Quantitative DNA methylation analysis detects cervical intraepithelial neoplasms type 3 and worse

BACKGROUND: DNA methylation may be used a potential biomarker for detecting cervical cancer. The authors of this report used quantitative methylation analysis of 4 genes in a full spectrum of cervical lesions to test its potential clinical application. METHODS: This hospital‐based, retrospective, ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2010-09, Vol.116 (18), p.4266-4274
Hauptverfasser: Lai, Hung‐Cheng, Lin, Ya‐Wen, Huang, Rui‐Lan, Chung, Ming‐Tzeung, Wang, Hui‐Chen, Liao, Yu‐Ping, Su, Po‐Hsuan, Liu, Yung‐Liang, Yu, Mu‐Hsien
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4274
container_issue 18
container_start_page 4266
container_title Cancer
container_volume 116
creator Lai, Hung‐Cheng
Lin, Ya‐Wen
Huang, Rui‐Lan
Chung, Ming‐Tzeung
Wang, Hui‐Chen
Liao, Yu‐Ping
Su, Po‐Hsuan
Liu, Yung‐Liang
Yu, Mu‐Hsien
description BACKGROUND: DNA methylation may be used a potential biomarker for detecting cervical cancer. The authors of this report used quantitative methylation analysis of 4 genes in a full spectrum of cervical lesions to test its potential clinical application. METHODS: This hospital‐based, retrospective, case‐control study was conducted in 185 patients and included patients who had a normal uterine cervix (n = 53), cervical intraepithelial neoplasm type 1 (CIN1) (n = 37), CIN2 (n = 22), CIN3 (n = 24), carcinoma in situ (CIS) (n = 22), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n = 20), and adenocarcinoma (AC) (n = 7). Methylation levels of the genes sex‐determining region Y, box 1 (SOX1); paired box gene 1 (PAX1); LIM homeobox transcription factor 1α (LMX1A), and NK6 transcription factor‐related locus 1 (NKX6‐1) were determined by using real‐time methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Cutoff values of the percentage of methylation reference (PMR) for different diagnoses were determined to test the sensitivity and specificity and to generate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Two‐sided Mann‐Whitney U tests were used to test differences in PMR between groups. RESULTS: The PMRs of the 4 genes were significantly higher in CIN3 and worse (CIN3+) lesions than the PMRs in specimens of normal cervix and CIN1 or CIN2 (P < .001). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting CIN3+ lesions were 0.88, 0.82, and 0.95, respectively, for SOX1; 0.78, 0.91, and 0.89, respectively, for PAX1; 0.77, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively, for LMX1A; and 0.93, 0.97, and 0.97, respectively, for NKX6‐1. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that quantitative PCR‐based testing for DNA methylation of 4 genes holds great promise for cervical cancer screening and warrants further population‐based studies using standardized DNA methylation testing. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. Quantitative methylation analysis of 4 genes in a full spectrum of cervical lesions was able to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia type 3 or worse with high accuracy. The results validated the clinical potential of quantitative methylation analysis, and the authors believe that the application of these new biomarkers will be clinically important in the next generation of cervical cancer screening.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.25252
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754027458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1238108316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5182-4d8c65f6781e76ba007179ade14605ca3d2b3c76038404146877a2a0a2b65e983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEYhYNY7LZ64w-QARGlMDXfyVyWtVqhVBQF74Z3M-_SlPkyybTMv2-muyp4UclFOOHJe05yCHnJ6CmjlL93vQunXOX1hKwYrUxJmeRPyYpSakslxc9DchTjTZaGK_GMHHKqtGSiWhH4OkGffILkb7H4cHVWdJiu5zbroS-gh3aOPhYNJnQpFg7DrXfQFr5PAXD06Rpbn3WPw9hC7GKR5hELka82xd0QIj4nB1toI77Y78fkx8fz7-uL8vLLp8_rs8vSKWZ5KRvrtNpqYxkavYGclZkKGmRSU-VANHwjnNFUWEllPrTGAAcKfKMVVlYck7e7uWMYfk0YU9356LBtIWebYm2UpNxItZDvHiUZF5ZRK5j-P0o5tVJXFcvo63_Qm2EK-QNjLfJbKltVD94nO8qFIcaA23oMvoMw51H10ma9tFk_tJnhV_uR06bD5g_6u74MvNkDEHMr2wC98_EvJ5Z0bOHYjrvzLc6PWNbrq_W3nfk90qy1EA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3071989958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative DNA methylation analysis detects cervical intraepithelial neoplasms type 3 and worse</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lai, Hung‐Cheng ; Lin, Ya‐Wen ; Huang, Rui‐Lan ; Chung, Ming‐Tzeung ; Wang, Hui‐Chen ; Liao, Yu‐Ping ; Su, Po‐Hsuan ; Liu, Yung‐Liang ; Yu, Mu‐Hsien</creator><creatorcontrib>Lai, Hung‐Cheng ; Lin, Ya‐Wen ; Huang, Rui‐Lan ; Chung, Ming‐Tzeung ; Wang, Hui‐Chen ; Liao, Yu‐Ping ; Su, Po‐Hsuan ; Liu, Yung‐Liang ; Yu, Mu‐Hsien</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: DNA methylation may be used a potential biomarker for detecting cervical cancer. The authors of this report used quantitative methylation analysis of 4 genes in a full spectrum of cervical lesions