Long-Term Outcome of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement in Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass

Background It has been well established that inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement at the time of open gastric bypass (OGB) surgery in patients with a body mass index of more than 55 kg/m2 reduces both the pulmonary embolism rate and the perioperative mortality. However, little is known about th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of vascular surgery 2010-10, Vol.24 (7), p.946-949
Hauptverfasser: Gargiulo, Nicholas J, O'Connor, David J, Veith, Frank J, Lipsitz, Evan C, Vemulapalli, Pratt, Gibbs, Karen, Suggs, William D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 949
container_issue 7
container_start_page 946
container_title Annals of vascular surgery
container_volume 24
creator Gargiulo, Nicholas J
O'Connor, David J
Veith, Frank J
Lipsitz, Evan C
Vemulapalli, Pratt
Gibbs, Karen
Suggs, William D
description Background It has been well established that inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement at the time of open gastric bypass (OGB) surgery in patients with a body mass index of more than 55 kg/m2 reduces both the pulmonary embolism rate and the perioperative mortality. However, little is known about the long-term effects of IVC filter placement in this particular group of patients. Methods Over an 8-year period, a total of 571 morbid obese patients underwent OGB procedures, and 58 (10%) of them required placement of an IVC filter before their procedure. All IVC filters were placed percutaneously through a femoral vein approach using a portable OEC fluoroscope. Types of IVC filters used in our study included the TrapEase ( n = 35), Simon-Nitinol ( n = 9), Greenfield ( n = 2), and Bard Recovery ( n = 12). Results Of the 58 patients who required an IVC placement, 56 remained free of any thromboembolic phenomena over the 8-year period (range, 1-8 years). The remaining two patients developed deep venous thrombosis. One patient was successfully treated with intravenous heparin and a 6-month course of Coumadin. She had complete resolution of her deep venous thrombosis and was incidentally noted to have a prothrombin 20210 gene mutation. The other patient, who had multiple gastric bypass complications, could not be successfully treated with intravenous heparin and thus progressed on to complete IVC thrombosis. She developed phlegmasia cerulea dolens and required bilateral above-the-knee amputations. She subsequently died 3 months after her procedures. Conclusion It appears that IVC filter placement at the time of OGB surgery is a relatively benign intervention with a maximal benefit. A note of caution should be exerted for those obese patients who have a hypercoagulable disorder and for those who have complications related to the gastric bypass. An aggressive posture, which may consist of immediate anticoagulation after their procedures (only when it is deemed safe), should be advocated in this small sub-group of morbid obese patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.05.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754001923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0890509610002542</els_id><sourcerecordid>754001923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-778ec0112727e50183b731d97393fbef0854320b01bbceefe209bbaa58d6fade3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVpabZJ_0APRbeevB1J1tqCUmiWJA0sJNAkxwpZHi_a2tJWshf230dm0x566GmG4b0H8z1CPjBYMmCrz7ulOaTtkkM-gFwClK_Igq2YLKQqq9dkAbWCQoJanZF3Ke0AGK_L-i0541ALppRckJ-b4LfFA8aB3k2jDQPS0NFb32F0IdIn9IauzcHQa9ePGOl9bywO6EfqPL03o8troo--xbgNzm_pjUljdJZeHvcmpQvypjN9wvcv85w8Xl89rL8Xm7ub2_W3TWFLWY5FVdVogTFe8QolsFo0lWCtqoQSXYMd1LIUHBpgTWMRO-SgmsYYWberzrQozsmnU-4-ht8TplEPLlnse-MxTElXsszfKy6ykp-UNoaUInZ6H91g4lEz0DNWvdMzVj1j1SB1xppNH1_ip2bA9q_lD8cs-HISYH7y4DDqZDMai62LaEfdBvf__K__2G3vvLOm_4VHTLswRZ_xaaYT16B_zMXOvTIA4LLk4hlCRp3N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754001923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-Term Outcome of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement in Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gargiulo, Nicholas J ; O'Connor, David J ; Veith, Frank J ; Lipsitz, Evan C ; Vemulapalli, Pratt ; Gibbs, Karen ; Suggs, William D</creator><creatorcontrib>Gargiulo, Nicholas J ; O'Connor, David J ; Veith, Frank J ; Lipsitz, Evan C ; Vemulapalli, Pratt ; Gibbs, Karen ; Suggs, William D</creatorcontrib><description>Background It has been well established that inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement at the time of open gastric bypass (OGB) surgery in patients with a body mass index of more than 55 kg/m2 reduces both the pulmonary embolism rate and the perioperative mortality. However, little is known about the long-term effects of IVC filter placement in this particular group of patients. Methods Over an 8-year period, a total of 571 morbid obese patients underwent OGB procedures, and 58 (10%) of them required placement of an IVC filter before their procedure. All IVC filters were placed percutaneously through a femoral vein approach using a portable OEC fluoroscope. Types of IVC filters used in our study included the TrapEase ( n = 35), Simon-Nitinol ( n = 9), Greenfield ( n = 2), and Bard Recovery ( n = 12). Results Of the 58 patients who required an IVC placement, 56 remained free of any thromboembolic phenomena over the 8-year period (range, 1-8 years). The remaining two patients developed deep venous thrombosis. One patient was successfully treated with intravenous heparin and a 6-month course of Coumadin. She had complete resolution of her deep venous thrombosis and was incidentally noted to have a prothrombin 20210 gene mutation. The other patient, who had multiple gastric bypass complications, could not be successfully treated with intravenous heparin and thus progressed on to complete IVC thrombosis. She developed phlegmasia cerulea dolens and required bilateral above-the-knee amputations. She subsequently died 3 months after her procedures. Conclusion It appears that IVC filter placement at the time of OGB surgery is a relatively benign intervention with a maximal benefit. A note of caution should be exerted for those obese patients who have a hypercoagulable disorder and for those who have complications related to the gastric bypass. An aggressive posture, which may consist of immediate anticoagulation after their procedures (only when it is deemed safe), should be advocated in this small sub-group of morbid obese patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.05.