Comparison of Humic Substances Isolated from Thermal Water and Surface Water by Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry
Characterization of humic substances isolated from thermal water and surface water was carried out by elemental analysis and electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Atomic ratios derived from elemental analysis represented compositional differences of hum...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of mass spectrometry (Chichester, England) England), 2010-01, Vol.16 (5), p.625-630 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 630 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 625 |
| container_title | European journal of mass spectrometry (Chichester, England) |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Kovács, K. Gáspár, A. Sajgó, Cs Schmitt-Kopplin, Ph Tombácz, E. |
| description | Characterization of humic substances isolated from thermal water and surface water was carried out by elemental analysis and electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Atomic ratios derived from elemental analysis represented compositional differences of humic substances. Hydrogen-to-carbon and oxygen-to-carbon atomic ratios were also calculated from molecular formulae determined by ultra high-resolution mass spectrometry. The van Krevelen diagram was used to illustrate the bias between the atomic ratios from elemental analysis and mass spectrometry. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1255/ejms.1087 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754013033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1255_ejms.1087</sage_id><sourcerecordid>754013033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-698f15546a8baf9917c273ee4beb352353b816d681fe185e6bd72eaf2ab74dae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkcFu1DAQhi0EoqVw4AWQTyAOKXYcO84RrVq6UhESXcQxGjtjyCqOg50cwuvwojjswomTR-NPnz3zE_KSs2teSvkOjz5dc6brR-SS15IXSgv9ONeVagqmVH1BnqV0ZExq1TRPyUXJNK-YLi_Jr13wE8Q-hZEGR-8W31v6sJg0w2gx0X0KA8zYUReDp4fvGD0M9GtuRQpjl9HowOK5Y1Z6M6CdY0hThJXuw9j_hLnP8tuwxD4jhwhjciH67ZLuVjuEjI_0M-YvbG_Sj5ASfZj-aDzOcX1OnjgYEr44n1fky-3NYXdX3H_6sN-9vy-s0HwuVKMdl7JSoA24puG1LWuBWBk0QpZCCqO56pTmDrmWqExXlwiuBFNXHaC4Im9O3imGHwumufV9sjgMMGJYUlvLinHBhMjk2xNp86Qpomun2HuIa8tZu0XSbpG0WySZfXW2LsZj94_8m0EGXp-ABN-wPeY9jXnK_5h-AwlqmBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754013033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Humic Substances Isolated from Thermal Water and Surface Water by Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Kovács, K. ; Gáspár, A. ; Sajgó, Cs ; Schmitt-Kopplin, Ph ; Tombácz, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kovács, K. ; Gáspár, A. ; Sajgó, Cs ; Schmitt-Kopplin, Ph ; Tombácz, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Characterization of humic substances isolated from thermal water and surface water was carried out by elemental analysis and electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Atomic ratios derived from elemental analysis represented compositional differences of humic substances. Hydrogen-to-carbon and oxygen-to-carbon atomic ratios were also calculated from molecular formulae determined by ultra high-resolution mass spectrometry. The van Krevelen diagram was used to illustrate the bias between the atomic ratios from elemental analysis and mass spectrometry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1469-0667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-6838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1255/ejms.1087</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20814082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Benzopyrans - analysis ; Benzopyrans - chemistry ; Fourier Analysis ; Hot Springs - chemistry ; Humic Substances - analysis ; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods</subject><ispartof>European journal of mass spectrometry (Chichester, England), 2010-01, Vol.16 (5), p.625-630</ispartof><rights>2010 Sage Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-698f15546a8baf9917c273ee4beb352353b816d681fe185e6bd72eaf2ab74dae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-698f15546a8baf9917c273ee4beb352353b816d681fe185e6bd72eaf2ab74dae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1255/ejms.1087$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1255/ejms.1087$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20814082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kovács, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gáspár, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sajgó, Cs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt-Kopplin, Ph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tombácz, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Humic Substances Isolated from Thermal Water and Surface Water by Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry</title><title>European journal of mass spectrometry (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester)</addtitle><description>Characterization of humic substances isolated from thermal water and surface water was carried out by elemental analysis and electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Atomic ratios derived from elemental analysis represented compositional differences of humic substances. Hydrogen-to-carbon and oxygen-to-carbon atomic ratios were also calculated from molecular formulae determined by ultra high-resolution mass spectrometry. The van Krevelen diagram was used to illustrate the bias between the atomic ratios from elemental analysis and mass spectrometry.