to test its potential clinical application. METHODS: This hospital‐based, retrospective, case‐control study was conducted in 185 patients and included patients who had a normal uterine cervix (n = 53), cervical intraepithelial neoplasm type 1 (CIN1) (n = 37), CIN2 (n = 22), CIN3 (n = 24), carcinoma in situ (CIS) (n = 22), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n = 20), and adenocarcinoma (AC) (n = 7). Methylation levels of the genes sex‐determining region Y, box 1 (SOX1); paired box gene 1 (PAX1); LIM homeobox transcription factor 1α (LMX1A), and NK6 transcription factor‐related locus 1 (NKX6‐1) were determined by using real‐time methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Cutoff values of the percentage of methylation reference (PMR) for different diagnoses were determined to test the sensitivity and specificity and to generate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Two‐sided Mann‐Whitney U tests were used to test differences in PMR between groups. RESULTS: The PMRs of the 4 genes were significantly higher in CIN3 and worse (CIN3+) lesions than the PMRs in specimens of normal cervix and CIN1 or CIN2 (P &lt; .001). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting CIN3+ lesions were 0.88, 0.82, and 0.95, respectively, for SOX1; 0.78, 0.91, and 0.89, respectively, for PAX1; 0.77, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively, for LMX1A; and 0.93, 0.97, and 0.97, respectively, for NKX6‐1. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that quantitative PCR‐based testing for DNA methylation of 4 genes holds great promise for cervical cancer screening and warrants further population‐based studies using standardized DNA methylation testing. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. Quantitative methylation analysis of 4 genes in a full spectrum of cervical lesions was able to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia type 3 or worse with high accuracy. The results validated the clinical potential of quantitative methylation analysis, and the authors believe that the application of these new biomarkers will be clinically important in the next generation of cervical cancer screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25252</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20564139</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma ; Adenylate cyclase ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers - analysis ; Cancer ; Cancer screening ; Cervical cancer ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - genetics ; cervical intraepithelial neoplasm ; Cervix ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA Methylation ; epigenetics ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Genes ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Homeobox ; Humans ; Lesions ; Medical sciences ; Medical screening ; methylation ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms ; Patients ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Population studies ; quantitative methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction ; Sensitivity analysis ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Squamous cell carcinoma ; Therapeutic applications ; Transcription factors ; Tumors ; Uterus</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2010-09, Vol.116 (18), p.4266-4274</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 American Cancer Society.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5182-4d8c65f6781e76ba007179ade14605ca3d2b3c76038404146877a2a0a2b65e983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5182-4d8c65f6781e76ba007179ade14605ca3d2b3c76038404146877a2a0a2b65e983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.25252$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.25252$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23208419$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20564139$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lai, Hung‐Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ya‐Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Rui‐Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Ming‐Tzeung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hui‐Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yu‐Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Po‐Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yung‐Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Mu‐Hsien</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative DNA methylation analysis detects cervical intraepithelial neoplasms type 3 and worse</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: DNA methylation may be used a potential biomarker for detecting cervical cancer. The authors of this report used quantitative methylation analysis of 4 genes in a full spectrum of cervical lesions to test its potential clinical application. METHODS: This hospital‐based, retrospective, case‐control study was conducted in 185 patients and included patients who had a normal uterine