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20831995</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anticoagulants - therapeutic use ; Body Mass Index ; Female ; Gastric Bypass - adverse effects ; Humans ; Male ; Obesity, Morbid - blood ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Patient Selection ; Prosthesis Design ; Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis ; Pulmonary Embolism - etiology ; Pulmonary Embolism - prevention &amp; control ; Radiography, Abdominal ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surgery ; Thrombophilia - complications ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex ; United States ; Vena Cava Filters ; Venous Thrombosis - diagnosis ; Venous Thrombosis - etiology ; Venous Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Annals of vascular surgery, 2010-10, Vol.24 (7), p.946-949</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-778ec0112727e50183b731d97393fbef0854320b01bbceefe209bbaa58d6fade3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-778ec0112727e50183b731d97393fbef0854320b01bbceefe209bbaa58d6fade3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509610002542$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20831995$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gargiulo, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veith, Frank J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipsitz, Evan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vemulapalli, Pratt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suggs, William D</creatorcontrib><title>Long-Term Outcome of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement in Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass</title><title>Annals of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Background It has been well established that inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement at the time of open gastric bypass (OGB) surgery in patients with a body mass index of more than 55 kg/m2 reduces both the pulmonary embolism rate and the perioperative mortality. However, little is known about the long-term effects of IVC filter placement in this particular group of patients. Methods Over an 8-year period, a total of 571 morbid obese patients underwent OGB procedures, and 58 (10%) of them required placement of an IVC filter before their procedure. All IVC filters were placed percutaneously through a femoral vein approach using a portable OEC fluoroscope. Types of IVC filters used in our study included the TrapEase ( n = 35), Simon-Nitinol ( n = 9), Greenfield ( n = 2), and Bard Recovery ( n = 12). Results Of the 58 patients who required an IVC placement, 56 remained free of any thromboembolic phenomena over the 8-year period (range, 1-8 years). The remaining two patients developed deep venous thrombosis. One patient was successfully treated with intravenous heparin and a 6-month course of Coumadin. She had complete resolution of her deep venous thrombosis and was incidentally noted to have a prothrombin 20210 gene mutation. The other patient, who had multiple gastric bypass complications, could not be successfully treated with intravenous heparin and thus progressed on to complete IVC thrombosis. She developed phlegmasia cerulea dolens and required bilateral above-the-knee amputations. She subsequently died 3 months after her procedures. Conclusion It appears that IVC filter placement at the time of OGB surgery is a relatively benign intervention with a maximal benefit. A note of caution should be exerted for those obese patients who have a hypercoagulable disorder and for those who have complications related to the gastric bypass. An aggressive posture, which may consist of immediate anticoagulation after their procedures (only when it is deemed safe), should be advocated in this small sub-group of morbid obese patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastric Bypass - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - blood</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - etiology</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Radiography, Abdominal</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Thrombophilia - complications</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vena Cava Filters</subject><subject>Venous Thrombosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Venous Thrombosis - etiology</subject><subject>Venous Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0890-5096</issn><issn>1615-5947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVpabZJ_0APRbeevB1J1tqCUmiWJA0sJNAkxwpZHi_a2tJWshf230dm0x566GmG4b0H8z1CPjBYMmCrz7ulOaTtkkM-gFwClK_Igq2YLKQqq9dkAbWCQoJanZF3Ke0AGK_L-i0541ALppRckJ-b4LfFA8aB3k2jDQPS0NFb32F0IdIn9IauzcHQa9ePGOl9bywO6EfqPL03o8troo--xbgNzm_pjUljdJZeHvcmpQvypjN9wvcv85w8Xl89rL8Xm7ub2_W3TWFLWY5FVdVogTFe8QolsFo0lWCtqoQSXYMd1LIUHBpgTWMRO-SgmsYYWberzrQozsmnU-4-ht8TplEPLlnse-MxTElXsszfKy6ykp-UNoaUInZ6H91g4lEz0DNWvdMzVj1j1SB1xppNH1_ip2bA9q_lD8cs-HISYH7y4DDqZDMai62LaEfdBvf__K__2G3vvLOm_4VHTLswRZ_xaaYT16B_zMXOvTIA4LLk4hlCRp3N</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Gargiulo, Nicholas J</creator><creator>O'Connor, David J</creator><creator>Veith, Frank J</creator><creator>Lipsitz, Evan