</description><subject>Benzopyrans - analysis</subject><subject>Benzopyrans - chemistry</subject><subject>Fourier Analysis</subject><subject>Hot Springs - chemistry</subject><subject>Humic Substances - analysis</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods</subject><issn>1469-0667</issn><issn>1751-6838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkcFu1DAQhi0EoqVw4AWQTyAOKXYcO84RrVq6UhESXcQxGjtjyCqOg50cwuvwojjswomTR-NPnz3zE_KSs2teSvkOjz5dc6brR-SS15IXSgv9ONeVagqmVH1BnqV0ZExq1TRPyUXJNK-YLi_Jr13wE8Q-hZEGR-8W31v6sJg0w2gx0X0KA8zYUReDp4fvGD0M9GtuRQpjl9HowOK5Y1Z6M6CdY0hThJXuw9j_hLnP8tuwxD4jhwhjciH67ZLuVjuEjI_0M-YvbG_Sj5ASfZj-aDzOcX1OnjgYEr44n1fky-3NYXdX3H_6sN-9vy-s0HwuVKMdl7JSoA24puG1LWuBWBk0QpZCCqO56pTmDrmWqExXlwiuBFNXHaC4Im9O3imGHwumufV9sjgMMGJYUlvLinHBhMjk2xNp86Qpomun2HuIa8tZu0XSbpG0WySZfXW2LsZj94_8m0EGXp-ABN-wPeY9jXnK_5h-AwlqmBE</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Kovács, K.</creator><creator>Gáspár, A.</creator><creator>Sajgó, Cs</creator><creator>Schmitt-Kopplin, Ph</creator><creator>Tombácz, E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Humic Substances Isolated from Thermal Water and Surface Water by Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry</title><author>Kovács, K. ; Gáspár, A. ; Sajgó, Cs ; Schmitt-Kopplin, Ph ; Tombácz, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-698f15546a8baf9917c273ee4beb352353b816d681fe185e6bd72eaf2ab74dae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Benzopyrans - analysis</topic><topic>Benzopyrans - chemistry</topic><topic>Fourier Analysis</topic><topic>Hot Springs - chemistry</topic><topic>Humic Substances - analysis</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kovács, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gáspár, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sajgó, Cs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt-Kopplin, Ph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tombácz, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of mass spectrometry (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kovács, K.</au><au>Gáspár, A.</au><au>Sajgó, Cs</au><au>Schmitt-Kopplin, Ph</au><au>Tombácz, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Humic Substances Isolated from Thermal Water and Surface Water by Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry</atitle><jtitle>European journal of mass spectrometry (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester)</addtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>630</epage><pages>625-630</pages><issn>1469-0667</issn><eissn>1751-6838</eissn><abstract>Characterization of humic substances isolated from thermal water and surface water was carried out by elemental analysis and electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Atomic ratios derived from elemental analysis represented compositional differences of humic substances. Hydrogen-to-carbon and oxygen-to-carbon atomic ratios were also calculated from molecular formulae determined by ultra high-resolution mass spectrometry. The van Krevelen diagram was used to illustrate the bias between the atomic ratios from elemental analysis and mass spectrometry.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>20814082</pmid><doi>10.1255/ejms.1087</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1469-0667 |
| ispartof | European journal of mass spectrometry (Chichester, England), 2010-01, Vol.16 (5), p.625-630 |
| issn | 1469-0667 1751-6838 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754013033 |
| source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Benzopyrans - analysis Benzopyrans - chemistry Fourier Analysis Hot Springs - chemistry Humic Substances - analysis Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods |
| title | Comparison of Humic Substances Isolated from Thermal Water and Surface Water by Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T15%3A06%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Humic%20Substances%20Isolated%20from%20Thermal%20Water%20and%20Surface%20Water%20by%20Electrospray%20Ionization%20Fourier%20Transform%20Ion%20Cyclotron%20Resonance%20Mass%20Spectrometry&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20mass%20spectrometry%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Kov%C3%A1cs,%20K.&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=630&rft.pages=625-630&rft.issn=1469-0667&rft.eissn=1751-6838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1255/ejms.1087&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754013033%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754013033&rft_id=info:pmid/20814082&rft_sage_id=10.1255_ejms.1087&rfr_iscdi=true |