Clinical setting and extent of premortem evaluation do not predict autopsy discrepancy rates

Autopsy rates have been affected by a number of factors, including technological advances and clinician beliefs of the diminished value of the autopsy. Such factors have resulted in a cultural shift in medicine away from the autopsy. Despite this shift, a number of studies have shown significant dif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Modern pathology 2010-09, Vol.23 (9), p.1225-1230
Hauptverfasser: Scordi-Bello, Irini A, Kalb, Thomas H, Lento, Patrick A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1230
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1225
container_title Modern pathology
container_volume 23
creator Scordi-Bello, Irini A
Kalb, Thomas H
Lento, Patrick A
description Autopsy rates have been affected by a number of factors, including technological advances and clinician beliefs of the diminished value of the autopsy. Such factors have resulted in a cultural shift in medicine away from the autopsy. Despite this shift, a number of studies have shown significant differences between antemortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem findings. Surveys of clinician beliefs about the autopsy have pointed toward antemortem diagnostic advancements as an important factor in declining rates. No study to date has addressed the hypothesis that such perceptions in diagnostic certainty have been matched by an actual decay in the yield of valuable or new information obtained by the autopsy. To address this hypothesis, we retrospectively compared the class I and class II discrepancies identified in 284 patients who died in three clinical settings with differing intensities of antemortem diagnostic workup. Despite a significantly different intensity of antemortem workup for patients in each clinical setting, including patients on a medical intensive care unit, patients on a surgical service and patients in an affiliated nursing home, discrepancy rates were found to be similar. Overall discrepancy rates for the medical intensive care unit, surgery service and nursing home patients were 27.8, 32.7 and 31.3%, respectively ( P =0.84). In addition, we found no statistical difference in the complexity of workup in discrepant and nondiscrepant cases in each clinical setting. Our study data refute the hypothesis that the intensity of antemortem diagnostic evaluation correlates with an actual decrease in the rate of major diagnostic discrepancies identified at autopsy.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/modpathol.2010.107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754000584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754000584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-b88ddabac0e2163d7dac83a2714c98ba42edc78e0c58b1a36e7c249f92f4708d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9P3DAQxS3UChbaL9BDZXHpKeB_WTvHagUFCakXekOKJvYEghI7tR3Efvt6WaBSDz2N9N5v3oweIV84O-NMmvMpuBnyQxjPBHvR9AFZ8VqyiglTfyArZhpZyaYWR-Q4pUfGuKqNOCRHgtViXZgVuduMgx8sjDRhzoO_p-AdxeeMPtPQ0zniFGLGieITjAvkIXjqAvUh7zw32ExhyWFOW-qGZCPO4O2WRsiYPpGPPYwJP7_OE_Lr8uJ2c1Xd_Pxxvfl-U1nFda46Y5yDDixDwdfSaQfWSBCaK9uYDpRAZ7VBZmvTcZBr1Faopm9ErzQzTp6Qb_vcOYbfC6bcTuUVHEfwGJbU6loxxmqjCnn6D_kYlujLc61WxjSNXDcFEnvIxpBSxL6d4zBB3Lactbvm2_fm213zRdNl6etr8tJN6N5X3qougNwDqVj-HuPf0_-J_QOpFpSS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748899369</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical setting and extent of premortem evaluation do not predict autopsy discrepancy rates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Scordi-Bello, Irini A ; Kalb, Thomas H ; Lento, Patrick A</creator><creatorcontrib>Scordi-Bello, Irini A ; Kalb, Thomas H ; Lento, Patrick A</creatorcontrib><description>Autopsy rates have been affected by a number of factors, including technological advances and clinician beliefs of the diminished value of the autopsy. Such factors have resulted in a cultural shift in medicine away from the autopsy. Despite this shift, a number of studies have shown significant differences between antemortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem findings. Surveys of clinician beliefs about the autopsy have pointed toward antemortem diagnostic advancements as an important factor in declining rates. No study to date has addressed the hypothesis that such perceptions in diagnostic certainty have been matched by an actual decay in the yield of valuable or new information obtained by the autopsy. To address this hypothesis, we retrospectively compared the class I and class II discrepancies identified in 284 patients who died in three clinical settings with differing intensities of antemortem diagnostic workup. Despite a significantly different intensity of antemortem workup for patients in each clinical setting, including patients on a medical intensive care unit, patients on a surgical service and patients in an affiliated nursing home, discrepancy rates were found to be similar. Overall discrepancy rates for the medical intensive care unit, surgery service and nursing home patients were 27.8, 32.7 and 31.3%, respectively ( P =0.84). In addition, we found no statistical difference in the complexity of workup in discrepant and nondiscrepant cases in each clinical setting. Our study data refute the hypothesis that the intensity of antemortem diagnostic evaluation correlates with an actual decrease in the rate of major diagnostic discrepancies identified at autopsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-3952</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20526285</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MODPEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>692/700/139 ; Adult ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Autopsies ; Autopsy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Cause of Death ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Intensive care ; Laboratory Medicine ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nursing homes ; original-article ; Pathology ; Patients ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Modern pathology, 2010-09, Vol.23 (9), p.1225-1230</ispartof><rights>United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc. 