cervix (n = 53), cervical intraepithelial neoplasm type 1 (CIN1) (n = 37), CIN2 (n = 22), CIN3 (n = 24), carcinoma in situ (CIS) (n = 22), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n = 20), and adenocarcinoma (AC) (n = 7). Methylation levels of the genes sex‐determining region Y, box 1 (SOX1); paired box gene 1 (PAX1); LIM homeobox transcription factor 1α (LMX1A), and NK6 transcription factor‐related locus 1 (NKX6‐1) were determined by using real‐time methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Cutoff values of the percentage of methylation reference (PMR) for different diagnoses were determined to test the sensitivity and specificity and to generate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Two‐sided Mann‐Whitney U tests were used to test differences in PMR between groups. RESULTS: The PMRs of the 4 genes were significantly higher in CIN3 and worse (CIN3+) lesions than the PMRs in specimens of normal cervix and CIN1 or CIN2 (P &lt; .001). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting CIN3+ lesions were 0.88, 0.82, and 0.95, respectively, for SOX1; 0.78, 0.91, and 0.89, respectively, for PAX1; 0.77, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively, for LMX1A; and 0.93, 0.97, and 0.97, respectively, for NKX6‐1. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that quantitative PCR‐based testing for DNA methylation of 4 genes holds great promise for cervical cancer screening and warrants further population‐based studies using standardized DNA methylation testing. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. Quantitative methylation analysis of 4 genes in a full spectrum of cervical lesions was able to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia type 3 or worse with high accuracy. The results validated the clinical potential of quantitative methylation analysis, and the authors believe that the application of these new biomarkers will be clinically important in the next generation of cervical cancer screening.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma</subject><subject>Adenylate cyclase</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - genetics</subject><subject>cervical intraepithelial neoplasm</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA Methylation</subject><subject>epigenetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Homeobox</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>methylation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>quantitative methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Therapeutic applications</subject><subject>Transcription factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEYhYNY7LZ64w-QARGlMDXfyVyWtVqhVBQF74Z3M-_SlPkyybTMv2-muyp4UclFOOHJe05yCHnJ6CmjlL93vQunXOX1hKwYrUxJmeRPyYpSakslxc9DchTjTZaGK_GMHHKqtGSiWhH4OkGffILkb7H4cHVWdJiu5zbroS-gh3aOPhYNJnQpFg7DrXfQFr5PAXD06Rpbn3WPw9hC7GKR5hELka82xd0QIj4nB1toI77Y78fkx8fz7-uL8vLLp8_rs8vSKWZ5KRvrtNpqYxkavYGclZkKGmRSU-VANHwjnNFUWEllPrTGAAcKfKMVVlYck7e7uWMYfk0YU9356LBtIWebYm2UpNxItZDvHiUZF5ZRK5j-P0o5tVJXFcvo63_Qm2EK-QNjLfJbKltVD94nO8qFIcaA23oMvoMw51H10ma9tFk_tJnhV_uR06bD5g_6u74MvNkDEHMr2wC98_EvJ5Z0bOHYjrvzLc6PWNbrq_W3nfk90qy1EA</recordid><startdate>20100915</startdate><enddate>20100915</enddate><creator>Lai, Hung‐Cheng</creator><creator>Lin, Ya‐Wen</creator><creator>Huang, Rui‐Lan</creator><creator>Chung, Ming‐Tzeung</creator><creator>Wang, Hui‐Chen</creator><creator>Liao, Yu‐Ping</creator><creator>Su, Po‐Hsuan</creator><creator>Liu, Yung‐Liang</creator><creator>Yu, Mu‐Hsien</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100915</creationdate><title>Quantitative DNA methylation analysis detects cervical intraepithelial neoplasms type 3 and worse</title><author>Lai, Hung‐Cheng ; Lin, Ya‐Wen ; Huang, Rui‐Lan ; Chung, Ming‐Tzeung ; Wang, Hui‐Chen ; Liao, Yu‐Ping ; Su, Po‐Hsuan ; Liu, Yung‐Liang ; Yu, Mu‐Hsien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5182-4d8c65f6781e76ba007179ade14605ca3d2b3c76038404146877a2a0a2b65e983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma</topic><topic>Adenylate cyclase</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - genetics</topic><topic>cervical intraepithelial neoplasm</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA Methylation</topic><topic>epigenetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Homeobox</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>methylation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>quantitative methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Therapeutic applications</topic><topic>Transcription factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lai, Hung‐Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ya‐Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Rui‐Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Ming‐Tzeung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hui‐Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yu‐Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Po‐Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yung‐Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Mu‐Hsien</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lai, Hung‐Cheng</au><au>Lin, Ya‐Wen</au><au>Huang, Rui‐Lan</au><au>Chung, Ming‐Tzeung</au><au>Wang, Hui‐Chen</au><au>Liao, Yu‐Ping</au><au>Su, Po‐Hsuan</au><au>Liu, Yung‐Liang</au><au>Yu, Mu‐Hsien</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative