Coverage Bias in Variances, Associations, and Total Error From Exclusion of the Cell Phone-Only Population in the United States

Although landline telephone household surveys often draw inference about the general population, a proportion with only cell phones is excluded. In the United States, like in much of the world, this proportion is substantial and increasing, providing potential for coverage bias. Studies have looked...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science computer review 2010-08, Vol.28 (3), p.287-302
Hauptverfasser: Peytchev, Andy, Carley-Baxter, Lisa R., Black, Michele C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 302
container_issue 3
container_start_page 287
container_title Social science computer review
container_volume 28
creator Peytchev, Andy
Carley-Baxter, Lisa R.
Black, Michele C.
description Although landline telephone household surveys often draw inference about the general population, a proportion with only cell phones is excluded. In the United States, like in much of the world, this proportion is substantial and increasing, providing potential for coverage bias. Studies have looked at bias in means, but undercoverage can affect other essential statistics. The precision of point estimates can be biased, leading to erroneous conclusions. Research examining multivariate relationships will be further affected by bias in associations. A national landline telephone survey was conducted, followed by a survey of adults with only cell phones. In addition to estimates of means and proportions, differences were found for variances and associations. Bias in some point estimates was reduced through poststratification but became larger and in opposite direction for others. Different uses of survey data can be affected by omitting the cell-only population, and reliance on postsurvey adjustments can be misleading.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0894439309353027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754043082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0894439309353027</sage_id><sourcerecordid>754043082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a71f34b214726c87a2324284088c6990c4c0d9e15d5fc2bc2c8328a14fc428603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFLHTEQh4O04Kv17jEUSi_ddjLJbrJH-3i2BUGh6nWJedka2Ze8ZnalnvqvN9snCoLQ0xDmm28m_Bg7EvBJCK0_g2mVkq2EVtYSUO-xhahrrAya5hVbzO1q7u-zN0S3AAI1wIL9WaY7n-1Pz78ESzxEfmVzsNF5-siPiZILdgwplpeNa36RRjvwVc4p85OcNnz12w0TFYCnno83ni_9MPDzmxR9dRaHe36ettPwTzHLZ-IyhtGv-Y_Rjp7este9HcgfPtQDdnmyulh-q07Pvn5fHp9WTgGOldWil-oahdLYOKMtSlRoFBjjmrYFpxysWy_qdd07vHbojERjhepdwRqQB-zDzrvN6dfkaew2gVy51UafJup0rUBJMPgfpGyaQs_Od8_I2zTlWL7R6UaUCwFnHewglxNR9n23zWFj830noJuT654nV0beP3gtOTv0ucQR6HEOC4lKzVy146jk97T7Re9fqyWi5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>761232022</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coverage Bias in Variances, Associations, and Total Error From Exclusion of the Cell Phone-Only Population in the United States</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Peytchev, Andy ; Carley-Baxter, Lisa R. ; Black, Michele C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peytchev, Andy ; Carley-Baxter, Lisa R. ; Black, Michele C.</creatorcontrib><description>Although landline telephone household surveys often draw inference about the general population, a proportion with only cell phones is excluded. In the United States, like in much of the world, this proportion is substantial and increasing, providing potential for coverage bias. Studies have looked at bias in means, but undercoverage can affect other essential statistics. The precision of point estimates can be biased, leading to erroneous conclusions. Research examining multivariate relationships will be further affected by bias in associations. A national landline telephone survey was conducted, followed by a survey of adults with only cell phones. In addition to estimates of means and proportions, differences were found for variances and associations. Bias in some point estimates was reduced through poststratification but became larger and in opposite direction for others. Different uses of survey data can be affected by omitting the cell-only population, and reliance on postsurvey adjustments can be misleading.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-4393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8286</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0894439309353027</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSCREH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adjustment ; Adults ; Bias ; Cell phones ; Cellular telephones ; Demographics ; Estimates ; Estimation bias ; History, theory and methodology ; Households ; Methodology ; Sociology ; Statistics ; Surveying errors ; Surveys ; Telephones ; United States of America ; Variances</subject><ispartof>Social science computer review, 2010-08, Vol.28 (3), p.287-302</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Fall 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a71f34b214726c87a2324284088c6990c4c0d9e15d5fc2bc2c8328a14fc428603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a71f34b214726c87a2324284088c6990c4c0d9e15d5fc2bc2c8328a14fc428603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0894439309353027$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0894439309353027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33751,33752,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23092447$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peytchev, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carley-Baxter, Lisa R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Michele C.