Effect of electroacupuncture on the healing process of tibia fracture in a rat model: a randomised controlled trial

Background Electrical stimulation is used to promote bone reunion, and is most effective when applied directly to the fracture site. Objective To examine the effects of electroacupuncture (EA) on the healing process of tibia fracture in a rat model. Methods Thirty 12-week-old male Wistar rats underw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society 2010-09, Vol.28 (3), p.140-143
Hauptverfasser: Nakajima, Miwa, Inoue, Motohiro, Hojo, Tatsuya, Inoue, Nozomu, Tanaka, Kazuto, Takatori, Ryota, Itoi, Megumi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Electrical stimulation is used to promote bone reunion, and is most effective when applied directly to the fracture site. Objective To examine the effects of electroacupuncture (EA) on the healing process of tibia fracture in a rat model. Methods Thirty 12-week-old male Wistar rats underwent unilateral open osteotomies of the tibiae. The rats were then assigned randomly to three groups: EA group (n=10), sham group (n=10) and control group (n=10). In the EA group, a cathodal electrode was connected to an acupuncture needle percutaneously penetrated directly at the surgery site, while an acupuncture needle inserted at 15 mm proximal to the surgery site was used as an anodal electrode. EA (50 Hz, 20 μA, 20 min) was performed daily for 3 weeks. In the sham group the acupuncture needles were inserted at the same sites but no electrical stimulation was given and in the control group, no treatment was given. The response was evaluated at 1, 3, 4 and 6 weeks after surgery by radiographic, macroscopic and mechanical examinations. Results The EA group showed accelerated bone healing (EA group 29.92±4.55 mm2, sham group 26.46±5.21 mm2, control group 26.19±2.81 mm2, p
ISSN:0964-5284
1759-9873
DOI:10.1136/aim.2009.001800