DNA methylation analysis detects cervical intraepithelial neoplasms type 3 and worse</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2010-09-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>4266</spage><epage>4274</epage><pages>4266-4274</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND: DNA methylation may be used a potential biomarker for detecting cervical cancer. The authors of this report used quantitative methylation analysis of 4 genes in a full spectrum of cervical lesions to test its potential clinical application. METHODS: This hospital‐based, retrospective, case‐control study was conducted in 185 patients and included patients who had a normal uterine cervix (n = 53), cervical intraepithelial neoplasm type 1 (CIN1) (n = 37), CIN2 (n = 22), CIN3 (n = 24), carcinoma in situ (CIS) (n = 22), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n = 20), and adenocarcinoma (AC) (n = 7). Methylation levels of the genes sex‐determining region Y, box 1 (SOX1); paired box gene 1 (PAX1); LIM homeobox transcription factor 1α (LMX1A), and NK6 transcription factor‐related locus 1 (NKX6‐1) were determined by using real‐time methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Cutoff values of the percentage of methylation reference (PMR) for different diagnoses were determined to test the sensitivity and specificity and to generate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Two‐sided Mann‐Whitney U tests were used to test differences in PMR between groups. RESULTS: The PMRs of the 4 genes were significantly higher in CIN3 and worse (CIN3+) lesions than the PMRs in specimens of normal cervix and CIN1 or CIN2 (P &lt; .001). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting CIN3+ lesions were 0.88, 0.82, and 0.95, respectively, for SOX1; 0.78, 0.91, and 0.89, respectively, for PAX1; 0.77, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively, for LMX1A; and 0.93, 0.97, and 0.97, respectively, for NKX6‐1. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that quantitative PCR‐based testing for DNA methylation of 4 genes holds great promise for cervical cancer screening and warrants further population‐based studies using standardized DNA methylation testing. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. Quantitative methylation analysis of 4 genes in a full spectrum of cervical lesions was able to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia type 3 or worse with high accuracy. The results validated the clinical potential of quantitative methylation analysis, and the authors believe that the application of these new biomarkers will be clinically important in the next generation of cervical cancer screening.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>20564139</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.25252</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2010-09, Vol.116 (18), p.4266-4274
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754027458
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adenocarcinoma
Adenylate cyclase
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers
Biomarkers - analysis
Cancer
Cancer screening
Cervical cancer
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - genetics
cervical intraepithelial neoplasm
Cervix
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA Methylation
epigenetics
Female
Female genital diseases
Genes
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Homeobox
Humans
Lesions
Medical sciences
Medical screening
methylation
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
Patients
Polymerase chain reaction
Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Population studies
quantitative methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction
Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Squamous cell carcinoma
Therapeutic applications
Transcription factors
Tumors
Uterus
title Quantitative DNA methylation analysis detects cervical intraepithelial neoplasms type 3 and worse
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A51%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20DNA%20methylation%20analysis%20detects%20cervical%20intraepithelial%20neoplasms%20type%203%20and%20worse&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Lai,%20Hung%E2%80%90Cheng&rft.date=2010-09-15&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=4266&rft.epage=4274&rft.pages=4266-4274&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.25252&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1238108316%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3071989958&rft_id=info:pmid/20564139&rfr_iscdi=true