</creatorcontrib><title>Coverage Bias in Variances, Associations, and Total Error From Exclusion of the Cell Phone-Only Population in the United States</title><title>Social science computer review</title><description>Although landline telephone household surveys often draw inference about the general population, a proportion with only cell phones is excluded. In the United States, like in much of the world, this proportion is substantial and increasing, providing potential for coverage bias. Studies have looked at bias in means, but undercoverage can affect other essential statistics. The precision of point estimates can be biased, leading to erroneous conclusions. Research examining multivariate relationships will be further affected by bias in associations. A national landline telephone survey was conducted, followed by a survey of adults with only cell phones. In addition to estimates of means and proportions, differences were found for variances and associations. Bias in some point estimates was reduced through poststratification but became larger and in opposite direction for others. Different uses of survey data can be affected by omitting the cell-only population, and reliance on postsurvey adjustments can be misleading.</description><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cell phones</subject><subject>Cellular telephones</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Estimation bias</subject><subject>History, theory and methodology</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Surveying errors</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Telephones</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Variances</subject><issn>0894-4393</issn><issn>1552-8286</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFLHTEQh4O04Kv17jEUSi_ddjLJbrJH-3i2BUGh6nWJedka2Ze8ZnalnvqvN9snCoLQ0xDmm28m_Bg7EvBJCK0_g2mVkq2EVtYSUO-xhahrrAya5hVbzO1q7u-zN0S3AAI1wIL9WaY7n-1Pz78ESzxEfmVzsNF5-siPiZILdgwplpeNa36RRjvwVc4p85OcNnz12w0TFYCnno83ni_9MPDzmxR9dRaHe36ettPwTzHLZ-IyhtGv-Y_Rjp7este9HcgfPtQDdnmyulh-q07Pvn5fHp9WTgGOldWil-oahdLYOKMtSlRoFBjjmrYFpxysWy_qdd07vHbojERjhepdwRqQB-zDzrvN6dfkaew2gVy51UafJup0rUBJMPgfpGyaQs_Od8_I2zTlWL7R6UaUCwFnHewglxNR9n23zWFj830noJuT654nV0beP3gtOTv0ucQR6HEOC4lKzVy146jk97T7Re9fqyWi5A</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Peytchev, Andy</creator><creator>Carley-Baxter, Lisa R.</creator><creator>Black, Michele C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Coverage Bias in Variances, Associations, and Total Error From Exclusion of the Cell Phone-Only Population in the United States</title><author>Peytchev, Andy ; Carley-Baxter, Lisa R. ; Black, Michele C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a71f34b214726c87a2324284088c6990c4c0d9e15d5fc2bc2c8328a14fc428603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cell phones</topic><topic>Cellular telephones</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Estimation bias</topic><topic>History, theory and methodology</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Surveying errors</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Telephones</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Variances</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peytchev, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carley-Baxter, Lisa R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Michele C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social science computer review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peytchev, Andy</au><au>Carley-Baxter, Lisa R.</au><au>Black, Michele C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coverage Bias in Variances, Associations, and Total Error From Exclusion of the Cell Phone-Only Population in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Social science computer review</jtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>302</epage><pages>287-302</pages><issn>0894-4393</issn><eissn>1552-8286</eissn><coden>SSCREH</coden><abstract>Although landline telephone household surveys often draw inference about the general population, a proportion with only cell phones is excluded. In the United States, like in much of the world, this proportion is substantial and increasing, providing potential for coverage bias. Studies have looked at bias in means, but undercoverage can affect other essential statistics. The precision of point estimates can be biased, leading to erroneous conclusions. Research examining multivariate relationships will be further affected by bias in associations. A national landline telephone survey was conducted, followed by a survey of adults with only cell phones. In addition to estimates of means and proportions, differences were found for variances and associations. Bias in some point estimates was reduced through poststratification but became larger and in opposite direction for others. Different uses of survey data can be affected by omitting the cell-only population, and reliance on postsurvey adjustments can be misleading.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0894439309353027</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-4393
ispartof Social science computer review, 2010-08, Vol.28 (3), p.287-302
issn 0894-4393
1552-8286
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754043082
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adjustment
Adults
Bias
Cell phones
Cellular telephones
Demographics
Estimates
Estimation bias
History, theory and methodology
Households
Methodology
Sociology
Statistics
Surveying errors
Surveys
Telephones
United States of America
Variances
title Coverage Bias in Variances, Associations, and Total Error From Exclusion of the Cell Phone-Only Population in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A57%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coverage%20Bias%20in%20Variances,%20Associations,%20and%20Total%20Error%20From%20Exclusion%20of%20the%20Cell%20Phone-Only%20Population%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20computer%20review&rft.au=Peytchev,%20Andy&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=302&rft.pages=287-302&rft.issn=0894-4393&rft.eissn=1552-8286&rft.coden=SSCREH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0894439309353027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754043082%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=761232022&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0894439309353027&rfr_iscdi=true