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-b88ddabac0e2163d7dac83a2714c98ba42edc78e0c58b1a36e7c249f92f4708d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-b88ddabac0e2163d7dac83a2714c98ba42edc78e0c58b1a36e7c249f92f4708d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20526285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scordi-Bello, Irini A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalb, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lento, Patrick A</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical setting and extent of premortem evaluation do not predict autopsy discrepancy rates</title><title>Modern pathology</title><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><description>Autopsy rates have been affected by a number of factors, including technological advances and clinician beliefs of the diminished value of the autopsy. Such factors have resulted in a cultural shift in medicine away from the autopsy. Despite this shift, a number of studies have shown significant differences between antemortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem findings. Surveys of clinician beliefs about the autopsy have pointed toward antemortem diagnostic advancements as an important factor in declining rates. No study to date has addressed the hypothesis that such perceptions in diagnostic certainty have been matched by an actual decay in the yield of valuable or new information obtained by the autopsy. To address this hypothesis, we retrospectively compared the class I and class II discrepancies identified in 284 patients who died in three clinical settings with differing intensities of antemortem diagnostic workup. Despite a significantly different intensity of antemortem workup for patients in each clinical setting, including patients on a medical intensive care unit, patients on a surgical service and patients in an affiliated nursing home, discrepancy rates were found to be similar. Overall discrepancy rates for the medical intensive care unit, surgery service and nursing home patients were 27.8, 32.7 and 31.3%, respectively ( P =0.84). In addition, we found no statistical difference in the complexity of workup in discrepant and nondiscrepant cases in each clinical setting. Our study data refute the hypothesis that the intensity of antemortem diagnostic evaluation correlates with an actual decrease in the rate of major diagnostic discrepancies identified at autopsy.</description><subject>692/700/139</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Autopsies</subject><subject>Autopsy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Cause of Death</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0893-3952</issn><issn>1530-0285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9P3DAQxS3UChbaL9BDZXHpKeB_WTvHagUFCakXekOKJvYEghI7tR3Efvt6WaBSDz2N9N5v3oweIV84O-NMmvMpuBnyQxjPBHvR9AFZ8VqyiglTfyArZhpZyaYWR-Q4pUfGuKqNOCRHgtViXZgVuduMgx8sjDRhzoO_p-AdxeeMPtPQ0zniFGLGieITjAvkIXjqAvUh7zw32ExhyWFOW-qGZCPO4O2WRsiYPpGPPYwJP7_OE_Lr8uJ2c1Xd_Pxxvfl-U1nFda46Y5yDDixDwdfSaQfWSBCaK9uYDpRAZ7VBZmvTcZBr1Faopm9ErzQzTp6Qb_vcOYbfC6bcTuUVHEfwGJbU6loxxmqjCnn6D_kYlujLc61WxjSNXDcFEnvIxpBSxL6d4zBB3Lactbvm2_fm213zRdNl6etr8tJN6N5X3qougNwDqVj-HuPf0_-J_QOpFpSS</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Scordi-Bello, Irini A</creator><creator>Kalb, Thomas H</creator><creator>Lento, Patrick A</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Clinical setting and extent of premortem evaluation do not predict autopsy discrepancy rates</title><author>Scordi-Bello, Irini A ; Kalb, Thomas H ; Lento, Patrick A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-b88ddabac0e2163d7dac83a2714c98ba42edc78e0c58b1a36e7c249f92f4708d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>692/700/139</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Autopsies</topic><topic>Autopsy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Cause of Death</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scordi-Bello, Irini A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalb, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lento, Patrick A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Modern pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scordi-Bello, Irini A</au><au>Kalb, Thomas H</au><au>Lento, Patrick A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical setting and extent of premortem evaluation do not predict autopsy discrepancy rates</atitle><jtitle>Modern pathology</jtitle><stitle>Mod Pathol</stitle><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1225</spage><epage>1230</epage><pages>1225-1230</pages><issn>0893-3952</issn><eissn>1530-0285</eissn><coden>MODPEO</coden><abstract>Autopsy rates have been affected by a number of factors, including technological advances and clinician beliefs of the diminished value of the autopsy. Such factors have resulted in a cultural shift in medicine away from the autopsy. Despite this shift, a number of studies have shown significant differences between antemortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem findings. Surveys of clinician beliefs about the autopsy have pointed toward antemortem diagnostic advancements as an important factor in declining rates. No study to date has addressed the hypothesis that such perceptions in diagnostic certainty have been matched by an actual decay in the yield of valuable or new information obtained by the autopsy. To address this hypothesis, we retrospectively compared the class I and class II discrepancies identified in 284 patients who died in three clinical settings with differing intensities of antemortem diagnostic workup. Despite a significantly different intensity of antemortem workup for patients in each clinical setting, including patients on a medical intensive care unit, patients on a surgical service and patients in an affiliated nursing home, discrepancy rates were found to be similar. Overall discrepancy rates for the medical intensive care unit, surgery service and nursing home patients were 27.8, 32.7 and 31.3%, respectively ( P =0.84). In addition, we found no statistical difference in the complexity of workup in discrepant and nondiscrepant cases in each clinical setting. Our study data refute the hypothesis that the intensity of antemortem diagnostic evaluation correlates with an actual decrease in the rate of major diagnostic discrepancies identified at autopsy.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>20526285</pmid><doi>10.1038/modpathol.2010.107</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-3952
ispartof Modern pathology, 2010-09, Vol.23 (9), p.1225-1230
issn 0893-3952
1530-0285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_754000584
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 692/700/139
Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
Autopsies
Autopsy - statistics & numerical data
Cause of Death
Hospitals
Humans
Hypotheses
Intensive care
Laboratory Medicine
Medical records
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nursing homes
original-article
Pathology
Patients
Surgery
title Clinical setting and extent of premortem evaluation do not predict autopsy discrepancy rates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A39%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20setting%20and%20extent%20of%20premortem%20evaluation%20do%20not%20predict%20autopsy%20discrepancy%20rates&rft.jtitle=Modern%20pathology&rft.au=Scordi-Bello,%20Irini%20A&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1225&rft.epage=1230&rft.pages=1225-1230&rft.issn=0893-3952&rft.eissn=1530-0285&rft.coden=MODPEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/modpathol.2010.107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E754000584%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748899369&rft_id=info:pmid/20526285&rfr_iscdi=true