C</creator><creator>Vemulapalli, Pratt</creator><creator>Gibbs, Karen</creator><creator>Suggs, William D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Long-Term Outcome of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement in Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass</title><author>Gargiulo, Nicholas J ; O'Connor, David J ; Veith, Frank J ; Lipsitz, Evan C ; Vemulapalli, Pratt ; Gibbs, Karen ; Suggs, William D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-778ec0112727e50183b731d97393fbef0854320b01bbceefe209bbaa58d6fade3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastric Bypass - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - blood</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - etiology</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Radiography, Abdominal</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Thrombophilia - complications</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vena Cava Filters</topic><topic>Venous Thrombosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Venous Thrombosis - etiology</topic><topic>Venous Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gargiulo, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veith, Frank J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipsitz, Evan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vemulapalli, Pratt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suggs, William D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gargiulo, Nicholas J</au><au>O'Connor, David J</au><au>Veith, Frank J</au><au>Lipsitz, Evan C</au><au>Vemulapalli, Pratt</au><au>Gibbs, Karen</au><au>Suggs, William D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-Term Outcome of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement in Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass</atitle><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>946</spage><epage>949</epage><pages>946-949</pages><issn>0890-5096</issn><eissn>1615-5947</eissn><abstract>Background It has been well established that inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement at the time of open gastric bypass (OGB) surgery in patients with a body mass index of more than 55 kg/m2 reduces both the pulmonary embolism rate and the perioperative mortality. However, little is known about the long-term effects of IVC filter placement in this particular group of patients. Methods Over an 8-year period, a total of 571 morbid obese patients underwent OGB procedures, and 58 (10%) of them required placement of an IVC filter before their procedure. All IVC filters were placed percutaneously through a femoral vein approach using a portable OEC fluoroscope. Types of IVC filters used in our study included the TrapEase ( n = 35), Simon-Nitinol ( n = 9), Greenfield ( n = 2), and Bard Recovery ( n = 12). Results Of the 58 patients who required an IVC placement, 56 remained free of any thromboembolic phenomena over the 8-year period (range, 1-8 years). The remaining two patients developed deep venous thrombosis. One patient was successfully treated with intravenous heparin and a 6-month course of Coumadin. She had complete resolution of her deep venous thrombosis and was incidentally noted to have a prothrombin 20210 gene mutation. The other patient, who had multiple gastric bypass complications, could not be successfully treated with intravenous heparin and thus progressed on to complete IVC thrombosis. She developed phlegmasia cerulea dolens and required bilateral above-the-knee amputations. She subsequently died 3 months after her procedures. Conclusion It appears that IVC filter placement at the time of OGB surgery is a relatively benign intervention with a maximal benefit. A note of caution should be exerted for those obese patients who have a hypercoagulable disorder and for those who have complications related to the gastric bypass. An aggressive posture, which may consist of immediate anticoagulation after their procedures (only when it is deemed safe), should be advocated in this small sub-group of morbid obese patients.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20831995</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.avsg.2010.05.004</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-5096
ispartof Annals of vascular surgery, 2010-10, Vol.24 (7), p.946-949
issn 0890-5096
1615-5947
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754001923
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Anticoagulants - therapeutic use
Body Mass Index
Female
Gastric Bypass - adverse effects
Humans
Male
Obesity, Morbid - blood
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Patient Selection
Prosthesis Design
Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis
Pulmonary Embolism - etiology
Pulmonary Embolism - prevention & control
Radiography, Abdominal
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Surgery
Thrombophilia - complications
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex
United States
Vena Cava Filters
Venous Thrombosis - diagnosis
Venous Thrombosis - etiology
Venous Thrombosis - prevention & control
title Long-Term Outcome of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement in Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T14%3A11%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-Term%20Outcome%20of%20Inferior%20Vena%20Cava%20Filter%20Placement%20in%20Patients%20Undergoing%20Gastric%20Bypass&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Gargiulo,%20Nicholas%20J&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=946&rft.epage=949&rft.pages=946-949&rft.issn=0890-5096&rft.eissn=1615-5947&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.avsg.2010.05.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754001923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754001923&rft_id=info:pmid/20831995&rft_els_id=S0890509610002542&rfr_iscdi=true