluation - economics
Drug Industry - economics
drug research and development
Economics, Pharmaceutical
Government agencies
Guidelines as Topic
health-care market segmentation
health-care reimbursement
Humans
Insurance, Health - economics
Insurance, Health - organization & administration
Internal Medicine
Measurement
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods
payer perspective
Payments
Prices
Task forces
title Good Research Practices for Measuring Drug Costs in Cost Effectiveness Analyses: Issues and Recommendations: The ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force Report—Part I
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T22%3A22%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Good%20Research%20Practices%20for%20Measuring%20Drug%20Costs%20in%20Cost%20Effectiveness%20Analyses:%20Issues%20and%20Recommendations:%20The%20ISPOR%20Drug%20Cost%20Task%20Force%20Report%E2%80%94Part%20I&rft.jtitle=Value%20in%20health&rft.au=Hay,%20Joel%20W.,%20PhD&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=3-7&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.eissn=1524-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00663.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754136160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748983065&rft_id=info:pmid/19874571&rft_els_id=S1098301510603865&rfr_iscdi=true