Territorial distribution of electoral supports in Latin America: The cases of Ecuador, Peru and Honduras (1979-2006)

Based on the classification of political party systems of Ecuador and Peru within the group of the least nationalized ones in Latin America, and Honduras as the one that shows a higher degree of nationalization, this paper works towards goals: First, explore if there has been changes or continuities...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Análisis político (Bogotá, Colombia) Colombia), 2009-09, Vol.22 (67), p.3-20
1. Verfasser:	Batlle, Margarita
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	spa
Schlagworte:	Classification Ecuador Honduras Latin America Nationalization Peru Political Parties
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	20
container_issue	67
container_start_page	3
container_title	Análisis político (Bogotá, Colombia)
container_volume	22
creator	Batlle, Margarita
description	Based on the classification of political party systems of Ecuador and Peru within the group of the least nationalized ones in Latin America, and Honduras as the one that shows a higher degree of nationalization, this paper works towards goals: First, explore if there has been changes or continuities related with the aforementioned level of nationalization; secondly, identify variables that can affect it. The central question involves exploring which factors are the ones that can make a party system to be more nationalized than another. The results of legislative elections celebrated between 1979 and 2006 are used here. Adapted from the source document.
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754067062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754067062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p642-3ac4b4457e92db96899b87918446af5f137495bae673f96ff814797e8659e693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjM1KxDAUhbtQcBx9h-xUsJC0SW7ibhhGRygoOPshTW8w0mlqft7fij7AbM5ZfN85F9WKsobVHKi4qq5T-qJUAAhYVfmAMfocojcjGXzK0fcl-zCR4AiOaBe0kFTmOcSciJ9IZ_KSmxNGb80TOXwisSZh-l3sbDFDiI_kHWMhZhrIPkxDiSaRe6ZB1w2l8uGmunRmTHj73-vq43l32O7r7u3ldbvp6lnypm6N5T3nAlA3Q6-l0rpXoJniXBonHGuBa9EblNA6LZ1TjIMGVFJolLpdV3d_r3MM3wVTPp58sjiOZsJQ0hEEpxKobM4yeauYan8AEZpjAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754043818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Territorial distribution of electoral supports in Latin America: The cases of Ecuador, Peru and Honduras (1979-2006)</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Batlle, Margarita</creator><creatorcontrib>Batlle, Margarita</creatorcontrib><description>Based on the classification of political party systems of Ecuador and Peru within the group of the least nationalized ones in Latin America, and Honduras as the one that shows a higher degree of nationalization, this paper works towards goals: First, explore if there has been changes or continuities related with the aforementioned level of nationalization; secondly, identify variables that can affect it. The central question involves exploring which factors are the ones that can make a party system to be more nationalized than another. The results of legislative elections celebrated between 1979 and 2006 are used here. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0121-4705</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANPOFB</identifier><language>spa</language><subject>Classification ; Ecuador ; Honduras ; Latin America ; Nationalization ; Peru ; Political Parties</subject><ispartof>Análisis político (Bogotá, Colombia), 2009-09, Vol.22 (67), p.3-20</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batlle, Margarita</creatorcontrib><title>Territorial distribution of electoral supports in Latin America: The cases of Ecuador, Peru and Honduras (1979-2006)</title><title>Análisis político (Bogotá, Colombia)</title><description>Based on the classification of political party systems of Ecuador and Peru within the group of the least nationalized ones in Latin America, and Honduras as the one that shows a higher degree of nationalization, this paper works towards goals: First, explore if there has been changes or continuities related with the aforementioned level of nationalization; secondly, identify variables that can affect it. The central question involves exploring which factors are the ones that can make a party system to be more nationalized than another. The results of legislative elections celebrated between 1979 and 2006 are used here. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Ecuador</subject><subject>Honduras</subject><subject>Latin America</subject><subject>Nationalization</subject><subject>Peru</subject><subject>Political Parties</subject><issn>0121-4705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjM1KxDAUhbtQcBx9h-xUsJC0SW7ibhhGRygoOPshTW8w0mlqft7fij7AbM5ZfN85F9WKsobVHKi4qq5T-qJUAAhYVfmAMfocojcjGXzK0fcl-zCR4AiOaBe0kFTmOcSciJ9IZ_KSmxNGb80TOXwisSZh-l3sbDFDiI_kHWMhZhrIPkxDiSaRe6ZB1w2l8uGmunRmTHj73-vq43l32O7r7u3ldbvp6lnypm6N5T3nAlA3Q6-l0rpXoJniXBonHGuBa9EblNA6LZ1TjIMGVFJolLpdV3d_r3MM3wVTPp58sjiOZsJQ0hEEpxKobM4yeauYan8AEZpjAw</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Batlle, Margarita</creator><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Territorial distribution of electoral supports in Latin America: The cases of Ecuador, Peru and Honduras (1979-2006)</title><author>Batlle, Margarita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p642-3ac4b4457e92db96899b87918446af5f137495bae673f96ff814797e8659e693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Ecuador</topic><topic>Honduras</topic><topic>Latin America</topic><topic>Nationalization</topic><topic>Peru</topic><topic>Political Parties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batlle, Margarita</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Análisis político (Bogotá, Colombia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batlle, Margarita</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Territorial distribution of electoral supports in Latin America: The cases of Ecuador, Peru and Honduras (1979-2006)</atitle><jtitle>Análisis político (Bogotá, Colombia)</jtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>67</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>3-20</pages><issn>0121-4705</issn><coden>ANPOFB</coden><abstract>Based on the classification of political party systems of Ecuador and Peru within the group of the least nationalized ones in Latin America, and Honduras as the one that shows a higher degree of nationalization, this paper works towards goals: First, explore if there has been changes or continuities related with the aforementioned level of nationalization; secondly, identify variables that can affect it. The central question involves exploring which factors are the ones that can make a party system to be more nationalized than another. The results of legislative elections celebrated between 1979 and 2006 are used here. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0121-4705
ispartof	Análisis político (Bogotá, Colombia), 2009-09, Vol.22 (67), p.3-20
issn	0121-4705
language	spa
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754067062
source	Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects	Classification Ecuador Honduras Latin America Nationalization Peru Political Parties
title	Territorial distribution of electoral supports in Latin America: The cases of Ecuador, Peru and Honduras (1979-2006)
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A43%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Territorial%20distribution%20of%20electoral%20supports%20in%20Latin%20America:%20The%20cases%20of%20Ecuador,%20Peru%20and%20Honduras%20(1979-2006)&rft.jtitle=An%C3%A1lisis%20poli%CC%81tico%20(Bogot%C3%A1,%20Colombia)&rft.au=Batlle,%20Margarita&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=67&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=3-20&rft.issn=0121-4705&rft.coden=ANPOFB&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E754067062%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754043818&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true